CNBC Daily Open: Investors seem conditioned to expect Trump reversals
The move should be a huge relief not just to investors, but perhaps most of the population on Earth. The U.S. and China are the two largest economies in the world, according to World Bank data, and a trade war in which imports of each other's goods double in price would probably stymie, if not cripple, the global economy.
But markets were mostly unmoved. Well, they did move — lower. The three big U.S. stock indexes retreated Monday as this outcome was more or less expected, since both sides had earlier telegraphed an extension of the tariff pause.
Investors could have also been conditioned to expect flip-flopping from Trump, such that threats, promises, criticisms and praises don't carry as much heft as they should anymore. On Monday, Trump said Intel's CEO Lip-Bu Tan's "success and rise is an amazing story," after describing Tan as "highly CONFLICTED" the week before.
There's a Freudian idea in which an individual projects their thoughts and feelings to another person. Researchers are, well, conflicted, on the veracity of the phenomenon, but empirical observation suggests it's not uncommon.
Trump extends pause on China tariffs. U.S. tariffs on China were delayed for 90 days, Trump said on Truth Social. It was the expected outcome from the latest round of talks between the two countries.
E.J. Antoni to be nominated as Bureau of Labor Statistics commissioner. Trump said Monday that Antoni, the chief economist at the conservative Heritage Foundation, is his choice to replace Erika McEntarfer, whom he fired after accusing her of data manipulation.
Intel CEO is a "success," Trump says. The U.S. president's praise of Lip-Bu Tan is a reversal in tone from his previous week's message, in which Trump said Tan "must resign, immediately."
U.S. stocks end Monday lower. Major stock indexes fell as traders awaited the release of the consumer price index later today — and appeared unimpressed by Trump's extension of tariff truce with China. European markets dipped as well.
[PRO] Citibank raises its S&P 500 forecast. The Wall Street bank attributed its higher year-end target for the index to strong quarterly earnings, expected benefits from Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill and a better-than-expected impact from tariffs.
What Trump's Nvidia and AMD China deal means for the world
Nvidia and AMD have agreed to share some of their revenue from sales to China with the U.S. government, according to several reports.
The arrangement crafted by U.S. President Donald Trump's administration is "unusual," analysts told CNBC, but underscores the transactional nature of the current White House leader. Meanwhile, investors see the move as broadly positive for both Nvidia and AMD, which can again secure access to the Chinese market.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
This MAGA "Biggest Loser" Star Had A Huge Meltdown Defending White People During A Talk About Slavery On CNN
Biggest Loser coach and Donald Trump supporter Jillian Michaels had a stunning meltdown Wednesday night while defending white people during a fiery debate about the president's efforts to rewrite US history. Michaels appeared on a CNN NewsNight panel with conservative commentator Scott Jennings, Rep. Ritchie Torres (D-N.Y.), Democratic strategist Julie Roginsky, and legal analyst Elie Honig to discuss Trump's pick for Kennedy Center honoree. The conversation took a sharp turn when Roginsky, discussing changes Trump has spearheaded at the Kennedy Center and the Smithsonian Institution, accused the president of 'trying to change culture' and revise history so it does not offend his MAGA base. Related: 'Can you address some of those things in there? Because have you looked at some of the things in there?' Michaels asked, referring to historical displays at the Smithsonian Institution. 'Yeah. Yes, slavery was a bad thing we should talk about,' Roginsky said before Michaels interrupted. 'He's not whitewashing slavery,' the fitness guru argued. 'And you cannot tie imperialism and racism and slavery to just one race, which is pretty much what every single exhibit does.' @Acyn/ CNN / Via Related: The CNN panel erupted in cross-talk, and Michaels turned to Torres and asked, 'Do you realize that only less than 2% of white Americans owned slaves?' citing a contested figure. 'But it was a system of white supremacy,' Torres responded. As people continued to talk over each other, Michaels added that slavery is thousands of years old, but was interrupted by a stunned Phillip, who said she was 'surprised' that her guest was 'trying to litigate who was the beneficiary of slavery.' 'In the context of American history, what are you saying is incorrect by saying it was white people oppressing Black people?' Phillip asked. 'Every single thing is like, oh, no, no, no, this is all because 'white people bad,' and that's just not the truth,' Michaels said. Related: Michaels then characterized a Smithsonian exhibit as claiming that people 'migrated from Cuba because 'white people bad,'' before accusing Roginsky of not knowing what's in the museum. But the exhibit Michaels called out didn't actually appear to make that argument. Later that night, she posted a photo of an exhibit that names US foreign policy as a contributor to political instability in Cuba and the Dominican Republic. The pictured exhibit did not expressly mention white people at all, except to note that some of the first Cubans to immigrate to the US were 'wealthy White Cubans.' @jillianmichaels / Via During her appearance on CNN, the fitness influencer also griped about other elements of the Smithsonian.'Do you know that when you walk in the front door, the first thing you see is the gay flag?' asked Michaels, who is married to a woman. She then started to criticize an exhibit that touches on gender testing in sports before Phillip interjected, 'We don't have time to litigate all of this.' Related: 'Of course we don't, because then you're going to lose the argument, and if everything is racialized, just like you're trying to do to me now,' Michaels told Phillip. 'Excuse me? Jillian, you brought up race,' Phillip said. 'This was a conversation about the arts, and you brought up race.' @Acyn/ CNN / Via This article originally appeared on HuffPost. Also in In the News: Also in In the News: Also in In the News:
CNBC
12 minutes ago
- CNBC
Friday's big stock stories: What's likely to move the market in the next trading session
Stocks @ Night is a daily newsletter delivered after hours, giving you a first look at tomorrow and last look at today. Sign up for free to receive it directly in your inbox. Here's what CNBC's producers were watching in Thursday's session and what's on the radar for Friday. UnitedHealth Group Some big names have piled into this health-care giant over the last several weeks, according to 13F filings compiled and reported on this evening by CNBC's Leslie Picker. She will have a lot more on "WorldWide Exchange" and "Squawk Box" Friday morning. David Tepper's Appaloosa Management bought the stock. So did Warren Buffett 's Berkshire Hathaway . And Scion Asset Management's Michael Burry , of "Big Short" fame, bought call options, hoping the stock is going higher. Shares are up 10% after hours. UnitedHealth has had a rough go in the market, and of course, outside of the market. Shares are down 46% so far year to date. The stock is 57% from the November 2024 high. It is by far the worst performing stock in the Dow 30 in 2025 and in the 12-month period. Top-rated analyst Lisa Gill of JP Morgan will weigh in with her first thoughts on the stock tomorrow morning with Frank Holland on "Worldwide Exchange," which starts at 5 a.m. ET. Gordon Gekko used to like to say, "money never sleeps pal." UNH YTD mountain UnitedHealth Group shares year to date Intel Bloomberg is reporting that the White House is considering making a direct investment in the stock. Intel was up 7% today on the news, it is up an additional 3% after hours. Intel is up 19% so far in 2025 but the stock is about 13% from its February high. This was a $68 stock back in 2021. It's now trading around $24. Full coverage continues tomorrow morning. INTC YTD mountain Intel shares year to date. Housing in the USA Noted analyst Ivy Zelman will join "Squawk Box" with Joe Kernen and Andrew Ross Sorkin in the 8 a.m. hour. There's a ton of issues including a shortage of homes to buy, high prices, a lack of places to move to — all of which ties up the market. Mortgage rates and local rules are also issues the builders say are holding them back. Zelman will go through the list with us and look at the stocks. The SPDR S & P Homebuilders ETF (XHB) is 10% from its November high. It is up 11.5% so far in August. A lot of the big names are up big in August. Hovnanian is up 31% in August, but it's still 35% from last summer's high. Lennar is up 16% in August, and it's 30% from its September 2024 high. Pultegroup is up almost 14% in August, and is 14% from its October high. Taylor Morris Home is also up about 15% in August, and is 10% from the November high. Toll Brothers is up 11% in August, and is 23% from the November high. NVR is up more than 8% in August, putting it 18% from its October high. Uranium and Rare Minerals As President Donald Trump heads to Alaska to meet with Russian President Vladimir Putin, the Global X Uranium ETF (URA) is up 39% in three months. The ETF is 7.5% from its mid-July high. It is up about 80% since Russia invaded Ukraine in 2022. The VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF (REMX) is up 46% in 2025. The Sprott Critical Materials ETF (SETM) is up 40% so far this year. Full coverage of the president's mission begins on "Squawk Box" in our 6 a.m. hour.
New York Post
13 minutes ago
- New York Post
Little Sisters of the Poor are still fighting ObamaCare— as states force nuns to violate their faith
It's enraging. More than a decade after the Obama administration first tried to force the Little Sisters of the Poor to buy contraception including abortifacient drugs for employees, states are still hounding the nuns in court. At its heart, ObamaCare was a massive welfare program meant to redistribute health-care costs to the middle class. But it was also a social engineering project aimed at coercing religious organizations and businesses to adopt progressive values. The Affordable Care Act mandated employers, including nonprofits such as the Little Sisters of the Poor, to pay for contraceptives in their worker-provided health insurance as an 'essential health benefit' under the euphemistic category of 'preventative and wellness services.' There was no 'religious exemption.' It's worth taking a step back and thinking about that term: The very idea that an American citizen should be impelled to ask the state for an 'exemption' to practice their faith is an assault on the fundamental idea of liberty. Imagine having to ask the state for an exemption to exercise your free speech? What makes the case even more unsettling, of course, is that the state is demanding citizens engage in activity that is explicitly against their faith. Now, there may well be numerous theological disputes within the Catholic Church. The use of contraception and abortion aren't among them. There is absolutely no question that nuns hold genuine, long-standing religious convictions. And there is no question that liberals want to smash them. Nevertheless, the Little Sisters spent years in court, working their way up to the Supreme Court and winning protections against the federal government (twice). In 2017, the Trump administration exempted religious groups like the Little Sisters from the ObamaCare mandate entirely. The government, however, bolstered with unlimited taxpayer funds, can hunt its prey in perpetuity. So states such as New Jersey and Pennsylvania began their own lawsuits against the Little Sisters. This week, in a nationwide ruling, Judge Wendy Beetlestone, chief judge for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, found that the Trump administration's expansion of religious exemptions from the contraception mandate was 'arbitrary and capricious.' Religious nonprofit groups and businesses will again have to ask for special accommodations from the Department of Health and Human Services to avoid buying abortifacients. Even if the Trump administration grants every one of them, one day there will be authoritarians in charge who won't — and nonprofit employees will still be guaranteed contraception through health plans paid for by employers. Beetlestone, incidentally, was the same judge who issued a nationwide injunction against the contraception exemption back in 2017, arguing it was 'difficult' to think of any rule that 'intrudes more into the lives of women.' The Supreme Court overturned it in 2020 by a 7-2 majority. Because no one has a right to free condoms. Indeed, the Religious Freedom Restoration Act holds that the state must have a 'compelling interest' and use the least restrictive means when burdening religious practice. Free birth control isn't a compelling interest. And fining religious organizations millions of dollars to pressure them into abandoning their beliefs is perhaps the most restrictive means of action, short of throwing nuns in prison. You'd think attacking a group of nuns who offer end-of-life care for the elderly would be a public relations nightmare for Democrats. Yet they've never really shied away from it. Because the point is to intimidate others. In many ways, the Little Sisters' struggle is reminiscent of the travails of Jack Phillips, the Colorado baker who refuses to create unique message cakes for gay weddings. Phillips is now embroiled in his umpteenth court case over his crimes. The message: Dissent from those who practice their faith will be punished. Take the Catholic Charities adoption agencies, which shuttered in numerous states due to laws and policies compelling them to place children with same-sex couples. The attacks will continue until the Supreme Court upholds the clear language and intent of the First Amendment and religious liberty. It's already punted once: In Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission, a 7-2 Supreme Court decision in favor of Jack Phillips, the court barred the state's attacks only if state officials openly demeaned their target's faith — a ruling so narrow as to be largely useless. But it shouldn't matter why the state is steamrolling the religious liberty of nuns, or anyone else for that matter. The problem is that the ObamaCare mandate is authoritarian and unconstitutional. And the only way to fix that problem is to overturn it. David Harsanyi is a senior writer at the Washington Examiner. Twitter @davidharsanyi
