
SC verdict may hike tax burden on OTT platforms, gaming apps
New Delhi: The Supreme Court ruling allowing dual taxation on television broadcasters may increase tax burden on over-the-top (OTT) platforms such as Amazon Prime and Netflix and other subscription based digital content and even gaming applications, said experts.
In its May 22 judgment on Asianet Satellite Communications and others, a bench of justices BV Nagarathna and NK Singh ruled that broadcasting involves delivery of service and delivery of entertainment and can be taxed by different authorities.
This means the Centre can impose
service tax
on the act of broadcasting, while states are allowed to charge entertainment tax on the content consumed by viewers.
"The ruling is mainly premised on the basis that both taxes deal with different aspects of broadcasting activities and hence, there is no overlap in taxing powers of the Centre and state," said Saloni Roy, partner, Deloitte India.
She added that although the case relates to the pre-goods and services tax (GST)era, the judgment could have "significant implications" and that it has created tax uncertainty for the industry.
Experts said it may lead to decentralisation of tax. "By endorsing the 'aspect theory', which permits separate taxation of different elements of the same activity, the court has opened the door to potential dual taxation on digital platforms such as OTT services, gaming apps and social media," said Saurabh Agarwal, partner, EY.
He added the ruling has not only created more confusion for the industry, but also goes against the spirit of the GST, which was designed to unify and replace various indirect taxes, including entertainment tax. "This ruling may pave the way for states or even local bodies-under Entry 62 of the Constitution-to reintroduce such levies under the label of 'entertainment," Agarwal said, adding that this may pose a challenge for the GST Council.
In the pre-GST era, state governments were empowered to levy tax on entertainment.
"With the introduction of GST, state governments are still empowered to levy tax on entertainment and amusement. However, this is permitted through local bodies such as panchayats, municipalities, etc.," Roy said.
For instance, Haryana Municipal Entertainment Duty Act, 2019 permits levy of duties with respect to admission to public entertainments, which includes any exhibition, performance, amusement, game, sport or race to which persons are ordinarily admitted on payment.
Maharashtra Entertainments Duty Act, 2023 provides for the levy of duty in respect to entry to entertainment or exhibition, including direct-to-home broadcasting service, which is to be collected by local bodies.
Similarly, Tamil Nadu charges both GST and entertainment tax on Indian Premier League match tickets. The digital industry under the streamlined tax regime under GST was aware of the taxation burden, but this decision reintroduces uncertainty, with the possibility of more states taxing OTT platforms, content creators and gaming applications in the name of entertainment. "There are many factors which should act against higher taxes for digital media as an indirect impact of this judgment, including the lack of territoriality in delivery of such services," said Shashank Mishra, Partner, Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas & Co.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
an hour ago
- Business Standard
Legal procedures followed while arresting female influencer: Kolkata Police
Kolkata Police have dismissed criticisms that they have "unlawfully" arrested a 22-year-old female Instagram influencer for allegedly uploading a video with communal comments, and claimed that all legal procedures were followed. They defended the arrest of influencer Sharmistha Panoli saying that the case was "duly investigated and adhering to legal procedures". "Kolkata Police acted lawfully according to the procedure established by law. The accused was not arrested for expressing patriotism or for personal belief; legal actions were taken for sharing offensive content which promotes hatred among the communities," Kolkata Police posted on Facebook on Sunday. "The case was duly investigated and adhering to legal procedures, several attempts were made to serve notice u/s 35 of BNSS to the accused but every time she was found absconding," the Kolkata Police stated. "Some social media accounts are spreading false information that Kolkata Police has unlawfully arrested a law student for opposing Pakistan. This narrative is mischievous and misleading," the Kolkata Police added. A case against the woman was lodged at the Garden Reach Police Station on May 15 based on allegations that she posted a video that Kolkata Police claimed: "was insulting to the religious belief of a class of citizen of India and amounted to promoting disharmony and hatred between different communities". The case was registered under the appropriate section of Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS). Hate speech and abusive language should not be misconstrued as freedom of speech and expression as enshrined in Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution, the Kolkata Police stated, further urging all "concerned to act responsibly and refrain from doing anything that would benefit our enemies". The accused woman, booked under relevant sections for promoting enmity between different groups, malicious acts intended to outrage religious feelings, apart from intentional insult, provoking breach of peace, has been sent to judicial custody till June 13 after her bail petition was rejected by a Kolkata court. BJP West Bengal president Sukanta Majumdar criticised the Kolkata Police for their "overactiveness" in arresting the woman for allegedly posting the video. The BJP leader has alleged that the arrest was made "not for justice, but for appeasement" keeping in mind the "vote-bank vendetta". "Sharmistha Panoli, 22, a law student, arrested for a now-deleted video and a public apology. No riots. No unrest. Yet Mamata Banerjee's police acted overnight not for justice, but for appeasement. But when TMC leaders insult Sanatan Dharma mock Maha Kumbh and push communal poison there's no FIR, no arrest, no apology. This is not justice. This is vote-bank vendetta," Majumdar posted.


Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Why was Sharmistha Panoli arrested? Kolkata Police's clarification amid row
The Kolkata police, being panned for arresting social media influencer Sharmistha Panoli, have claimed that the controversial action was taken after " duly investigating and adhering to legal procedures". The police claimed they acted lawfully against the 22-year-old woman as she had been sharing offensive content that promoted communal hatred. The police said Sharmistha Panoli wasn't arrested for expressing patriotism or personal belief. "Kolkata Police acted lawfully according to the procedure established by law. The accused was not arrested for expressing patriotism or for personal belief; legal actions were taken for sharing offensive content which promotes hatred among the communities," Kolkata Police posted on Facebook on Sunday. The police said all legal procedures laid down by the law were adhered to. They claimed in a post on Facebook on Sunday that they had issued notices to the influencer but she was allegedly found to be absconding. "Consequently, a warrant of arrest was issued by the competent court, following which she was apprehended lawfully from Gurgaon during the day. She was thereafter produced before the appropriate Magistrate and was granted transit remand as per due process of law. Later, the court sent her to judicial custody," it said. Also read: Who is Sharmishta Panoli, Instagram influencer held for controversial remarks linked to Op Sindoor? In her videos, Panoli had called out Bollywood actors for being silent on Operation Sindoor. The police termed the narrative claiming she was arrested unlawfully, "mischievous and misleading". "Some social media accounts are spreading false information that Kolkata Police has unlawfully arrested a law student for opposing Pakistan. This narrative is mischievous and misleading," the Kolkata Police added. They said they had filed a case on allegations that she posted a video which was "insulting to the religious belief of a class of citizens of India and amounted to promoting disharmony and hatred between different communities". Hate speech and abusive language should not be misconstrued as freedom of speech and expression as enshrined in Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution, the Kolkata Police stated. BJP West Bengal president Sukanta Majumdar has alleged that the police's action was rooted in the state government's policy of appeasement and "vote-bank vendetta". "Sharmistha Panoli, 22, a law student, arrested for a now-deleted video and a public apology. No riots. No unrest. Yet Mamata Banerjee's police acted overnight — not for justice, but for appeasement. But when TMC leaders insult Sanatan Dharma… mock Maha Kumbh and push communal poison — there's no FIR, no arrest, no apology. This is not justice. This is vote-bank vendetta," Majumdar posted. With inputs from PTI


The Wire
an hour ago
- The Wire
Key Witness in Gauri Lankesh Murder Case Receives Threats, Complains to Special Court
Menu हिंदी తెలుగు اردو Home Politics Economy World Security Law Science Society Culture Editor's Pick Opinion Support independent journalism. Donate Now Law Key Witness in Gauri Lankesh Murder Case Receives Threats, Complains to Special Court The Wire Staff 48 minutes ago The witness who has been threatened was crucial in identifying the accused and the place where the alleged conspiracy was hatched to murder Lankesh. Gauri Lankesh was shot at her home in September 2017. Photo: PTI Real journalism holds power accountable Since 2015, The Wire has done just that. But we can continue only with your support. Contribute now New Delhi: An important witness in the case pertaining to the murder of journalist-activist Gauri Lankesh has complained to the special court about receiving threats from people who told him not to identify the accused. The witness, a resident of Belagavi received the threats over a phone call on May 28 and submitted a written complaint on the same day, reported Deccan Herald. 'The witness received a phone call where he was threatened not to identify the accused. He filed a complaint before the court. Though he was disturbed and upset, he testified before the court on Thursday,' a source told the newspaper. A copy of the complaint and a memo by the special public prosecutor were submitted to the court. The witness who has been threatened was crucial in identifying the accused and the place where the alleged conspiracy was hatched to murder Lankesh. Well-known journalist and editor Lankesh, a household name for readers in Karnataka because of her sharp writing and bold views, was shot dead at her residence in Bengaluru late on September 5, 2017. She was editor of the weekly Lankesh Patrike – a magazine that has been described as an 'anti-establishment' publication – and had come under attack for her views against the communal politics of the Sangh parivar in Karnataka. The chargesheet in her murder case had said that the assassination was an 'organised crime' carried out by people associated with the Sanatan Sanstha, an extremist right-wing Hindutva organisation. Make a contribution to Independent Journalism Related News Petition in Madhya Pradesh HC Over Communal Coverage of Rape Case in Bhopal When the Supreme Court Echoes Populist Sentiments, It Risks Undermining the Constitution's Voice UP Deputy CM Backs Hindu Rashtra Call at Right-Wing Event in Lucknow US Jury Orders NSO Group to Pay $168 Million in WhatsApp Spyware Case Supreme Court Raps MP Govt for Shielding Police in Custodial Death of Pardhi Youth Agra Muslim Man Murder: Cops Shoot, Arrest Two, Person who Linked Event to Pahalgam Attack Also Held Supreme Court Flags ED's 'Pattern of Allegations Without Any Evidence' After 19-Month Freeze, Modi Signals Thaw with Canada Following Carney's Win Trump's Anti-Bribery Freeze Offers Adani Hope, But No Guarantee of Reprieve, Say US Legal Experts View in Desktop Mode About Us Contact Us Support Us © Copyright. All Rights Reserved.