
UN warns of 'ongoing tragedy' as Indigenous groups in Colombia face extinction
BOGOTA: The United Nations human rights office in
Colombia
warned Tuesday that five Indigenous groups in a storied mountain range face "physical and cultural" extinction, a critical threat that stems from armed groups fighting over their territory and insufficient state protection.
Scott Campbell, Colombia's representative for the
UN High Commissioner for Human Rights
, said in a statement that the risk of physical and cultural extinction of Indigenous People of the
Sierra Nevada de Santa Marta
is "an ongoing tragedy that we can and must prevent."
Campbell urged the Colombian government to protect the Kogui, Wiwa, Kankuamo, Arhuaco, and Ette Naka Indigenous groups, whose combined population is approximately 54,700 people.
Campbell's statement followed a visit to the Sierra Nevada region, where UN officials spoke with representatives of these Indigenous tribes.
"These groups are under various forms of cruel attack from non-state armed groups," Campbell said, highlighting the "devastating repercussions on their lives, their land, their territory, their self government...and their spirituality."
In 2022, UNESCO added the ancestral knowledge of these Indigenous groups to its Intangible Cultural Heritage of Humanity list. The recognition highlights the "fundamental role" their traditions play in preserving the Sierra Nevada de Santa Marta - a mountain range that emerges directly from the Caribbean Sea and boasts snowy peaks reaching nearly 6,000 meters.
But for many years, the Indigenous people of the Sierra Nevada have been under attack from settlers, and now from rebel groups.
Campbell said that rebel groups in the area are imposing curfews on Indigenous communities and interfering with their local assemblies. He added that hundreds of Indigenous people from the Sierra Nevada de Santa Marta have been forcibly displaced, while last year an Arhuaco community leader was murdered and a member of the Kogui tribe disappeared.
Colombia's government has struggled to pacify rural areas where rebel groups and drug trafficking gangs fight for territory abandoned by the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia, the large guerilla group that made peace with the government in 2016.
President Gustavo Petro has launched peace talks with most of the nation's remaining rebel groups, but the negotiations have yielded few results so far.
Campbell urged the government to protect Indigenous people in the Sierra Nevada not only through military force, but by providing better access to healthcare, education and employment opportunities.
"The violent situation has its roots in disputes over control of territory, drug trafficking routes and various forms of illicit economic activity by non-state armed groups." Campell said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
an hour ago
- First Post
Germany reviewing fate of Afghans stranded in Pakistan amid mass deportations
Pakistan has begun to deport documented Afghan refugees ahead of its September 1 deadline for them to leave, according to the United Nations, a step that could see more than 1 million Afghans expelled from the country. In total, more than one million Afghans have left Pakistan since 2023, including more than 200,000 since April. AFP File Germany is assessing whether Afghans stranded in Pakistan and awaiting resettlement will still be permitted to enter the country, Interior Minister Nancy Faeser said on Thursday as Islamabad steps up deportations. Pakistan has begun expelling documented Afghan refugees ahead of its September 1 deadline for their departure, the United Nations said, a move that could force more than one million Afghans out of the country. The group includes over 2,000 Afghans approved for relocation to Germany under an admission programme aimed at evacuating individuals deemed at risk under Taliban rule in Afghanistan. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD A source familiar with the situation told Reuters that Pakistani authorities have continued detaining Afghans for deportation across the border, even during the country's Independence Day holiday on Thursday. 'People with German admission approval are being brought to the Torkham border (between Pakistan and Afghanistan) as we speak,' the source told Reuters. German Interior Minister Alexander Dobrindt confirmed that some Afghans in Germany's resettlement scheme 'have recently drawn the attention of Pakistani authorities', and Berlin was in discussions with Islamabad over their status. 'We are reviewing whether these people can actually leave for Germany. Whether this actually happens depends on the outcome of the review process,' Dobrindt told journalists. Germany's admission programme for at-risk Afghans – launched in October 2022 by the centre-left government in office at the time – is now under review following February's migration-focused election won by conservatives. The new centre-right coalition intends to close the scheme, which had already been suspended pending an ongoing review. Since May 2021, Germany has admitted about 36,500 Afghans seen as vulnerable to Taliban crackdowns, but the conservative-led government says humanitarian migration now exceeds the country's integration capacity. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD On Wednesday, Germany's foreign ministry said it was in close contact with Pakistani authorities and using established emergency mechanisms to prevent deportations of Afghans. The interior ministry said it could not provide a timeline to determine the future of the admission programme but expects decisions soon. It did not say whether the increase in deportations from Pakistan would hasten a decision. With inputs from agencies


Economic Times
an hour ago
- Economic Times
Same-sex couple moves court against Income Tax Act
A same-sex couple has challenged a discriminatory tax law in Bombay High Court. The couple argues that the law unfairly taxes gifts between same-sex partners. Heterosexual couples do not face this tax burden. The petitioners claim this violates constitutional rights. The court admitted the petition and will notify the Attorney General. The LGBTQIA+ community is closely watching the case. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads 'The love that dare not speak its name' spoke up against an 'uneven' tax code on Thursday morning at Room number 6 of the Bombay High Court, a theatre of many epic legal battles. A same-sex couple, in a relationship for years, has moved the court, challenging the law that discriminates against them by taxing the gifts received by one partner from the Income Tax Act, no such tax on gifts is levied for a heterosexual couple, even if the partners are not formally married but are presumed to be in a marriage. They are not taxed simply because they have the possibility of getting to the petitioners, such unequal economic treatment to same-sex couples, who may be in a long, stable relationship, would amount to a denial of the equal protection of the law on the basis of sex --- a form of discrimination prohibited by Articles 14 and 15 of the Constitution of the petition, the bench comprising Justice and Firdoush Pooniwalla said the court would send a notice to the Attorney General as it raises a constitutional petitioners, Payio Ashiho, a homemaker, and his partner Vivek Divan, a lawyer who had practised at the High Court and worked at the UN headquarters, were represented by Advocate Dr Dhruv to curb tax evasion, Section 56(2)(x) of the IT Act taxes any money, property, or other assets received without adequate consideration if their value exceeds Rs 50,000. Such receipts or gifts are categorised as 'income from other sources'. However, as per the fifth proviso to Section 56(2)(x), such gifts are not treated as 'income from other sources' and therefore not taxed, when received from 'relatives', which also includes 'spouses' (a term that the statute does not separately explain).Unlike the partners in a heterosexual couple, the petitioners are unable to claim tax benefit as they would not legally qualify as 'spouses' as they belong to the same petition challenges the constitutional validity of the explanation to the fifth proviso to Section 56(2)(x) of the Act, insofar as it discriminates against same-sex couples in taxing gifts received from one partner to petitioners have prayed before the court, (1) to declare the reference to the term 'spouse' as unconstitutional in so far as it excludes same-sex couples in the same circumstances; (2) to declare that the particular proviso is applicable to same-sex couples in a long, stable relationship; (3) restrain tax authorities from carrying out reassessment and imposing penalties relating to transactions between the petitioners. It may be pointed out that the petitioners neither seek recognition nor presumption of outcome of the proceedings, according to legal circles, would be closely followed by the LGBTQIA+ community as it could have a bearing on investments, property ownerships, and some legal victories, community members, often voicing the discriminations they encounter, believe they still have a long way to go in preserving their dignity and freedom. While in 2018, the apex court had decriminalised same-sex relationship by scrapping a colonial era law, in 2023, a five-member Supreme Court bench declined to recognise LGBTQIA+ persons' right to marry under the Special Marriage Act, K Singh, managing partner of law firm Capstone Legal said For such a prayer to be granted, an expansive reading of the word 'spouse' is required to be considered by the Court.'However, the biggest bottleneck would be the fact that no legal provision in India recognises the rights of same sex couples,' said Singh.


Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Russia bans Reporters Without Borders, puts press freedom group on ‘undesirable' list
Russia has put Reporters Without Borders (RSF) on its list of "undesirable" organisations, effectively banning the media watchdog from operating in the country, Moscow's justice ministry register showed Thursday. The Kremlin has escalated its decade-long clampdown on independent media after sending troops to Ukraine in 2022.(AP) Under a controversial law passed in 2015, but rarely used before its offensive on Ukraine, Russia can ban overseas organisations deemed a threat to national security. Being branded as "undesirable" criminalises the group and puts its staff at risk of prosecution. The Kremlin has escalated its decade-long clampdown on independent media after sending troops to Ukraine in 2022, imposing sweeping censorship laws that effectively ban criticism of the army. RSF, based in France, regularly denounces attacks on freedom of expression and helps persecuted journalists. Only last month, a Russian court jailed a journalist and former volunteer for the late opposition leader Alexey Navalny -- whose organisations have been declared "extremist" in Russia -- for 12 years. Reporters Without Borders described her imprisonment as a "symbol of the Kremlin's repression of independent voices" and called for her release, as for all journalists in Russian detention. The list of "undesirable" entities maintained by the justice ministry targets around 250 organisations now, including Amnesty International, Greenpeace, and Yale University. It also features groups controlled by people long reviled by Russian authorities, including Hungarian-born billionaire George Soros and Mikhail Khodorkovsky, a Russian tycoon who opposed President Vladimir Putin.