Trump's new tariffs and Musk's political bombshell shake Wall Street
"Markets had been telling us that peak tariff risk is behind us but to have tariffs back in the forefront is causing some skittishness," said Emily Roland, co-chief investment strategist at Manulife John Hancock Investments in Boston. "Investors were getting to that period of ebullience in markets and we're taking a little step back from that."But investors likely have some hopes the announcements are not permanent, she said: "That's the pattern we've been in, announcing punitive tariffs and then dialing that back a little bit. That could certainly be the next phase of this back and forth negotiation," said Roland.According to preliminary data, the S&P 500 lost 49.39 points, or 0.77%, to end at 6,230.76 points, while the Nasdaq Composite lost 183.18 points, or 0.89%, to 20,417.92. The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 421.03 points, or 0.95%, to 44,400.64.One of the S&P 500's biggest drags was from electric vehicle maker Tesla, whose shares dived after CEO Musk announced formation of a new political party named the "America Party", further escalating his feud with Trump.Investors also awaited other US trade announcements after Trump said on Sunday that the US was on the cusp of several deals and would notify other countries of higher tariffs by July 9, with new duties to take effect on August 1.On Monday, Trump threatened an extra 10% tariff on countries aligning themselves with the "Anti-American policies" of the BRICS group of Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa.In early April, stock indexes saw dramatic volatility after Trump unveiled a base tariff rate of 10% on most countries and additional duties ranging up to 50% on April 2 and then announced a 90-day pause days later.In early April, the Nasdaq confirmed a bear market or a 20% drop from its recent record, while the S&P 500 had narrowly averted a bear. Both indexes had returned to record levels by late June.Shares of WNS Holdings rallied after the French IT services firm Capgemini agreed to buy the outsourcing firm for $3.3 billion in cash.advertisementTrump's tariff policies have stoked inflation worries, further complicating the Fed's path to lower rates. Minutes of its June meeting, scheduled for release on Wednesday, should offer more clues on the monetary policy outlook.Traders are betting on a roughly 95% probability that rates will remain unchanged in July while the odds for a September cut are close to 60%, according to CME Group's FedWatch tool.Another area of investor focus is US tax-cut and spending plans, signed into law by Trump late last week. These are expected to swell the national deficit by over $3 trillion in the next decade.- EndsMust Watch
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
9 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Why is Trump taking aim at BRICS?
The story so far: U.S. President Donald Trump's threat to impose 10% tariffs on members of the BRICS grouping that held a summit in Rio de Janeiro this week is the latest in a series of similar threats. Why is BRICS in Mr. Trump's cross-hairs? Even before he was sworn in as U.S. President for the second time, Donald Trump had made it clear that he saw the BRICS grouping as 'anti-American' and a threat to the dollar that he needed to neutralise. On November 30 last year, Mr. Trump said the U.S. would require BRICS members to commit that they would not create a new BRICS common currency, 'nor back any other currency to replace the mighty U.S. dollar', threatening 100% tariffs on them. It's a threat he has repeated several times since. Mr. Trump's irritation appears to stem from BRICS declarations in South Africa in 2023 and Russia in 2024, where members that now also include Egypt, Ethiopia, Indonesia, Iran and the UAE, discussed a BRICS Cross-Border Payments Initiative that aims to facilitate trade and investment within BRICS countries using local currencies and other mechanisms. The initiative built momentum due to the problems Western sanctions on Russia have meant for trading partners in the Global South. What has the U.S. threatened to do? Last Sunday (July 6, 2025), just as BRICS leaders gathered in Rio for the 17th BRICS summit, Mr. Trump said in a social media post that any country aligning with BRICS would face a 10% added tariff. The penalty was 'just for that one thing' of being a member, Mr. Trump said later. It is unclear why the tariff rate was dropped to a tenth from the original threat of 100%, and even whether Mr. Trump will go through with the BRICS tariffs along with other reciprocal tariffs planned for August 1. But there seems little doubt that Mr. Trump wants BRICS de-fanged. 'You can tell the (U.S.) President is (upset) every time he looks at the BRICS de-dollarisation effort…(and) Rio didn't help,' said Steve Bannon, Trump's former White House chief strategist, according to Politico magazine. Editorial | Building resilience: On the 17th Summit of BRICS emerging economies In addition, the Trump administration has slapped 50% tariffs on Brazil after accusing President Lula da Silva of a 'witch-hunt' against former Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro, who faces charges of attempted coup. It has also imposed 30% tariffs on South Africa after accusing it of unequal trade, as well as expressing concerns over the treatment of Afrikaners (White South Africans). Republican Senators close to Mr. Trump also plan to bring a bill called the Sanctioning Russia Act of 2025 that seeks to place 500% tariffs on imports of oil and sanctioned Russian products, which would hurt Russia, as well as India and China, its two biggest importers. Are Mr. Trump's concerns valid? Mr. Trump's concerns about de-dollarisation have been denied by practically every BRICS member. The South African Ministry of Foreign Affairs issued a detailed statement explaining why the BRICS attempt to use national currencies within the grouping is not the same as replacing the dollar as the global standard. While anti-U.S. rhetoric of some BRICS leaders has been harsh, the wording of the BRICS Rio declaration 2025 issued this week does not directly challenge the U.S. or the dollar. In the operative Paragraph 50, the leaders said they resolved to task ministers of finance and central bank governors 'to continue the discussion on the BRICS Cross-Border Payments Initiative and acknowledge the progress made by the BRICS Payment Task Force (BPTF) in identifying possible pathways to support the continuation of discussions on the potential for greater interoperability of BRICS payment systems.' Paragraph 13 expressed 'serious concerns' over the rise of unilateral tariff and non-tariff measures but didn't name the U.S. Where does India stand? The Modi government, hopeful of clinching a Free Trade Agreement with the U.S., has strenuously objected to Mr. Trump's categorisation of the BRICS as 'anti-American'. Also read: India will give a 'new form' to BRICS grouping in 2026: PM Modi In a parliamentary response on December 2, 2024, the MoS (Finance) Pankaj Chaudhury made it clear that the U.S. allegations referred to a report prepared by Russia during its chairmanship of BRICS, where it had spoken of 'possible alternatives relating to cross-border payments' and 'leveraging existing technology to find an alternative currency'. He added that the report was only 'taken note of' by other BRICS members, not adopted. In March 2025, External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar was more categorical, saying there is no Indian policy to replace the dollar. He conceded, however, that BRICS members had differences, and there was no unified position of the grouping on the issue.
Deccan Herald
30 minutes ago
- Deccan Herald
Rising South: An order rebalanced
US President Donald Trump has, in his inimitable style, once again taken to social media to issue a threat to the BRICS countries huddled together to devise strategies against the US tariff attacks. 'Any country aligning with the anti-American policies of BRICS will be charged an ADDITIONAL 10 per cent tariff,' he said, hours after the BRICS finance ministers issued a statement that criticised the tariffs, calling them a threat to the global virtually to the BRICS gathering, Russian President Putin reiterated his suggestion of greater financial independence from the US dollar in international trade settlements. Trump is understandably annoyed at the revival of this narrative of criticising Trump's use of tariffs as a coercive policy to force countries to enter bilateral trade deals that favour the US, the BRICS summit proposed a series of reforms in the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and its currency valuation methods. According to the BRICS economic advocacy group, in the current economic uncertainty, the IMF needs to embrace urgent reforms in the quota system to increase the representation and voting power of developing countries, as the present system promotes dominance of advanced economies. The BRICS nations are also calling for an end to the 'gentlemen's agreement' which has historically favoured European countries in the IMF's leadership financial institutions, especially the two Bretton Woods institutions – the IMF and the World Bank (WB) – did play a significant role in the international financial architecture for some years. But they could not prevent the financial crisis nor bail the developed economies out of the crisis, much of which was their own creation. It has also been noted that their working and decision-making process continued to be greatly influenced by the developed 'North' and less relevant to the developing or underdeveloped 'South'. The last two or three decades have seen the global growth engine shift from the North to the South, which now houses three of the world's largest economies. Meanwhile, groupings such as BIMSTEC, BRICS, ASEAN, and SCO have added tremendous muscle to the emerging South-South countries add up to represent about 49% of the world's population, 39% of the global GDP, and 23% of international trade. In a changing geopolitical and geo-economic setting, when the US under Trump's administration is looking to withdraw from global institutions and looking more inwards in its quest for Making America Great Again (MAGA), the post-World War II economic institutions cannot expect to be relevant and succeed in their original objectives by remaining within a seven decades-old organisational structure. They must either reinvent themselves or face the possibility of paling into BRICS financial institutions and efforts under the South-South Cooperation (SSC) are assured signs of a collective leadership that is aligned with a multilateral world order – these are realities of the present era. The rise of the South, the emerging economies, and India's leadership role in SSC promise an alternative to archaic perceptions that are far removed from ground realities, and to the North and its tired leadership. Blocking the progress of BRICS will serve no real purpose for America or the attempts to create roadblocks for BRICS are born out of apprehensions of a challenge to the America-led world order, which is creaking under its own weight of contradictions. The independent non-dollar trade settlement system, which the BRICS is considering, may not be a reality soon, but it is born out of necessity, from the dollar's failure to meet the challenges and needs of the present era. The bilateral and multilateral economic, security, and strategic arrangements under the BRICS agenda need not necessarily hurt the interests of the US or any other grouping unless there is an established clash of interests, which in a highly globalised world would be detrimental for everyone play an important role in understanding the geopolitical and geo-economic dynamics of any given time. The decisions, economic or otherwise, the interpretations of meetings and events, and policy formulations made on flawed perceptions will lead to detrimental results. America and the rest of the Western world have to learn from past errors of judgement and look at the emerging institutions of the South, such as BRICS, from a new perspective. The shift is real – looking away cannot alter that reality.
New Indian Express
30 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
59 Palestinians in Gaza are killed by Israeli airstrikes or shot dead while seeking aid
DEIR AL-BALAH: At least 31 Palestinians were fatally shot on their way to an aid distribution site in the Gaza Strip on Saturday, while Israeli airstrikes killed at least 28 Palestinians including four children, Palestinian hospital officials and witnesses said. The deaths came after no signs of a breakthrough in ceasefire talks following two days of meetings between U.S. President Donald Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Trump had said he was closing in on an agreement between Israel and Hamas that would potentially wind down the war. The 31 shot dead were on their way to a distribution site run by the Israeli-backed American organization Gaza Humanitarian Foundation near Rafah in southern Gaza, hospital officials and witnesses said. The Red Cross said its field hospital saw its largest influx of dead in more than a year of operation after the shootings, and that the overwhelming majority of the more than 100 people hurt had gunshot wounds. The airstrikes in central Gaza's Deir al-Balah killed 13 including the four children, officials at Al-Aqsa Martyrs Hospital said. Fifteen others were killed in Khan Younis in the south, according to Nasser Hospital. Israel's military did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Intense airstrikes continued Saturday evening in the area of Beit Hanoun in northern Gaza.
