logo
Teenage boys are in crisis. The creators of Netflix's ‘Adolescence' want adults to pay attention

Teenage boys are in crisis. The creators of Netflix's ‘Adolescence' want adults to pay attention

Yahoo24-03-2025

The world for kids today looks a lot different than it did for their parents.
A scene from the hit Netflix series 'Adolescence' captures just how vast that difference is.
In the show's second episode, Detective Inspector Luke Bascombe (Ashley Walters) is at a secondary school to investigate why 13-year-old Jamie Miller (Owen Cooper), the central character, allegedly killed his classmate Katie. Based on their Instagram interactions, he assumes the two were friendly, if not romantic.
That is, until Bascombe's son — also a student at the school — tells him he's got it all wrong.
The seemingly innocuous emojis that Katie commented with on Jamie's Instagram were actually a coded form of bullying. The dynamite emoji represents an exploding red pill, a reference to the manosphere. The 100 symbol is another manosphere nod, alluding to a theory in those circles that 80% of women are attracted to 20% of men.
In other words, Katie implied that Jamie is an incel.
It's a dizzying realization for Bascombe and the other adults — who are clearly clueless about the pernicious ideas that kids in their care are exposed to and how that permeates their lives.
That disconnect is at the heart of 'Adolescence,' which since its premiere has viewers talking about young men's attitudes toward women, incel culture, smartphone use and more.
The British miniseries starts out as a crime drama, but over the course of its four episodes, it explores what exactly could have possessed such an innocent-looking boy to do something so horrific.
The answers it comes up with aren't so simple.
CNN spoke to series co-creator Jack Thorne about his journey into darker corners of the internet, young male rage and what he hopes parents take away from the show.
The conversation has been edited for length and clarity.
This series touches on a lot of timely issues: The manosphere, modern masculinity, online bullying. What made you want to tell this story?
It started with my friend (series co-creator) Stephen Graham. Stephen called me up and said we should write a show about boys hating girls and about knife crime, which in (the UK) is really problematic right now.
That was the start of us talking about male rage, our own anger, our own cruelty. We were trying to build a complicated portrait of masculinity: Of how we were made and how teenagers are being made in a lot of similar ways, but with a lot of differences, too.
Were these issues something you had been thinking about for a while?
It's something I've been thinking about, but something I'd sort of dismissed.
As I was leaning in and trying to understand, I actually found a lot of things that were surprising to me, and a lot of ideas that, if I'd heard them at the wrong time, would have taken me on journeys that I'm very grateful I didn't go on.
The ideas behind incel culture are very attractive because they make sense of a lot of things: feelings of isolation, low self worth, feeling unattractive. They tell you that there is a reason why the world is against you: Because the world has been built from a female perspective, and these women have all the power. (These ideas suggest that) you need to better yourself, get in the gym, learn how to manipulate and learn how to harm.
What was your research process for writing the character of Jamie?
Looking in a lot of dark corners, so Reddit and 4chan, and then changing my algorithm. I had a lot of burner accounts on all the big social media platforms, and I started following the obvious people. The obvious people took me to the less obvious people, and the less obvious people were the ones that I found really interesting.
No 13-year-old really is consuming Andrew Tate. What they are consuming is someone that's really into gaming or TV shows or music, who has consumed Andrew Tate and is now espousing it in a different way. That level of the waterfall was the level I concentrated on as I was trying to find the people that had helped build Jamie.
Was there an overarching question that you were trying to answer?
Why did Jamie do it?
We always said, 'This isn't a whodunnit, but a whydunnit.' That's why we go to the school in episode two, because if we hadn't seen the education system, we wouldn't have understood him properly. If we hadn't seen the way that his peers operate, we wouldn't have understood him properly. In episode three, we're trying to understand the way that his brain works and what he's processed.
Then in episode four, we're in almost the most complicated place. We're not going to make it easy to blame the parents for everything, but they are partially responsible here. What do they do with that question of responsibility, and how much responsibility should they take?
You explored Jamie's descent into violent misogyny from multiple perspectives: His school environment, his home environment, his social media use. Where did he go wrong?
There's that phrase, 'it takes a village to raise a child.' It also takes a village to destroy a child, and Jamie has been destroyed.
He's being destroyed by a school system that's not helping him. He's been destroyed by parents that are not really seeing him. He's been destroyed by friends that maybe don't reach him in the way that he needs to be reached. He's been destroyed by his own brain chemistry, and he's been destroyed by the ideas that he's consumed. All these different elements are in play here.
I know you have a young son. How are you navigating these issues as a parent?
We're not quite there yet. He's just coming up to 9, and he likes 'The Gremlins' and Roald Dahl. He's not quite in the position where he's interested in phones, and he's certainly not interested in vlogs or blogs or any of those things.
The question is what we do when the pressure starts to build. What happens when he goes to secondary school and 80% of his class have got smartphones and he wants one, too? (What happens) when they get to take their phone to bed, and he wants to take his phone to bed, too?
That stuff is terrifying to me. Trying to work out group solutions to it is probably the answer, rather than trying to govern it from parent to parent. So that's creating discussion groups amongst the parents, so that hopefully when we get to 11, enough of his friendship group have been denied phones that us denying him a phone is not as awful as it otherwise might be.
What needs to change to address the radicalization of young men?
I think we need to find a way of dealing with social media. How we do that with the people that are governing social media right now is very tough, because it's not going to come from (the platforms) policing themselves. And in America, it's not going to come from legislation either.
In Britain, we're trying to talk to the government about the digital age of consent. In Australia, under 16 are banned from social media, and it's the social media companies' responsibility to keep them off it. I hope that in Britain we can start talking about it. But how you do that in America right now, I do not know.
This morning, I read about a parent group in Kent (a county in England) who are all working together to stop their kids at that crucial age getting smartphones. That will be huge, but it's a very, very complicated problem. And it requires a lot of complicated solutions.
Each episode of the series was filmed as one continuous shot, which was a fascinating creative choice. How did that affect the way you told the story?
It wasn't my decision. That was what (director Phil Barantini) and (Graham) took to me when I first got involved, and I was really excited by it. The reason why I love it from a writing perspective is it encourages you to think in a whole different way.
(Graham) said there's one rule with writing single-shot shows, which is that the camera can't go anywhere without a human. So you had to find a way of spinning enough stories to keep the audience's attention. We couldn't just stay with Jamie, and we couldn't just stay with Eddie (Jamie's father, played by Graham). We had to be moving inside that police station. We had to find different, other stories to follow.
It also forced me to be really partial in my storytelling. Usually your job as a storyteller is to give as much information to the audience as possible. You would be cutting to Katie's family. You would be cutting to Jamie going through the legal process. You'd be cutting to Bascombe dealing with the problem of the missing knife. I can't suddenly move in time and place too rapidly.
It shakes an audience out of its normal consumption method. It's forced them out of their comfort zone a little bit and made them uneasy, and that was to our benefit.
I found that scene from episode two, in which DI Bascombe's son explains the hidden meaning of those emojis, so striking. What do you think that exchange captures about the gulf between parents and children today?
It's one of my favorite scenes because it's about two things: It's about him unpeeling something that he doesn't understand and being bewildered by what he's trying to understand. And it's about a really delicate relationship between father and son that's quite seriously broken.
In that scene, he recognizes for the first time that he is Eddie in this situation — he hasn't seen his kid, and he doesn't understand so much of what his kid is experiencing.
There's not many moments of positivity in this show, but the gentle love story between Bascombe and his son, ending with them going off to get chips together, is one of the sweeter stories that we tell in the whole show.
Have you heard from other parents who have watched the show?
It's been amazing. The really gratifying thing has been parents who've watched this show with their kids. Even (UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer) actually talked about watching the show with his 16-year-old and 14-year-old.
Close friends have said, 'You've prompted discussions with me and my kids that I've never had before.' That's the best review you could possibly get.
You've previously described TV as an 'empathy box.' What do you hope that viewers take away from the show?
Listen to kids. They're really vulnerable right now, and they need you.
That's everyone. That's not just parents, listen to your children. That's teachers, listen to your students. That's politicians, listen to the young people. I think they're the great excluded at the moment, and I think they're going through enormous pain. And we need to help them, because they're in real trouble.
There aren't simple answers to this, but the biggest answer is let them talk, or find a way to get them talking, or get inside what they're worrying about. Then maybe, maybe you can release some stuff that can allow you to help them.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Princess Diana gowns star in ‘largest' auction of late royal's fashion
Princess Diana gowns star in ‘largest' auction of late royal's fashion

CNN

time17 minutes ago

  • CNN

Princess Diana gowns star in ‘largest' auction of late royal's fashion

Princess Diana's ski suit, a Dior handbag given to her by France's first lady and the floral dress she wore to visit children in hospital are among dozens of items from the late royal's wardrobe headed to auction this month. Featuring over 100 pieces belonging to the former Princess of Wales — including hats, handbags and shoes, as well as sketches and handwritten letters — the sale has been described by Julien's Auctions the 'largest collection' of the royal's fashion ever to go under the hammer. Titled 'Princess Diana's Style & A Royal Collection,' the auction is accepting online bids ahead of a live sale at The Peninsula in Beverly Hills, California later this month. The highest estimates belong to two dresses: A floral number Diana sported on several occasions between 1988 and 1992, including during an official visit to Spain, and a cream silk Catherine Walker evening gown the Princess of Wales wore during her 1986 tour of the Gulf. Both are expected to fetch between $200,000 and $300,000, according to the auction house. The former dress was designed by the high-end British salon Bellville Sassoon, whose owner David Sassoon later revealed the princess referred to it as her 'caring dress,' because its bright colors put sick children at ease during hospital visits. Other big-ticket dresses include a yellow floral Bruce Oldfield two-piece, a blue sleeveless shift dress by her close friend Gianni Versace and a black taffeta evening gown that she wore to an event in London in 1981 — her first official appearance since the announcement of her engagement to then-Prince Charles. The latter gown's designer Elizabeth Emanuel, who went on to co-create Diana's wedding gown, said in an press release that she offered up archival items and sketches so they could be 'loved and appreciated once again by those who will never forget those golden days when Diana was our Queen of Hearts.' Other notable lots include a lambskin Dior handbag given to Diana by former French first lady, Bernadette Chirac, and the peach-colored straw archer hat she wore for her honeymoon send-off in 1981. While many of items were worn on formal occasions, others demonstrate Diana's quintessential take on casual '80s and '90s style, including a scarlet nylon ski suit and an oversized sweatshirt bearing the logo of the British Lung Foundation (with top estimates of $50,000 and $20,000, respectively). Diana's fashion has frequently commanded large sums at auction — even during her lifetime. In 1997, she put almost 80 dresses up for sale via Christie's, raising over $3.2 million for cancer and AIDS research. The current auction record for a one of her outfits was set at Julien's Auctions in 2023, when the black-and-blue Jacques Azagury gown she wore to at least two public engagements in the mid-1980s sold for $1.14 million As well as private viewings in New York, London and Los Angeles, a selection of Diana's wardrobe items from this month's sale are currently being exhibited at the Museum of Style Icons in Newbridge, Ireland. The auction also includes items belonging to members of the British Royal Family, including the Duke and Duchess of Windsor, Queen Elizabeth II and the Queen Mother, with some of the pieces dating from the 19th century. A portion of the auction's proceeds will go to the British charity Muscular Dystrophy UK, the auction house said. 'Princess Diana's legacy lives on not only through her humanitarian work but also in the timeless elegance of her style, which continues to inspire the world,' said Julien's Auctions' co-founder and executive director, Martin Nolan, in a press release.

Jamie Foxx's Reaction to BET Awards Tribute Goes Viral
Jamie Foxx's Reaction to BET Awards Tribute Goes Viral

Newsweek

time31 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Jamie Foxx's Reaction to BET Awards Tribute Goes Viral

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Jamie Foxx's reaction to his tribute at the 2025 BET Awards has gone viral on social media. Newsweek reached out to Foxx's representative via email for comment on Tuesday. The Context Foxx, an Academy Award-winning actor known for films like Django Unchained, Ray and Collateral, had a medical emergency in April 2023. During his Netflix comedy special Jamie Foxx: What Had Happened Was..., which was released in December last year, Foxx, who is also a singer, revealed the 2023 health scare was actually a "brain bleed that led to a stroke." "April 11, I was having a bad headache, and I asked my boy for aspirin. I realized quickly that when you're in a medical emergency, your boys don't know what the f*** to do," the Grammy winner said. "Before I could get the aspirin, I went out. I don't remember 20 days." BET Ultimate Icon Award recipient Jamie Foxx speaks onstage during the 2025 BET Awards at the Peacock Theatre in Los Angeles on June 9, 2025. BET Ultimate Icon Award recipient Jamie Foxx speaks onstage during the 2025 BET Awards at the Peacock Theatre in Los Angeles on June 9, 2025. MICHAEL TRAN/AFP via Getty Images What To Know Foxx—whose real name is Eric Marlon Bishop—received the Ultimate Icon Award at the BET Awards in Los Angeles on Monday. Ahead of his acceptance speech, a slew of artists took the stage to pay tribute to the 57-year-old's career. Kenneth "Babyface" Edmonds and Ludacris covered Foxx's 2005 song "Unpredictable" ahead of Tank's rendition of Ray Charles' 1958 tune "Night Time Is the Right Time." Jennifer Hudson also sang a portion of Kanye West's "Gold Digger," which had featured Foxx, before T-Pain, Doug E. Fresh and Teddy Riley sang his hit "Blame It." During the tribute, the camera panned to Foxx, who appeared to say, "Oh my God" as he wiped away tears. On X, formerly Twitter, user @MessyMindofMe shared a snippet of the moment, which has since gone viral online. "Seeing Jamie Foxx get so emotional during this tribute is giving me chills," she wrote. "I am so happy for him #BETAwards." Seeing Jamie Foxx get so emotional during this tribute is giving me chills. I am so happy for him #BETAwards — 𝕋𝕙𝕖𝕄𝕖𝕤𝕤𝕪𝕄𝕚𝕟𝕕𝕠𝕗𝕄𝕖 (@MessyMindofMe) June 10, 2025 At the time of publication, the clip racked up more than 141,400 views and 6,900 likes. In his acceptance speech, which was presented by Stevie Wonder, Foxx referred to his near-fatal stroke. "I gotta be honest—when I saw the 'in memoriam' [portion of the awards show], I was like, 'Man, that could have been me,'" he said. "I don't know why I went through what I went through, but I know my second chance I'm not going to turn down. I have so much love to give." While pointing to God and appearing emotional, Foxx continued: "I told him, I said, 'Bro, just give me one more crack at this, and I promise, I said whatever reason you put this on me, I promise I'm going to do right.'" Foxx's daughters, Anelise Bishop and Corinne Foxx—who were in the audience—cried during his message. At one point, Corinne Foxx put her hand on Bishop's knee. What People Are Saying In the comments underneath @MessyMindofMe's X post, fans sent Jamie Foxx messages of support. X user @TrumpMadeUBroke wrote: "I was in tears. What a beautiful tribute and his speech was amazing! God bless him!" @mystic_bey said: "We almost lost this talent! I'm so glad they gave him his flowers right." @LyndaStarrMusic shared: "I was emotional WITH HIM." @Twon024 chimed in: "A legend." @b1s added: "Stevie, Babyface and Teddy Riley that's royalty right there. All showed up for him." What Happens Next Jamie Foxx will star in Netflix's upcoming film Fight for '84, which is about the 1984 U.S. Olympic Boxing team. A release date has not yet been set.

Netflix's Ted Sarandos says AI will make it cheaper to tell epic stories — and won't kill creativity
Netflix's Ted Sarandos says AI will make it cheaper to tell epic stories — and won't kill creativity

Business Insider

time32 minutes ago

  • Business Insider

Netflix's Ted Sarandos says AI will make it cheaper to tell epic stories — and won't kill creativity

AI may be a game changer for Hollywood budgets, but it won't replace human creativity, says Netflix co-CEO Ted Sarandos. In a conversation on the WTF podcast with entrepreneur Nikhil Kamath, Sarandos said he wasn't afraid of AI. "I hope creators aren't either because it's going to make a great tool to tell stories even better, and make it possible to make movies they couldn't before," he said. Sarandos highlighted AI's potential to reduce the cost of visual effects. He said Martin Scorsese's Netflix film "The Irishman" used de-aging technology that was thought to have added about $30 million to the budget: "Today, we can do that exact film better for a fraction." That kind of cost reduction, Sarandos explained, could allow a wider range of creators to tell more ambitious stories without requiring blockbuster-size budgets. "Those tools will become very much like visual effect tools, very much like computer animation," he said. "You're using the tools to tell the story and express yourself in a way that you couldn't before." Sarandos didn't believe that AI would replace the emotional core of storytelling. "What AI is doing today is like the antithesis of imagination," he said. "It's giving you the most predictable outcome based on these kinds of rough ideas you're giving it." Sarandos admitted that some creators could simply accept AI-generated content without "taking the step of saying, 'Not like this,' and just go with what was spit out — that would be the danger." He was confident that the tech can "lower the cost of doing things in a way that makes it possible to tell bigger and better stories — but still requires people to do that." Director James Cameron echoed similar concerns in an April appearance on Meta's "Boz to the Future" podcast, suggesting AI could as much as halve the cost of effects-heavy blockbusters, but not replace human creators. Meanwhile, several tech giants now offer AI video tools. In December, OpenAI released Sora, an AI video generator that can create short videos from written instructions and edit existing videos by filling frames. Last month, Google unveiled Flow, which uses its latest AI models to generate visuals, sound effects, and dialogue.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store