Swinney calls for legal referendum if SNP secures majority at Holyrood election
Writing in a column in the Daily Record, Mr Swinney said that in the 17 years since the 2008 financial crash 'people feel like they are working harder than ever, but not seeing any improvement in their living standards'.
He said the UK economy is 'fundamentally failing to deliver for ordinary people' as well as generating insufficient funding for public services.
The SNP leader called for the May 2026 Holyrood elections to be 'a springboard for Scotland taking charge of our own destiny'.
He said the situation had got worse since the 2014 referendum, and wrote: 'Think what could have been achieved had we not been forced to spend so much time and money trying to mitigate the ongoing damage of Brexit.
'Or the carnage unleashed by Liz Truss's mini-budget. Or the years of austerity, or Westminster cuts like the Winter Fuel Payment.
'We were told we didn't need independence and we just needed a Labour government – but look how that has turned out.'
He wrote that 'independence is the catalyst that will deliver a better future for us all' and that 'with Scotland's energy resources in Scotland's hands, we can reduce bills for consumers and cut costs for businesses'.
Mr Swinney revealed he hoped to deliver an SNP majority similar to 2011 in a bid to 'secure a legal referendum recognised by all' and had submitted a motion to the SNP conference proposing that 'we work to deliver a majority of SNP MSPs in the Scottish Parliament to secure that referendum'.
He pledged to unveil 'radical policies that we know will transform Scotland' in the coming months, and to 'break the logjam and end this frustration that we all feel'.
Mr Swinney added: 'We must be ready to follow the path which we know can lead us to an independent state.'
Scottish Conservative deputy leader Rachael Hamilton said: 'John Swinney is like a broken record. In a bid to silence internal critics of his weak leadership, he has thrown diehard nationalists some more red meat on the one issue they all agree on: independence.
'Ordinary Scots are sick and tired of the SNP's obsession with breaking up the UK.
'The public want John Swinney to focus on fixing the damage his government has done in decimating essential services such as schools and the NHS at the same time as making Scotland the highest taxed part of the UK.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
CNH Industrial posts upbeat results as cost-cuts cushion slump in equipment demand
(Reuters) -Farm and construction equipment maker CNH Industrial reported second-quarter profit and revenue above Wall Street estimates on Friday, as its ongoing effort to reduce costs helped offset pressures from lower sales and production. The Basildon, UK-based company has been producing tractors and combines below retail demand to reduce excess dealer inventories, as it manages through a cyclical period of lower sales – a strategy also adopted by peers Deere, AGCO and Caterpillar. CNH expects 2025 sales to drop below last year's levels and warns that, combined with reduced production, this will likely put further pressure on its margins. However, its efforts to reduce costs will partially mitigate the erosion. Demand for new equipment has taken a hit from a prolonged weakness in farmer income and weak commodity prices, prompting manufacturers to scale back production as farmers postpone or reassess major purchase decisions. Shares of the company, famous for its Case IH and New Holland brands, rose 1.6% in pre-market trading. They have risen more than 14% since the start of the year. CNH reported an adjusted profit of 17 cents per share for the quarter ended June 30, above analysts' expectations of 14 cents per share, according to data complied by LSEG. Its total costs and expenses in the reported quarter dropped to $4.43 billion, from $5.03 billion last year. Quarterly revenue fell 14% to $4.71 billion, but was above analysts' estimates of $4.17 billion. The company reaffirmed its full-year outlook, but cautioned that ongoing uncertainty surrounding U.S. trade policy, potential responses from global trading partners, and their broader impacts could influence its projections. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Liverpool launch adidas kit as Conor Bradley is handed new squad number
Liverpool FC have finally launched their much-anticipated new strip ahead of the start of the season. The Premier League champions had to wait until August 1 to officially unveil their playing kit from new suppliers adidas. Reds fans have been waiting anxiously for the previous deal with Nike to come to an end as the club penned a 10-year deal with the German kit manufacturer earlier this year. READ MORE: Barcelona dream becomes a reality for talented young footballer Yazmin Doherty READ MORE: The Co Antrim village that could be Liverpool star's next holiday destination And in an unusual move the Anfield giants released both their home and away strips at 9am on Friday morning. It is the third partnership between Liverpool and adidas, with the club enjoying success from 1985-1996 and again from 2006-2012, with many iconic strips being favourites among the fanbase. Following the relesed the club announced shirt numbers for new signings Giorgi Mamardashvili, Jeremie Frimpong, Milos Kerkez, Florian Wirtz, Hugo Ekitike, Armin Pecsi and Freddie Woodman this morning. Wirtz will wear the iconic number seven jersey once sported by Sir Kenny Dalglish and previously worn by Luis Diaz. Kerkez will wear the number six, Ekitike 22, Frimpong 30, Mamardashvili 25 and Woodman 28. Conor Bradley has also taken the opportunity to change his squad number ahead of the big kick-off. The Northern Ireland international has worn the number 84 since breaking into the Reds first team, but he has now switched to the vacant number 12 shirt for the 2025/26 campaign. Meanwhile, should supporters want to honour Diogo Jota, who died in a car crash last month, by having 'Diogo J. 20' printed on the back of their shirts in official club stores or via the official online store, as well as adidas in-store or online (where regionally offered), all profits will go to LFC Foundation, the club's official charity. The Foundation has committed to creating a grassroots football programme in Diogo's name. Liverpool will wear their new strip for the first time on Monday when they host Athletic Bilbao in the club's final summer friendly before they travel to Wembley next weekend to take on Crystal Palace in the Community Shield.
CNN
31 minutes ago
- CNN
Trump's new tariffs have no precedent in the modern era
In just six months, President Donald Trump has remade global trade and upended a century of precedent. Trump on Thursday announced higher tariffs — again — on just about every country in the world. Even as some countries' tariff rates came in lower than they had feared, practically all goods coming in to the United States face a significantly higher tax than when Trump took office in January. The new trade regime will put in place the highest tariffs America has imposed since 1933, during the Smoot-Hawley era — a tariff bill that contributed to the deepening of the Great Depression. The higher tariffs threaten to disrupt the global economy again. Despite a milder-than-expected impact so far at home, there's already some evidence Trump's tariffs are — slowly — reigniting inflation and slowing the US economy. That danger is why leaders of developed countries for decades have largely lowered tariff rates and welcomed globalization — actions that have fueled the services economy backed by Big Tech and finance, but have also contributed to the offshoring of factories and manufacturing jobs. Last year, imports to the United States faced an effective tariff rate of 1.2%, a low tax that has fallen over the course of many decades. Declining tariffs in part persuaded US companies to make their products in foreign countries where labor costs were cheaper — and then ship those goods back into the United States while facing a relatively minuscule tax penalty for doing so. But that rate is set to surge to more than 18% when Trump's new tariffs take effect August 7, according to Yale's Budget Lab. Those taxes will be shared between exporters, importers and retailers, but economists widely expect consumers will pay for some of those tariffs in the form of higher prices. Companies that have for decades relied on overseas manufacturing to maximize profits and keep consumer prices low have declared massive tariff bills over the past few months. Apple on Thursday said it paid $800 million in tariffs last quarter and expects to pay $1.1 billion this quarter. Automakers, including GM, Stellantis and Volkswagen, also reported tariff costs of over $1 billion over the past quarter. Many major retailers, including Walmart and Target, have said recently they wouldn't be able to absorb all the tariff costs and would raise prices for their customers. Trump's tariffs are unpopular in polls, and businesses have fought them. But the White House has a decidedly positive view of its unorthodox strategy. Despite some negative reaction on Wall Street Friday, stocks remain near record highs. US gross domestic product, the broadest measure of the economy, bounced back sharply in the second quarter by some measures. The labor market has remained resilient, and inflation is still reasonably close to normal levels. That has given the Trump administration confidence that it can levy tariffs around the world to accomplish its multifaceted goals: Grow revenue, revive America's manufacturing economy, impose maximum political pressure and restore the balance of trade between the United States and the rest of the world. Tariffs have worked in many of those regards: The Treasury Department reports about $150 billion in tariff revenue since Trump took office, up considerably from previous years. Numerous American manufacturers have announced major commitments to build new factories in the United States. Trump has used the threat of tariffs to impose his will on multiple countries to negotiate everything from peace deals to lower taxes. And America's trade gap briefly narrowed earlier this year. However, each of those victories comes with considerable caveats. Tariff revenue is paid in the form of a tax on US importers, not foreign countries as Trump routinely claims. Many of the companies' factory announcements were already in the works or are years away from taking place, and — considering America has about 400,000 open manufacturing jobs it can't fill — it's not clear where the labor force for those factories will come from. Trump's tariff threats don't always work and sometimes penalize US consumers, who have to pay higher prices as a result. And the trade gap, after countries worked through their pre-tariff inventories, is widening again. It's unclear how history will view this moment. Trump's grand trade experiment so far has paid off better than most had expected. But economists continue to fear a delayed shock reaction that could damage the global economy and take America's standing in the world down a peg.
