Huge change to Qantas Frequent Flyer points - so what does it mean for you?
Qantas has increased the number of points required for most reward seats, with business and first class redemptions going up by 15 to 20 per cent.
Fees and surcharges are also rising, with the airline justifying the move by claiming they are essential to 'sustain and expand the program'.
For business class domestic flights, like Sydney to Melbourne, there will only be a five per cent increase.
While the Sydney to London points cost rose by 15 per cent, the fees increased from $473 to $648, or 37 per cent.
A Sydney to Melbourne business class seat will go from 18,400 points, plus $55, to 19,300 points, plus $76.
A Sydney to London economy purchase will rise from 55,200 points, plus $263, to 63,500 points, plus $263.
The good news is Qantas Frequent Flyers will earn up to 25 per cent more points on Qantas domestic flights.
Qantas will roll out up to one million additional Classic Reward seats through new deals with Hawaiian Airlines, Finnair, Air France, KLM and Iberia.
Qantas Loyalty CEO Andrew Glance said: 'These adjustments will ensure we can continue to invest in enhancing the program for the long term and continue to grow the levels of Classic and Classic Plus Reward seat availability for members year on year.'
The value per point is better in premium cabins than in economy.
Daniel Sciberras, from Point Hacks - a guide to maximising frequent flyer points and credit card bonus offers – told Daily Mail the changes were fair when put into context.
'No-one likes to see points go up, but the last time Qantas increased their points cost was back in June 2019, so that's a good six years ago now,' he said.
'I don't think they're unreasonable increases because they're in line with the two to three per cent inflation increase every year.
'A lot of these frequent flyer changes get a lot of heat because they don't go up at all for a number of years, then they do one big increase.'
Mr Sciberras claimed there was a good reason for infrequent increases.
'I think part of that is IT issues. They're very complex in the way these programs are set up, so that's why I suspect they don't change them frequently,' he said.
'It's a lengthy process when they change the figures.'
Mr Sciberras said the changes to the program didn't affect the strategy Aussies should use to get the most out of their points.
'You'll still get the best bang for your buck by redeeming your points for long-haul international premium seats,' he said.
'That will always get you more value than redeeming points for an economy flight between Sydney and Melbourne.'
Before this week's changes, one Qantas Point for Classic Rewards translated to around two cents for economy flights and eight cents for business flights.
The Qantas Frequent Flyer program has more than 16.5million members and is Australia's largest loyalty program.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
3 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Kmart is hit with bombshell claims it mislead customers about the horrific place it sourced clothing
Retail giant Kmart is facing accusations it misled customers on its ethical credentials by sourcing clothing supplies from factories in China with links to slave labour. An Australian-based Uyghur group has filed a lawsuit against the outlet in the Federal Court, seeking to gain documents so they can see whether it knowingly sourced stock from suppliers who used forced labour from those in the ethnic group. In its ethical sourcing statement, Kmart said it aimed to provide products that respected human rights according to its ethical sourcing code which committed to abiding by international standards, including guidelines set out in the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights. The lawsuit filed by the Australian Uyghur Tangritagh Women's Association claims Kmart included on its 2024 and 2025 factory lists two suppliers with links to the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region. It said this region in China's west has been well- documented for 'systemic state-sponsored forced labour and other atrocities against Uyghur and other Turkic Muslim people '. The group wants proof from Kmart that it has abided by its ethical sourcing promises regarding these suppliers and whether its public statements have been misleading or deceptive. Kmart must ensure it is not profiting off forced labour in China, association president Ramila Chanisheff said. 'We're demanding answers from Kmart so we know whether its actions live up to its words about addressing forced labour risks in its supply chain,' she said. The retailer risks a legal claim that it breached Australian Consumer Law by misleading and deceptive conduct if documents show it had failed to monitor the risk of it using forced labour in its supply chain. Maurice Blackburn principal lawyer Jennifer Kanis said the firm was using this first-of-its-kind case to bring real accountability to Australian retailers. 'Kmart tells customers that it supports ethical sourcing and the protection of human rights - but we know there are credible links between two of its factories and suppliers and the use of Uyghur forced labour in Xinjiang,' Ms Kanis said. Human Rights Law Centre associate legal director Freya Dinshaw said the case highlighted the weaknesses in Australia's laws when members of the public are left to take companies to court on suspicions of modern slavery. Unlike the United States, Australia has not banned imports of products made in the Xinjiang region, instead opting for a transparency approach which requires businesses to report annually on their actions to identify and address slavery risks.
Telegraph
3 hours ago
- Telegraph
The Daily T: Can private schools survive Labour?
Since Labour's controversial 20% VAT on private school fees has taken effect, over 50 private schools have closed, with many more at risk. The policy was meant to raise billions to hire new teachers, but The Daily Telegraph 's exclusive analysis reveals it may have the opposite effect. In today's episode of The Daily T, Tim Stanley and Cleo Watson speak to Julie Robinson, CEO of the Independent Schools Council, about how schools are shutting their doors, the impact on SEND pupils, and how the wealthiest families are avoiding the tax altogether by paying fees up front. And why is everyone talking about Sydney Sweeney and… her jeans? The White Lotus star is making headlines after a new American Eagle campaign and revelations that she's a registered Republican - and now even President Donald Trump is getting involved.
The Guardian
4 hours ago
- The Guardian
Hundreds of jobseeker payments cancelled illegally by government IT system, watchdog finds
The legality of the system designed to penalise jobseekers has been thrown into doubt after the commonwealth ombudsman found a government department's automatic system unlawfully cancelled payments. The ombudsman has found 964 jobseekers had their payments unlawfully cancelled between April 2022 and July 2024 by the automated IT system that underpins the targeted compliance framework (TCF) system. TCF is designed to make sure jobseekers meet requirements such as attending meetings with an employment provider and applying for jobs to continue to receive their payments. Payment cancellations have been paused since January after the government found a further 1,326 people had financial penalties 'applied incorrectly' due to an IT issue. On top of this, 45 people had their payments illegally cancelled because the system continued to operate in error. On Wednesday, the ombudsman found the payments had been cancelled unlawfully and recommended the government continue to pause cancellations until the it could review the legality of the entire TCF system. The ombudsman, Iain Anderson, said he investigated cancellations where public servants working at the Department of Employment and Workplace Relations had failed to consider individual circumstances before cancelling a payment as laid down by law. 'They were just automating the cancellation without considering the individual circumstances of the jobseeker and whether it was appropriate to cancel the payment or not,' he told Guardian Australia. 'The target compliance framework itself has been very problematic in that regard.' Anderson said that in 2022 DEWR was also meant to put in a 'digital protection framework' to ensure jobseekers were treated fairly, but the department had failed to do so. Anderson said the secretary of DEWR, Natalie Jones, needed to be 'completely confident' the system was working properly before the cancellations resume. 'The targeted compliance framework has had a number of different problems, and so the secretary of DEWR needs to do much more than simply look at the unlawful cancellation issue. 'They need to be really certain that the entire target compliance framework is going to comply with the law and be fair.' He said there were also concerns as to whether the suspension of payments, which happens in tens of thousands of cases each month, was legal. 'We have some concerns as to whether the suspension process is happening fairly and reasonably,' he said. On top of this, Guardian Australia understands a Deloitte report into the IT system that underpins the TCF has found that it is not functioning within the proper legal frameworks. The Deloitte report – which has yet to be published – recommends overhauling the TCF's IT system to ensure that the suspension or cancellation of payments is done legally. The Greens have called for the government to abolish the TCF and release the report. 'It is clear that the TCF is an expensive hangover from a conservative government which has been heartlessly prolonged by this Labor government for far too long,' senator Penny Allman-Payne said. The DEWR is also conducting a legal review to examine the way decisions are being made under the legislation. The Ombudsman will continue to investigate the TCF with another report due out later in the year.
