Progressives let hatred of Trump push them over the edge. It's truly sad to see.
Show Caption
Hide Caption
Americans 'approve' of Trump's first month in office, CBS poll finds
A majority of US adults polled by CBS News/YouGov approved of how President Donald Trump handled his first month back in the White House.
If you thought that Trump Derangement Syndrome was a thing of the past, think again. President Donald Trump still has the ability to drive his opponents − well, nuts.
At a rally at Michigan's Capitol last week to protest Trump and his right-hand billionaire Elon Musk, a state Democratic lawmaker told the crowd something quite shocking.
'Just under two weeks ago, I underwent surgery to ensure that I would never have to navigate a pregnancy in Donald Trump's America,' Rep. Laurie Pohutsky said, according to the Michigan Advance. 'I refuse to let my body be treated as currency by an administration that only sees value in my ability to procreate.'
Pohutsky, who has previously served as Michigan House speaker pro tempore, continued: 'If you know people who are questioning how serious this is, I'm going to repeat myself. A sitting government official opted for voluntary sterilization because she was uncertain she would be able to access contraception in the future.'
What Pohutsky did is indeed serious – with lasting repercussions for her future, should she ever regret her decision.
It's also just plain sad.
Pohutsky may think she's some kind of social justice warrior, but the 36-year-old, married lawmaker is hurting herself and setting a bad example for her female constituents.
She knows better than anyone – or should – that wide access to abortion is cemented into the Michigan Constitution and contraception is readily available. It's unclear what she's trying to prove by taking this drastic step – and broadcasting it widely.
Yet, Pohutsky's actions are symptomatic of a much bigger disconnect between progressives and the rest of the country.
Opinion: Liberals want to erase women. Trump is standing up for our most basic rights.
Republicans are 'fascists' and relationships with men are bad? Liberals are not OK.
The protest in Michigan was one of many around the country last Wednesday to challenge the early actions of the Trump administration, which is operating at an unprecedented pace.
Signs among the Michigan crowd included 'Fight the Fascists,' Resist Nazis,' 'Arrest Elon,' 'Eat the Rich,' 'Impeach the Clown' and 'This Is A Coup Directed At You.'
So Pohutsky wasn't the only one in attendance who was on edge. There's something especially disturbing, though, to see women take their 'fears' of Trump and Republicans to such an extreme that they harm themselves and their relationships.
Pohutsky's sterilization reminds me of a trend that began shortly after Trump was elected to his second term. Women announced on social media that they were swearing off sex, dating and marriage to punish the men in their lives, in part for their role in helping elect Trump.
And since November, doctors have reported a surge in requests from women for long-term birth control or more drastic procedures like getting their tubes tied.
Majority of Americans support Trump, believes he's fulfilling promises
While Democrats are beside themselves that Trump is the president, the rest of the country has a much rosier outlook. A new poll from CBS News/YouGov found that Trump has a positive approval rating – 53% – among U.S. adults.
Of that number, 31% strongly approve and 22% somewhat approve.
Opinion: Hey Dems, chill. You lost. And Trump just getting started on what voters want.
And 70% said Trump is doing exactly what he said he would do during his campaign, although 49% said they were surprised at the speed with which Trump has taken actions in his first few weeks.
Whether liberals want to accept it or not, Trump will be president for the next four years.
They have a right to protest all they want. But I hope more women think long and hard before they take extreme measures like Pohutsky did for political reasons.
They may think they're really 'showing' Trump. In the end, they're hurting themselves.
Ingrid Jacques is a columnist at USA TODAY. Contact her at ijacques@usatoday.com or on X: @Ingrid_Jacques
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
25 minutes ago
- New York Post
Mamdani-like Democratic Socialist Omar Fateh loses key endorsement in Minneapolis mayoral race
Minneapolis mayoral candidate Omar Fateh, a Democratic Socialist whose campaign has drawn parallels to Zohran Mamdani, lost the endorsement of Minnesota's Democratic-Farmer-Labor Party (DFL) on Thursday. The decision to strip Fateh of his endorsement came after incumbent Minneapolis Democratic Mayor Jacob Frey challenged the DFL's voting process. 'After a thoughtful and transparent review of the challenges, the Constitution, Bylaws & Rules Committee found substantial failures in the Minneapolis Convention's voting process on July 19th, including an acknowledgement that a mayoral candidate was errantly eliminated from contention,' DFL Party Chairman Richard Carlbom said in a statement. 3 Democratic socialist Omar Fateh is running for Minneapolis mayor. X / @OmarFatehMN 3 Fateh's campaign has drawn similarities to Zohran Mamdani. Facebook/Omar Fateh 'As a result, the Constitution, Bylaws & Rules Committee has vacated the mayoral endorsement,' he added. Fateh, a 35-year-old Somali American state senator, had received more than 60% of the vote from delegates at the DFL's contested convention. 3 The decision to strip Fateh of his endorsement came after incumbent Minneapolis Democratic Mayor Jacob Frey challenged the Minnesota Democratic-Farmer-Labor Party's (DFL) voting process. Minnesota DFL Frey, who was elected mayor in 2017 and reelected in 2021, was in charge of Minneapolis while the city burned during 2020's BLM riots in the wake of George Floyd's death at the hands of a white police officer. Fateh is set to face off with Frey in the November mayoral election.
Chicago Tribune
25 minutes ago
- Chicago Tribune
California Gov. Newsom signs legislation calling for special election on redrawn congressional map
SACRAMENTO, Calif — California voters will decide in November whether to approve a redrawn congressional map designed to help Democrats win five more U.S. House seats next year, after Texas Republicans advanced their own redrawn map to pad their House majority by the same number of seats at President Donald Trump's urging. California lawmakers voted mostly along party lines Thursday to approve legislation calling for the special election. Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom, who has led the campaign in favor of the map, then quickly signed it — the latest step in a tit-for-tat gerrymandering battle. 'We don't want this fight and we didn't choose this fight, but with our democracy on the line, we will not run away from this fight,' Democratic Assemblyman Marc Berman said. Republicans, who have filed a lawsuit and called for a federal investigation into the plan, promised to keep fighting it. California Assemblyman James Gallagher, the Republican minority leader, said Trump was 'wrong' to push for new Republican seats elsewhere, contending the president was just responding to Democratic gerrymandering in other states. But he warned that Newsom's approach, which the governor has dubbed 'fight fire with fire,' was dangerous. 'You move forward fighting fire with fire and what happens?' Gallagher asked. 'You burn it all down.' In Texas, the Republican-controlled state Senate was scheduled to vote on a map Thursday night. After that, Republican Gov. Greg Abbott's signature will be all that is needed to make the map official. It's part of Trump's effort to stave off an expected loss of the GOP's majority in the U.S. House in the 2026 midterm elections. What states are doing in the battle over congressional maps as Texas pursues plan President Donald Trump soughtOn a national level, the partisan makeup of existing districts puts Democrats within three seats of a majority. The incumbent president's party usually loses congressional seats in the midterms. The president has pushed other Republican-controlled states including Indiana and Missouri to also revise their maps to add more winnable GOP seats. Ohio Republicans were also already scheduled to revise their maps to make them more partisan. The U.S. Supreme Court has said the Constitution does not outlaw partisan gerrymandering, only using race to redraw district lines. Texas Republicans embraced that when their House of Representatives passed its revision Wednesday. 'The underlying goal of this plan is straight forward: improve Republican political performance,' state Rep. Todd Hunter, the Republican who wrote the bill revising Texas' maps, said. On Thursday, California Democrats noted Hunter's comments and said they had to take extreme steps to counter the Republican move. 'What do we do, just sit back and do nothing? Or do we fight back?' Democratic state Sen. Lena Gonzalez said. 'This is how we fight back and protect our democracy.' Republicans and some Democrats championed the 2008 ballot measure that established California's nonpartisan redistricting commission, along with the 2010 one that extended its role to drawing congressional maps. Democrats have sought a national commission that would draw lines for all states but have been unable to pass legislation creating that system. Trump's midterm redistricting ploy has shifted Democrats. That was clear in California, where Newsom was one of the members of his party who backed the initial redistricting commission ballot measures, and where Assemblyman Joshua Lowenthal, whose father, Rep. Alan Lowenthal, was another Democratic champion of a nonpartisan commission, presided over the state Assembly's passage of the redistricting package. Newsom on Thursday contended his state was still setting a model. 'We'll be the first state in U.S. history, in the most democratic way, to submit to the people of our state the ability to determine their own maps,' Newsom said before signing the legislation. Former President Barack Obama, who's also backed a nationwide nonpartisan approach, has also backed Newsom's bid to redraw the California map, saying it was a necessary step to stave off the GOP's Texas move. 'I think that approach is a smart, measured approach,' Obama said Tuesday during a fundraiser for the Democratic Party's main redistricting arm, noting that California voters will still have the final say on the map. Bipartisan group led by ex-Obama officials 'rolling the dice' on new remapping plan for Illinois legislatureThe California map would last only through 2030, after which the state's commission would draw up a new map for the normal, once-a-decade redistricting to adjust district lines after the decennial U.S. Census. Democrats are also mulling reopening Maryland's and New York's maps for mid-decade redraws. However, more Democratic-run states have commission systems like California's or other redistricting limits than Republican ones do, leaving the GOP with a freer hand to swiftly redraw maps. New York, for example, can't draw new maps until 2028, and even then, only with voter approval. In Texas, outnumbered Democrats turned to unusual steps to try to delay passage, leaving the state to delay a vote by 15 days. Upon their return, they were assigned round-the-clock police monitoring. California Republicans didn't take such dramatic steps but complained bitterly about Democrats muscling the package through the Statehouse and harming what GOP State Sen. Tony Strickland called the state's 'gold-standard' nonpartisan approach. 'What you're striving for is predetermined elections,' Strickland said. 'You're taking the voice away from Californians.'
Axios
25 minutes ago
- Axios
Newsom signs California redistricting measures in response to Texas bill
California Gov. Gavin Newsom signed two redistricting bills into law on Thursday evening after a Democratic-controlled Legislature passed them earlier in the day. Why it matters: The legislation is in direct response to Texas' Republican-controlled House passing a new congressional map at the urging of President Trump, and the consequences of both could prove pivotal in the 2026 midterms and the 2028 presidential election.
