logo
What's the Democrats' problem? It's the spending, stupid.

What's the Democrats' problem? It's the spending, stupid.

The Hill6 hours ago

After four years of crisis-level spending, Democrats now worry about deficits and debt. Strange, isn't it? The Democrats' selective attention shows clearly that their priority is not deficits and debt but preserving bloated spending and raising taxes to pay for it.
Democrats have seized on a looming 2026 increase in tax rates as their baseline, instead of today's tax rates, which were lowered by the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. By so doing, they argue that not allowing tax rates to increase above today's levels is a deficit and debt increase.
From the Democrats' point of view, tax rates going up (as they will in 2026 for average American taxpayers without legislation preventing this) equates to keeping rates unchanged. It is a neat way of transforming tax cuts that aren't into the tax hikes that will be. Such is the duplicity of the Democrats; such is the fluidity of baselines.
The baseline that the Democrats don't talk about is the one that has gotten America into today's deep deficit and debt hole, and that they supercharged with spending over the previous four years. What Democrats and the Biden administration did was to make the COVID crisis their baseline for spending and keep it there.
Looking at fiscal years, the Congressional Budget Office shows that in 2019, the federal government spent approximately $4.4 trillion — a sizable 8 percent increase over 2018. In 2020, COVID hit, and spending shot up 47 percent to $6.5 trillion.
Under Biden, it stayed roughly there: $6.8 trillion in 2021, $6.2 trillion in 2022, $6.1 trillion in 2023 and $6.7 trillion in 2024.
Crisis-level spending, even without a crisis driving it, saw Biden and Democrats run approximately $7.5 trillion in deficit spending over just four years.
Subtracting actual 2019 spending from their crisis-level spending shows nearly $8.2 trillion in spending above the 2019 level, per my calculations. Such crisis-level spending put 2024 spending 52 percent over where it had been in 2019.
Even when 2019 spending is adjusted annually for inflation (increasing 2019 spending by Consumer Price Index growth and then increasing each year thereafter) — an inflation that hit a 40-year high and that the Democrats' excessive spending helped to fuel — I estimated that Biden and Democratic crisis-level spending surpassed it by $6 trillion.
In Biden's first year, and after I adjusted 2019 spending in each of the five years for inflation, federal spending exceeded the adjusted 2019 spending level by $1.3 trillion.
Spending is the problem. Not tax revenues.
Tax revenues increased in 2019 (the first year they were collected because the rate adjustments occurred in 2018, and the lower rate revenues were paid in 2019) under the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. They barely edged down in 2020, despite COVID. They increased again in 2021, 2022 and 2024.
In 2023, revenues fell when slower economic growth (following tax increases in Biden's misnamed Inflation Reduction Act), an end to pandemic policies and the expiration of certain tax provisions combined to lower them.
Looking at revenues and spending versus GDP underscores that excessive spending is the culprit. A March Congressional Budget Office report showed 2024 revenues below the 30-year average by just 0.1 percentage point: 17.1 percent versus 17.2 percent. In contrast, spending was over by 2.3 percentage points: 23.4 percent versus 21.1 percent.
Subtracting that 2.3 percent spending from 2024's actual deficit and the resulting deficit, I found that it would have been just 4.1 percent of GDP, exceeding the Congressional Budget Office's 30-year average of 3.9 percent by just 0.2 percentage points. Sure, it's still too high, but hardly the bloated deficits that Biden left.
To make it even clearer: Inflating 2019 spending by the Consumer Price Index over the last five years, per my calculations, it would have been nearly $5.4 trillion in 2024, instead of the $6.7 trillion that it was under Biden. That $5.4 trillion would have amounted to just nearly 18.7 percent of GDP, instead of the 23.4 percent that it was.
Calculating the deficit from our inflated 2024 spending level, I found that, as a percentage of GDP, it would have amounted to just 1.6 percent, less than half of the Congressional Budget Office's 30-year average.
With COVID, spending increased; it should have. When COVID ended, spending should have reverted to pre-crisis levels — at least to a pre-crisis level adjusted for inflation.
It did not. And it did not over each of the next four years.
Democrats' crisis-level spending has created crisis-level deficits and debt. Now, they want a disguised tax hike under the guise of paying for them.
To update the Democrats' 1992 campaign slogan: It's the spending, stupid.
J.T. Young is the author of the recent book, 'Unprecedented Assault: How Big Government Unleashed America's Socialist Left' from RealClear Publishing and has over three decades' experience working in Congress, the Department of Treasury, the Office of Management and Budget, and representing a Fortune 20 company.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

As a Mamdani Victory Looms, Anti-Muslim Attacks Roll In From the Right
As a Mamdani Victory Looms, Anti-Muslim Attacks Roll In From the Right

New York Times

time16 minutes ago

  • New York Times

As a Mamdani Victory Looms, Anti-Muslim Attacks Roll In From the Right

Even before Zohran Mamdani claimed victory in New York City's Democratic mayoral primary, he had become a target of racist attacks from the far right. Those attacks have only intensified in the wake of his commanding performance on Tuesday, with Republican elected officials and right-wing media figures accusing him of promoting Islamic law, supporting terrorism and posing a threat to the safety of New Yorkers, especially Jews. There has been nothing subtle about it: Stephen Miller, the architect of the Trump administration's immigration policy, called Mr. Mamdani's apparent win 'the clearest warning yet of what happens to a society when it fails to control migration.' Representative Andy Ogles, Republican of Tennessee, accused Mr. Mamdani of supporting terrorists and asked Attorney General Pam Bondi to strip him of his citizenship and deport him. Representative Nancy Mace, Republican of South Carolina, shared a photo of Mr. Mamdani preparing for an Eid service while dressed in a kurta, writing, 'we sadly have forgotten' the Sept. 11 attacks, which occurred when Mr. Mamdani was 9 years old and living in Manhattan. And Charlie Kirk, the head of Turning Point USA, a leading group for conservative youth, sought to connect him to those attacks even more directly. '24 years ago a group of Muslims killed 2,753 people on 9/11,' he wrote. 'Now a Muslim Socialist is on pace to run New York City.' The attacks on Mr. Mamdani, who would be the first Muslim mayor of New York City if elected, deal in well-worn Islamophobic and anti-immigrant tropes. To some, they carry echoes of the 'birther' conspiracy theory Donald J. Trump stoked for years before he was elected president, when he falsely claimed that President Barack Obama was Muslim and born in Kenya. Mr. Obama is Christian and was born in Hawaii; Mr. Mamdani is Muslim and was born to Indian parents in Uganda. But like the 'birther' attacks, the vitriolic barbs being aimed at Mr. Mamdani seek to paint him as a shadowy, dangerous figure who bears no resemblance to the candidate himself. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

Ron Insana: Trump would imperil more than just the Fed's independence by naming a ‘shadow chair'
Ron Insana: Trump would imperil more than just the Fed's independence by naming a ‘shadow chair'

CNBC

time17 minutes ago

  • CNBC

Ron Insana: Trump would imperil more than just the Fed's independence by naming a ‘shadow chair'

The saying, "No, no, a thousand times no" remains a relevant cry as a news report suggests President Donald Trump may preemptively name a new Federal Reserve chairman nearly a year before Jerome Powell 's term expires. The Wall Street Journal reported on Wednesday that the president has already narrowed his choices down to several candidates to replace Powell, who he has referred to as a " dummy " or " stupid " for not having already cut interest rates as the president wants him to do. Naming a new Fed chief this early, effectively creating a so-called "shadow" chair who can criticize the existing central bank leader, would have long-lasting consequences for the prized independence of the Fed. Packing the Fed, just as several presidents have tried to pack the Supreme Court, reduces the central bank to just another politicized arm of the executive branch. By statute, this was never intended to occur. The Fed's dual mandates and its impartiality If a president were to pressure the Fed to bend to their will, it would lead to legitimate questions about the central bank's ability to meet its statutory dual mandates of maximum sustainable employment and stable prices. Since the end of the era of Richard Nixon– a president who, in secret, tried to pressure then-Fed chief Arthur Burns to soften up on policy ahead of the 1972 election – his successors have all supported an independent Fed so that the central bank can keep the economy on an even keel. No doubt, all presidents – and most people – would love to see lower rates bring down the cost of borrowing, but at what price? Is the president willing to tolerate resurgent inflation? Are the American people, who elected President Trump to bring down prices, willing to risk the Fed's independence only to end up in the place where they started in 2024 – when they were upset and unsettled by the high cost of living? Time will tell. The erosion of trust in Treasurys and the U.S. dollar More important is whether a politicized central bank that cuts rates irrespective of economic conditions will be trusted by domestic and foreign bond market investors to maintain the safety and security of U.S. Treasury bonds, as well as the purchasing power and reserve currency status of the U.S. dollar. The answer is a resounding no, as the dollar is broadly weaker against foreign currencies, reflecting a clear protest to the Fed challenge being presented by the president. Several names have been floated as a possible early replacement for Powell. They include Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent – who raised the idea of a shadow Fed chair last year – National Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett and former Fed Governor Kevin Warsh. The Journal also suggested that former World Bank President David Malpass could be in the running. While I'll leave my out my opinions about their respective qualifications, the issue is not about who will be the new leader of the Fed. This is about the process and the policy of subverting a sitting Fed chair – and that's what bothers me most. This should bother all Americans who value the absolute and relative stability of the U.S. economy, when compared to the rest of the world. We know that whether in Turkey, Venezuela or any other nation that has a dependent central bank, the results are always less than optimal. Currency debasement, inflation and unpredictable economic cycles dominate those countries while nations with independent central banks, be they New Zealand or the U.S., enjoy relative stability and prosperity. While I have long maintained that the U.S. economy is the envy of the world, my feelings would abruptly change if the Fed were to become a politicized tool influenced by executive expediency rather than economic necessity. If the day comes that a preemptive nominee emerges from the shadows, I would run for cover. The safety and soundness of the dollar and U.S. bonds would be suspect with a very long shadow cast over the nation's creditworthiness. Again, I say, "No, no, a thousand times no." —Ron Insana is a CNBC contributor.

Bill Moyers, LBJ aide and legendary broadcast journalist, dies at 91
Bill Moyers, LBJ aide and legendary broadcast journalist, dies at 91

USA Today

time23 minutes ago

  • USA Today

Bill Moyers, LBJ aide and legendary broadcast journalist, dies at 91

Bill Moyers, a former White House press secretary to Lyndon B. Johnson who became the thoughtful voice of public television, has died. He was 91. Moyers died in a New York City hospital on June 26 following a "long illness" and complications from prostate cancer, his longtime friend Tom Johnson, the former CEO of CNN, confirmed. Tom Johnson was an assistant to Moyers during Lyndon Johnson's administration and compared his former boss to past legends of broadcast journalism, such as CBS's legendary Edward R. Murrow. "In five decades of broadcast journalism, Bill reached the very highest standards of excellence in journalism. I believe he reached the same stature as Edward R. Murrow," Johnson tells USA TODAY. "He was one of President Johnson's most trusted advisors and in many ways was the son that LBJ never had." Moyers won 35 Emmy Awards in his storied career, primarily for his work on PBS as host of "Frontline" and "Bill Moyers Journal." His career was punctuated by the 1988 landmark series, "Joseph Campbell and the Power of Myth,' a series of six one-hour interviews with Campbell, the prominent mythologist and religious scholar. The accompanying book became a national bestseller, with both series popularizing Campbell's phrase, "Follow your bliss." 'Not only was Bill a journalist of the highest caliber, he played an essential role in the creation of PBS as a trusted aide to President Johnson," PBS chief Paula Kerger said in a statement. "It was my privilege to work closely with him for over three decades, and I was always inspired by the clarity of his vision and his unwavering commitment to the ideals that continue to inspire public media. Bill was always of service: as a journalist, a mentor, and a fierce champion for PBS. He fought for excellence and honesty in our public discourse, and was always willing to take on the most important issues of the day with curiosity and compassion. While he will be greatly missed, we will continue to carry his legacy forward in service to the American people.' This story is developing.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store