What Are Animal Birth Control Rules That Top Court Called "Absurd" Over Stray Dog "Menace"
The Supreme Court on Monday directed the Delhi government and civic bodies to start picking up stray dogs from all localities at the earliest and keep them at dog shelters, an order that came amid a rise in cases of dog bites and deaths due to rabies.
A bench of Justices JB Pardiwala and R Mahadevan also said the Animal Birth Control (ABC) Rules, 2023, are "absurd". According to the rules, a stray dog is picked up from a locality, and is sterilised and sent back to the same locality.
"Pick up dogs from all localities and shift them to shelter homes. For the time being, forget the rules," the bench said.
They also said the situation was "extremely grim".
"Immediate steps need to be taken to take care of the menace of dog bites leading to rabies," the bench said.
The top court said that children should not, at any cost, fall prey to stray dog bites leading to rabies. "We are issuing these directions keeping the larger public interest in mind."
What Are Animal Birth Control (ABC) Rules, 2023
The Animal Birth Control (ABC) Rules, 2023, are a set of guidelines issued by the Centre to manage stray dog populations.
They focus on sterilising and vaccinating stray dogs to control their numbers and prevent the spread of rabies.
They were formed to address human-dog conflicts and promote animal welfare.
The Supreme Court said the dog shelters should be created to accommodate around 5,000 stray dogs, and sufficient personnel should be deployed there to sterilise and immunise the canines.
The top court also sought a reply from authorities on coming up with shelter homes within eight weeks.
The court also warned that if any person or organisation comes in the way of the picking up of stray dogs by the authorities, strict action will be taken against them.
It also directed the authorities to create a helpline within a week so that all dog bite cases are reported immediately.
Over 37 Lakh Dog Bite Cases In India In 2024
The Centre last month said that India reported over 37 lakh dog bite cases and 54 suspected human rabies deaths in 2024.
According to data shared by Union Minister SP Singh Baghel in the Parliament on July 22, the total number of dog bite cases stood at 37,17,336, while the total 'suspected human rabies deaths' were 54 last year.
He said that municipalities are responsible for controlling the stray dog population, adding that they are implementing the Animal Birth Control Programme to regulate their population.
Elaborating on the steps, he said his ministry issued an advisory in November 2024 to states, asking them to implement the ABC Programme and related activities through local bodies, as part of its objective to ensure the "safety and security of children, especially toddlers, from stray dog attacks".
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
Fur and fury: Top court order for removal of stray dogs triggers backlash from PETA and others
The Supreme Court's recent directive to pick up all street dogs in Delhi-NCR, sterilise them, and keep them in shelters, without returning them to their original territories, has drawn sharp criticism from leading animal welfare organisations. In exclusive conversations with multiple senior voices in the sector warned that the move could trigger chaos on the streets, undermine rabies control, and violate both Indian law and international best HAS NEVER WORKED: PETA INDIA'Communities think of neighbourhood dogs as family, and the displacement and jailing of dogs is not scientific and has NEVER worked,' said Dr Mini Aravindan, Senior Director of Veterinary Affairs, PETA a 2022–23 population survey, Dr Aravindan pointed out that Delhi is home to around 10 lakh community dogs, with less than half sterilised. 'Forced removal of some 10 lakh community dogs from Delhi's streets will cause uproar in communities that care deeply for them and chaos and suffering for the dogs on a large scale,' she explained. According to her, the displacement strategy will fail to control population or rabies and may instead worsen conflicts. 'It is unfeasible to build enough dog shelters, and displacing dogs causes fights over territory and problems like starvation. Ultimately, dogs make their way back into the same territories, especially when puppies continue to be born,' she India stressed that India has had a sterilisation mandate for community dogs since 2001, a process that also includes rabies vaccination. 'Had the Delhi government implemented an effective sterilisation program, there would hardly be any dogs on the road today. It is not too late to start now. Instead of wasting resources on ineffective and inhumane drives, we need effective sterilisation, closure of illegal pet shops, and public encouragement to adopt dogs from shelters or the streets,' Dr Aravindan IS AGAINST SCIENCE, LAW, AND PUBLIC SAFETY: FIAPOCalling the order 'a shocking judgment,' Bharati Ramachandran, CEO of the Federation of Indian Animal Protection Organisations (FIAPO), argued that the move runs contrary to WHO and World Organisation for Animal Health (WOAH) guidance, as well as India's Animal Birth Control (ABC) Rules, 2023.'The proper and responsible response to tragedies like rabies deaths is a massive sterilisation and vaccination campaign. India has philanthropists who would gladly fund it. The problem is not money, it's the lack of political will,' she stressed that mass removal disrupts stable, vaccinated dog populations, causing a 'vacuum effect' where unvaccinated dogs quickly move in, increasing rabies risk. 'Mass dog vaccination is effective for controlling dog-mediated rabies. Removal does not reduce density or control rabies long term,' she also emphasised that shelters should be reserved for dogs who are sick, injured, or unable to survive on the streets. 'Healthy, vaccinated community dogs should remain in their home territories. This approach protects human and animal health, complies with Indian law, and upholds humane, science-based governance.'SHORT-TERM DISPLACEMENTS ONLY MAKE THINGS WORSE: HUMANE WORLD FOR ANIMALS INDIAAlokparna Sengupta, Managing Director of Humane World for Animals India, called the decision 'shortsighted and unscientific.''The order reflects a fundamental misunderstanding of human-dog conflict issues, rabies, and effective population control. Sustainable management of street dogs requires high-throughput implementation of ABC programs. Relocation and impounding not only shift the problem but exacerbate it,' Sengupta LEGAL AND OPERATIONAL CONFLICT"The Supreme Court's new order has got municipal bodies in a tough spot either they need to follow the court's latest instructions or stick to the ABC Rules, which are part of India's animal protection law. Building enough shelters for even a small part of Delhi NCR's stray dog population in just eight weeks is simply not possible," said Advocate Niharika adds that it would cost huge amounts of money, need a lot of land, and, if rushed, could cause serious suffering to the dogs. This order forces authorities to choose between breaking the law or disobeying the court, and in the process, it goes against our constitutional duty to treat animals with compassion, envisaged in article 51(a)(g) of the Indian DEBATE FAR FROM OVERWhile the court's intention stems from concerns over dog bite incidents and rabies fatalities, animal rights experts insist that science, law, and practical experience favour sterilisation and in-situ coming weeks will be crucial, as state governments, municipal bodies, and animal welfare organisations navigate this legal and ethical impasse, all while Delhi's community dogs remain caught in the middle.- EndsTune InMust Watch
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
an hour ago
- Business Standard
SC crackdown on stray dog menace: How other nations tackled the problem
The Supreme Court on Monday, August 11, ordered that all stray dogs in Delhi-NCR must be shifted away from residential localities and any organisation that blocks this exercise will face strict action. The court's order comes amid a rise in dog bite cases and rabies deaths. A bench of Justices JB Pardiwala and R Mahadevan took suo motu cognisance of a news report on rising rabies deaths. The court strictly said it will hear arguments only from the Centre, excluding petitions from dog lovers or other parties. Authorities in Delhi-NCR have been directed to build shelters, relocate dogs, and update the court. The shelters must employ professionals for handling, sterilisation, and vaccination, and have CCTVs installed to prevent escapes. Civic bodies must set up a helpline for bite cases and round up all dogs, whether sterilised or not. How canines were tamed globally Globally, the proven formula is a mix of vaccination, sterilisation, registration, public education, and large-scale sheltering or in some cases, euthanasia. Public health benchmarks suggest around 70 per cent vaccination coverage and high sterilisation rates are needed to stop rabies and stabilise populations. Out of all the examples, the case of Netherlands is often cited as the most humane manner of dealing with street dogs. The Netherlands' success came over decades through dense animal-control networks, strict ownership laws, adoption incentives and a national catch-neuter-vaccinate-return (CNVR) programme. Most dogs became owned, microchipped or sheltered. The transformation was gradual, built on steady investment in shelters, adoption systems and enforcement. Thailand and Bhutan: Mass sterilisation and vaccination Greater Bangkok sterilised and vaccinated hundreds of thousands of dogs between 2016 and 2023 via mobile clinics, community engagement and data tracking, leading to fewer bites and better rabies control where coverage was sustained. Bhutan is the first country in the world to sterilise and vaccinate 100 per cent of its stray dog population. A small nation with tens of thousands of dogs, it treated control as a public-health priority, combining vaccination, sterilisation and awareness in urban and border areas. How China tackled rabies and stray dogs China prioritised rabies elimination with mass vaccination, compulsory registration, online reporting and enforcement of 'civilised dog-keeping' rules. Since 2014, Beijing implemented mass mandatory rabies vaccination, established 664 sites, and paired it with anonymous reporting and educational programs. By 2023, vaccine antibody rates among dogs reached 80-86 per cent in urban Beijing, with official reports of zero human rabies cases since 2021. Controversial measures: Turkiye's euthanasia law Countries such as Turkiye have resorted to mass removals or euthanasia after high-profile attacks. Turkiye's recent law allows large-scale roundups and euthanasia, upheld by courts but criticised by welfare groups. Historically, Turkiye implemented a CNVR program starting in 2004, which aimed to humanely manage the stray dog issue through sterilisation and vaccination. However, this program suffered from underfunding, poor management, and insufficient scale, leading to continued population growth and associated problems. In 2024, Turkiye introduced a controversial new law that replaced the previous CNVR approach. This law mandates municipalities to capture stray dogs and keep them in shelters where they must be sterilised and vaccinated. Strays are to be offered for adoption, but euthanasia is allowed for dogs deemed aggressive, ill, or untreatable. Evidence, however, suggests such measures offer only temporary relief if abandonment, low vaccination and poor waste management persist. How does India's infrastructure compare to the world? India's national ABC Rules and history of sterilisation/vaccination drives have produced progress in places like Meghalaya, Goa, Tamil Nadu, Jaipur and Jodhpur. But coverage is patchy, and many municipalities lack veterinary capacity. In Chennai, only 27 per cent of the 181,000 stray dogs were sterilised in 2024, according to a report by The Times of India. Delhi has about 1 million strays, with 470,000 sterilised in 2023. Twenty-one centres run by 13 NGOs can handle 10,000 surgeries daily, but actual figures fall short, according to another report published in The Times of India in July 2025. The Supreme Court's order marks a decisive shift in India's approach to the stray dog crisis, prioritising public safety over sentiment but concerns of animal activists remain.
Hindustan Times
3 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Supreme Court refuses to reverse Bombay high court ban on pigeon feeding
The Supreme Court has refused to interfere with the Bombay high court's orders directing the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) to prosecute those feeding pigeons at Mumbai's 'kabutarkhanas' (pigeon feeding spots) in defiance of civic directives. The Supreme Court said that proceedings in the matter remain pending before the high court. (HT PHOTO) A bench of justices JK Maheshwari and Vijay Bishnoi noted that proceedings in the matter remain pending before the high court, which is expected to take up the case again on August 13. 'Parallel indulgence by this court is not proper. Petitioner can move the high court for modification of the order,' said the bench, refusing to interfere. The high court, hearing multiple petitions by animal lovers and rights activists challenging the BMC's demolition of decades-old kabutarkhanas, initially stayed the demolition but barred feeding. On July 30, after noting continued feeding and obstruction of civic officials, the high court ordered criminal cases under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, calling the acts a 'public nuisance likely to spread diseases and endanger human life.' On July 24, the high court warned that pigeon breeding and large congregations at kabutarkhanas posed a 'grave social concern', stressing the decision was in the 'larger interest of societal health, from children to senior citizens.' In court, BMC presented medical evidence that pigeon droppings and feathers can trigger asthma, hypersensitivity, pneumonitis, and lung fibrosis, conditions with no cure once advanced. The civic body argued that many victims realise the damage only after irreversible harm to the lungs. Petitioners in the Supreme Court, including Pallavi Sachin Patil, argued that pigeon feeding is a long-standing religious practice, particularly among Hindu devotees and the Jain community, with some 51 feeding spots in Mumbai operating for decades. They claimed health concerns were overstated and that asthma was more directly linked to pollution from vehicles and open burning. They proposed alternatives, such as bird towers for human-pigeon coexistence. The crackdown sparked street protests. On August 6, hundreds clashed with police at Dadar 'kabutarkhana', tearing down tarpaulin sheets erected to block feeding. Two days earlier, over 1,000 community members protested after the site was barricaded with bamboo poles and covered.
