logo
Obituary: Norman Tebbit

Obituary: Norman Tebbit

BBC News08-07-2025
Norman Tebbit, who has died at the age of 94, was at the heart of Margaret Thatcher's political revolution.He was a man whose philosophy of self-reliance formed the core of his political beliefs.An able and conscientious politician, his plain speaking on immigration and Europe endeared him to the Tory faithful, and he was once spoken of as a possible party leader.And while Lord Tebbit's uncompromising views often enraged his political opponents, he was unmoved by the less-than-flattering names they bestowed upon him.
Norman Beresford Tebbit was born on 29 March 1931 in the working-class suburb of Ponders End in north London.His father, a manager in a jewellery and pawnbroker's business, had progressed sufficiently in life to be buying his own house.However, prosperity was not to last. The manager's job disappeared in the economic depression, and the family moved to what became a series of short-term lets in Edmonton.Tebbit's father found employment as a painter, although not before he had travelled the streets looking for work on a bicycle that was later became to become famous.
By the time the young Norman arrived at Edmonton County Grammar School, he had already developed his interest in Conservative politics."I felt you should be able to make your own fortune," he said. "You should be master of your own fate."Leaving school at 16, he joined the Financial Times where, much to his annoyance, the operation of the closed shop forced him to join the print union, Natsopa.After two years, he went to do his National Service with the RAF where he gained a commission as a Pilot Officer.However, he decided that his political ambitions were not compatible with a service career so he left to sell advertising with a company run by a family friend.
He had not lost his love of flying and he signed up with the Royal Auxiliary Air Force as a part-time pilot.He narrowly escaped death when his Meteor jet failed to take off and ploughed off the end of a runway in Cambridgeshire.Trapped in the burning plane, Tebbit managed to force open the cockpit canopy. His aircraft was completely destroyed.Sixty years later, doctors told him that he'd lived with a cardiac arrhythmia for most of his life. It was possible that he had slipped unconcious on the runway.In 1953, he joined the British Overseas Airways Corporation (BOAC) as a pilot and, three years later, married a nurse called Margaret Daines.For the next 17 years, he juggled his flying with a career as an activist for the British Airline Pilots' Association.The man who would later be instrumental in tackling Britain's trade unions became a scourge of the airline's management.
The election of a Labour government in 1964 spurred him towards politics.He was eventually selected as the Conservative candidate for Epping, a seat once held by Sir Winston Churchill.He won his chance after giving a characteristically robust Tebbit speech.It advocated selling off state-owned industries, trade union reform, immigration control and an attack on the so-called permissive society.The seat then contained the Labour stronghold of Harlow, but an energetic campaign, coupled with the overconfidence of the sitting Labour MP, saw Tebbit victorious in 1970.
He quickly became disillusioned with Ted Heath's leadership.Tebbit felt that the radical platform on which the Conservatives had won the election was being ignored, in favour of a more consensus style of politics.But in 1972, he accepted a job as parliamentary private secretary to the minister of state for employment, the first rung on the ladder to ministerial office.His new post was not to last long. Angered by Heath's adoption of a prices and incomes policy - a clear breach of a manifesto promise - and his failure to curb union influence, Tebbit resigned from the government.
Three months later, the Conservatives were out of office.Tebbit, now the member for the newly created seat of Chingford, would gain a reputation as a thorn in the side of Labour ministers.In 1975, he clashed with the Employment Secretary Michael Foot over the government's failure to condemn the dismissal of six power station workers.The men had refused to join a trade union following the imposition of a new closed shop agreement at the plant.Tebbit revelled in his ability to get under the government's skin."I was quite amused to find that, as a maverick backbencher with no formal standing, I could lure ministers into wasting their time, and fire power, on such an unimportant target," he said.Foot fired back, famously comparing Tebbit to a "semi-house-trained polecat" during a debate on parliamentary business.
When the Conservatives won the 1979 election, Margaret Thatcher appointed Tebbit as an under secretary of state at the Department of Trade.Within 18 months, he was employment secretary, a move that signalled the government's intention to take a tough line on industrial relations.In the autumn of 1981, with three million unemployed and with riots blighting a number of inner city areas, Tebbit made the speech for which he will always be remembered.Addressing the Conservative Party conference in Blackpool, he strayed from his prepared text to remember how his father had reacted to his own unemployment."I grew up in the '30s with an unemployed father. He didn't riot. He got on his bike and looked for work, and he kept looking till he found it."The trade unions and the labour movement were outraged, claiming that Tebbit had told the unemployed to "get on your bike". But the education secretary insisted his emphasis had been on condemning the riots.
His 1982 Employment Act raised the level of compensation for workers dismissed for refusing to join a union.It also made any closed shop agreement subject to regular ballots and removed the immunity of trade unions from civil action if they authorised illegal industrial action.Tebbit later claimed that this was "my finest achievement in government".In 1983, he became trade and industry secretary, following the resignation of Cecil Parkinson over an extra-marital affair.During his tenure, he presided over the Thatcher government's privatisation programme and was instrumental in encouraging foreign investors to Britain, not least the establishment of a Nissan car plant.But the IRA bomb which exploded in Brighton's Grand Hotel during the 1984 Conservative conference changed his life forever.
The attack killed five people and injured more than 30 others. He and his wife were trapped under tons of debris.They laid together, holding hands, waiting for help. Tebbit gave Margaret a message to give to their children, in case he died.He was left with a broken shoulder blade, fractured vertebrae, a cracked collar bone and needing plastic surgery - but was back at his desk within three months.Margaret was less fortunate. As a result of her injuries, she remained paralysed and faced months of hospital treatment. She returned home in a wheelchair and the Tebbits' domestic life had to adapt accordingly.
Following a cabinet reshuffle in the autumn of 1985, he left the DTI to become Conservative Party chairman. He threw himself into rebuilding a moribund organisation, launching a membership drive and preparing the party for the next election.Tebbit used the 1986 Conservative conference to launch an election campaign in all but name, under the slogan, The Next Move Forward.Margaret Thatcher's popularity rating was beginning to slide, and some commentators began talking about the succession. Polls suggested that Norman Tebbit might be a popular choice in a future leadership contest, which made relations with the prime minister difficult.In the end, the 1987 election resulted in a Conservative landslide.
Tebbit left the cabinet after the election to look after his wife. But his ability to create controversy had not deserted him.In 1990, he suggested that a test of the willingness of ethic minorities in Britain to assimilate was to see if they supported the England cricket team or the side from their country of origin.He turned down an invitation from Thatcher to return to the government as education secretary, but steadfastly supported her when her leadership was challenged and she was eventually forced from office.He decided not to seek election in 1992, and was created a life peer as Baron Tebbit of Chingford.
He was not content to sit quietly in the Lords. He embarrassed new Prime Minister John Major with a show-stopping appearance during the 1992 party conference debate on Europe, when he lambasted the decision to sign the Maastricht Treaty.He later criticised the Conservative Party's move to a moderate, right of centre position, saying this allowed UKIP to hoover up the political right.In 2009, he published The Game Cook which instructed readers on the best way to cook game, after his local butcher told him that none of his customers knew how to prepare a pheasant.Having campaigned for Brexit, he grew impatient with Theresa May's negotiations with Brussels - accusing the government of "thinking of nothing but the rights of foreigners".
In 2020, his wife Margaret died, having suffered from Lewy Body Dementia.Two years later, he made his final appearance in the House of Lords, after a 52-year parliamentary career.Lord Tebbit's working-class credentials and dry Conservative ideology made him an influential figure throughout the Thatcher years and beyond.The satirical puppet show, Spitting Image, portrayed him as a leather-clad bovver boy, the enforcer of the Iron Lady's doctrine.He believed that homosexuals should not have senior cabinet posts, thought foreign aid fuelled corruption, and that too many immigrants fail to integrate.He helped move the Conservative party from one-nation centrism under Sir Edward Heath, to a position where it favours a small state, controlled immigration and life outside the European Union.One academic commented: "Although Thatcherism was the political creed of Essex Man, it was Norman Tebbit who was perhaps the public face or voice of Essex Man, and articulated his views and prejudices."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Parents' jobs to determine who gets civil service internships
Parents' jobs to determine who gets civil service internships

The Independent

time23 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Parents' jobs to determine who gets civil service internships

Civil service hopefuls will have their fates decided by their parents' jobs under a shakeup aimed at recruiting more staff from working class backgrounds. The government will tighten eligibility criteria for Whitehall internships as part of a broader push to make the civil service more representative of the working class. The main Whitehall internship scheme will be limited to students from "lower socio-economic backgrounds" and based on which occupations their parents held when they were 14. Pat McFadden, the minister responsible for civil service reform, said Whitehall needed to reflect the country as a whole. "We need to get more working-class young people into the Civil Service so it harnesses the broadest range of talent and truly reflects the country," he told the BBC. "The government makes better decisions when it represents and understands the people we serve." The changes will take effect from summer 2026 and will give young people experience writing briefings, planning events, conducting policy research and shadowing civil servants, according to the broadcaster. The existing work summer placement programme, which lasts up to eight weeks and is paid, is open to undergraduates in the final two years of their degree. The move comes after the government announced plans to move thousands more civil servants out of London as part of plans to "radically reform the state". In May, the government confirmed it would cut the number of civil servants working in London by 12,000 and shift jobs to a series of new regional "campuses" across the country. Mr McFadden said at the time that the government would be relocating a "substantial number of roles". "The aim is to reduce the London count by about 12,000. That will save us £94m in lease costs because the properties in London are very expensive. "And we will move thousands - it's difficult to put a precise number - thousands of those jobs to new themed campuses around the country," he told Times Radio. The changes will also see 11 government office buildings in London close, including one of its largest Westminster sites, in a move expected to save £94m a year by 2032. The move will see two new major "campuses" created, one in Manchester focused on digital innovation and AI and another in Aberdeen on energy. Manchester is already home to major offices of the science and culture departments, while Aberdeen houses the new Great British Energy headquarters. Other roles will be created in Birmingham, Leeds, Cardiff, Glasgow, Darlington, Newcastle and Tyneside, Sheffield, Bristol, Edinburgh, Belfast and York, with the changes expected to bring £729 million to the local economy by 2030.

Business confidence worse than during Covid
Business confidence worse than during Covid

Telegraph

time24 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Business confidence worse than during Covid

Business confidence has plunged to an all-time low to surpass the pandemic and Liz Truss's mini-Budget after Rachel Reeves unleashed record taxes on employers. Bosses said they were 'frustrated' that the Chancellor had hit businesses with a barrage of cost increases while failing to improve the economic backdrop. The survey published by the Institute of Directors (IoD) showed the share of business leaders reporting they were pessimistic about the economic outlook exceeded those who were optimistic by 72pc. It means bosses are at their most pessimistic since the monthly survey started running in 2016, to outstrip the Covid lockdowns, fraught Brexit negotiations and the aftermath of Ms Truss's disastrous mini-Budget. Andrew Griffith, the shadow business secretary, accused the Government of 'attacking private enterprise with the zeal of a Left-wing student union'. He added: 'Instead of the cuts in spending which are urgently needed, this socialist Government hits businesses with higher taxes, raised energy costs and more trade-union inspired red tape. 'A year ago businesses faced a summer of uncertainty followed by massive tax hikes. Like a bad horror move franchise, the Chancellor seems determined to release a sequel.' Businesses are slashing investment plans and expect to cut back the number of staff they employ, amid falling revenues and soaring costs. Anna Leach, the IoD's chief economist, urged the Chancellor to 'urgently quash rumours of further tax rises for business this autumn, and accelerate planning reforms and de-regulation to restore confidence and drive growth'. She added: 'Companies continue to battle cost increases – particularly arising from the national minimum wage and National Insurance contribution changes – and many are frustrated that while the Government has been quick to raise costs for business, it has been much slower to deliver improvements to the wider business environment. 'Last year, damaging speculation around tax rises in the lead-up to the 2024 Budget caused many firms to pause investment and hiring decisions – contributing to six months of near-zero economic growth. 'We're now living with the economic consequences of those tax hikes, even as uncertainty around future costs once again builds. With ripple effects through the economy from tax changes and signs of consumer retrenchment, many firms report that they are struggling to plan amid a cacophony of risk.' Mel Stride, the shadow chancellor, urged Ms Reeves to 'heed the calls from the Institute of Directors and put to bed speculation about more damaging tax rises'. The economy shrank in April and May, while unemployment is rising and job vacancies are falling as companies cut back spending. October's £25bn raid on employers' National Insurance contributions shocked businesses. The tax rate was increased from 13.8pc to 15pc, and the earnings threshold at which it kicks in was reduced, taking in more part-time workers. The tax rise came into force in April, alongside a 6.7pc increase in the national living wage. Economists estimate that Ms Reeves will have to raise taxes or cut spending to the tune of £20bn or more in the Budget to maintain the buffer against her borrowing rules. But the Government has struggled to make even modest savings, performing about-turns on welfare reform and on the winter fuel payments to pensioners. Two thirds of businesses told the IoD they need action on taxes from the Government, with 64pc calling for help with the cost of employment. Half said they want less red tape, and 39pc said they need lower energy bills. An HM Treasury spokesman said: 'UK business confidence is the highest in 10 years, according to a Lloyds Bank survey published only this week. Since the election, we have struck three major trade deals with the EU, US and India, more than £1bn has been invested to fix our national infrastructure and the Bank of England has cut interest rates four times. 'And because of the tax decisions we took at the Budget last year, we have been able to deliver on the priorities of the British people, from investing in the NHS to cutting lists as we deliver on the Plan for Change.'

US trade war: The state of play as Trump signs order imposing new tariffs - but there are more delays
US trade war: The state of play as Trump signs order imposing new tariffs - but there are more delays

Sky News

time33 minutes ago

  • Sky News

US trade war: The state of play as Trump signs order imposing new tariffs - but there are more delays

Donald Trump's trade war has been difficult to keep up with, to put it mildly. For all the threats and bluster of the US election campaign last year to the on-off implementation of trade tariffs - and more threats - since he returned to the White House in January, the president 's protectionist agenda has been haphazard. Trading partners, export-focused firms, customs agents and even his own trade team have had a lot on their plates as deadlines were imposed - and then retracted - and the tariff numbers tinkered. While the UK was the first country to secure a truce of sorts, described as a "deal", the vast majority of nations have failed to secure any agreement. Deal or no deal, no country is on better trading terms with the United States than it was when Trump 2.0 began. Here, we examine what nations and blocs are on the hook for, and the potential consequences, as Mr Trump's suspended "reciprocal" tariffs prepare to take effect. That will now not happen until 7 August. 2:49 Why was 1 August such an important date? To understand the present day, we must first wind the clock back to early April. Then, Mr Trump proudly showed off a board in the White House Rose Garden containing a list of countries and the tariffs they would immediately face in retaliation for the rates they impose on US-made goods. He called it "liberation day". The tariff numbers were big and financial markets took fright. Just days later, the president announced a 90-day pause in those rates for all countries except China, to allow for negotiations. The initial deadline of 9 July was then extended again to 1 August. Late on 31 July, Mr Trump signed the executive order but said that the tariff rates would not kick in for seven additional days to allow for the orders to be fully communicated. Since April, only eight countries or trading blocs have agreed "deals" to limit the reciprocal tariffs and - in some cases - sectoral tariffs already in place. Who has agreed a deal over the past 120 days? The UK, Japan, Indonesia, the European Union and South Korea are among the eight to be facing lower rates than had been threatened back in April. China has not really done a deal but it is no longer facing punitive tariffs above 100%. Its decision to retaliate against US levies prompted a truce level to be agreed between the pair, pending further talks. There's a backlash against the EU over its deal, with many national leaders accusing the European Commission of giving in too easily. A broad 15% rate is to apply, down from the threatened 30%, while the bloc has also committed to US investment and to pay for US-produced natural gas. 1:40 Where does the UK stand? We've already mentioned that the UK was the first to avert the worst of what was threatened. While a 10% baseline tariff covers the vast majority of the goods we send to the US, aerospace products are exempt. Our steel sector has not been subjected to Trump's 50% tariffs and has been facing down a 25% rate. The government announced on Thursday that it would not apply under the terms of a quota system. UK car exports were on a 25% rate until the end of June when the deal agreed in May took that down to 10% under a similar quota arrangement that exempts the first 100,000 cars from a levy. Who has not done a deal? Canada is among the big names facing a 35% baseline tariff rate. That is up from 25% and covers all goods not subject to a US-Mexico-Canada trade agreement that involves rules of origin. America is its biggest export market and it has long been in Trump's sights. Mexico, another country deeply ingrained in the US supply chain, is facing a 30% rate but has been given an extra 90 days to secure a deal. Brazil is facing a 50% rate. For India, it's 25%. What are the consequences? This is where it all gets a bit woolly - for good reasons. The trade war is unprecedented in scale, given the global nature of modern business. It takes time for official statistics to catch up, especially when tariff rates chop and change so much. Any duties on exports to the United States are a threat to company sales and economic growth alike - in both the US and the rest of the world. Many carmakers, for example, have refused to offer guidance on their outlooks for revenue and profits. Barriers to business are never good but the International Monetary Fund earlier this week raised its forecast for global economic growth this year from 2.8% to 3%. Some of that increase can be explained by the deals involving major economies, including Japan, the EU and UK. US growth figures have been skewed by the rush to beat import tariffs. There is an elephant in the room: inflation. Countries imposing duties on their imports force the recipient of those goods to foot the additional bill. Do the buyers swallow it or pass it on? The latest US data contained strong evidence that tariff charges are now making their way down the country's supply chains, threatening to squeeze American consumers in the months ahead. It's why the US central bank has been refusing demands from Mr Trump to cut interest rates. You don't slow the pace of price rises by making borrowing costs cheaper. A prolonged period of higher inflation would not go down well with US businesses or voters. It's why financial markets have followed a recent trend known as TACO, helping stock markets remain at record levels. The belief is that Trump always chickens out. He may have to back down if inflation takes off.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store