BJP MP Baijayant Panda leads Group 1 delegation to meet Indian Ambassador in Algeria
Algiers [Algeria], May 31 (ANI): Group 1 of the all-party Indian parliamentary delegation, led by Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) MP Baijayant Panda, met with India's Ambassador to Algeria, Dr Swati Vijay Kulkarni, as part of their diplomatic visit to the country.
The delegation arrived in Algeria on May 30 and is scheduled to depart on June 2. The visit comes in the aftermath of the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack in Jammu and Kashmir, which claimed 26 lives, including that of a foreign tourist.
The Group 1 delegation, led by Baijayant Jay Panda, Member of Parliament and former Minister, includes senior parliamentarians and officials such as Dr. Nishikant Dubey, S. Phangnon Konyak, Rekha Sharma, Asaduddin Owaisi, Satnam Singh Sandhu, Ghulam Nabi Azad, and former Foreign Secretary Harsh Vardhan Shringla.
This leg of the diplomatic outreach follows earlier visits to Bahrain, Kuwait, and Saudi Arabia, as part of Operation Sindoor--India's global initiative to counter terrorism and mobilise international support in the wake of the Pahalgam attack.
According to the Embassy of India in Algiers, the delegation will focus on countering cross-border terrorism, with special emphasis on Pakistan-sponsored terrorism, and aims to deepen bilateral and multilateral cooperation between India and Algeria on counter-terrorism intelligence and strategy.
Before arriving in Algeria, the delegation spent two days in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, where they held extensive discussions with senior government officials, policy think tanks, media representatives, and the Indian diaspora. Baijayant Jay Panda told ANI that the talks were open and candid, particularly on the challenge of terrorism.
'Saudi Arabia has a policy of zero tolerance towards terrorism, like us. Prime Minister Narendra Modi's visit to Saudi Arabia following the Pahalgam attack and the joint statement by both governments made it clear that there is no tolerance for any kind of terrorism,' Panda said.
He also highlighted the strengthening ties between India and Saudi Arabia in defence, counterterrorism, and trade, describing Saudi Arabia as a major regional power. The delegation also visited Diriyah, a UNESCO World Heritage Site known for its traditional mud-brick architecture.
The visit is part of India's broader Operation Sindoor, launched on May 7 to target terror camps linked to multiple terror groups following the Pahalgam attack.
The parliamentary delegation's mission underscores India's firm resolve to combat terrorism in all its forms and manifestations and build stronger international partnerships to address this global menace. (ANI)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
5 minutes ago
- Business Standard
We've leased every aircraft available globally; nothing left: Air India CEO
Amid persistent supply-chain disruption and sluggish plane production rates, Air India has exhausted the global secondary aircraft leasing market, having already taken all planes currently suitable and available, the airline's chief executive officer & managing director, Campbell Wilson, told Deepak Patel in an interview in New Delhi. Besides, even as Gulf carriers push for more flying rights to and from India, Wilson made it clear that bilateral entitlements should only be expanded where there is strong point-to-point demand. He also discussed a range of other key issues – from the Air India's fleet modernisation timeline and the push for India to build its own global hubs, to the operational and financial impact of Pakistan's airspace closure, lingering travel sentiment after Operation Sindoor, the burden of increased user development fees on business-class passengers, and Air India's calibrated approach to starting operations from Navi Mumbai airport. Edited excerpts: You had mentioned last year that Air India Group, which has about 300 planes in its fleet, will have a fleet of about 400 by 2027. Is that assessment still on track or has anything changed? It is generally on track. When Air India was privatised, the airline was itself operating around 70 aircraft. Air India Express (Air India's low-cost airline subsidiary) had about 25 planes. So, in total, there were less than 100 planes at the time. Today, the Air India group has about 305 planes. Obviously, from the 570 aircraft that we have ordered (since 2023 from Airbus and Boeing), a lot of deliveries are yet to come. Whether or not we have 400 aircraft, plus or minus a couple, really depends on the pace of those deliveries – that would be in the hands of Airbus and Boeing, not ours. But yes, it will be very much in that ballpark. You have spoken quite strongly against granting more bilateral rights to certain locations (such as West Asian hubs). It's been a concern for many years. How does Air India see the government's present stance on this matter? What should the government keep in mind while deciding to increase the bilateral rights with any country? India has entered into many liberal, and, in some cases, open-sky agreements with countries in North America, Australasia and Europe. And they are driven by equality of opportunity. That is a key principle to bear in mind. There are large populations and traffic flows on both sides. Competition is what should then drive the agenda. Where such a balance isn't there, there need to be other considerations. What is the benefit that accrues to India? I think the most important thing to bear in mind is aviation as a catalyst for economic and social development. Every flight brings employment opportunities, not just directly but also indirectly. The connectivity that aviation brings facilitates business across sectors. It brings tourism, the people that travel through an airport, connecting through an airport, giving value to the local economy, even if they are not really setting foot on local soil. That whole ecosystem needs to be fostered in India for India's benefit. At present, when people are hubbing (travelling via hubs) through other places, most of the economic benefit is accruing to where the hub is located. So, our effort at Air India is to bring more of that economic benefit to Indian soil, not just for us, but for Indian business, Indian society, Indian employment and Indian skills and development. That's the key thing to bear in mind. Do you mean it makes sense for the government to increase bilateral rights, or have an open-sky policy where there is substantial point-to-point traffic? Yes, and I think the evidence shows that is the case. You and IndiGo have placed significant aircraft orders. Do you think it is the right time for Airbus or Boeing to establish their final assembly line in India? I think that's probably a question for them rather than us. We would certainly welcome more OEM (original equipment manufacturer) presence in India, whether it is to facilitate the repair of components or even the manufacture of components – more skills that are readily available. The import process, and the taxation process of getting things into and out of India, add some time and cost which we would rather not incur. So, the more operating base of aircraft is in India, the more case there is for people to domicile themselves in India. That takes us back to my point about the spin-off benefits of having a strong aviation industry in India – our size and scale are a trigger for these people to want to base themselves in India and enjoy the advantages of skilled labour, cost competitiveness, and the like. Will modernisation of narrow-body aircraft fleet be completed by the end of this year? Yes, more or less. We are about 68 per cent complete right now. By the end of this year, minus a couple of planes, the upgrade should be complete. The caveat is that we decided to extend the life of 13 narrow-body aircraft which were supposed to be retired; those planes' modernisation will spill over into next year. The modernisation of wide-body aircraft has started. It is scheduled to be completed by 2027. Is that on track? About 35 per cent of our wide-body fleet is currently what we will call 'modern' – both the A350 aircraft that we took, the B777 planes that we took, and a couple of B777 aircraft we refreshed (upgraded). Through the course of this year, we will continue with the refresh programme for the B777s, and we will commence the full refit of the B787s. That refresh programme – because they are big aircraft and we cannot ground them all at the same time for obvious reasons – will last well into 2027. The pacing is driven not only by the fact that we cannot ground everything at once, but also the supply and certification of seats, particularly first- and business-class seats. Those (seat-supply issues) have proved more challenging to get completed than anyone had expected, including the manufacturers. So, that upgrade programme is a little bit later than we would have liked. Nonetheless, it is commencing in earnest. The B777 upgrades are underway, and the first B787 will go for refit in July. We expect the wide-body aircraft modernisation to be over sometime in 2027. In March, you had mentioned that the aircraft supply is expected to remain constrained for the next 4-5 years. Has anything changed in recent months? The supply chain is getting progressively better, but it is still slow. If you look at Boeing's B737 or B787 production rate, there is progress – on becoming healthier, and faster output. One of the constraints was Spirit Aerosystems in the US, which manufactures components for both Boeing and Airbus. This company was in the process of being carved into two, and there seems to be good progress on that front. So, a lot of the things – seat certification, programmes that were stuck in bottlenecks, not just for us but others too – are now coming to fruition. Things are getting progressively better. I'm more optimistic than I was, but I think the constraint will last for some time (three-four years) because it does take a long time to catch up. Do you think Airbus or Boeing should now start developing or designing a new aircraft altogether or should they continue to focus on supply-chain issues first? They certainly need to make sure that the aircraft they have currently committed to sell are being produced at the pace we all want, and they want. But, as an industry, we must always be looking at the next step in technology, for many reasons – sustainability, efficiency, safety, etc. So, we would encourage continued research & development on what the next generation looks like. Can you give an idea about the operational and financial impact of the Pakistan airspace closure? The operational impact is public and obvious. It does cause longer flight times to Europe and North America – relatively minor in the case of Europe, a little longer in the case of North America. In some cases, it means we either cannot fly non-stop to a handful of destinations, which means we need to take a refuelling stop en route. In some cases, it means we cannot take a completely full load of cargo and passengers, so it is operationally annoying and clearly has a financial implication. But that is what it is, and we adjust and continue moving forward. Can you give us an idea on the average increase in the duration of affected flights? And how many flights have been impacted? We are operating non-stop flights to all North American points we previously operated non-stop flights to, except Chicago, Toronto and Washington DC. We have a San Francisco flight that is also doing an intermediate stop on occasion. For the San Francisco flight, the intermediate stop is not always in both directions; it depends on wind conditions and other factors. The rest of the flights are continuing to operate non-stop, albeit with a slightly longer flight time. However, non-stop is still a very compelling proposition. So, from a customer experience perspective, it is a relatively minor inconvenience. Do you think the government should consider some relief for Indian carriers who have been affected by the Pakistan airspace closure? It is not for me to discuss that through the media. Clearly, we have been having close engagement with the government through this period for all sorts of reasons. It is just a discussion that we will continue to have. There are many ways in which we support the government, and the government supports us; we are on the same team. About 32 airports were closed in northern and western India for about a week after Operation Sindoor. Which of the 32 airports were you operating your flights to? And have your flight operations come back to normal at these stations? Across the Air India group, there were 13 airports whose closure directly affected us. It meant we did not operate around 800 flights that would have otherwise taken place. About 75,000 customers had to be refunded or reaccommodated. It was disruptive to not just us but to the travelling public. Those airports, for most parts, have now reopened. Travel sentiment, obviously, is a bit affected, so we have not put back the full capacity (to these 13 airports). For example, we were operating 12 flights a day to Srinagar. So, it does take a while for those to recover. But we did make a commitment, and again, this is where we work very closely with the government. The Airports Economic Regulatory Authority (Aera) has recently allowed airport operators in Delhi and Mumbai to charge higher user development fee (UDF) from business-class passengers. This has never happened in India. What do you think about this new step? The burden clearly falls more on us because we operate first-, business- and premium economy-class seats. More appropriately, it falls more on our passengers. I think when you look at the infrastructure that is provided, it is not clear to me that a different class of passengers uses materially different infrastructure (at the airport). Lounges are provided by us. The rest of the infrastructure is largely the same. So, I guess you would have to ask the regulator why they believe a certain proportion of passengers should pay more than others when they are getting effectively the same product and service. I can understand the argument that a first- or business-class passenger might be able to absorb the charge more easily, or the person who is paying is a company rather than an individual. But the fact is, it is a cost on the traveller, and that has to be borne by the traveller and/or the airline and the industry. The higher the cost we have to bear, the less travel there is going to be, or the less margin there will be for investing in more travel. It has a compounding effect. We, at core, have an interest to make sure that Indian aviation is fair, competitive, and keeps a broader economic and social value of a healthy aviation ecosystem, front and centre. Can you give us some details about your plans for the Navi Mumbai airport? Our case is slightly more complex because we operate through a hub model in the existing (Mumbai) airport. So, while we certainly want and will operate from Navi Mumbai, we need to be judicious in what routes we move to Navi Mumbai – such that we don't weaken the hub. Those discussions are ongoing (with the airport operator), and we will make some announcement in due course. Is leasing planes an interim solution to deal with the supply-chain issues and consequent slow deliveries of new planes? Let us bear in mind that we leased 11 B777s. We also leased 25 A320s. We will take delivery of the 50th B737 whitetail aircraft next week. We took six whitetail A350s. We have pretty much consumed all capacity that was out there for immediate availability, whether leased or whitetail. If there was more, we would have taken more. Every airline is struggling for more capacity due to production delays. So, yes, in theory, it is a solution. In practice, there is nothing to get.
India Today
10 minutes ago
- India Today
No Muslim to be allowed in gym: Bhopal sub-inspector's remark goes viral
A video from Bhopal has surfaced on social media, showing sub-inspector Dinesh Sharma making a controversial remark during an interaction with a gym owner. In the footage, Sharma is heard instructing the owner to prohibit the entry of Muslim trainers and trainees at the the video, Sub-Inspector Dinesh Sharma can be heard saying: "No Muslim will come here to give or take training. I have made it clear to you." advertisementThe statement was reportedly made a few days ago when members of the Bajrang Dal visited a gym in Bhopal's Ayodhya Nagar area, questioning the presence of Muslim trainers at the facility. Police were called in to defuse the tension, and among the responding officers was sub-inspector Dinesh Sharma. In a video that later surfaced on social media, Sharma is seen instructing the gym owner not to allow Muslim trainers or clients into the premises. "No Muslim will come here to give or take training. I have made it clear to you," he can be heard the video's circulation, senior police officials took note of the incident and initiated an internal inquiry against the Bhopal MP and BJP leader Alok Sharma came out in support of the sub-inspector's remarks. He reiterated concerns over Muslim gym trainers and claimed that a list of trainers in Bhopal has been compiled. He added that women clients should be assigned only female list of gym trainers will be handed over to the police, who will take appropriate action in accordance with the law," he said. "There is a Mohan Yadav-led government in Madhya Pradesh. Love Jihad and Land Jihad will not be allowed." These remarks were made in the context of the recent arrest of Mohsin Khan, an Indore-based shooting academy operator, who has been accused of molesting a female trainee under the guise of providing rifle shooting Dal activists alleged that Mohsin Khan was "a predator trapping innocent Hindu daughters" and claimed that data found on his phone revealed over 150 Hindu girls had been targeted in a similar in recent months, a systematic sexual exploitation racket targeting Hindu women and girls has reportedly surfaced in Bhopal as well as in smaller towns across Madhya Pradesh.
India Today
10 minutes ago
- India Today
Pak PM admits country went around with begging bowl, says allies no more expect it
Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, in a stark admission of his country's financial woes, said even close allies no longer expect Islamabad to roam the world with a "begging bowl." Amid rising tensions with India, Sharif added that both he and Army chief Field Marshal General Asim Munir were unwilling to shoulder the weight of economic dependency any Pakistani military personnel in Quetta on Saturday, the provincial capital of restive Balochistan, Sharif called China a "time-tested" friend and Saudi Arabia a "trustworthy" and "reliable" ally. advertisement"China is the most time-tested friend of Pakistan. Saudi Arabia is one of the most reliable and trustworthy friends of Pakistan. This applies to Turkey, Qatar and the UAE," he said. "But let me point out abundantly here that they expect us now to engage them in trade, commerce, innovation, research and development, education and health, investments, and profitable ventures mutually. They no longer expect us to go there with a begging bowl," he stressed that Pakistan should fully utilise natural and human resources to tide over its economic challenges, adding that he and Field Marshal Asim Munir no longer want to carry the burden of dependency on their shoulders."I am the last person, along with Field Marshal Asim Munir, to carry this (economic) burden any more on our shoulders. The Almighty has blessed us with natural and human resources. We must make full use of them and deploy them for these very profitable ventures," he further Pakistani Prime Minister's remarks came at a time when its allies like Turkey have sided with Islamabad and condemned India's strikes on terror camps in the neighbouring May 7, India launched Operation Sindoor, military strikes on nine terror bases in Pakistan and Pakistan-Occupied Kashmir (POK) in retaliation for the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack, which killed 26 people. The strikes killed 100 terrorists from the Jaish-e-Mohammed, Lashkar-e-Taiba and Sindoor was launched in response to the Pahalgam terror attack on April 22, which killed 26 people, mostly then sought to escalate the situation by launching a barrage of drones and missiles at Indian cities and military installations, but they were shot down by India's S-400 air defence system. India then launched a fierce counter-attack, striking 11 Pakistani military sites across the country, before both sides agreed to cease all the International Monetary Fund (IMF) gave cash-strapped Pakistan a fresh bailout of USD 1 billion despite strong objections from India. The bailout is part of a support package under the Extended Fund Facility (EFF), approved in September 2024, which totals USD 7 billion. Till now, Pakistan has received USD 2.1 billion through this had recently asked the IMF to reconsider its decision to help Pakistan financially, arguing that the country continues to support terrorism and allows such groups to use its land to plan and carry out attacks against its response to New Delhi's objections, the IMF said that the financial support it gave to Islamabad was part of an earlier agreement and followed normal InMust Watch IN THIS STORY#Pakistan#India-Pakistan#Jammu and Kashmir
