logo
UNHRC Publishes Findings On Guinea-Bissau, Haiti, Kazakhstan, Latvia, North Macedonia, Spain, And Viet Nam

UNHRC Publishes Findings On Guinea-Bissau, Haiti, Kazakhstan, Latvia, North Macedonia, Spain, And Viet Nam

Scoop6 days ago
GENEVA (18 July 2025) – The UN Human Rights Committee today issued its findings on Guinea-Bissau, Haiti, Kazakhstan, Latvia, North Macedonia, Spain and Viet Nam, following its review of these States parties during its 144th session.
The findings highlight positive developments and outline key concerns and recommendations regarding each country's implementation of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR). Key issues include:
Guinea-Bissau
The Committee noted with concern that despite constitutional guarantees, the judiciary remains vulnerable to political interference and pressure from criminal networks. It urged the State party to strengthen the independence and functioning of the judiciary by, among others, providing increased resources to the judicial system. The Committee also raised concerns about restrictions of peaceful assembly, intimidation of human rights defenders, and interference with trade unions, urging the authorities to respect and protect civic space.
Haiti
The Committee expressed concern about the impact of ongoing large-scale gang violence on the Haitian population and the inability of the police to stop it. It called on the State party to take steps to fully comply with its obligations to protect the right to life, including by implementing a public policy to dismantle the gangs and 'self-defence brigades', and to redouble efforts to prevent and eliminate corruption in state institutions, one of the root causes of insecurity and human rights violations.
Kazakhstan
The Committee expressed concern that counter-terrorism efforts may be unduly restricting civic space and about reports of the use of force and acts of torture by law enforcement officials against members of civil society. It urged the State party to bring its counter-terrorism efforts in line with its international human rights law obligations and ensure that all allegations of excessive use of force are properly investigated and that victims are provided with remedies.
Latvia
The Committee raised concerns about border protection measures restricting asylum access, which it said expose refugees to the risk of non-refoulement and ill-treatment. It called on the authorities to ensure all individuals in need of international protection are assessed fairly and efficiently and to investigate allegations of pushbacks and ill-treatment of refugees at border points.
North Macedonia
The Committee was concerned that despite progress achieved in some areas, including the adoption of a strategy for the inclusion of Roma 2022-2030, discrimination and marginalization against the Roma community remained significant, with its members experiencing high levels of poverty and exclusion, and subjected to ethnic profiling. It called on the authorities to embrace poverty reduction efforts and improve advocacy and awareness to address anti-Roma discrimination.
Spain
The Committee welcomed progress made in areas of memory, truth and reparation for past human rights violations, including the adoption of the 2022 Democratic Memory Law and the establishment of a Prosecutor for Human Rights and Democratic Memory, but expressed regrets that the 1977 Amnesty Law remains active and that proceedings initiated in 2010 for violations committed during the Spanish Civil War and the Franco Dictatorship have not resulted in any effective actions. It also expressed concern about violent incidents of pushbacks of refugees and the alleged excessive use of force by border agents in Ceuta in 2014 and Melilla in 2022, resulting in serious injuries and deaths. It called on the authorities to implement fair asylum procedures that respect the principle of non-refoulement and to investigate the incidents of excessive use of force in Ceuta and Melilla.
Viet Nam
The Committee welcomed the recent removal of the death penalty for eight crimes in Viet Nam. However, it remained concerned that the death penalty remains for ten crimes, including non-violent crimes. The Committee called on the State party to refrain from carrying out executions by maintaining a de facto moratorium. The Committee also raised concerns about reports of torture and ill treatment of detainees. The full Concluding Observations are available on the session page.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Councillor brushes off Israeli woman's hate crime accusation
Councillor brushes off Israeli woman's hate crime accusation

Otago Daily Times

time4 hours ago

  • Otago Daily Times

Councillor brushes off Israeli woman's hate crime accusation

Nandor Tanczos A Whakatāne district councillor says he was both surprised and amused to learn from police he had been accused of a hate crime by a woman in Tel Aviv, Israel. On July 13, Whakatāne-Ōhope ward councillor Nandor Tanczos shared a link on his personal Facebook page to an online petition calling for United Nations special rapporteur Francesca Albanese and the doctors of Gaza to be nominated for a Nobel Peace Prize. The United States imposed sanctions on Ms Albanese, an outspoken critic of Israel's military offensive in Gaza, this month. Mr Tanczos said the petition was created in the wake of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's nomination of US President Donald Trump for the prize. The prize is awarded annually to the person who has "done the most or the best work for fraternity between nations, for the abolition or reduction of standing armies and for the holding and promotion of peace congresses". Mr Tanczos said he had also posted some "anti-genocide stuff" about the war in Gaza. The councillor regularly shares news articles, opinion pieces and his own views on the conflict via his personal Facebook page. He said he was contacted through his Facebook page by a woman in Tel Aviv who accused him of anti-Semitism and said she had two children in the Israeli Defence Force (IDF) who were "good people". Mr Tanczos responded to her, explaining he had nothing against Jewish people, only against the current actions being taken in Gaza by the IDF. Three days later, he said he received a courtesy call from the Whakatāne police. "The woman rang them from Tel Aviv to complain about my social media posts." Mr Tanczos said he was surprised to learn that opposing what he believed to be genocide was a hate crime in her eyes. He said he was assured by the police officer that phoned him they had looked into his online activity and informed the complainant no crime had been committed. "The police were great. It was just a courtesy call to let me know what had happened. It actually made me laugh to think that someone from Tel Aviv would go as far as reporting me to the New Zealand Police about this." Mr Tanczos said the experience would not stop him from expressing his opinions on Facebook. "I don't have any hesitation in denouncing Israel's actions in Gaza. I'm not anti-Semitic." Police were not available to comment but a senior media adviser from police national headquarters said she did not think such complaints were common. - By Diane McCarthy ■LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air.

International Ruling Will Ratchet Up Accountability For Climate Action
International Ruling Will Ratchet Up Accountability For Climate Action

Scoop

time2 days ago

  • Scoop

International Ruling Will Ratchet Up Accountability For Climate Action

The Environmental Law Initiative says the International Court of Justice's landmark ruling will usher in a new era of accountability for states, including Aotearoa New Zealand, to deliver on their climate change commitments. In it's advisory opinion, the world's highest court ruled that states are legally obligated to halt the production and use of fossil fuels, and those that fail to prevent climate harm could be held liable for reparations. The Court also underscored that states must meet their obligations under human rights law, customary international law and other treaties, beyond just the Paris agreement and United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. 'This ruling is an incredibly significant development, which will open new avenues for accountability, including climate litigation through domestic, regional and international courts," says ELI's Director, Research and Legal, Dr Matt Hall. 'It will inevitably have bearing on both New Zealand policy making and global negotiations. 'It dispels the argument that small states like New Zealand are too small to matter. It's clear, we have obligations, and we need to deliver on them.' The ruling, made early Thursday morning in the Hague, followed a request spearheaded by Vanuatu, other Pacific Island nations, climate-vulnerable countries, and youth campaigners worldwide. The Court's ruling has been heralded for bringing clarity to the obligations of states in regard to fossil fuels: Advertisement - scroll to continue reading 'Failure of a State to take appropriate action to protect the climate system from GHG emissions — including through fossil fuel production, fossil fuel consumption, the granting of fossil fuel exploration licences or the provision of fossil fuel subsidies — may constitute an internationally wrongful act which is attributable to that State.' The Court's advisory opinion is extensive, covering areas including climate mitigation, adaptation, remedies for climate damage, and human rights. It highlights the responsibility of states to put in place regulatory and legislative measures to limit corporate emissions. The ruling also says that the adverse effects of climate change may impair the enjoyment of the right to life which is enshrined in human rights treaties such as the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. Advisory opinions are authoritative interpretations of binding international law and hold significant legal influence.

Outrage after Givealittle shuts down Gaza fundraising page
Outrage after Givealittle shuts down Gaza fundraising page

Otago Daily Times

time3 days ago

  • Otago Daily Times

Outrage after Givealittle shuts down Gaza fundraising page

New Zealand donors are fighting Givealittle for refunds after their page was shut down over concerns around money laundering in Gaza. More than $3500 is locked in one Givealittle fund, which is destined for what organisers say is a friend to buy formula for babies, after the donation company changed its policy on Gaza. Givealittle has recently updated its policy in response to "operational risks" associated with transferring funds to individuals in Gaza, a spokesperson told Midday Report. As a result, four pages have been closed. One of those pages was a fundraiser set up by Ciara's friend in the United Kingdom to raise money to buy baby formula for families in need in Gaza. Ciara, who wishes to keep her last name anonymous, told Midday Report that when the page was set up, Givealittle said it would be moderated in three days but in the meantime, they could start fundraising. "We just got straight into it and within about six days we had about $3500 fundraised," Ciara said. Givealittle then asked for verification of their contact in Gaza who was getting the formula and distributing it to families. Ciara said they provided Givealittle with their contact's bank account details, written permission for them to fundraise on their contact's behalf and their passport. On July 17, Givealittle emailed to say the page did not meet its requirements and would not be going ahead. "They have said that, in high-risk areas such as Gaza, they don't believe there is evidence of where their funds are going and that they would like [funds] to go through a registered charity instead," Ciara said. "They are leaning on some very tight New Zealand laws on anti-money laundering and countering terrorism regime, which are extremely tight and basically give us no wiggle room. "The thing that really got us was that they changed their policy on donating to individuals in Gaza while our page was receiving funds." Givealittle told Ciara in an email, which Midday Report has seen, that as a regulated platform under New Zealand's Anti-Money Laundering and Countering Financing of Terrorism (AML/CFT) regime, they "have a duty to go beyond minimum requirements when we assess risk". The platform was worried the funds could be used by someone linked to Hamas, which New Zealand has listed as terrorist entity. "While we acknowledge the identity information you have provided for [their contact in Gaza] we note that your relationship with him only began in May of this year and has developed entirely online," the Givealittle email read. "In this context, we are unable to verify the end use of funds with the confidence required under our obligations. The risk of misuse - even where intentions are good - is high, and in such cases, we must err on the side of caution." Now the page has $3573 on hold that the organisers and donors can't access. "We have got many donors waiting, who require explanation on where their money is going," Ciara said. "Furthermore, we've got children, babies and families who are starving in Gaza." She is still waiting on a response from Givealittle to explain what is happening with the funds. "We have just been absolutely beside ourselves. The devastation that's happening is unfathomable," Ciara said. "Here is a way for us to provide some kind of help. Yes, it might just be a drop in the ocean, but it is a tin of formula for a starving baby to get them through that next day. I just think it is absolutely outrageous. It's unforgivable and it's unacceptable." Givealittle said in a statement to Midday Report the decision to update its policy was not taken lightly. "The banking and financial infrastructure in Gaza is now so unstable that we can no longer, with certainty, verify the identity of individual beneficiaries or ensure that funds can be delivered safely and transparently," a spokesperson said. This policy applies to only to individual fundraising in Gaza. "Givealittle continues to support pages linked to registered New Zealand charities operating in the region, where funds can be safely distributed through trusted channels. We encourage donors who wish to help to continue giving through these organisations," the spokesperson said. "We appreciate the compassion of those who have created and supported these pages and are committed to ensuring that generosity continues to have an impact." Any payments already due to verified individuals will still be honoured. It comes after Midday Report reported PayPal was withholding funds donated by New Zealanders for families in Gaza. On Wednesday, Paypal confirmed that account had been re-opened.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store