logo
Prominent national Democrats ask Josh Kraft to stop using names, likenesses in unauthorized fundraising push

Prominent national Democrats ask Josh Kraft to stop using names, likenesses in unauthorized fundraising push

Boston Globe6 days ago
And, it turns out, Schiff never said Kraft could reach out with that urgent message.
The Kraft
Schiff's name and likeness is one of at least five the campaign has sent in recent weeks that feature prominent national Democrats who have not publicly weighed in on the Boston mayor's race. At least two of those politicians have now asked the Kraft campaign to stop using their names and likenesses in the email fundraising solicitations.
'Immediately after being informed that the Kraft campaign sent an email we did not approve of in Schiff's name, we reached out to the campaign to ask them to stop,' said a spokesperson for the Schiff campaign. 'While an unfortunate situation, the Kraft campaign let us know that it would not happen again.'
Advertisement
In addition to Schiff, Kraft fundraising emails featured US Representative Eric Swalwell of California; US Representative Jasmine Crockett of Texas; former North Carolina Governor Roy Cooper, who is running for US Senate; and Shawn Harris, a retired brigadier general and political candidate in Georgia. Swalwell's campaign said he also did not approve the fundraising solicitation, and is asking Kraft to put an end to it. Crockett, Cooper, and Harris did not return requests for comment from the Globe on Monday, but none appears to have publicly waded into the Boston mayor's race.
Advertisement
The emails sent by the Kraft campaign urged potential donors to financially support both Kraft and the highlighted politician in whose name the email was sent. So-called split list fundraising is not uncommon in Democratic politics; allied politicians often urge their donors to back like minded candidates in an effort to increase their ranks and forge connections. Typically, those fundraising solicitations come from politicians who have explicitly endorsed one another, or at least signed off on the shared fundraising push.
It would be highly unusual, if not unheard of, for a political candidate to send such an email in a contested election if she had not already endorsed one of the candidates, political operatives said.
Related
:
For example, in the last month alone, Mayor Michelle Wu's campaign has sent email blasts from US Senators Ed Markey and Elizabeth Warren, as well as US Representative Ayanna Pressley. All three are vocal supporters of the mayor, and the emails sent in their name directed
donors to give exclusively to Wu.
Political and campaign finance experts called the Kraft campaign's recent fundraising blitz unorthodox, or even potentially misleading for donors, while Wu, whom Kraft is seeking to unseat, argued it could be illegal.
In a letter on Sunday, Wu campaign treasurer Robert Binney called on the state Office of Campaign and Political Finance to investigate.
Advertisement
'Even assuming a donor managed to decipher the fine print, these voters would reasonably assume that leading national figures like Senator Schiff and Representative Crockett are supporting Kraft's campaign for Mayor, which we believe to be untrue and an obvious attempt to deceive voters,' Binney wrote. 'At best these practices are highly deceptive and negligent, at worst they are illegal violations of our state campaign finance laws.'
A spokesperson for the Kraft campaign defended the legality of the fundraising push, and said the unauthorized emails were 'an error on the part of our vendor.'
'Our vendor is responsible for the approvals process with all candidates involved. As a result of today's inquiries, we have been made aware that what we thought was an isolated incident in failing to seek approval was much larger,' said the spokesperson, Eileen O'Connor. 'As a result, we are moving to shut down the links and terminate our agreement with the consulting firm.'
The OCPF complaint from Wu's campaign is 'lacking on both substantive and legal grounds,' O'Connor added. 'Michelle Wu is desperate to distract voters from her broken campaign promises and failures on so many pressing issues.'
Related
:
The Kraft campaign has also
The email featuring Schiff was sent on July 20. When Schiff's team reached out the next day,
they were quickly told it would not happen again.
But more than a week later, on Aug. 2, Kraft's campaign sent an email that appeared to come from Swalwell, another well known California Democrat.
Advertisement
'As the senior-most Democrat on the House Homeland Security Committee, I've seen a lot,' the email begins, before railing against a Trump appointee and the actions of the administration.
'Chip in today,' the email urged, linking to an
Swalwell also did not approve of the email sent in his voice, a spokesperson told the Globe Monday.
'We were not aware that they did this. We did not approve, nor would we have,' said Lisa Tucker, a spokesperson for Swalwell's campaign. Tucker said Swalwell's team had reached out to the Kraft campaign to ask that the joint Act Blue link be shut down.
Tucker said Swalwell has offered a 'partner toolkit' for a year and a half 'and have never had something like this happen.' Typically, allied candidates who want to fundraise alongside him would seek permission directly, and the Swalwell campaign would approve of any fundraising emails before they are sent, she said.
'This is definitely making us reexamine our process to make sure this doesn't happen again,' Tucker said.
Other emails featuring prominent national Democrats were sent on July 30 and Aug. 1, according to screenshots obtained by the Globe.
Kraft is seen as Wu's closest rival in the mayor's race this year, though a recent Suffolk University/ Boston Globe poll
Advertisement
So far, Kraft has been a strong fundraiser. As of the end of June,
Related
:
The fundraising emails raise serious questions about the Kraft campaign's tactics, said Jack Corrigan, a campaign finance lawyer and longtime Democratic operative who has donated to Wu this campaign cycle
but does not work for her campaign. The emails — at least some of which were sent without permission of the high profile Democrats — imply an endorsement, and for donors, that could be 'deceptive,' Corrigan said.
'Even if it's legal,' he said, 'it's questionable.'
Tal Kopan of the Globe staff contributed to this report.
Emma Platoff can be reached at
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Democrats, GOP are both guilty of gerrymandering. Texas' scheme exposes the problem.
Democrats, GOP are both guilty of gerrymandering. Texas' scheme exposes the problem.

USA Today

time18 minutes ago

  • USA Today

Democrats, GOP are both guilty of gerrymandering. Texas' scheme exposes the problem.

Texas' new map aims to add five additional Republican-leaning seats, giving Republicans an additional cushion ahead of what could be a challenging midterm election. The debate surrounding the Texas decision to draw new House district boundaries in advance of the 2026 midterm elections has escalated into a national conversation surrounding gerrymandering, with Republicans and Democrats accusing each other of being the problem. The truth is that both Republicans and Democrats are flagrant offenders in the arena of districting. Nobody has their hands clean when it comes to gerrymandering. Even so, by deciding to redraw their boundaries mid-decade, Texas has kicked off a potential arms race ahead of the midterms. Republicans started this new fight. Opinion: Texas Democrats look bad in redistricting fight. Republicans look even worse. Democrats and Republicans both gerrymander Gerrymandering is the term for an old practice in which those drawing the borders of electoral districts strategically design them to favor their own electoral chances. They can do so by packing voters of the opposing party into a few sacrificial districts or by spreading them out across many districts. The result is states like Illinois, in which only 3 of 17 House Seats are held by Republicans, despite 43.8% of voters breaking for President Donald Trump in 2024. So, as much as Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker wants to bash Texas Republicans, he signed into law his state's heavily slanted map. Opinion: Supreme Court could end race-based voting districts. Good. They're antiquated. Of the states given a failing grade by Princeton's nonpartisan Gerrymandering Project, nine have a partisan advantage toward Republicans and four toward Democrats. Texas hasn't made it worse. Texas scheme escalates the problem – and rallies Democrats What Texas Republicans are doing is new, in a sense. Redistricting typically occurs in response to significant demographic changes, often highlighted by the census at the beginning of every decade. Texas has decided to redraw its boundaries midway through the decade, with President Donald Trump's endorsement. Texas' new map aims to add five additional GOP-leaning seats, giving Republicans an additional cushion ahead of what could be a challenging midterm election for them. Opinion alerts: Get columns from your favorite columnists + expert analysis on top issues, delivered straight to your device through the USA TODAY app. Don't have the app? Download it for free from your app store. Texas' decision to redraw its boundaries has nationalized the conversation around districting and opened the doors for similar attempts from Democratic states. California Gov. Gavin Newsom has threatened to fight fire with fire and match Texas' actions in his own state, as has Pritzker in Illinois. Democrats are framing this as a pure response to Republican actions, but the reality is that they've been gerrymandering themselves for years. Regardless, Texas' actions worsen the matter because they are the first shot in this particular battle. Both sides have their hands dirty, but Texans will be the ones bearing the blame for what unfolds next. Dace Potas is an opinion columnist for USA TODAY and a graduate of DePaul University with a degree in political science. You can read diverse opinions from our USA TODAY columnists and other writers on the Opinion front page, on X, formerly Twitter, @usatodayopinion and in our Opinion newsletter.

Texas Democrats fled the state to oppose GOP redistricting. Why this one stayed behind.
Texas Democrats fled the state to oppose GOP redistricting. Why this one stayed behind.

USA Today

time18 minutes ago

  • USA Today

Texas Democrats fled the state to oppose GOP redistricting. Why this one stayed behind.

In 2003, Texas Rep. Richard Peña Raymond battled a Republican redistricting plan all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court. Now, he's doing it again. But as fellow Democrats fled the state, he stayed. AUSTIN – State Rep. Richard Peña Raymond, a South Texas Democrat, has spent the past week prowling near-empty halls in the Texas state Capitol, talking to any Republican lawmaker who would listen and trying to avert a U.S. Supreme Court showdown. On the nearby House floor, Republican lawmakers maneuvered to try to launch a rare mid-decade redistricting effort. They've drawn up a new map of U.S. House districts that could give the GOP five more seats and help the party maintain control of the narrowly-divided chamber. Most of Raymond's Democratic colleagues left Texas in an attempt to bust the quorums needed for the legislature to pass the measure. But he stayed behind, trying to cajole, convince, pressure or plead his way out of the crisis. For Raymond, it's déjà vu all over again. In 2003, when Texas Republican lawmakers again tried to redraw districts outside the norms of the once-a-decade process that follows each new Census, Raymond was on the redistricting committee and became an ardent voice of the opposition. When the measure passed, he was named as a plaintiff in a lawsuit that ultimately ended in front of the U.S. Supreme Court. This time, he said, the stakes are even higher. 'Two-thousand-three was a big deal. We went through a lot,' Raymond, 64, told USA TODAY from his first-floor office at the Capitol. 'I could see that that was history making and what's going on right now will be history making.' Midterm battle prompts Texas showdown The current showdown began when President Donald Trump and White House officials urged Texas Republican leaders to redraw voting maps to add five new Republican-friendly seats to the U.S. House of Representatives. State Democrats traveled to Illinois – some even to New York and Massachusetts – to prevent Republicans from reaching the two-thirds quorum in the 150-member legislature needed to conduct business. If Texas Republicans succeed in adding five GOP seats to the U.S. House, the Trump-friendly chamber could allow the president to continue one of the most aggressive and disruptive agendas in modern presidential history. A Democratic majority in January 2027 opens the door to Congressional investigations, legislative paralysis − even a third impeachment. Gov. Greg Abbott has threatened to arrest the absent lawmakers and the U.S. Justice Department has said it will also try to track down the AWOL representatives. And on Aug. 8, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton asked the state Supreme Court to oust 13 Democratic lawmakers from office over their absence from the Capitol, arguing they abandoned their seats when they fled the state. The GOP's Texas power play has set off a redistricting arms race as blue state leaders move to create more Democratic-leaning House seats to counter Texas, and lawmakers in other red states, including Indiana and Missouri, consider joining the fray. Vice President JD Vance met with Indiana lawmakers on Aug. 7 reportedly to urge them to redraw maps and Florida Republican leaders have said they, too, will form a committee to begin redrawing districts. In 2003, Texas Republicans also tried to redraw maps three years after Census data was released, prompting state Democrats to retreat to a Holiday Inn in Oklahoma, just over the state line from Texas and out of reach of troopers who could force them to return. 'Pack a toothbrush. Pack hair spray.' How the Texas Democrats are living on the run Raymond fought the bill in committee then joined his colleagues in Oklahoma. During committee hearings, he was at times the lone Democrat, objecting to Republican motions and grilling witnesses about the legality and fairness of gerrymandering maps for partisan gain. His goal was to get his comments and questions – and their replies – on the official record. 'Just really putting them through the ringer to build the court record,' he remembered. 'I was very, very involved in it, from the beginning to the end.' Lawmakers ultimately approved the new maps. But lawsuits were filed and the case wound up in the U.S. Supreme Court. A 5-4 decision upheld the Texas redistricting plan but ruled part of it violated the Voting Rights Act by diluting the voting power of Latino voters. A proposal to split Laredo, Raymond's hometown, in half was removed. 'It was a 50-50 victory, but a victory nonetheless,' he said. 'Try to talk to everybody' On Aug. 8, Raymond walked the short distance from his first-floor office to the second-floor House chamber. He wound his way around desks, chatting with fellow lawmakers, both Democrat and Republican, patting others on the back, joking with others. There's a saying, he said, that's popular in the Spanish-speaking border city where he's from: Hablando se entiende, or 'Speaking to each other, you're able to understand each other.' 'I have always tried my whole career to try to talk to everybody, get to know everybody, all 149 other members,' he said. 'That hasn't changed.' Raymond, a state lawmaker since 2001, is one of the more tenured Democrats in the legislature. Known as a moderate, he represents a heavily Latino district that fans out for several square miles from Laredo along the U.S.-Mexico border and is home to about 183,000 residents. Last year, Trump managed a near sweep of Texas border counties, traditionally a Democratic stronghold, winning 14 of the 18 counties on or near the border, including Webb County, which includes Laredo. Trump's wins along the border were the biggest for a presidential candidate in three decades, outpacing those by native Texan George W. Bush when he won the governorship in 2004. The border's shifting allegiances make it politically risky for representatives of those districts to align too closely with national Democratic figures, such as Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker, who is essentially harboring the Texas Democrats, said Mark Jones, a Rice University political scientist. It's no coincidence, Jones said, that five of the six Democrats who stayed behind last week were from border districts in South Texas. Raymond, who is up for reelection next year, also likely prefers to keep his distance, he said. Republicans in Texas appear to be razor-focused on keeping the new redistricting maps unchanged, Jones said, despite the efforts of Raymond or anyone else. 'The idea you can stay behind and get maps drawn to be less impactful on Democratic representation is very unlikely,' he said. Raymond acknowledged he's faced with a herculean task – not unlike Sisyphus rolling the boulder up the hill at Tartarus in Greek mythology. His deepest fear, he said, is that the issue will again end up before the Supreme Court – this time with a court much more malleable to the GOP agenda. Still, he'll keep trying. When it gets to feel overwhelming, he said, he tries to remind himself that other members equally love their country and state – and are trying to make it better. 'I recognize that we won't always agree on how we get there, but I don't ever doubt that,' Raymond said. 'I always start from that common place.' The session on Aug. 8 was brief: Eight minutes gavel to gavel. House Speaker Dustin Burrows, a Republican, recognized there still wasn't a quorum, chastised the missing members and adjourned until Monday, Aug. 11. Moments after Burrows gaveled the meeting to a close, Raymond began talking to other lawmakers. Follow Jervis on Twitter: @MrRJervis. Contributing: Zac Anderson, USA TODAY.

Ruben Gallego Fires Up Iowa Crowd With Attack on Trump's Tax Bill
Ruben Gallego Fires Up Iowa Crowd With Attack on Trump's Tax Bill

Newsweek

time19 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Ruben Gallego Fires Up Iowa Crowd With Attack on Trump's Tax Bill

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Arizona Senator Ruben Gallego fired up a crowd in Iowa on Saturday by attacking the GOP's tax bill that is backed by President Donald Trump. Speaking at a town-hall meeting in Davenport, eastern Iowa, Gallego, a Marine veteran and Arizona's first Latino U.S. senator, said the bill, known as the "One Big, Beautiful Bill" would make Americans "sicker and poorer" because of its cuts to Medicaid and food assistance programs. Why It Matters The House of Representatives passed the One Big, Beautiful Bill by 218 votes to 214 in July, after months of internal GOP divisions and last-minute negotiations. The more than 1,000-page legislation extends Trump's 2017 tax cuts, eliminates taxes on tips and overtime, and boosts funding for immigration enforcement and defense. The bill will also reduce Department of Health and Human Services budget by $880 billion over 10 years, including cuts to Medicaid. The Congressional Budget Office estimates that the bill would result in 11.8 million people losing health insurance by 2034, with the majority of those losing their coverage from Medicaid. Gallego's town hall appearance sparked further speculation about him potentially running for president in 2028. Arizona Senator Ruben Gallego, a Democrat, speaks during a town-hall meeting on August 9, 2025, in Davenport, Iowa. Arizona Senator Ruben Gallego, a Democrat, speaks during a town-hall meeting on August 9, 2025, in Davenport, Iowa. AP Photo/Charlie Neibergall What To Know Gallego told an audience of some 180 Democrats: "We are now sicker and poorer because of Donald Trump. We are now sicker and poorer because of [Iowa GOP Representative Mariannette] Miller-Meeks. We are now going to be sicker and poorer—and dead, according to [Iowa GOP Senator Joni Ernst]—because they made that choice." He also weighed in on the Jeffrey Epstein files controversy. "It's just something odd about it. It just smells bad," he said. During his visit to Iowa, he dodged a question about a presidential run, posed by local news outlet KCCI 8 News. "Right now, all I'm considering is how do we win back in 2026, how do we get more Democrats into the House, to the Senate, how do we pass sane legislation," he said. "It's a long time from now," he continued. "Right now, let's just focus on 2026." The Iowa State Fair is known for drawing White House hopefuls. Sen. @RubenGallego (D-AZ), who stopped at the Iowa State Fair yesterday, isn't ruling out a 2028 presidential bid but told me he's 'focused on 2026' right now. He says he'll come back to the fair next year. @KCCINews — Amanda Rooker KCCI (@ARookerKCCI) August 9, 2025 What People Are Saying Pete Wernimont, a Waterloo resident who attended the town hall told The Associated Press: "I think this bill is helping Democrats see clearly what's at stake with the future of protections for so many regular Americans. I just hope they are there when it really matters a year from now." Alexandra Salter, a physician assistant from Davenport told the outlet: "I came here because I work in health care and this bill will hurt health care. I think we are getting more vocal about it, because we need to speak up." Speaking before the event, Senator Ruben Gallego told reporters: "This is the galvanizing moment that's happening because Democrats now understand, we're the people that fight for the middle class and the working class of America. This is a clarifying moment for us." He continued: "Trying to reinvigorate the Democratic Party, trying to remind us that our core base is working class and working class issues—that's all we're focusing on. I will definitely be back to help out any Democrat in 2026 and 2028 because Iowa should be in play in both years." What Happens Next Democrats will continue to attack Republican policies as they hope to gain support in advance of November 2026's midterm elections. Meanwhile, whether Gallego runs for president in 2028 remains to be seen.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store