Teenage boys are in crisis. The creators of Netflix's ‘Adolescence' want adults to pay attention
The world for kids today looks a lot different than it did for their parents.
A scene from the hit Netflix series 'Adolescence' captures just how vast that difference is.
In the show's second episode, Detective Inspector Luke Bascombe (Ashley Walters) is at a secondary school to investigate why 13-year-old Jamie Miller (Owen Cooper), the central character, allegedly killed his classmate Katie. Based on their Instagram interactions, he assumes the two were friendly, if not romantic.
That is, until Bascombe's son — also a student at the school — tells him he's got it all wrong.
The seemingly innocuous emojis that Katie commented with on Jamie's Instagram were actually a coded form of bullying. The dynamite emoji represents an exploding red pill, a reference to the manosphere. The 100 symbol is another manosphere nod, alluding to a theory in those circles that 80% of women are attracted to 20% of men.
In other words, Katie implied that Jamie is an incel.
It's a dizzying realization for Bascombe and the other adults — who are clearly clueless about the pernicious ideas that kids in their care are exposed to and how that permeates their lives.
That disconnect is at the heart of 'Adolescence,' which since its premiere has viewers talking about young men's attitudes toward women, incel culture, smartphone use and more.
The British miniseries starts out as a crime drama, but over the course of its four episodes, it explores what exactly could have possessed such an innocent-looking boy to do something so horrific.
The answers it comes up with aren't so simple.
CNN spoke to series co-creator Jack Thorne about his journey into darker corners of the internet, young male rage and what he hopes parents take away from the show.
The conversation has been edited for length and clarity.
This series touches on a lot of timely issues: The manosphere, modern masculinity, online bullying. What made you want to tell this story?
It started with my friend (series co-creator) Stephen Graham. Stephen called me up and said we should write a show about boys hating girls and about knife crime, which in (the UK) is really problematic right now.
That was the start of us talking about male rage, our own anger, our own cruelty. We were trying to build a complicated portrait of masculinity: Of how we were made and how teenagers are being made in a lot of similar ways, but with a lot of differences, too.
Were these issues something you had been thinking about for a while?
It's something I've been thinking about, but something I'd sort of dismissed.
As I was leaning in and trying to understand, I actually found a lot of things that were surprising to me, and a lot of ideas that, if I'd heard them at the wrong time, would have taken me on journeys that I'm very grateful I didn't go on.
The ideas behind incel culture are very attractive because they make sense of a lot of things: feelings of isolation, low self worth, feeling unattractive. They tell you that there is a reason why the world is against you: Because the world has been built from a female perspective, and these women have all the power. (These ideas suggest that) you need to better yourself, get in the gym, learn how to manipulate and learn how to harm.
What was your research process for writing the character of Jamie?
Looking in a lot of dark corners, so Reddit and 4chan, and then changing my algorithm. I had a lot of burner accounts on all the big social media platforms, and I started following the obvious people. The obvious people took me to the less obvious people, and the less obvious people were the ones that I found really interesting.
No 13-year-old really is consuming Andrew Tate. What they are consuming is someone that's really into gaming or TV shows or music, who has consumed Andrew Tate and is now espousing it in a different way. That level of the waterfall was the level I concentrated on as I was trying to find the people that had helped build Jamie.
Was there an overarching question that you were trying to answer?
Why did Jamie do it?
We always said, 'This isn't a whodunnit, but a whydunnit.' That's why we go to the school in episode two, because if we hadn't seen the education system, we wouldn't have understood him properly. If we hadn't seen the way that his peers operate, we wouldn't have understood him properly. In episode three, we're trying to understand the way that his brain works and what he's processed.
Then in episode four, we're in almost the most complicated place. We're not going to make it easy to blame the parents for everything, but they are partially responsible here. What do they do with that question of responsibility, and how much responsibility should they take?
You explored Jamie's descent into violent misogyny from multiple perspectives: His school environment, his home environment, his social media use. Where did he go wrong?
There's that phrase, 'it takes a village to raise a child.' It also takes a village to destroy a child, and Jamie has been destroyed.
He's being destroyed by a school system that's not helping him. He's been destroyed by parents that are not really seeing him. He's been destroyed by friends that maybe don't reach him in the way that he needs to be reached. He's been destroyed by his own brain chemistry, and he's been destroyed by the ideas that he's consumed. All these different elements are in play here.
I know you have a young son. How are you navigating these issues as a parent?
We're not quite there yet. He's just coming up to 9, and he likes 'The Gremlins' and Roald Dahl. He's not quite in the position where he's interested in phones, and he's certainly not interested in vlogs or blogs or any of those things.
The question is what we do when the pressure starts to build. What happens when he goes to secondary school and 80% of his class have got smartphones and he wants one, too? (What happens) when they get to take their phone to bed, and he wants to take his phone to bed, too?
That stuff is terrifying to me. Trying to work out group solutions to it is probably the answer, rather than trying to govern it from parent to parent. So that's creating discussion groups amongst the parents, so that hopefully when we get to 11, enough of his friendship group have been denied phones that us denying him a phone is not as awful as it otherwise might be.
What needs to change to address the radicalization of young men?
I think we need to find a way of dealing with social media. How we do that with the people that are governing social media right now is very tough, because it's not going to come from (the platforms) policing themselves. And in America, it's not going to come from legislation either.
In Britain, we're trying to talk to the government about the digital age of consent. In Australia, under 16 are banned from social media, and it's the social media companies' responsibility to keep them off it. I hope that in Britain we can start talking about it. But how you do that in America right now, I do not know.
This morning, I read about a parent group in Kent (a county in England) who are all working together to stop their kids at that crucial age getting smartphones. That will be huge, but it's a very, very complicated problem. And it requires a lot of complicated solutions.
Each episode of the series was filmed as one continuous shot, which was a fascinating creative choice. How did that affect the way you told the story?
It wasn't my decision. That was what (director Phil Barantini) and (Graham) took to me when I first got involved, and I was really excited by it. The reason why I love it from a writing perspective is it encourages you to think in a whole different way.
(Graham) said there's one rule with writing single-shot shows, which is that the camera can't go anywhere without a human. So you had to find a way of spinning enough stories to keep the audience's attention. We couldn't just stay with Jamie, and we couldn't just stay with Eddie (Jamie's father, played by Graham). We had to be moving inside that police station. We had to find different, other stories to follow.
It also forced me to be really partial in my storytelling. Usually your job as a storyteller is to give as much information to the audience as possible. You would be cutting to Katie's family. You would be cutting to Jamie going through the legal process. You'd be cutting to Bascombe dealing with the problem of the missing knife. I can't suddenly move in time and place too rapidly.
It shakes an audience out of its normal consumption method. It's forced them out of their comfort zone a little bit and made them uneasy, and that was to our benefit.
I found that scene from episode two, in which DI Bascombe's son explains the hidden meaning of those emojis, so striking. What do you think that exchange captures about the gulf between parents and children today?
It's one of my favorite scenes because it's about two things: It's about him unpeeling something that he doesn't understand and being bewildered by what he's trying to understand. And it's about a really delicate relationship between father and son that's quite seriously broken.
In that scene, he recognizes for the first time that he is Eddie in this situation — he hasn't seen his kid, and he doesn't understand so much of what his kid is experiencing.
There's not many moments of positivity in this show, but the gentle love story between Bascombe and his son, ending with them going off to get chips together, is one of the sweeter stories that we tell in the whole show.
Have you heard from other parents who have watched the show?
It's been amazing. The really gratifying thing has been parents who've watched this show with their kids. Even (UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer) actually talked about watching the show with his 16-year-old and 14-year-old.
Close friends have said, 'You've prompted discussions with me and my kids that I've never had before.' That's the best review you could possibly get.
You've previously described TV as an 'empathy box.' What do you hope that viewers take away from the show?
Listen to kids. They're really vulnerable right now, and they need you.
That's everyone. That's not just parents, listen to your children. That's teachers, listen to your students. That's politicians, listen to the young people. I think they're the great excluded at the moment, and I think they're going through enormous pain. And we need to help them, because they're in real trouble.
There aren't simple answers to this, but the biggest answer is let them talk, or find a way to get them talking, or get inside what they're worrying about. Then maybe, maybe you can release some stuff that can allow you to help them.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
8 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Lars von Trier threw water at Bryce Dallas Howard and insulted her father
Lars von Trier threw a glass of water in Bryce Dallas Howard's face and insulted her father because he wanted to see her "angry face". The 'Jurassic World' actress worked with the director on 2005 film 'Manderlay' and she revealed her first meeting with the moviemaker on the set in Norway came as a bit of a shock as she was subjected to a barrage of insults and a jibe about her director dad Ron Howard. Bryce told The Times newspaper: "He started insulting me: 'Your father's a terrible filmmaker.' I went: 'Lars, what are you trying to see?' and he said: 'Your angry face. I don't know what it looks like'." She went on to reveal von Trier then threw a glass of water in her face and Bryce responded by doing the same to him. The actress added: "So I threw a glass of water in his face. He goes: 'Why did you do that?' and got up and left. That was my introduction to the Lars von Trier experience." However, Bryce is adamant she wasn't upset by the encounter. She explained: "It wasn't like I went to my room and cried or anything. I was sort of delighted by it." Bryce's dad started as an actor before moving behind the camera and she hopes to do more directing in the future, but she will never give up acting completely like he did. She added: "I don't want to let go of acting as my dad has done. That would be really heartbreaking because I learn so much being on a set. I have so much fun.' Bryce is close to her filmmaker father and he recently shared a sweet tribute to her on Instagram to mark her 44th birthday earlier this year - declaring she has far exceeded the family's expectations with her huge success in the movie business. Ron wrote: "Happy Birthday, Daughter! You've always made your mom and me happy and incredibly proud. "But the scope of what you've achieved with your family and career and the future you are building exceeds our wildest hopes from back when you were this adorable kid we loved so much." It came just a day after Bryce shared her own tribute to her dad on his birthday, writing in a post on Instagram: "I love you so much Dad, more than words can say."


Tom's Guide
15 minutes ago
- Tom's Guide
Netflix's newest No. 1 movie is an intense psychological thriller — and you'll never guess the ending
Netflix's top 10 list is constantly shifting as new titles are added to the streaming service every week. In this case, the latest psychological thriller from Tyler Perry has taken the No. 1 spot after premiering on June 6. 'Straw' follows a single mother whose already fragile world begins to crumble in just one day. As pressure mounts at home, at work, and in the system meant to protect her, she finds herself pushed to a breaking point. What unfolds is a tense, emotionally charged story about what happens when someone reaches their last straw. I'm not surprised 'Straw' has taken the crown since it has all the ingredients viewers tend to eat up. As a taut thriller with crime drama elements, plot twists, and backed by a well-known filmmaker, it was almost inevitable that this new release would climb to the top of the U.S. trending list. So, if you've seen 'Straw' pop up on your homepage, here's everything you need to know before adding it to your Netflix watchlist. 'Straw' follows Janiyah Wiltkinson (Taraji P. Henson), a single mother in Atlanta who finds her already difficult life unraveling over the course of one harrowing day. After being unexpectedly fired from her job, she returns home to discover an eviction notice on her apartment door. Her daughter, who suffers from a chronic illness, urgently needs medication they can no longer afford. Desperate and out of options, Janiyah attempts to secure help through legal channels, but is met with indifference and red tape at every turn. Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips. Driven to her limits by a world that continually turns its back on her, she faces unthinkable decisions in a place where help never comes and hope is in short supply,. Forcing everyone around her to confront how far one woman will go when pushed past her breaking point. One thing I'll give 'Straw' credit for: it's easily one of Perry's strongest movies since his Netflix run started. Most of his releases seem to shoot straight to the top of the charts, but this is one of the rare ones that actually earns its spot. First of all, the movie does not hold back on emotion, making sure every moment lands hard enough to move or frustrate you. It opens with a quiet, deliberate look at Janiyah's life with muted colors and everyday details like unwashed dishes. As the story progresses, the pace picks up, building tension to pull you in completely. Within just 24 hours, everything falls apart, and you soon realize that Janiyah is experiencing more than just bad luck. This includes losing her job and access to her money before child services takes her daughter away. A police officer then hits her car, threatens her, tickets her, and tows it. She's evicted, her belongings left in the rain. And when she returns for her last paycheck, she gets caught in a deadly armed robbery. It's pretty harrowing stuff and you immediately wish for Janiyah to have a happy ending. Of course, with most of Perry's work, happiness isn't always guaranteed. At the heart of this thriller is Taraji P. Henson's powerful performance and one reason why I was so hooked. She fully inhabits Janiyah's heartbreak and struggles, delivering an emotional monologue halfway through that stands out as the movie's most unforgettable moment. It almost makes you wish the rest of the movie matched her intensity, because unfortunately, 'Straw' becomes quite convoluted, especially when it brings in another plot point surrounding the FBI. This thriller also sometimes leans too heavily into its emotional beats, tipping into melodrama. Scenes like Janiyah collapsing in the rain and shouting to the sky feel overdone, and the rapid buildup of intensity risks breaking the audience's immersion. Some moments, like that rain scene, even come off as cheaply made. Not to mention the twist ending is likely to leave viewers feeling conflicted. While it adds an unexpected layer to the story, I personally feel the movie's impact might have been even stronger without it. But still, anyone who enjoys a good twist might find themselves pleasantly surprised (and even more heartbroken). 'Straw' isn't Tyler Perry's weakest work, but it struggles with familiar issues seen in much of his filmography. The story is overloaded with obvious symbolism, overly complicated plot points, and forced emotional moments that don't quite land. Still, if you enjoy intense psychological thrillers, it's worth a watch, and it earns its No. 1 spot largely thanks to Henson's exceptional performance. I'm not the only one who thinks so either. At the time of writing (June 9), 'Straw' has a solid 77% audience score on Rotten Tomatoes, with viewers calling it "powerful" and 'emotional,' with Henson's acting being labeled as 'excellent.' Five out of eight critic reviews are also positive, proving that 'Straw' is one of Perry's strongest movies to date. You can stream 'Straw' on Netflix now. However, if you're not feeling it, see what's new on Netflix this week or check out our guide on the new movies and shows added in June 2025.


Los Angeles Times
22 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
In Geoff Dyer's U.K. childhood, a Cadbury Milk Tray meant everything
A certain sort of British memoir takes education as its queasy, pivotal center. The narrators of these books — among them Robert Graves' WWI-scarred reminiscence, 'Good-Bye to All That' (1929), and Henry Green's WWII-era bildungsroman, 'Pack My Bag' (1940) — are often tortured by their schooling, with its wicked authority figures and cruel classmates. Importantly, they refuse to be tight-lipped about the experience. They usually — in the cases of the above, always — end up at Oxford, where their tenure at such an ideal of English education allows their adult selves to come into view. Geoff Dyer is among the great uncategorizable prose writers of the past several decades and he also went to Oxford, albeit at the end of the 1970s, with the war deprivations of yore in rearview. He was not reared by British public academies — the privileged equivalent of private schools in America — but instead at a grammar in suburban Cheltenham, 'a place famed for its Jane Austeny terraces,' he states in his new autobiography, 'Homework,' though his alma mater stuck out like a jagged edge: It 'was, by some distance, the most forbidding modernist building in town.' 'Homework' distinguishes itself like such a structure among the developed, dreary grounds of the British scholastic narrative. No fan of Dyer's, whose many books have ranged from a bizarre if thrilling immersion in the psyches of American jazz musicians to a volume about procrastinating while trying to write about D.H. Lawrence, will be surprised that he departs from precedent. But even if his latest never actually takes us to university ('Oxford lies beyond the boundaries of this book-map and inventory,' he announces), it reflects U.K. literary custom like nothing he's written. Dyer, now 67 years old and for a decade a USC professor, is a cosmopolitan author whose output — fiction, nonfiction, both — has often spanned far-flung locales. Yet this project's geography is circumscribed, its borders hedged. If Dyer has grown sentimental about the England of his upbringing, his nostalgia is a subtle critique of how optimism in big government has grown worse for wear — 'Homework' bursts with working-class pride, a fond and mournful belief in the possibility of the British welfare state. Still, the fact of remembering can sometimes feel more important to Dyer than how events translate. He leads us through a grove of anecdotes, some more meaningful than others. Dyer conjures a macabre, powerful image of his father in a hospital bed after a botched surgery, wearing a badge that reads 'Private Health Care Makes Me Sick,' and spends a few too many pages on the delight of eating 'sweets' (not candy — too Yankee), which nonetheless produces this glorious quip: 'During one discussion of various oral afflictions, my mum exclaimed 'I've had gum boils,' as if announcing an achievement that was in danger of being unjustly overlooked.' Humor is his life raft because he neglects to plot much of a course around the seas of memory. The book's languor can be ponderous and vintage, more 20th century than 21st. Yet the text's unhurried recollections reflect its content: 'Homework' feels leisurely as if to reflect the functional, socialist-adjacent government that allows its characters to subsist. If only, Dyer implies, Americans with the misfortune of paying for their own dental care could afford the rite of developing gum boils. Eventually, Dyer's aimlessness gets us somewhere — and, in the most English way, we find the book's emotional destination in what he neglects to proclaim outright. Dyer, an only child, spends a lot of time delving into his relationship with his parents, focusing on moments when he butts heads with his dad. Young Geoff, child of an expanding consumer economy, wants a guitar, a stereo, a Red Feather racing bike — 'If you didn't have a racer you didn't have a bike,' his older self declares with undiminished enthusiasm, 'but since no one who had a bike didn't have a racer this wasn't an issue.' He receives all of these things. His dad is a sheet metal worker, his mother a school cook, and they have limited financial means — still, the book's contrast, between familial impecunity and the minor damage of the narrator's disappointments, forces us to look past circumstance and consider how materialism relates to affection and if this conflict is generational. Dyer's father was traumatized by the austerity of growing up in England between two military cataclysms, and his daily satisfaction is bound in his ability to pinch pences. In one particularly memorable scene, he buys his son a tennis racket at a store that offers a 10% discount to members of an athletic club — to which he doesn't belong, but he argues his way into getting the deal regardless. In another, Dyer describes a Cadbury Milk Tray that his dad purchased for his mother each year on Valentine's Day though his mom didn't like chocolate. This did not dampen her gratitude, however: The gesture 'was an expression of indulgence unrestrained by any considerations of expense.' Naturally, most of the contents of the Milk Tray were eaten by me, first the ones I knew I liked from the top layer and then, when that top layer had been decimated, the same items from the bottom layer. This bottom layer also came to include what my Auntie Hilda called 'spit-backs' from the top layer: half-eaten choices that I'd liked the look of — based on the legend — but then turned against when I took a bite. And so, to avoid waste, they were returned to the box for someone else — my dad — to finish off. This moment sticks in the mind, the intimacy of a family in which a present for the mother becomes a treat for the child, whose chewed and discarded food is finished by the father. It points toward the book's core: a question of how to distinguish tenderness from frugality. Is 'Homework' about a child who took a remarkably frictionless path, aided by a nation that had invested in civic institutions, from monetary hardship to the ivory tower? Merely technically. Is it a story of how members of a family, protected by a social safety net from abject desperation, developed different ideas about how to relate to material circumstance? We're getting there. What 'Homework' does best is keep these possibilities open while never having an answer for whether the elder Dyer's annual ceremony with the Cadbury box was an act of love. The real homework is the labor that we do when we spend our whole lives wondering. Felsenthal is a fiction writer, poet, critic and essayist whose work has appeared in the New Yorker, the Guardian, the Atlantic and other publications.