Karnataka tables new bill to regulate crowds at events after stadium stampede
The bill was tabled in the Assembly on Wednesday, over two months after the stampede at Bengaluru's Chinnaswamy Stadium on June 4, which resulted in 11 deaths and multiple injuries, news agency PTI reported.
(Also Read: Bengaluru to get India's 2nd largest stadium: ₹1,650 crore project with 60,000 seats)
What does the Bill propose?
According to the proposed legislation, any individual or group intending to organise an event or function likely to attract a large crowd must first obtain permission from the jurisdictional authority.
The level of permission required depends on the estimated crowd size. If the gathering is fewer than 7,000 people, the officer in charge of the local police station may grant permission after due inquiry.
For crowds exceeding 7,000 but fewer than 50,000, the Deputy Superintendent of Police (DySP) has the authority to approve the event. In cases where the expected crowd is over 50,000, the jurisdictional Superintendent of Police or the Commissioner of Police must provide the necessary clearance, also following a detailed inquiry.
The bill lays out strict penalties for violations. Anyone who organises, attempts to organise, or abets the organisation of an unpermitted event could face imprisonment for a term ranging from a minimum of three years to a maximum of seven years, a fine of up to ₹1 crore, or both. Further, anyone who disturbs or attempts to disturb the order of a crowd at any event, whether through spreading rumours, making provocative statements, causing a breach of peace, or inciting collective violence or property destruction, may be punished with up to three years of imprisonment, a fine of ₹50,000, or both.
In the event of a crowd disaster that results in loss of life or property, those responsible could face even more serious consequences. If the incident leads to injuries, the punishment ranges from a minimum of three years to seven years in prison.
If it results in fatalities, the penalty would be a minimum of ten years in prison, which may extend to a life sentence. Additionally, anyone who disobeys or encourages others to disobey the lawful directions of a police officer of sub-inspector rank or above, particularly instructions to disperse from a gathering, will be liable to a fine of ₹50,000, along with mandatory community service for one month.
Once passed, all offences under this Act will be considered cognisable, non-bailable, and triable by a Judicial Magistrate First Class.
(Also Read: Bengaluru woman falls for 'Kerala lottery' trap, loses ₹11.8 lakh to scammers posing as cops)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
30 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
‘Fear of another u-turn by Nitish': Kanhaiya on Modi govt's CM-PM removal bills
In a dig at Bihar CM Nitish Kumar and his majority partner BJP, Congress leader Kanhaiya Kumar said on Thursday that the Modi government's recent bills in Parliament, which propose new norms for removing leaders arrested on serious charges, were aimed at preventing BJP allies like Nitish from 'making yet another about-turn'. Congress leader Kanhaiya Kumar was at a press conference as part of Rahul Gandhi-led 'Voter Adhikar Yatra' in Bihar.(PTI File) He named Andhra Pradesh CM Chandrababu Naidu, too, as one such ally in the BJP-led NDA. The BJP, which does not have a Lok Sabha majority on its own, remains in power at the Centre with the support of Nitish Kumar's JDU and Naidu's Telugu Desam Party (TDP). Kanhaiya was speaking at a press conference in Lakhisarai as part of Leader of the Opposition Rahul Gandhi's 'Voter Adhikar Yatra'. 'The BJP is sending a signal to Nitish ji that 'if you try to do yet another about turn, we will frame you in some case, keep you behind bars for 30 days and get you sacked'. All his MLAs of the JDU will then be bought over and made to sing 'Narendra Modi zindabad',' he said. Union home minister Amit Shah on Wednesday moved a trio of bill in the Lok Sabha, which seek to allow for removal of the prime minister, chief ministers, and other ministers if they are arrested on serious charges for a period of 30 days. The Opposition has pointed out that these bills speak of mere allegations, not requiring conviction by a court. They fear central probe agencies would arrested Opposition leaders and force them out using these rules. Kanhaiya said 'arrogance of power' made the BJP miss that if these bills become law, 'they will hit the BJP hard once it is out of power'. Earlier, Congress ally RJD's Tejashwi Yadav made similar assertions. 'They are bringing this for Nitish Kumar and Chandrababu Naidu. They have only one job – to blackmail. If PMLA is slapped in ED cases, there can be no quick bail. These are torture tactics.' (with PTI inputs)
The Hindu
30 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Bill passed to seize properties derived from illegal mining
The Legislative Assembly passed the Karnataka Appointment of Recovery Commissioner for Seizure and Attachment of Property of Illegal Mining and Proceeds of Crime Bill, 2025, on Thursday, which seeks to appoint a recovery commissioner to seize and attach properties derived from illegal mining activities. The Bill said a serving or retired officer, not below the rank of Additional Chief Secretary, would be appointed as the recovery commissioner to supervise recovery proceedings. The Bill said the recovery commissioner shall issue directions to subordinate officers for the timely enforcement of attachment or forfeiture orders, receive complaints from individuals, and recommend further legal or criminal action where necessary. The Bill also provides the recovery commissioner with powers similar to those of a civil court, and ensures that officers cannot be prosecuted for acts done in good faith. The House passed the Karnataka Traditional Migratory Shepherds (Welfare Measures and Protection Against Atrocities) Bill, 2025, for registration and identification of traditional migratory shepherds and to establish a fund for implementing welfare schemes for shepherds. The Karnataka Lifts, Escalators and Passenger Conveyors (Amendment) Bill, 2025, was passed to ensure trust-based governance for ease of living and doing business. It aimed to comply with the modifications specified in the Central Electricity Authority (measures relating to safety and electric supply) Regulations, 2003. The Basavanabagewadi Development Authority (Amendment) Bill, 2025, was passed to include the representing MLC as part of the whole of the Basavanabagewadi, whose territory lies within the limits of the authority, as a member of the authority.
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Centre's ban on real-money gaming apps: Why enforcing it won't be easy
A nationwide blanket ban on real-money gaming (RMG) platforms in India is now all but certain after The Promotion and Regulation of Online Gaming Bill, 2025, was passed by the Rajya Sabha on Thursday, August 21, by means of a voice vote. The passage of the Bill took a little over an hour. The Lok Sabha had cleared the Bill on Wednesday. It will become law once it receives the President's assent. The Bill seeks 'to prohibit the offering, operation, facilitation, advertisement, promotion and participation in online money games,' targeting companies behind fantasy sports and card games that allow users to stake money for rewards with the risk of losses. The sweeping ban not only potentially puts an end to the legal cover secured by RMG firms through multiple court rulings but also marks a clear break from the past for the Indian government in terms of policy. The IT Ministry's earlier pro-industry rules had proposed a self-regulatory framework for online gaming in India, but implementation proved difficult amid concerns over the gaming industry policing itself. On the other hand, the provisions of the Bill pave the way for the promotion of e-sports as a legitimate competitive sport, alongside 'online social games' that may charge subscription or access fees, provided they do not involve stakes or wagers. However enforcing the ban on RMG platforms may prove challenging, as illegal betting sites and gambling apps have previously evaded restrictions by switching domains, using mirror websites, changing bank providers, using mule bank accounts, and relying on untraceable cryptocurrency wallets. As per the legislation, 'No person shall offer, aid, abet, induce or otherwise indulge or engage in the offering of online money game and online money gaming service,' failing which they could be imprisoned for up to three years and penalised Rs 1 crore. This would make it illegal for internet service providers (ISPs) and web-hosting services to support RMG platforms such as Dream11, Mobile Premier League (MPL), Winzo, etc. It would also force Apple and Google to remove such apps from their respective app stores. The legislation also prohibits banks and financial institutions from facilitating financial transactions on such promoting RMG platforms, such as social media influencers and celebrities, also face jail time of two years and a penalty of Rs 50 lakh. Social media platforms such as Instagram, YouTube, and X as well as communication apps, search engines, and any other form of media platform could also be held liable for failing to curb ads from RMG firms. To investigate offences under the legislation, the online gaming law empowers authorised officials to carry out search operations at physical and virtual places, even without a warrant. One of the main concerns is that banning all RMG platforms would drive players deeper into the dark web. 'The illegal market, currently estimated at over USD 100 billion annually, poses significant risks to tax collections and national security, exploiting payment channels like UPI mule accounts, hawala networks, and cryptocurrencies,' Kazim Rizvi, founding director, The Dialogue, told The Indian Express. 'Cutting off the legitimate RMG industry through prohibitive regulation will not curb such illicit activity, rather, it would drive players further into these shadow markets, amplifying fiscal losses and regulatory challenges,' he added. The cumulative size of illegal betting firms was estimated at Rs 8.2 lakh crore, according to a 2024 report by Think Change Forum, an independent think tank. Another report published by Digital India Foundation (DIF) in March 2025 found that four online gambling platforms – Parimatch, Stake, 1xBet, and Batery Bet – saw over 1.6 billion visits from Indian users in a span of three months. Online casinos, gambling and betting apps were deemed illegal as they were considered to be games of chance. Rummy games and fantasy sports apps were permissible as the courts had held that they were games of skill. However, the new law moves past this distinction as its provisions apply to all online money gaming platforms, irrespective of whether they are games of skill or chance. 'It wipes out domestic companies that the government could regulate, and opens the door for illegal offshore betting and gambling entities to exploit and defraud users further,' Meghna Bal, director of Esya Centre, opined. The new online gaming law suggests that RMG platforms will be blocked through orders issued under Section 69A of the IT Act, 2000, similar to the blocking of illegal betting and gambling sites. Last month, the IT Ministry informed Parliament that it has blocked 1,524 gambling and betting websites and mobile apps since 2022, using powers under the IT Act, 2000 and the IGST Act, 2017. However, prohibiting access to these platforms has been difficult as they use tactics such as: Domain switching: Offshore gambling websites frequently evade restrictions by switching domains to stay online. For instance, three different mirror websites of online betting platform Parimatch (such as and saw 266 million visits from Indian users over three months, as per the DIF report. 'Moreover, during account creation, we discovered that the same login credentials worked across multiple mirror sites,' it added. Mule bank accounts: These are bank accounts that are often rented from small vendors and may belong to unsuspecting individuals. Gambling platforms use such mule bank accounts to covertly move money and route it outside India. These accounts threaten to weaken the legislation's payment blocking provisions and risk penalising innocent account holders rather than the outlawed platforms themselves. Advanced digital marketing strategies: While popular influencers with more than a million or so followers may be easily identified and penalised under the new online gaming law, betting companies such as Stake reportedly promote their platform by relying on a network of micro and nano influencers who may be harder to trace. The law also does not make an exception for influencers or celebrities whose likeness has been used to promote RMG platforms without their consent. Direct communication: Direct calls or messages guiding users to specific URLs may also keep their services visible and accessible to Indian users despite the official ban. The government is expected to issue supplemental rules in order to operationalise the new online gaming law. A key area requiring clarity, according to Vikram Jeet Singh, Partner, BTG Advaya, is how websites and apps offering online money games will be identified. 'A game developer will always strongly argue that their game is not subject to the prohibition, for any number of reasons. If there is a dispute on whether an online game is an online money game, the government should clarify what authority (or court) will settle the dispute. There are 'in game purchases' available in most games, and it is not clear if these or other 'micro-transactions' in games are now prohibited,' he told The Indian Express.
