Why is Trump taking aim at BRICS?
Why is BRICS in Mr. Trump's cross-hairs?
Even before he was sworn in as U.S. President for the second time, Donald Trump had made it clear that he saw the BRICS grouping as 'anti-American' and a threat to the dollar that he needed to neutralise. On November 30 last year, Mr. Trump said the U.S. would require BRICS members to commit that they would not create a new BRICS common currency, 'nor back any other currency to replace the mighty U.S. dollar', threatening 100% tariffs on them.
It's a threat he has repeated several times since. Mr. Trump's irritation appears to stem from BRICS declarations in South Africa in 2023 and Russia in 2024, where members that now also include Egypt, Ethiopia, Indonesia, Iran and the UAE, discussed a BRICS Cross-Border Payments Initiative that aims to facilitate trade and investment within BRICS countries using local currencies and other mechanisms. The initiative built momentum due to the problems Western sanctions on Russia have meant for trading partners in the Global South.
What has the U.S. threatened to do?
Last Sunday (July 6, 2025), just as BRICS leaders gathered in Rio for the 17th BRICS summit, Mr. Trump said in a social media post that any country aligning with BRICS would face a 10% added tariff. The penalty was 'just for that one thing' of being a member, Mr. Trump said later. It is unclear why the tariff rate was dropped to a tenth from the original threat of 100%, and even whether Mr. Trump will go through with the BRICS tariffs along with other reciprocal tariffs planned for August 1. But there seems little doubt that Mr. Trump wants BRICS de-fanged. 'You can tell the (U.S.) President is (upset) every time he looks at the BRICS de-dollarisation effort…(and) Rio didn't help,' said Steve Bannon, Trump's former White House chief strategist, according to Politico magazine.
Editorial | Building resilience: On the 17th Summit of BRICS emerging economies
In addition, the Trump administration has slapped 50% tariffs on Brazil after accusing President Lula da Silva of a 'witch-hunt' against former Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro, who faces charges of attempted coup. It has also imposed 30% tariffs on South Africa after accusing it of unequal trade, as well as expressing concerns over the treatment of Afrikaners (White South Africans). Republican Senators close to Mr. Trump also plan to bring a bill called the Sanctioning Russia Act of 2025 that seeks to place 500% tariffs on imports of oil and sanctioned Russian products, which would hurt Russia, as well as India and China, its two biggest importers.
Are Mr. Trump's concerns valid?
Mr. Trump's concerns about de-dollarisation have been denied by practically every BRICS member. The South African Ministry of Foreign Affairs issued a detailed statement explaining why the BRICS attempt to use national currencies within the grouping is not the same as replacing the dollar as the global standard. While anti-U.S. rhetoric of some BRICS leaders has been harsh, the wording of the BRICS Rio declaration 2025 issued this week does not directly challenge the U.S. or the dollar.
In the operative Paragraph 50, the leaders said they resolved to task ministers of finance and central bank governors 'to continue the discussion on the BRICS Cross-Border Payments Initiative and acknowledge the progress made by the BRICS Payment Task Force (BPTF) in identifying possible pathways to support the continuation of discussions on the potential for greater interoperability of BRICS payment systems.' Paragraph 13 expressed 'serious concerns' over the rise of unilateral tariff and non-tariff measures but didn't name the U.S.
Where does India stand?
The Modi government, hopeful of clinching a Free Trade Agreement with the U.S., has strenuously objected to Mr. Trump's categorisation of the BRICS as 'anti-American'.
Also read: India will give a 'new form' to BRICS grouping in 2026: PM Modi
In a parliamentary response on December 2, 2024, the MoS (Finance) Pankaj Chaudhury made it clear that the U.S. allegations referred to a report prepared by Russia during its chairmanship of BRICS, where it had spoken of 'possible alternatives relating to cross-border payments' and 'leveraging existing technology to find an alternative currency'.
He added that the report was only 'taken note of' by other BRICS members, not adopted. In March 2025, External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar was more categorical, saying there is no Indian policy to replace the dollar. He conceded, however, that BRICS members had differences, and there was no unified position of the grouping on the issue.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
20 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Italy minister warns concert with pro-Putin conductor risks turning into propaganda coup
A concert in Italy by a top Russian conductor shunned in the West since the invasion of Ukraine could send the wrong message, the Italian culture minister said on Tuesday, stopping short of asking organisers to cancel it. Valery Gergiev – regarded as close to Russian President Vladimir Putin – is expected to lead a local orchestra and soloists from St Petersburg's Mariinsky Orchestra on July 27 at the Reggia di Caserta palace near Naples. The event has drawn protests from Italian politicians and international activists, including the wife of late Russian opposition leader Alexei Navalny, who have all urged Italy to cancel it. 'There is a big problem' with the festival, Yulia Navalnaya wrote in an op-ed on Tuesday's la Repubblica newspaper, calling Gergiev a 'conscious and active accomplice of Putin's regime'. Gergiev, 72, did not immediately comment. Italy's Culture Minister Alessandro Giuli said in a statement: 'Art is free and cannot be censored. Propaganda, however, even if done with talent, is something else.' The minister said that the concert could 'turn a high-level but objectively controversial and divisive musical event into a sounding board for Russian propaganda'. Giuli added that the centre-left regional authority of Campania, which organised and paid for the 'Un'Estate da RE' festival, was free to choose which events to host. The president of Campania, Vincenzo De Luca, rejected criticism, telling reporters that blocking cultural exchanges 'does not help peace, but only serves to fuel the rivers of hatred'. De Luca, a critic of Israel's military campaign in Gaza, said last week Gergiev had been invited, along with Israeli conductor Daniel Oren, to keep 'channels of communication open even with those who do not think like us'. Italy's right-wing government has supported Ukraine and international sanctions against Moscow. In 2022, several Western cultural institutions, including Milan's La Scala, the Munich Philharmonic Orchestra and New York's Carnegie Hall, severed ties with Gergiev over his failure to condemn Russia's invasion of Ukraine. A year after, he was made director of Moscow's Bolshoi Theatre, despite being banished from many international concert halls. Navalny's Anti-Corruption Foundation wrote last week to the Italian interior minister, urging him to deny entry to Gergiev, and to the culture minister and the director of the Reggia di Caserta asking them to cancel the concert.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
28 minutes ago
- First Post
'Can you hit Moscow, St. Petersburg?' Trump privately asked Zelenskyy if Ukraine could strike deep inside Russia
Trump privately encouraged Zelenskyy to intensify attacks within Russian territory, asking whether Ukraine could target cities like Moscow and St. Petersburg if provided with the appropriate weapons, according to a report, citing sources read more Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and US President Donald Trump appear at a meeting, while they attend the funeral of Pope Francis, at the Vatican, April 26, 2025. (Photo: Reuters) US President Donald Trump privately encouraged Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy to intensify attacks within Russian territory, asking whether Ukraine could target cities like Moscow and St. Petersburg if provided with the appropriate weapons, according to a report, citing two people briefed on the conversation. 'Volodymyr, can you hit Moscow? . . . Can you hit St Petersburg too?' Financial Times quoted Trump as saying during a July 4 call with Zelensky. Zelenskyy reportedly replied, 'Absolutely. We can if you give us the weapons.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The provocative remarks made by Trump to Zelenskyy reportedly came just a day after a tense phone call with Russian President Vladimir Putin, which Trump later described as 'bad,' according to Financial Times, citing sources. Trump's conversation with Zelenskyy is being viewed as a direct response to Putin's refusal to engage in US-backed ceasefire negotiations. The behind-the-scenes exchange reflects growing frustration within the Trump administration over Moscow's unwillingness to compromise and signals a sharp shift from Trump's earlier campaign pledge to avoid deeper US involvement in foreign conflicts. It also contrasts with his traditionally cautious stance toward confronting Russia. Trump signalled support for Ukraine launching long-range strikes, describing the approach as a way to 'make them (Russians) feel the pain' and force the Kremlin to negotiate, reported FT, citing two individuals familiar with the call. While it is still uncertain whether the US will supply long-range weapons to Ukraine, a Western official familiar with the discussions told FT that Trump's remarks reflect a growing sentiment among Ukraine's Western allies, one that supports more aggressive strikes inside Russian territory to 'bring the war to Muscovites.' This view, the official added, is quietly gaining momentum among American policymakers as frustration with Moscow's stance continues to build. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Meanwhile, neither the White House nor the Ukrainian president's office has responded to requests for comment on the report. On Monday, in major policy shift, President Trump announced new weapons for Ukraine and threatened sanctions on countries that continue buying Russian exports unless Moscow agrees to a peace deal within 50 days. Sitting alongside Nato Secretary General Mark Rutte in the Oval Office, Trump expressed frustration with Russian President Vladimir Putin. 'My conversations with him are very pleasant, and then the missiles go off at night,' Trump told reporters, adding that Putin had repeatedly broken promises to end the war. 'He's fooled a lot of people,' Trump said, calling Putin a 'tough guy.' 'He fooled Clinton, Bush, Obama, Biden — he didn't fool me,' he added. Trump said billions of dollars in advanced weapons would be sent to Ukraine, including urgently requested Patriot air defence systems. 'We're going to make top-of-the-line weapons, and they'll be sent to Nato,' he said, clarifying that Nato allies would cover the costs. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'It's a full complement with the batteries,' he noted. 'We're going to have some come very soon, within days… a couple of the countries that have Patriots are going to swap over and will replace the Patriots with the ones they have.' Up to 17 Patriot batteries ordered by other countries could be diverted to Ukraine 'very quickly,' he said. Trump's threat to impose secondary sanctions—targeting nations that continue to buy Russian oil—would mark a significant escalation in Western sanctions policy. Currently, while Western nations have largely cut direct financial ties with Moscow, they have stopped short of penalising other countries such as China and India for continuing to import Russian oil, allowing the Kremlin to earn hundreds of billions in revenues since the war began. Bipartisan support is growing in Congress for legislation that would authorise such measures. With inputs from agencies
Indian Express
36 minutes ago
- Indian Express
‘Will they fight for us?' Trump doubts NATO allies, backs UK in defence talks
US President Donald Trump has said he believes UK would support the United States in the event of war, but expressed doubt over whether European Union countries would do the same. He indicated this was one reason he had not pursued a trade agreement with the bloc. In an interview with the BBC published on Tuesday, Trump said, 'One of the problems with NATO, as I said, we have to fight for them, but will they actually fight for us if we had a war?' 'I'm not sure I can say it, but I will say this, I believe that the UK would fight with us. I think that they would be with us. I'm not sure that a lot of the other countries would be,' he added. Trump, said this view influenced his decision to offer Britain some relief from his tariff policy. The US has granted exemptions to the UK, while threatening to impose a 30% tariff on European goods. 'Look, that's why I made a deal with them,' Trump said, referring to Britain. 'I haven't made a deal – I mean, I've made some other deals but for the most part, in terms of your competitors, and in terms of the European Union, I haven't made a deal.' NATO's mutual defence clause, known as Article 5, has only been invoked once following the attacks on the United States on 11 September 2001. British forces participated in the US-led response.
