Quarter of employers planning to axe jobs as Rachel Reeves taxes hit
April saw Labour's increase on taxes for employers combined with global market uncertainty when President Donald Trump started dealing out tariffs. The perfect storm has drastically swayed hiring and firing decisions within businesses at large, a new survey has found.
One in four employers plan to make redundancies in the next three months and the number of employers planning to hire more people this summer has dropped to a record low only surpassed by the pandemic. The retail sector could be especially affected.
This is higher than the 21% recorded in Autumn. The Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development (CIPD) surveyed 2,000 businesses as part of its latest Labour Market Outlook report.
The report also found 27% of employers had a redundancy programme in the last 12 months and half offered enhanced packages above and beyond what the law requires. Employers with less than 250 workers were far more likely to offer the statutory redundancy pay.
Only one in 10 retail employers plan to increase staff levels over the summer while 30% expect a drop in staff numbers, reports the Express. Rachel Reeves' taxes were implemented as President Trump's tariffs came into play (Image: GETTY)
In response to these staggering figures, the CIPD is urging the government to 'consult with employers and business bodies to limit the potential impact the Employment Rights Bill could have on employer's hiring plans as businesses face mounting external pressures'.
James Cockett, senior labour market economist at the CIPD, said: 'It was always going to be a huge change for employers but they're operating in an even more complex world now.
'It's vital the government works closely with employers to balance the very real risk of reductions in investment in people, training and technology with their desire to reduce poor employment practice.'
Andrew Griffith MP, Shadow Secretary of State for Business and Trade, said: 'Alongside making families £3,500 worse off, Labour's Jobs Tax is crushing confidence, killing jobs, and pushing employers to the brink. Under Labour, the economy has flatlined and with businesses under mounting pressure, things can only get worse.
'This report only confirms what we hear daily from the shop floor to the boardroom: confidence has collapsed. Labour can't understand why, because their cabinet has zero business experience.' One in four employers plan to make redundancies before the year is up (Image: GETTY)
A Treasury spokesman told the outlet: 'In a period of global uncertainty this government is delivering stability for business. Trade deals with India and the US show the benefits of our cool-headed diplomacy.
'We have provided business rates relief, capped corporation tax, and are protecting the smallest businesses from the employer National Insurance increases. And we've now seen four interest rate cuts since July, making it cheaper for businesses to borrow.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
5 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Zelenskiy dons more formal attire for high-stakes meeting with Trump
By Steve Holland WASHINGTON (Reuters) -The last time Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelenskiy visited the White House, his dark military-style outfit drew scorn from U.S. President Donald Trump, who wears suits every day. Zelenskiy's garb at that February meeting featured in a disastrous session with Trump in which the two leaders bickered and the Ukrainian president was escorted out of the White House early, without lunch. On Monday, with his country facing pressure to accept a peace deal to end Europe's deadliest war in 80 years, Zelenskiy showed up for his talks with Trump wearing more formal attire. The black-on-black ensemble, sans tie, wasn't exactly a suit, but it seemed to please Trump all the same. A reporter who had asked Zelenskiy in February why he was not wearing a suit complimented the Ukraine leader on the attire he chose for his latest Oval Office session with Trump. "You look fabulous in that suit," the reporter said. Trump chimed in: "I said the same thing." This time, Zelenskiy got in a good-natured dig. "You're wearing the same suit," he told the reporter, drawing laughter. "I changed." The media-savvy Ukrainian leader had worn military-type outfits to show solidarity with the troops fighting Russian invaders since Moscow's 2022 full-scale invasion. But after the February meeting with Trump, Zelenskiy switched to a more formal wardrobe. When the two leaders met at Pope Francis's funeral in Rome in April, the Ukrainian president wore a heavy black field jacket and black shirt buttoned to the collar, with no tie. The negative focus on Zelenskiy's attire at the White House was widely criticized at the time by Ukrainians, who have largely rallied around their leader since Moscow's invasion. (Reporting By Steve HollandEditing by Colleen Jenkins and Alistair Bell)
Fast Company
6 minutes ago
- Fast Company
Trump wants to change voting. The Constitution was designed to protect it from people like him
President Donald Trump has big plans for redesigning the way states hold elections ahead of the 2026 midterms, calling for a nationwide end to mail-in ballots and voting machines on Monday. The U.S. Constitution stands in his way. In a new post on his social network Truth Social, Trump wrote that he was 'going to lead a movement to get rid of MAIL-IN BALLOTS' as well as voting machines, which he called 'Highly 'Inaccurate'' and 'Seriously Controversial.' 'ELECTIONS CAN NEVER BE HONEST WITH MAIL IN BALLOTS/VOTING, and everybody, IN PARTICULAR THE DEMOCRATS, KNOWS THIS,' Trump wrote without providing evidence supporting his claims. Presidents aren't given power over state election law. The 'Elections Clause' in Article I Section 4, leaves 'the times, places, and manner of holding elections' for the U.S. House and Senate up to the states, and only Congress is given power 'make or alter' these rules. Subscribe to the Design newsletter. The latest innovations in design brought to you every weekday Privacy Policy | Fast Company Newsletters Trump falsely claimed in his social media post on Monday that the U.S. is the only country with mail-in voting (at least 40 countries allow people to vote by mail), and he said he would sign an executive order ahead of next year's midterm election to make the changes. Eight states and Washington, D.C., allow for all-mail-in elections, and an additional 15 states allow for mail-in elections in some circumstances and jurisdictions, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures. Hollow legal ground Trump's apparent legal argument for having the power to end mail-in voting as president, as laid out in his post, is that states are 'merely an 'agent'' for the federal government in counting and tabulating votes, and the president is the ultimate authority of the federal government. 'They must do what the Federal Government, as represented by the President of the United States, tells them,' Trump wrote. Like his push for Texas to adopt new congressional districts that are gerrymandered to help Republicans, Trump's latest election proposals are about letting the president decide policy that's actually left up to the states, and giving the executive branch power to shape the legislative branch that was designed to act as one of its checks. Rather than a separation of powers, it's a consolidation.
Vox
8 minutes ago
- Vox
The serious trend behind MSNBC's silly new name
is a senior politics correspondent at Vox, covering the White House, elections, and political scandals and investigations. He's worked at Vox since the site's launch in 2014, and before that, he worked as a research assistant at the New Yorker's Washington, DC, bureau. Goodbye MSBNC, and hello 'MS NOW.' In an announcement that has triggered widespread befuddlement and mockery, the progressive cable news network is getting rebranded. The new name isn't meant to call to mind Microsoft or the honorific 'Ms.' Instead, in the style of congressional bill-naming, MS NOW is purportedly an acronym for the following mouthful: 'My Source for News, Opinion, and the World.' Underneath this seemingly silly story, though, are currents of major change — and fear — in the mainstream media. Today, Explained Understand the world with a daily explainer, plus the most compelling stories of the day. Email (required) Sign Up By submitting your email, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Notice . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply. Because both MSNBC and its fellow political news network CNN are meeting the same fate; they're being jettisoned by the big corporate bethemoths that currently own them. Those corporate behemoths — Comcast owns MSNBC, while Warner Bros. owns CNN — have legitimate business reasons for making this change. Each is offloading these political news channels, as well as various other cable networks, to a new separate company, called by some a 'SpinCo' (spin-off company) and by others a 'ShitCo' (no explanation needed). This is because cable news is viewed as a declining business. Yet there's another clear implication. President Donald Trump loathes both MSNBC and CNN, and his administration has been willing and eager to wage personal and political vendettas against their corporate owners. Take, for instance, how Paramount had to grovel before Trump because he was annoyed at Paramount-owned CBS. The Federal Communications Commission held up Paramount's merger deal until the company agreed to pay a $16 million settlement in a bogus lawsuit Trump had brought against 60 Minutes. So now, with these spinoffs, Comcast and Warner Bros. will no longer have to worry about being punished by the federal government for MSNBC and CNN's coverage. To be clear: Comcast's spin-off of MSNBC and other cable properties was already in the works before Trump won his second term. And there's obviously no political motivation behind Comcast ditching its other cable properties, like the USA Network, SYFY, Oxygen, the Golf Channel, CNBC, and E! (Comcast is keeping NBC News and Universal Studios.) But since Trump began his second term, the company's thinking has apparently evolved on one point: whether MSNBC can keep its name. Back in January, the new CEO of MSNBC's SpinCo, Mark Lazarus, said that MSNBC would keep its name after the spin-off. So the announcement Monday of the new MS NOW name was a change of plan. This would, of course, create more obvious distance between whatever 'MS NOW' is up to and the existing NBC media empire. CNBC, in contrast, will get to keep its name despite being spun off. We don't know whether that's because they're less likely to displease Trump, less likely to cause problems for NBC's brand, or some other reason. What we do know is that, this year, Trump has normalized the weaponization of the government against corporations who have displeased him with shocking speed. For now, at least, this has to be part of companies' strategic calculations. Placating the president is the new cost of doing business in the United States of America.
