logo
Hunger-striking women demand Israel return the body of Palestinian activist killed in settler clash

Hunger-striking women demand Israel return the body of Palestinian activist killed in settler clash

Independenta day ago
Nearly two dozen Bedouin women, enrobed in black, sat on the floor of a modest hut that baked under the desert sun of the Israel i-occupied West Bank. The room was quiet, the women still.
The women are on a hunger strike to call for Israeli authorities to release the body of a beloved community leader killed during a clash with a Jewish settler last week. They say they will continue until the man's remains are returned for burial in his hometown of Umm al-Khair.
Witnesses said Awdah Al Hathaleen was shot and killed by a radical Israeli settler during a confrontation caught on video. Israeli authorities said they would only return the body if the family agrees to certain conditions that would 'prevent public disorder.' The villagers say those include limiting attendance for a funeral that would normally draw hundreds and burying him at night in a nearby city.
'We want him to be buried here in Umm al-Khair and have a respectable funeral without any conditions. What did we do to deserve this treatment? We did nothing," said his mother, Khadra Hathaleen, 65, who is among the dozens of women, aged 15-70, from the village who are on strike.
The hunger strike, in its sixth day Tuesday, marks a rare public protest by a group of Bedouin women accustomed to mourning in private. Their move reflects their anger over Awdah's death as well as what they perceive as Israel's attempt to dictate unreasonable conditions that violate their customs, beliefs, and right to the land beneath them.
But beyond that, they say they have been forced to speak up after repeated settler attacks and Israeli raids have targeted their husbands, sons and fathers. Adding to their outrage, the settler suspected in the shooting, Yinon Levi, was quickly released by an Israeli court from his house arrest.
Their story won an Oscar, but their suffering continues
The plight of Palestinians in this area of the West Bank, known as Masafer Yatta, was featured in 'No Other Land,' an Oscar-winning documentary about settler violence and life under Israeli military rule.
Al Hathaleen, a political activist and an English teacher, was a contributor to the film and close friend of its Palestinian co-directors.
It documents life in a region where Jewish residents are building new settlements and expanding old ones on hilltops ringing Palestinian villages — all while Israeli military bulldozers arrive frequently to demolish Palestinian homes they say amount to illegal construction. Palestinians say its nearly impossible to secure Israeli permits to build on their lands.
Four Palestinians have been killed by settlers this year, according to UN data.
Witnesses said that the confrontation that led to Al Hathaleen's death began after settler excavators began digging on village land. Some Palestinians threw stones after one excavator injured a young man from the village, witnesses said. The Israeli military said that during the confrontation Palestinians hurled rocks at an Israeli civilian, who opened fire toward the 'terrorists.'
Levi, a well known settler who is under international sanctions for violence toward Palestinians, was briefly arrested last week. He was quickly freed from house arrest, with a judge ruling there was no proof that Levi fired the fatal bullets.
Video shot by a Palestinian witness showed Levi firing a gun twice and tussling with a group of unarmed Palestinians. In the footage, Levi accused the group of throwing rocks at him. It did not show where his shots landed.
But residents said that he fired the bullet that hit Al Hathaleen in the chest, and that no one else in the encounter was armed.
Israeli military and police did not respond to requests for comment on who else could have fired the fatal shot. Levi could not be reached for comment; multiple calls to his phone went unanswered.
Since the killing, Israeli forces returned to the village and arrested 18 men. Villagers said at least one remains in jail — the hunger strikers are also demanding his release.
A feeling of complete vulnerability
On Monday, a week after Al Hathaleen was killed, Levi was back within eyesight of the village, the sound of his excavators pummeling the ground audible from the hut where the hunger-striking women sat.
To Sara Hathaleen, it was a reminder of the village's vulnerability.
'They come at 2 o'clock or 3 o'clock in the morning,' said the 39-year-old, who is Al Hathaleen's sister-in-law. 'It's like a horror, because we hear their cars and we know that they are coming for us. We don't know who will be next, or who they will take next.'
Most of Umm al-Khair's residents are related — some closely, some distantly — and nearly all share the surname Hathaleen. Al Hathaleen and his wife use an alternate spelling.
Sara Hathaleen said her own husband, Aziz, was detained by Israel after the killing and released Tuesday.
'We want to have a voice and to take part,' she said. 'The men are hurt by settlers or taken by the army, put in prison, and are not available.'
Three of the women on strike — Al Hathaleen's mother, sister and widow — have needed medical attention, according to Sara Hathaleen.
Israeli military and police did not respond to requests for comment on the strike.
Demanding to be heard
Myassar Hathaleen, 32, sat in the fasting hut with the other women. Since she stopped eating, her breast milk has dried up and she wakes at night to her infant crying to be breastfed.
Her brother, Hamid, was arrested the day Al Hathaleen was killed and he has not yet been released.
'We're striking because the world needs to wake up,' said Myassar. 'We don't want to make any problems. We just want to live in justice, and in silence."
Hanady Al Hathaleen, 24, said that she will settle for nothing less than a proper burial for her husband in his hometown.
'Awdah was killed here because he was resistant, in his own way,' she said. 'He was killed here and he must be buried here. The land of Umm al-Khair drinks from his blood.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Diane's husband was killed by a reckless driver - the wait for justice was almost as painful
Diane's husband was killed by a reckless driver - the wait for justice was almost as painful

Sky News

time22 minutes ago

  • Sky News

Diane's husband was killed by a reckless driver - the wait for justice was almost as painful

Diane Gall's husband, Martyn, had been out on a morning bike ride with his friends on their usual route one winter morning in November 2020 - when he was killed by a reckless driver. Diane and her daughters had to wait almost three years for her husband's case to be heard in court. The case was postponed three times, often without warning. "You just honestly lose faith in the system," she says. "You feel there's a system there that should be there to help and protect victims, to be victims' voices, but the constant delays really take their toll on individuals and us as a family." The first trial date in April 2022 was cancelled on the day and pushed four months later. The day before the new date, the family were told it wasn't going ahead due to the barristers' strike. It was moved to November 2022, then postponed again, before eventually being heard in June the following year. "You're building yourself up for all these dates, preparing yourself for what you're going to hear, reliving everything that has happened, and it's retraumatising," says Diane. 'Radical' reform needed Diane's wait for justice gives us an insight into what thousands of victims and their families are battling every day in a court system cracking under the weight of a record-high backlog. There are 76,957 cases waiting to be heard in Crown Courts across England and Wales, as of the end of March 2025. To relieve pressure on the system, an independent review by Sir Brian Leveson last month made a number of recommendations - including creating a new division of the Crown Court known as an intermediate court, made up of a judge and two magistrates, and allowing defendants to choose to be tried by judge alone. He said only "radical" reform would have an impact. 4:32 But according to exclusive data collected for Sky News by the Law Society, there is strong scepticism among the industry about some proposed plans. Before the review was published, we asked 545 criminal lawyers about the idea of a new tier to the Crown Court - 60% of them told us a type of Intermediate Court was unlikely to reduce the backlog. "It's moving a problem from one place to another, like moving the deck chairs on the Titanic. It's not going to do anything," says Stuart Nolan, chair of the Law Society's criminal law committee. "I think the problem with it is lack of resources or lack of will to give the proper resources. "You can say we need more staff, but they're not just any staff, they are people with experience and training, and that doesn't come quickly or cheap." Instead, the lawyers told us creating an additional court would harm the quality of justice. Chloe Jay, senior partner at Shentons Solicitors, agrees the quality of justice will be impacted by a new court division that could sit without a jury for some offences. She says: "The beauty of the Crown Court is that you have two separate bodies, one deciding the facts and one deciding law. "So the jury doesn't hear the legal arguments about what evidence should be excluded, whether something should be considered as part of the trial, and that's what really gives you that really good, sound quality of justice, because you haven't got one person making all the decisions together. "Potentially in an intermediate court, that is what will happen. The same three people will hear those legal arguments and make the finding of guilt or innocence." The most striking finding from the survey is that 73% of criminal lawyers surveyed are worried about offences no longer sitting in front of a jury. Casey Jenkins, president of London Criminal Court Solicitors' Association, says this could create unconscious bias. "There's a real risk that people from minority backgrounds are negatively impacted by having a trial by a judge and not a jury of their peers who may have the same or similar social background to them," she says. "A jury trial is protection against professional judicial decisions by the state. It's a fundamental right that can be invoked." Instead of moving some offences to a new Crown Court tier, our survey suggests criminal lawyers would be more in favour of moving cases to the magistrates instead. Under the Leveson proposals, trials for offences such as dangerous driving, possessing an offensive weapon and theft could be moved out of the Crown Courts. 'Catastrophic consequences' Richard Atkinson, president of the Law Society, says fixing the system will only work with fair funding. "It's as important as the NHS, it's as important as the education system," he says. "If it crumbles, there will be catastrophic consequences." Ms Jenkins agrees that for too long the system has been allowed to fail. "Everyone deserves justice, this is just not the answer," she says. "It's just the wrong solution to a problem that was caused by chronic, long-term under-investment in the criminal justice system, which is a vital public service. "The only way to ensure that there's timely and fair justice for everybody is to invest in all parts of the system from the bottom up: local services, probation, restorative justice, more funding for lawyers so we can give early advice, more funding for the police so that cases are better prepared." Government vows 'bold and ambitious reform' In response to Sky News' findings, the minister for courts and legal services, Sarah Sackman KC MP, told Sky News: "We inherited a record and rising court backlog, leaving many victims facing unacceptable delays to see justice done. "We've already boosted funding in our courts system, but the only way out of this crisis is bold and ambitious reform. That is why we are carefully considering Sir Brian's bold recommendations for long-term change. "I won't hesitate to do whatever needs to be done for the benefit of victims." The driver that killed Diane's husband was eventually convicted. She wants those making decisions about the court system to remember those impacted the most in every case. Every victim and every family.

District attorneys says Alabama teen killed by police had grabbed a gun
District attorneys says Alabama teen killed by police had grabbed a gun

The Independent

time2 hours ago

  • The Independent

District attorneys says Alabama teen killed by police had grabbed a gun

A district attorney said Wednesday that an Alabama police officer who fatally shot a teenager in the back was justified in his use of deadly force because the youth grabbed a gun after struggling with the officer. But the teen's family questioned that conclusion and said they have many unanswered questions about what had happened. Jefferson County District Attorney Dany Carr announced that no charges will be brought against the officer who shot and killed Jabari Peoples, 18. Peoples was shot on June 23 by a police officer in a parking lot in Homewood, an affluent suburb near the city of Birmingham. Peoples and a friend had been parked in the parking lot. Carr said an officer had approached the car at about 9:30 p.m. and attempted to detain Peoples because of suspected marijuana in the car. The officer attempted to put handcuffs on Mr. Peoples 'for officer safety' after noticing a gun in the car door but a struggle ensued, Carr wrote. He said Peoples then ran back to his vehicle and grabbed a gun. 'At the time of the shooting, Mr. Peoples had the gun in his right hand and the officer fired one shot, hitting Mr. Peoples in the left side of the back causing injury that ultimately caused his death,' Carr wrote in a statement. Carr made the announcement immediately after showing the family body camera footage of the shooting. The footage has not been released to the public. But a family member said they were only shown a short clip that was hard to see and want additional information. 'I have so many unanswered questions, still. Today, what I saw on this video, my brother was afraid. He was scared. He was running for his life,' Angel Smith, People's sister, said. Smith said her brother could be heard saying, 'Sir, I promise I'm not trying to resist.' Ben Crump, an attorney representing the family, said they want full transparency. He said the police department should release all of the available video. 'We want exactly what you would want if this was your son that was shot in the back running away from the police,' Crump said. Homewood Police Chief Tim Ross did not immediately return an email seeking comment. Groups have staged regular protests in Homewood since the shooting, criticizing the police department's refusal to show the video to family members. Carr made the decision to show the video to family members after the Alabama Law Enforcement Agency turned its findings over to his office. Peoples was a 2024 graduate of Aliceville High School in the city of the same name, about 100 miles (160 kilometers) west of Homewood.

Palestine Action supporters claim they are the 'moral backbone' of the UK and that hundreds of them are ready to swarm police ahead of protests this weekend
Palestine Action supporters claim they are the 'moral backbone' of the UK and that hundreds of them are ready to swarm police ahead of protests this weekend

Daily Mail​

time4 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

Palestine Action supporters claim they are the 'moral backbone' of the UK and that hundreds of them are ready to swarm police ahead of protests this weekend

Palestine Action supporters have boasted that they are the 'moral backbone' of Britain as hundreds prepare to swarm the police this weekend. At least 500 activists are set to join a demonstration at Parliament Square this Saturday, in which they will hold signs saying 'I oppose genocide, I support Palestine Action'. It has fuelled fears of a 'mass arrest' event, with police and No 10 confirming this week that anyone who supported the newly proscribed terror group would be arrested. But yesterday Tim Crosland, co-founder of Defender Our Juries, which is organising this weekend's protest, said he was 'proud' of those who had signed up to show support for Palestine Action, calling them 'the moral backbone of this country'. He told Times Radio that arresting peaceful protesters was a waste of police time. 'I think the spectacle of police resources, a police service that's under immense pressure, that doesn't answer phone calls for burglaries, that they're dragging retired priests and teachers into police vans for holding up signs,' he said. 'It's an appalling waste of funds.' Last week, Palestine Action won permission to challenge the ban after the High Court ruled it had an arguable case. A judicial review will take place in November. Until then, the ban remains in place. It means that membership of, or support for, Palestine Action is a criminal offence punishable by up to 14 years in prison, under the Terrorism Act 2000. But Mr Crosland also told an online press conference yesterday afternoon that there would be continued demonstrations in support of the group until the judicial review had concluded. He said he had been 'hearing from thousands of people wanting to take part in this action'. 'It feels like there's huge energy behind it,' he added. 'By November, we hope that this crazy law is struck down and we don't need to campaign against it anymore.' The Met has said the protests had 'the intention of placing a strain on the police' - something organisers have denied. But Mr Crosland claimed the police were in 'disarray' over the ban, with forces from across the country taking differing approaches to protesters, with some not taking action against peaceful demonstrations. There have already been 200 arrests at protests organised by Defend Our Juries since the ban came into force last month. However, Mr Crosland claimed no one had yet been charged, adding that there was 'a sense' that no one would be until the appeal had been heard. The former government lawyer said Defend Our Juries had received legal advice that claims against the police 'for unlawful arrest and for trespass to people's property' could be possible if the High Court rules in Palestine Action's favour. Mr Crosland said Defend Our Juries had written directly to Home Secretary Yvette Cooper and Met Chief Sir Mark Rowley ahead of this weekend's protests, but had yet to receive a response. However, he said the group had received a 'nice letter' from Lord Hermer last October in relation to their Free Political Prisoners campaign, in which the Attorney General said he 'would love to meet'. 'Unfortunately, it wasn't quite the right time back then, and it seems still not to be quite the right time, but he did send us a nice letter,' Mr Crosland added. Prison bosses have initiated emergency measures for a possible influx of arrested demonstrators this weekend amid concerns that some jails are close to full. A Met Police spokesperson said: 'We are aware that the organisers of Saturday's planned protest are encouraging hundreds of people to turn out with the intention of placing a strain on the police and the wider criminal justice system. 'The Met is very experienced in dealing with large-scale protests, including where the protest activity crosses into criminality requiring arrests. 'While we will not go into the specific details of our plan, the public can be assured that we will have the resources and processes in place to respond to any eventuality. 'Our officers will continue to apply the law in relation to Palestine Action as we have done since its proscription. 'Anyone showing support for the group can expect to be arrested.' The move to ban Palestine Action came after two Voyager aircraft were damaged at RAF Brize Norton in Oxfordshire on June 20, which police said caused about £7 million worth of damage. Home Secretary Yvette Cooper announced plans to proscribe Palestine Action three days later, saying the vandalism of the planes was 'disgraceful' and the group had a 'long history of unacceptable criminal damage '.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store