BOJ warns US tariffs could hit firms' profits, delay capex plans
TOKYO (Reuters) -Profits of Japanese firms are likely to fall this year because of U.S. tariffs, leading them to downgrade capital expenditure plans, the central bank said on Friday, signalling caution over an expected hit to the export-dependent economy.
Automakers have swallowed the rising costs from the tariffs instead of passing them on to U.S. consumers, as seen in a fall of roughly 20% in export prices since April, the Bank of Japan said in a full version of its quarterly outlook report.
"This suggests Japanese automakers are averting price hikes that may lead to falling sales volume, at the cost of seeing profitability worsen," the BOJ added.
The hit to Japanese exports from U.S. tariffs will become clearer once global trade volume, now inflated by companies front-loading shipments to avert higher U.S. levies, turns down, the bank said.
"Due to such direct and indirect effect of higher U.S. tariffs, Japanese companies face an increasing chance of profit declines in the current fiscal year," it added.
There was a need to scrutinise how falling profits could affect firms' willingness to keep hiking pay, it said.
The BOJ said U.S. tariffs have yet to cause any major change in Japanese companies' plans for capital expenditure.
But past shocks of such scale have caused firms, many of which set spending at the start of Japan's fiscal year in April, to downgrade plans toward the latter half of the year, it said.
"Uncertainty surrounding trade policy could affect capital expenditure plans with a lag," it said.
In a summary of the outlook released on Thursday, the BOJ projected the economy to expand 0.6% in the current fiscal year, before growing 0.7% in 2026 and 1.0% in 2027.
U.S. President Donald Trump struck a trade deal with Japan last month that lowers tariffs on auto imports and spares Tokyo from punishing new levies on other goods.
Japan's auto sector, which accounts for more than a quarter of its U.S. exports, would see tariffs cut to 15% from 25% now, at an unspecified date. Duties set to take effect on other Japanese goods from August 1 were also cut to 15% from 25%.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
26 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
What's Next as Trump Tests India's Ties With Russia
By , Naomi Ng, and K Oanh Ha Save Never miss an episode. Follow The Big Take Asia podcast today. President Trump has been cranking up the pressure on India, a country the US has courted as a strategic counterweight against China. Last week, Trump announced a 25% tariff on the country, a higher rate than many other major economies in Asia. But he didn't stop there. This week, he's threatened to raise the levy even higher. His message to India is clear: Stop buying Russian oil.
Washington Post
an hour ago
- Washington Post
How India can win Trump's trade game
India desperately needs a trade deal with President Donald Trump — for both economic and strategic reasons. When rival Pakistan, with its far smaller economy, finalized an agreement first, it underscored just how badly India has misplayed its hand. India was among the first countries to enter trade negotiations with the Trump administration. Yet despite nearing an interim deal several times, there has been no breakthrough. And prospects for one have dimmed in recent weeks, with the president first slapping a 25 percent tariff on the country, then threatening further unspecified measures and 'substantially' higher tariffs if India does not stop buying Russian oil. The key to breaking out of this spiral? Recognizing that the holdup is political and personal, not economic. With those higher tariffs set to take effect as soon as Wednesday, some of India's most export-dependent industries — including gems, textiles, apparel and crude oil refining — are braced for pain. The pharmaceutical sector, a pillar of India's export economy, is also at risk. The tariffs could shave as much as 0.3 percentage points off India's GDP growth. Worse, they will make India less attractive as a manufacturing hub in a region where competitors such as Bangladesh, Pakistan and Vietnam have already secured more favorable trade terms with Trump. The mercurial Trump has made no secret of his frustration with the government of Prime Minister Narendra Modi. The original sin stems from the end of fighting between India and Pakistan in May, a welcome development that Trump claimed full credit for. Modi has repeatedly said that India's ceasefire decision was made without foreign influence — without mentioning Trump. That omission, along with India's refusal to halt Russian oil purchases despite U.S. pressure, has hardened Trump's stance. Contrast that with Pakistan's brazen diplomatic flattery, which included nominating Trump for a Nobel Peace Prize. 'The fact that India has been unwilling to publicly acknowledge … the president's role in bringing the India-Pakistan ceasefire to pass has really stuck in Trump's head,' Milan Vaishnav of the Carnegie Endowment told me. If it hopes to close the deal, India will have to provide Trump with some kind of symbolic 'win.' But Modi needs to tread carefully at home. He could probably close India's refineries to Russian oil without putting India's economy at risk, but acknowledging Trump's role in the ceasefire would be politically disastrous. Modi's carefully cultivated strongman image leaves little room for displays of deference. Opposition leader Rahul Gandhi jibed that Trump said 'Narendra surrender,' and Modi rolled over. A gifted politician, Modi will have to find a way to square that circle. There are other sweeteners India could offer Trump. Both countries have agreed in principle to increase bilateral trade to $500 billion annually, from the current $190 billion, by 2030. India had promised to slash duties on most U.S. imports, in exchange for a 15 percent tariff on its exports into the United States — a competitive rate compared with Vietnam's 20 percent and Pakistan's 19 percent. India also agreed to increase imports of American natural gas to close its $45.7 billion trade surplus with the U.S. But Trump is said to have pushed hardest for opening India's agriculture sector, and that's where the domestic politics become truly daunting. Nearly 44 percent of India's workforce depends on agriculture, and Modi is haunted by a year-long farmers' protest in 2020 and 2021 that forced his government to repeal key farm reforms. The Hudson Institute's Aparna Pande told me that Modi may be hoping to push any agriculture concessions past the October elections in the state of Bihar. Expect him to try to hold the line on agriculture while offering concessions elsewhere. Some possibilities: India could sweeten the deal on pharmaceutical imports, the backbone of the U.S.-India trade relationship, by offering to lower or even eliminate its 10 percent tariff on American pharmaceutical products. It could also pledge to increase purchases of American energy and defense equipment. On energy, India might eliminate the existing 2.5 percent import duty on American liquefied natural gas — just as it has already done in deals with the United Arab Emirates and Australia. Such a move would not only boost U.S. energy exports but also provide a stark contrast with China, which continues to impose a 15 percent tariff on U.S. gas imports. Opportunities abound on defense as well. Despite long-standing security cooperation with the United States, India has not yet made procurement pledges in this round of negotiations. But during Modi's U.S. visit in February, he announced plans to buy Javelin anti-tank missiles and Stryker combat vehicles, as well as finalize the purchase of P-8I maritime patrol aircraft. Advancing these plans and committing to new defense acquisitions would undoubtedly help to placate Trump. Navigating Trump's shifting trade demands has proven challenging for Modi. It will be difficult, but not impossible, for him to concede enough without alienating his domestic base. Modi has long made the case to voters that only he could successfully manage India's relationships with great powers. Time for him to prove it.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Brazil, Japan beef talks focus on smaller Brazilian states, upsetting industry
By Ana Mano and Marcela Ayres SAO PAULO (Reuters) -Ongoing talks to open the Japanese market to Brazilian beef are focusing on supplies from three small Brazilian exporting states, upsetting other parts of the South American country's industry that are eager to reach the high-paying customers, according to multiple sources. Brazil, the world's biggest beef exporter, has tried for two decades to crack the Japanese market without success. A deal would give Japan an alternative to its top suppliers, the United States and Australia, at a time when U.S. tariffs are reshaping global food trade. Negotiations gained momentum after a state visit of Brazil's President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva in March to Japan, one of the world's largest beef importers. But the current state of talks, which focus on states representing less than 4% of Brazil's exports by volume, worries meatpackers in the big beef-producing states of Sao Paulo, Mato Grosso, Mato Grosso do Sul, and Para. Together, they accounted for nearly 60% of Brazil's total beef exports, or 1.72 million metric tons last year. A Brazilian government memo, issued after a technical visit by Japanese officials in June, showed Brasília answered "a questionnaire for the import of beef from the southern part of the Republic Federation of Brazil," naming Rio Grande do Sul, Parana, and Santa Catarina. Those three small exporting states were declared free of foot-and-mouth, a contagious viral disease in cattle, earlier than the other states, although Brazil acquired in May the national status of being free of the disease without vaccination from the World Organization for Animal Health. Brazil's last outbreak of the disease was in 2006, according to the government. The Brazilian Agriculture Ministry did not have an immediate comment on its talks with Japan. A local government source, who asked not to be named, confirmed talks were taking place by region. The person said Brazil initially has no plans to negotiate permits beyond the three states. Beef sector representatives, including exporters, told Reuters they hope more states will be included. "We know talks are difficult," said Paulo Mustefaga, head of beef lobbying group Abrafrigo, which represents Marfrig and smaller beef exporters. "The surprise for us is that this is now moving towards approval for only three states." Japan's Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries said it was aware of Brazil's status of being free of foot-and-mouth disease. It added that Japan is "conducting a risk assessment in accordance with Japanese procedures" ahead of issuing any export permits to Brazilian meatpackers, without elaborating. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
