logo
Jason Blum on Those Big Budgets for Horror Movies and Why ‘Sinners' Is the Exception to the Rule

Jason Blum on Those Big Budgets for Horror Movies and Why ‘Sinners' Is the Exception to the Rule

Yahoo12-06-2025
Blumhouse founder Jason Blum has an axe to grind when he hears people say Ryan Coogler's 'Sinners' is not a horror film. Admittedly, the movie is a genre-bending period film and folk fable about the roots of blues music, but it's got vampires killing people in it, so it's a horror movie. And Blum wants you to know it.
'Sinners'' box office success — $350 million worldwide to date — has defied expectations for what an original horror film can do, and even though Blum didn't make it, it's good for his business when the genre as a whole thrives. But much of the discussion around that movie before its release was its hefty budget — a reported $90 million — that complicated its path to profitability. For Blum, he's built his empire on movies made on the cheap that can still be marketed as events, break out in a big way, and spawn franchises. But as Blumhouse has scaled up and the demand for horror has increased, Blumhouse can't make movies as modestly, and the industry too runs into challenges to continue to make horror movies work financially.
More from IndieWire
'Titan: The OceanGate Disaster' Review: A Surface-Level Netflix Documentary About the Submersible Implosion Heard Around the World
Tom Cruise Has Never Been Happy with His Breath-Defying Underwater Scenes, So 'Final Reckoning' Went Three Times Bigger
Blum on Tuesday took the stage in Hollywood at a press event called The Business of Fear, in which he and a panel of Blumhouse and Atomic Monster associates discussed box office trends for the genre and how horror has evolved over the years, such that the genre 'horror' can't be viewed so narrowly. IndieWire asked him about 'Sinners,' a movie he says is 'one of my favorite horror movies I've seen in a long time,' and why he felt 'Sinners' was the rare exception to the rule about making horror movies work on such a massive scale.
'We are definitely not interested in doing movies with that size a budget. That said, I'm glad they had the budget that they had because I think it really helped make the movie rich and incredible and amazing; but we are not going to make horror movies at that level anytime soon, maybe ever,' Blum said in the panel discussion. 'The bigger the budget, the more strain on the creative and the more sanding down of edges. And I think, generally speaking, 'Sinners' being the exception, the product is less interesting. So we are committed to lower budgets to continue to be able to take creative risks and do interesting things, which I think is harder to do when you have more money.'
Blumhouse, following its merger with James Wan's Atomic Monster, has scaled up significantly such that it needs to have 'major studio-level success,' as Blum puts it. That means $100 million+ movies, which even for Blum and Wan is rare for movies made for just $1 million. He acknowledges that an indie like last year's 'Longlegs' pulled off the feat, and films like 'Terrifier 3' came dang close, Blum said today 'it's much harder to do what we started doing 15 years ago.'
'So the way that we've addressed that is by adding a bit of money to our model; but still, by studio standards, for instance, the budgets of our movies are 60 percent off the average sticker price, actually probably more, 75 percent off, the average sticker price,' Blum said.
Blumhouse has five remaining movies on its slate for 2025, all of them sequels, including 'M3GAN 2.0,' 'Five Night's at Freddy's 2,' a new 'Conjuring' movie, 'The Black Phone 2,' and 'Mortal Kombat 2.' At the event, Blumhouse also announced it's in development on 'Ma 2,' with Octavia Spencer set to return. But it's threading a needle in finding original properties that someday can be the next major franchise for Blumhouse.
Together with Atomic Monster it's branching out into video games, an exciting growth area to tell other horror stories, but Blumhouse president Abhijay Prakash explained that they're positioned to adapt one of those games into a film should one break out, though that wasn't the reason it launched the division. Blumhouse also announced at the event it will be adapting another indie horror game hit, 'Phasmaphobia.'
Blum is also staying true to the company's philosophy about finding good stories, things that are genuinely scary, rather than trying to stack them with stars or buzzy directors and figure out the rest later. IndieWire asked Blum about a recent viral video from Charli XCX in which she pitched the idea of a 'Final Destination' movie starring all 'It Girls,' and directed by Coralie Fargeat for good measure. Blum hadn't seen the video, but he'd want to hear a bit more.
'Generally, I am not a fan, I think no one on this panel is, of reverse-engineering movies. You never get a good result,' he said. 'It's how, unfortunately, the vast majority of movies are made, but it's very hard to get a good movie reverse-engineering it.'
Blum added the studio is unlikely to again release a movie day-and-date in theaters and on Peacock as it did with 'Five Nights at Freddy's' but won't be repeating with the sequel. Horror works best in the theater, not at home, and it's the reason the genre has consistently grown in popularity and still hasn't reached its peak. He says it will lead to movies that are one day constructed very differently for theatrical than they are for streaming — not just a difference in quality or budgets — and horror is very equipped for that evolution.
'Horror, in my mind, is the only genre that you just can't get what you are going to see a horror movie for at home on TV. It doesn't work,' he said. 'The only way to be really scared is when your phone is not with you and when you are in a dark room with a lot of other people and you are fully focused on a movie. You guys try it. Watch a horror movie on streaming, and when you know a scare is coming, look away for two seconds and look back. It stops working. It's just, your suspension of disbelief is broken, and when you are leading that up to a scare, you are just not scared. It's actually made horror in cinema stronger.'
Best of IndieWire
Guillermo del Toro's Favorite Movies: 56 Films the Director Wants You to See
'Song of the South': 14 Things to Know About Disney's Most Controversial Movie
Nicolas Winding Refn's Favorite Films: 37 Movies the Director Wants You to See
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Denzel Washington: ‘I'm Not That Interested' in Winning Oscars
Denzel Washington: ‘I'm Not That Interested' in Winning Oscars

Yahoo

time16 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Denzel Washington: ‘I'm Not That Interested' in Winning Oscars

Denzel Washington has adopted a post-Oscars mentality after spending decades in the Hollywood machine. The two-time Academy Award winner said during a recent appearance 'Jake's Takes' while promoting his latest film 'Highest 2 Lowest' that awards don't mean that much to him. 'I've been at this a long time, and there's times when I've won, shouldn't have won, didn't win, should have won,' Washington said in the below video. 'Man gives the award, God gives the reward. I'm not that interested in Oscars.' More from IndieWire How 'Night Always Comes' Cracks Action Sequences Wide Open 'Dry Leaf' Review: Alexandre Koberidze's Latest Is Low-Resolution and Hard Going And he isn't even that big of a fan of the two he already has: 'People say, 'Well, where do you keep it?' I say, 'Next to the other one,'' he said of his pair of Oscars. 'I'm not bragging. I'm just telling you how I feel about it. On my last day, it ain't going to do me a bit of good.' Washington won Best Supporting Actor for 'Glory' in 1990 and Best Actor for 'Training Day' in 2002. He has also been nominated for his work in 'Cry Freedom' (1987), 'Malcolm X' (1992), 'The Hurricane' (1999), 'Flight' (2012), 'Fences' (2016), 'Roman J. Israel, Esq.' (2017), and 'The Tragedy of Macbeth' (2021). He was notably snubbed in 2024 for 'Gladiator II.' Washington's 'Malcolm X' lose has since been deemed by many as one of the biggest Academy snubs of all-time (Al Pacino won the Best Actor award for 'Scent of a Woman' instead in 1993). Washington previously told Esquire that, after losing for 'Malcolm X,' he asked his wife Pauletta Washington to start voting in his place for the Academy Awards. 'I went through a time then when [my wife] Pauletta would watch all the Oscar movies — I told her, I don't care about that,' he said. ''They don't care about me? I don't care. You vote. You watch them. I ain't watching that.' I gave up. I got bitter. My pity party.' Washington has also been outspoken about his 'Gladiator II' and 'American Gangster' auteur Ridley Scott never having won Best Director. 'Ridley is overdue,' Washington told The Hollywood Reporter. 'How can he not have won an Oscar? That doesn't even make sense. I don't believe it, actually.' Washington also told 'BBC Radio 1' that Scott not having an Oscar is proof that the Academy can't do their 'job' recognizing deserving talent. 'Would you tell somebody how can this man not have an Academy Award? Do your job,' he said. 'I mean seriously, though. … Believe me, and I'm not talking out a turn, he doesn't give a…' Washington's frequent collaborator Spike Lee, who directed the actor in both 'Malcolm X' and 'Highest 2 Lowest' among many other films, previously said, 'We don't do our work for awards, which are nice, but it's the work that is going to stand above all awards.' Best of IndieWire Guillermo del Toro's Favorite Movies: 56 Films the Director Wants You to See 'Song of the South': 14 Things to Know About Disney's Most Controversial Movie Nicolas Winding Refn's Favorite Films: 37 Movies the Director Wants You to See

Kimchi, burrito bowls, KFC: People love sneaking food into movie theaters. Here's why you should stop
Kimchi, burrito bowls, KFC: People love sneaking food into movie theaters. Here's why you should stop

San Francisco Chronicle​

timea day ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

Kimchi, burrito bowls, KFC: People love sneaking food into movie theaters. Here's why you should stop

Bottles of wine. Chipotle burrito bowls. Entire buckets of Kentucky Fried Chicken. Bay Area movie theater owners and managers have some wild stories about things patrons have snuck into cinemas — whether it's because of seemingly high prices, the thrill of breaking the rules or just someone's twisted and very specific desire to eat a Taco Bell Crunchwrap Supreme while watching 'Sinners.' 'I'll catch them with drinks or snacks, and I'm like, 'Really?'' Buck says. 'If you bring your own bowl to our theater, it costs $4 to fill it with popcorn. And you can bring a really big bowl.' Chronicle restaurant critic MacKenzie Chung Fegan recently wrote about the strange trend of people bringing outside food into restaurants — a masterful exploration of the social contract with a side of egg salad. It got me thinking about my personal red line: Never bring outside food into an independent movie theater. My hatred of outside food in the theater solidified during my 18 years as a Chronicle movie critic, when I would often go to advance screenings, filled by people who won radio contests. As if the free tickets weren't enough, many brought their own full dinners. (I'll never forget the woman who pulled out a Ziploc bag full of kimchi, and as the lights went down, started eating it with her fingers.) The concession stand prices can seem to justify the crime. The AMC Metreon in San Francisco sells a large popcorn for $11.79. Red Vines are $6.99, more than triple the cost of an identical box an escalator ride away at Target. (Independent theaters often have better deals, like the Cameo's bring-your-own-bowl $4 popcorn special. The Grand Lake Theater's popcorn prices range from $5 to $7, with real butter.) Truth be told, I hauled a Matson cargo ship worth of candy into theaters as a child, and in college wore a trenchcoat in summer weather so I could smuggle burritos for me and two friends into 'Days of Thunder' at the Fremont Theatre in San Luis Obispo. Let he who is free of Skittles in his pockets cast the first stone … And yet as a journalist, I've written too many stories about historic Bay Area theaters going full 'The Last Picture Show' and closing forever. Others seek non-profit models, GoFundMe campaigns and personal debt to stay afloat. If you love movies this should feel personal. And when it feels personal, paying $6.50 for a diet soda should feel less like robbery and more like a carbonated civic act. My first call is to Allen Michaan, who owns the Grand Lake Theater in Oakland and has been managing theaters since Aug. 16, 1972, when he took over the Rialto in Berkeley. 'The food subsidizes the operations of the theater,' Michaan begins, before giving a lesson in cinema economics. Theaters give between 50% and 65% of ticket sales back to the studio, with the blockbuster films that fill theaters all summer usually on the higher end of that range. And some studio films require a minimum length in theaters. If they bomb, theater owners are stuck with near-empty rooms. 'The remainder (of ticket revenue) is not enough to cover the operations of the theater,' Michaan said. 'We absolutely rely on the food sales to get us into the black.' For Cameo-owner Cathy Buck, being in the center of Wine Country has meant Wine Country problems. 'Before we had our beer and wine license, we used to have full wine bottles all the time in the theater,' she said. Michaan's darkest years just passed. For decades, a KFC was across the alley from his theater. 'We used to have people try to sneak in Kentucky Fried Chicken, which was always smelly and a mess,' he said. 'Thankfully the chicken place isn't next to the Grand Lake any more. Now it's a Starbucks.' When considering outside food, I place the corporate multiplexes in a different category. What you do there is between you and your god. But everyone I've met who runs an indie movie theater is hustling, and no one is getting rich. Michaan lost money on the Grand Lake for years — I wrote about it in 2010 — subsidizing the theater with his successful auction and antiques fair businesses. If there's an owner who is using those $6 boxes of Junior Mints to fund a stable of race horses, I haven't met her yet. However, one recent trend is combatting the outside food urges: better movie theater menus. The Alameda Theatre near my home partners with the adjacent Cinema Grill to offer movie-themed food and drink specials that align with what's playing. (Currently serving: 'The Human Torch,' a Fireball/Rumchata drink for the new 'Fantastic Four' movie.) The Balboa and 4-Star in San Francisco, both run by Cinema SF, have better beer selections than some local bars. The New Mission in San Francisco and New Parkway in Oakland have particularly robust menus; the Parkway's Peruvian tacos with slow-roasted pork and a pineapple-cabbage slaw are the best thing I've consumed in a movie theater. Buck offers her foodie clientele all-local fare, including partnerships with wineries, two different chocolatiers and two companies providing gelato. Her plans for the new 'Downton Abbey' movie out next month are a galaxy away from the Dune popcorn bucket. 'We're serving bubbles, English breakfast tea, both hot and cold, two kinds of tea sandwiches and two kinds of scones,' Buck said. 'We only have five seats left.' And though theater owners would prefer you hit the concession stand, they also say they're not aggressive about enforcing the outside food policy. 'We're not a police state about it,' Michaan said. In fact his biggest outside food problem, decades ago at a theater in Menlo Park, came from a manager who took the policy too strictly, at one point interrogating a couple with a small child. 'She made them pour out the formula in the baby's bottle, because it was outside food,' Michaan said. 'And I fired her! I mean, it's possible to take these things too far.'

The Slow Death of the Contemporary Art Gallery
The Slow Death of the Contemporary Art Gallery

Hypebeast

time2 days ago

  • Hypebeast

The Slow Death of the Contemporary Art Gallery

The contemporary art gallery as we know it is dying. In cities like New York and Los Angeles, dedicated spaces that once buzzed with foot traffic and formal openings are now struggling with rising rents and changing expectations. The old model, where a gallery does everything for its artists, feels like it's falling apart. Big gallery chains, the ones built on endless art fairs, multiple cities and huge rosters of artists, are losing their grip. Last month, Tim Blum announced he would close his Blum & Poe galleries in L.A. and Tokyo and even stop plans for a new one in Tribeca. He was blunt about the reason: 'This is not about the market. This is about the system,'he told ARTnews, pointing out that collectors have more power than ever to negotiate. His decision echoes a wider feeling across the industry with many giving up on the idea of building giant gallery empires. You can see this shift happening at major events. The latestArt Baselconfirmed that galleries are showing more mid-priced work, not just the massive, ultra-expensive pieces they once counted on. A recentreport from Art Basel and UBSshowed that while the overall art market shrank last year, the number of actual sales went up. It's a clear signal that the business is no longer just about a small group of big spenders, it's now about reaching a wider audience at lower price points. 'The old model was built on scarcity and prestige. The new one runs on access and attention.' A significant force behind this change is the shifting demand for different types of art. The once-dominant 'blue-chip' artists, masters whose work commanded staggering prices, are no longer the only game in town. Collectors are increasingly turning their attention to 'red-chip' artists, a new class of talents whose value is built on viral hype and cultural relevance rather than institutional endorsement. These artists are attractive for two main reasons: their work is often more accessible and affordable, and it brings fresh, diverse cultural perspectives that feel relevant and exciting to a global audience. This hunger for new voices and unconventional methods is reshaping the market. A key example isOlaolu Slawn, a London-based artist who sold out his solo show,I present to you, Slawn, at the Saatchi Yates gallery in 2024 by creating and selling 1,000 individual, more accessible pieces, an approach that challenges the fine art world's focus on scarcity and prestige. A separate but related trend sees celebrities entering the art market with their own work, often commanding high prices based on their fame. Actor Adrien Brody is a notable example. His art, which he described is about celebrating the little nuances in life has sold for significant amounts, as per a convo withInterview Magazine. For instance, a painting he created of Marilyn Monroe was sold at a Cannes gala auction for $425,000 USD, illustrating how star power can directly translate into commercial value. However, his work has drawn sharp criticism from the industry, with critics often labeling it as kitschy and derivative. One critic writing forARTnewsdescribed his work as having a 'faux naïve aesthetic' and 'mediocre production value,' while others have accused him of cheaply appropriating the styles of Jean-Michel Basquiat and Andy Warhol. As the old guard shrinks, smaller galleries are finding new ways to thrive. In New York,Tiwa Galleryshows self-taught artists in a relaxed space, rejecting flashy Landddcombines Latin American crafts with immersive events. In L.A.,Marta galleryblends art and design right into everyday life. These new spaces care more about quiet, genuine connection than putting on a spectacle. Retail is also becoming a new kind of gallery. Stores like South Korea's Gentle Monster and London's Dover Street Market are blurring the lines between art and commerce, transforming shopping into an immersive cultural experience. Gentle Monster's stores are famous for their fantastical, ever-changing installations, from surreal kinetic sculptures to robotic figures that draw in visitors who are just as interested in the art as they are in the eyewear. Dover Street Market, founded by Comme des Garçons's Rei Kawakubo, is a 'beautiful chaos' where each brand and artist is given a dedicated space to create a unique installation, turning the store into a constantly evolving exhibition. By blending high-end retail with cutting-edge art and design these spaces offer a new kind of public access to creativity, making the gallery experience a part of a commercial transaction rather than a separate cultural outing. 'If your space is fueled by DJs and cocktails, maybe it isn't really a gallery anymore.' It's clear that going to a gallery is no longer the only way to see or buy art. Today, buyers can just scroll on their phones and purchase work directly from studios or social media. This instant access has replaced the slow dance of white-cube shows and champagne previews. Some galleries are trying to keep up, creating online art drops and hosting pop-ups in different retail spaces. But others are pushing back, as one veteran gallerist puts it: if your space is fueled by DJs and cocktails, maybe it isn't really a gallery anymore. Art isn't disappearing. It's just moving, becoming more accessible and less tied to one physical location. The old model was built on scarcity and prestige. The new one runs on access and attention. The question isn't whether galleries will survive, but which ones can change fast enough to matter.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store