IAEA helped eliminate our nuclear scientists, alleges Iran's Consul General to India
Discussing the takeaways from the 12-day Iran-Israel conflict in an interaction with a few senior journalists, Fard alleged the IAEA, led by its Director General Rafael Grossi, had become a front of the 'US-Israeli axis' deploying as many as 25 percent of its monitors for Iran's nuclear sites. He said the IAEA remaining silent while the Americans bombed Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan nuclear sites on June 22 was a violation of the IAEA code.
However, when pressed whether Iran would exit the IAEA in protest since Iran's Parliament had authorised it, Fard said an executive decision to that effect had not been taken. "The door is still open, even though legislative steps had been taken to exit IAEA," he said.
He also conceded that the targeted killings of senior military personnel including General Amir Ali Hajizadeh, the head of the airspace unit of the Revolutionary Guards, and General Gholamreza Mehrabi, the deputy intelligence chief, was due to systematic infiltration of the intelligence community by Israel's Mossad over a period of time.
The Consul General was non-committal on the extent of damage to Iran's nuclear programme, but said Iran was committed to resuming uranium enrichment and its nuclear energy programme for peaceful purposes. He denied suggestions that Iran had reached 90 percent weapons-grade enrichment, asserting it was to the extent of 60 percent.
"We will never go for nuclear weapons, as it is 'haram' in our religion," he said, adding, "but no one can take away our right of developing nuclear energy for peaceful purposes including for medical science."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
21 minutes ago
- Business Standard
China launches global AI body to rival US in $4.8 trillion tech race
While humanoid robots faced off in a boxing ring at China's flagship artificial intelligence conference in Shanghai, a fight in the US-China tech war was fought in suits nearby over who gets to set the rules in the AI age. China's answer is a new global organization to convene countries to foster safe and inclusive use of the powerful new technology. At the annual World AI Conference over the weekend, Chinese Premier Li Qiang warned of AI 'monopoly' and instead called on foreign officials in the room — mostly from developing countries — to cooperate on governance. The new group, known as the World AI Cooperation Organization, embodies China's plan to jostle with the US for sway by positioning itself as a champion of AI for all. More favorable rules may give a global boost to Chinese companies competing with US firms to sell hardware and services in a market estimated to hit $4.8 trillion by 2033. For many of the countries represented at the conference, Chinese firms already offer competitive solutions, even if the US dominates the supply of cutting-edge AI chips. 'The Chinese are coming to the table with a very different AI product mix that is going to be extremely appealing to lower-income countries that lack the computing and power infrastructure needed for large-scale implementation of OpenAI-like AI systems,' said Eric Olander of the China-Global South Project. Over 800 AI companies from more than 70 countries and regions attended the conference, according to the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Using technology as both carrot and calling card, Beijing's approach appears to take a page out of its earlier Digital Silk Road initiative, which put Chinese companies at the center of telecommunications networks spanning continents. China for years has strived to define the global parameters for emerging technologies such as 5G, seeking to influence development and set the stage for its companies to win market share abroad. Huawei Technologies Co.'s prominent role in standard-setting groups became the subject of scrutiny of the US government when it cracked down on the use of its equipment. Global AI governance has emerged as a new battleground for the world's leading powers, both seeing the technology as critical not just for their economy but national security. President Donald Trump declared last week that his country will 'do whatever it takes' to lead in AI, with his plan for actions including countering Chinese influence in international governance bodies. While there are no binding global rules for AI development, China's action plan calls for building more digital infrastructure that uses clean power and unifying computing power standards. The country also said it supports the role of businesses in creating technical standards in security, industry and ethics. Details about the Chinese body, to be headquartered in Shanghai, are scarce. In brief public remarks before media were ushered out of the room, a Chinese Foreign Ministry senior official, Ma Zhaoxu, said the organization would work to establish standards and governance frameworks. China would discuss details with those countries that are willing to join, he added. As US and Chinese companies race to develop systems that could match or even surpassed human intelligence, safety concerns have also prompted calls for guardrails. AI pioneer Geoffrey Hinton, who spoke at the Chinese event, expressed support for international bodies to collaborate on safety issues. Part of Beijing's AI strategy appears to come from its diplomatic playbook, which urges support for Global South countries to step up in international affairs. In his address to kick off the Saturday event, Li emphasized helping those nations develop AI. These countries made up most of more than 30 nations that were invited to the high-level governance talks, including Ethiopia, Cuba, Bangladesh, Russia and Pakistan. A handful of European countries including the Netherlands, France and Germany, the EU and several international organizations were also represented. No nameplate for the US was seen by Bloomberg News. The US Embassy in Beijing declined to comment on any official presence. Achmad Adhitya, special adviser to Indonesia's vice president who attended the meeting, told Bloomberg News that China's initiative is 'very appreciated by the Indonesian government.' His country is preparing AI curricula to be rolled out across 400,000 schools and is training 60,000 teachers about the tech, he said. Beijing's emphasis on openness — a word used 15 times in its governance action plan — appears to ride on the success of Deepseek earlier this year. The AI upstart stunned the world not just by releasing AI models that are almost as capable as those of OpenAI but also made them freely available for anyone to download and customize for free. A succession of Chinese companies has done the same, with companies from incumbent giants like Alibaba and newcomers like Moonshot releasing cutting-edge large language models that are similarly open-weight. That accessibility may be especially important to developing countries who may not have the resources to gather vast datasets and train their own AI models from scratch, a process that would involve expensive chips made by companies such as Nvidia Corp. China also emphasizes internet sovereignty, something that may appeal to more autocratic regimes around the world. 'We should respect other countries' national sovereignty and strictly abide by their laws when providing them with AI products and services,' according to the country's Global AI Governance Initiative issued in 2023. In contrast, Trump's AI plan vows that the US government will only work with engineers who 'ensure that their systems are objective and free from top-down ideological bias.' The US-China rivalry presents a familiar dilemma for countries that may feel pressured to choose a side, but Solly Malatsi, minister of communications and digital technologies of South Africa, rejects the binary choice. 'It's not a case of one model over the other,' Malatsi said from the conference. 'It's about an integration of the best of both worlds.'
Economic Times
21 minutes ago
- Economic Times
How to rattle a cage before making a deal
Former co-producer and host of the reality TV series that judged the business skills - and nerves - of contestants, The Apprentice, Donald Trump is rattling the cage as India is set to miss the August 1 deadline to sign a trade deal with the US. Now, as US president, Trump's latest statement, threatening penal tariffs over and above a retaliatory 25% for India buying arms and oil from Russia, will widen the scope of negotiations underway for an expanded trade agreement with the US. The two countries are headed for a sixth round of talks on an early harvest deal expected by October-November. Arms and energy represent low-hanging fruit for India to trim its trade surplus with the US. Russia isn't exporting much by way of arms, as it wages its war in Ukraine. This naturally forces India, the world's largest importer, to shop elsewhere. As far as Russian oil goes, China, too, is sidestepping Western sanctions. Not only will the US need to prevail upon China, but it will also have to ensure offsetting production increases by the clutch of deals the US has signed while keeping retaliatory tariffs on hold, the common thread appears to be a combination of levies and investment commitments. This addresses reciprocal taxation, and lends itself to easier agreement. Market access - which India brings to the table - is, however, a more complex issue where tariff action may not be effective against non-tariff barriers. Crafting a trade deal with India requires careful consideration of India's no-go areas like agriculture. Available commentary on the India-US trade framework negotiations suggests there are no deal breakers in sight, and it's more a matter of fixing details. Which is comforting news for New Delhi, because Trump may be a hard negotiator, but he's also a deal-maker. Tariffs on Indian exports to the US, if imposed, are being seen as a temporary measure that will be superseded by a deal announced a few months from now. That would count as among the quickest trade deals India has stitched up with any of its trading partners. Elevate your knowledge and leadership skills at a cost cheaper than your daily tea. Regulators promote exchanges; can they stifle one? Watch IEX Jane St: How an options trader smelt a rat when others raised a toast TCS job cuts may not stop at 12,000; its bench policy threatens more From near bankruptcy to blockbuster drug: How Khorakiwala turned around Wockhardt Stock Radar: SBI Life rebounds after testing 50-DEMA; could hit fresh record highs above Rs 2,000 – check target & stop loss These 10 banking stocks can give more than 25% returns in 1 year, according to analysts Two Trades for Today: A metals stock for an over 6% gain, a large-cap chemicals maker for about 7% upmove F&O Radar| Deploy Broken Wing in LIC Housing Finance to benefit from bearish outlook
Time of India
38 minutes ago
- Time of India
US-China trade: Beijing warns Washington against coercion on Russian oil tariffs; vows to defend energy sovereignty
File photo: Chinese foreign ministry spokesperson Guo Jiakun China on Wednesday issued a warning to the United States, rejecting threats of increased tariffs over its continued purchase of Russian oil. In a pointed response posted on X, Chinese foreign ministry spokesperson Guo Jiakun said, 'Tariff wars have no winners. Coercion and pressuring will not achieve anything.' He added that China would 'firmly defend its sovereignty, security and development interests,' and would continue to secure its energy supplies in ways that serve national interests. The statement came after US treasury secretary Scott Bessent warned Chinese officials during trade talks in Stockholm that the US may impose significant tariffs if Beijing continues buying sanctioned Russian oil. According to The Straits Times, Bessent told the Chinese side that new legislation in Congress could authorise tariffs of up to 500 per cent on countries that purchase Russian oil, and may prompt US allies to follow suit in a coordinated effort to choke Moscow's energy revenues. As per news agency ANI, the warning also included US objections to China's purchase of Iranian oil and sales of over $15 billion worth of dual-use technology to Russia, items Washington says have bolstered Moscow's military operations in Ukraine. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Learn More - How Watching Videos Can Boost Your Income TheDaddest Undo Despite the sharp rhetoric, Bessent characterised the two-day US-China talks in Sweden as 'constructive,' with both sides expressing willingness to explore an extension of the current tariff pause, which ends on August 12. As per news agency AP, Chinese trade official Li Chenggang confirmed that both countries had agreed to work toward extending the tariff truce and would maintain close contact to address trade concerns. The US has already finalised trade agreements with key partners like the UK, Japan, and the EU after US President Donald Trump's announcement of broad "Liberation Day" tariffs earlier this year. However, a comprehensive deal with China remains elusive. US trade representative Jamieson Greer, speaking on MSNBC, acknowledged ongoing tensions but described China as 'very pragmatic' and the talks as 'going in the right direction.' Trump's broader foreign policy posture remains aggressive. He recently shortened a 50-day deadline for Russian President Vladimir Putin to reach a peace deal on Ukraine to just 10–12 days. Speaking alongside UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer in Scotland, Trump said, 'I want to be generous, but we just don't see any progress being made... I don't want to do that to Russia, but it would be sanctions and maybe tariffs.' The Stockholm round offered little clarity on the possibility of a Trump-Xi summit, though Bessent said the talks reflected the two presidents' shared desire to maintain trade negotiations. Trump, on his Truth Social platform, claimed he wasn't seeking a summit with Xi, but acknowledged receiving an invitation from the Chinese leader. Amid escalating tensions over energy and technology trade, analysts believe Beijing is unlikely to yield under pressure. As Wendy Cutler of the Asia Society Policy Institute was quoted by AP, saying, 'Beijing will not buy into a one-sided deal this time around.' Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays . Discover stories of India's leading eco-innovators at Ecopreneur Honours 2025
