Julianne Moore on her children's book being restricted at DOD schools: ‘It is a great shock'
Actor Julianne Moore says she is surprised that schools overseen by the Department of Defense Education Activity have apparently decided to pull her children's book 'Freckleface Strawberry' amid an ordered review of educational content.
'It is a great shock for me to learn that my first book, 'Freckleface Strawberry,' has been banned by the Trump Administration from schools run by the Department of Defense,' Moore wrote Sunday in a post on Instagram.
Amid the review, the department has also reportedly pulled at least two other children's books: Kathleen Krull's biography of Ruth Bader Ginsburg, 'No Truth Without Ruth,' and Amy Ellis Nutt's 'Becoming Nicole.'
The DOD Education Activity notified parents with children in these schools that these books were pulled due to a review focusing on materials related to gender and equity ideologies, according to The Guardian.
A spokesperson for DOD Education Activity told The Hill the department is reviewing its current policies and instructional resources in light of recent executive orders from President Trump and Department of Defense guidance.
'At this time, we are conducting a review — no materials have been permanently removed from our school libraries pending completion of the review. During this period, materials under review will have access limited to professional staff,' according to a statement from the department.
Moore wrote in her Instagram post that 'Freckleface Strawberry' is a semi-autobiographical story about a 7-year-old girl who does not like her freckles but later accepts them when she realizes that she is different 'just like everybody else.'
'It is a book I wrote for my children and for other kids to remind them that we all struggle, but are united by our humanity and our community,' the 'May December' star added.
'I can't help but wonder what is so controversial about this picture book that caused it to be banned by the US Government,' Moore said. 'I am truly saddened and never thought I would see this in a country where freedom of speech and expression is a constitutional right.'
Last month, the Department of Education dismissed 11 complaints regarding book bans that it had received during the Biden administration.
The department announced at the time it was ending former President Biden's 'book ban hoax,' saying the complaints about book removals were 'meritless' and based 'upon a dubious legal theory.'
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
13 minutes ago
Gracie McGraw marks Pride Month, celebrates identity as 'out and proud queer, bisexual woman'
Gracie McGraw is proud to be who she is. The eldest daughter of country music superstars Tim McGraw and Faith Hill spoke out in an Instagram story post Tuesday, refuting recent headlines that claimed she was coming out after re-sharing posts in support of Pride Month. "Hello all!! It has come to my attention that some tabloids have taken an Instagram story I posted yesterday and have used it as click bait saying I've 'come out,'" the 28-year-old wrote. "Let me be VERY clear here….. I've been an out and proud queer, bisexual woman and I wouldn't have it any other way," she continued. "I have and will always be very vocal about my support of LGBTQIA+ rights and the community, but thank you so much to these tabloids for shedding light that it's pride month!!!" Pride Month has been celebrated every June since at least 1970 and spotlights the lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer/questioning, intersex, and asexual communities and their ongoing fight for equal rights. "So many people out there don't have the support, love, or understanding from their families when it comes to their sexuality or gender identity, but just know that there is a beautiful community out there that loves you and cares about and for you!!" Gracie McGraw wrote in her message Tuesday. "Check on your people and keep safe out there. Give love to each other." Gracie McGraw is the oldest of three and has two younger sisters, Maggie McGraw, now 26, and Audrey McGraw, who is 23. Their parents -- Tim McGraw and Hill -- married back in October 1996.
The Intercept
21 minutes ago
- The Intercept
How the FBI Sought a Warrant to Search Instagram of Columbia Student Protesters
Newly unsealed records provide new details about the Trump administration's failed effort this spring to obtain a search warrant for an Instagram account run by student protesters at Columbia University. The FBI and federal prosecutors sought a sweeping warrant, the records show, that would have identified the people who ran the account along with every user who had interacted with it since January 2024. Between March 15 and April 14, the FBI and the Department of Justice filed multiple search warrant applications and appeared numerous times before two different judges in Manhattan federal court as part of an investigation into Columbia University Apartheid Divest, or CUAD, a student group. A magistrate judge denied the application three times in March, a decision which a district court judge later affirmed in April. 'It is unusual for a magistrate judge to reject a search warrant application from the government.' 'It is unusual for a magistrate judge to reject a search warrant application from the government,' said F. Mario Trujillo, a staff attorney at the Electronic Frontier Foundation. 'And it is even more unusual for the government to try and appeal that decision to a district court judge, who again rejected it. That speaks to the lack probable cause in the warrant application.' The records — which include transcripts of hearings with the judges as well as the government's filings — provide a rare blow-by-blow of the search warrant application process, which, in line with normal procedure, was initially conducted under seal. The materials were unsealed on Tuesday as part of a court action originally filed by the New York Times in May, which The Intercept supported. Columbia University and CUAD did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The government first sought a search warrant on March 15, the records show. The Times previously reported that the Department of Justice sought the search warrant after a top official, Emil Bove, ordered the department's civil rights division to find a list of CUAD's members. For a month, the government argued to judges that a March 14 post on Instagram from @cuapartheiddivest — the group was banned from Instagram in late March for violating community standards — was a 'true threat' against the university's then-interim president Katrina Armstrong in violation of federal law. The post referred to the university's use of the New York Police Department to break up campus demonstrations and the targeting of student activists by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. Screenshot from the government's application for a search warrant targeting the Instagram account of Columbia University Apartheid Divest. Source: Court filing 'The people will not stand for Columbia University's shameless complicity in genocide!' reads the post, in part, next to a photo of graffiti spray-painted onto a Manhattan mansion used as the president's housing at Columbia. 'The University's repression has only bred more resistance and Columbia has lit a flame it can't control. Katrina Armstrong you will not be allowed peace as you sic NYPD officers and ICE agents on your own students for opposing the genocide of the Palestinian people.' 'FREE THEM ALL' reads the graffiti in the photo, alongside an inverted triangle, a much-disputed symbol that pro-Palestine protesters in the U.S. and around the world have used. Hamas, the militant group that ruled the occupied Gaza Strip, has also used the inverted triangle to identify bombing targets, the FBI agent — whose name was redacted — wrote in an affidavit accompanying the search warrant application. The FBI agent wrote that the photograph of the graffiti and message in the Instagram post were sufficient probable cause of an 'interstate communication of a threat to injure, in violation of' the law. Read our complete coverage The argument, made in multiple hearings over the following weeks, failed to convince two judges. Reviewing the initial application, Chief Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn determined it was a 'close call' and asked for more information about the 'symbolism and context of the posting,' according to a letter from the government. On March 16, Netburn denied the search warrant application, finding the post 'seemed like protected speech' under the First Amendment, the government letter said. The Justice Department quickly appealed the rare denial of a search warrant application. 'Because Judge Netburn's ruling significantly impedes an ongoing investigation into credible threats of violence against an individual, prompt reversal is necessary,' wrote Alec C. Ward, a trial attorney in the Justice Department's civil rights division, in a March 20 letter to a district court judge. Following hearings on March 24 and March 25, which largely concerned the Justice Department's procedural missteps, District Court Judge John Koeltl referred the search application back to Netburn. During a March 28 hearing, Netburn denied the request for a search warrant application once again. Netburn criticized the government for failing to 'clearly represent what the case law is' around the First Amendment and threats. 'Words that may reflect heated rhetoric, in the context in which they are made would not reasonably engender fear, do not constitute a true threat,' Netburn said, ruling that the government hadn't met its burden to establish that the triangle symbol 'in the context here and in the context of the statement that the president of Columbia University will not have peace, is a true threat, as the law identifies.' The government also hadn't indicated whether Armstrong, the interim Columbia president, herself actually interpreted the statements as threatening, which binding precedent from the U.S. Supreme Court requires. 'We have not had an opportunity to put that question directly to Ms. Armstrong at this point,' Ward told Netburn. The FBI had flagged the post to Armstrong's office, Ward said at the hearing, 'conveying its belief that the threat should be taken seriously from a security standpoint.' Ward compared the post to burning a cross outside a residence, which is not protected speech under the First Amendment, saying the two were not 'exactly equivalent' but still comparable as 'symbolic threats.'
Politico
29 minutes ago
- Politico
Karine Jean-Pierre is leaving the Democratic Party. Her former White House colleagues have some thoughts.
Karine Jean-Pierre's announcement that she's leaving the Democratic Party — timed with the rollout of a new book — has detonated long-simmering grievances among her former White House colleagues about Jean-Pierre's pursuit of celebrity and personal media exposure while serving as then-President Joe Biden's press secretary. The attention-grabbing ploy lit up Democratic and Biden alumni texting groups and reignited frustrations that burned for years about Jean-Pierre, according to seven former Biden administration officials granted anonymity to describe private conversations. One former official recalled that Jean-Pierre had joked about becoming an independent even while on the job in the Biden White House, an off-key comment for someone ostensibly serving as a major messenger for the Democratic Party. Another former official said that Jean-Pierre had begun working during the Biden administration with a New York-based publicist and had copied that person on official emails before some of Jean-Pierre's White House colleagues intervened. 'Everyone thinks this is a grift,' the first former official said of Jean-Pierre's book project. As Biden's press secretary, Jean-Pierre's halting, ineffectual briefings exasperated reporters and routinely offered material for the Republican Party's main account on X. She frustrated colleagues throughout the West Wing for focusing on raising her own profile while leaving the hands-on management of media relations and the White House press shop to other aides. While it's unclear how she will portray Biden or her time in the White House in the book, titled 'Independent: A Look Inside a Broken White House, Outside the Party Lines,' several former colleagues expressed confusion at how Jean-Pierre seemingly intends to paint Biden as a victim while pinning her own decision to leave the party on his 'broken' White House. The teasing of the book project by the Hachette imprint stated that Jean-Pierre will offer her view of the three weeks of turmoil following Biden's miserable debate last summer that culminated with him dropping his reelection bid, a result the book's promotional material blames in part on 'a betrayal by the Democratic party.' Jean-Pierre's former staffers offered withering criticism of what they see as an opportunistic grift. 'She made a joke about being an independent last year and now it's a book. All ideas are monetary — even the dumb ones,' said one of the former staffers. Caitlin Legacki, a Democratic strategist who worked in the Commerce Department's communications shop during Biden's term, also took issue with the book's apparent premise. 'Kamala Harris and the entire Biden/Harris campaign did hero's work to avoid losing 400 electoral votes and giving Republicans a supermajority in Congress, which is what would have happened if he stayed on the ticket,' she said. 'It's more productive to focus on that, and thank Biden for doing the responsible thing by stepping aside, than it is to pretend this was an unwarranted act of betrayal.' Democrats, Legacki continued, should shift their focus to the effects of Republican's 'Big Beautiful Bill, which she said would have been even more drastic had Biden remained on the ticket and bolstered the GOP's numbers in Congress. 'People will literally die because of Republican Medicaid cuts. Kids will go hungry because of SNAP cuts,' she said. 'The only reason we stand a chance to reduce the harm inflicted is the Democratic Party did the right thing here. It's completely nuts to be more upset that the Party didn't prioritize Joe Biden's ego and keep him on the ticket than to thank god we averted complete and total disaster.' A New York-based publicist, Gilda Squire, worked informally with Jean-Pierre while she was in the White House and was, on multiple occasions, copied on official emails before staffers raised the issue, another former official said. Squire previously served as publicity director for HarperCollins Publishers and also did PR for Penguin Putnam Publishing, according to her LinkedIn. And Jean-Pierre was the subject of several lengthy profiles in lifestyle publications, including Vogue and Women's Health and traveled to New York to appear on The View. According to two of the former officials, Jean-Pierre had been hoping for a post-White House job as a co-host on the show, following the template of her predecessor, Jen Psaki, who departed the job after just more than a year for an anchor job at MSNBC. But no such opportunity materialized for Jean-Pierre, a factor three of her former colleagues surmised that likely led to the book. Neither Jean-Pierre nor Squire responded to a request for comment. While a number of former colleagues kept their comments private, Jeremy Edwards, who served in the press shop under Jean-Pierre, posted a succinct response to her book project on X: 'lol.' Jean-Pierre wouldn't be the first press secretary in recent years to turn against her boss or former colleagues. Stephanie Grisham, who served as press secretary during President Donald Trump's first term, authored a 2021 book detailing her experience in the White House and how Trump often berated her. But whereas Grisham was never allowed to brief at the podium, Jean-Pierre was the public face of the administration for two and half years. One Democratic operative who worked with Jean-Pierre prior to her White House tenure called the sudden turnabout 'the most grift-y thing I've seen in a long time, and that's saying something in Washington.' 'SHE was the public face telling us all that this White House was on track and that Biden was amazing. And now she doesn't even want to be a Democrat????' one of the former Biden White House officials said via text. 'She's making herself the middle ground here when Republicans hate her. She's not in any position to be a connector of our two party system and assuming she could be is just ego.'
