Lawmaker files bill to move state agencies out of Austin, save taxpayers money
AUSTIN (KXAN) — As the state of Texas looks to crack down on wasteful spending, one area that's under the microscope is real estate.
During the first ever Committee on Delivery of Government Efficiency, committee members discussed cost savings from rental and government owned properties.
'We have tried to eliminate unnecessary contracts,' said Brian Guthrie, director of the Teacher Retirement System of Texas. 'We have also eliminated lease space. We have purchased new headquarters outside of the downtown area.'
Some committee members questioned why some buildings couldn't be moved outside of the Austin though.
'Is there any reason y'all did not look any further outside of Austin? In Waco, or Huntsville, Houston?' said State Rep. Briscoe Cain, R-Deer Park.
These same questions have crossed Sen. Mayes Middleton's mind as well and that is why he filed SB 1004 to move state agencies out of Austin.
'Change is coming': Texas DOGE hosts first meeting
'For a long time I have had this idea,' Middleton said. 'Why not move them to lower cost real estate around the state?'
Middleton said the move could save taxpayers millions and create opportunities for people living in different regions of the state.
'It would create jobs in rural Texas that are not there right now,' he said.
Middleton said lawmakers would determine if the agency needs to move when the agency comes before the Sunset Advisory Commission for review.
'And as they come up we would determine how much they are spending either in rent or the value of the office building they are in here near the capitol,' he said. 'Then compare that to moving them outside of Austin and what that rent, or buying real estate in a lower cost area would be.'
At the end of the day he said it's all about cutting costs and saving taxpayers money, but also giving more opportunities to those living outside the Capital city.
'We have had an incredible difficulty attracting state workers to work for our state agencies and I think it would resolve that issue,' Middleton said.
The bill will now be reviewed by the Business & Commerce committee.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
A huge political spat has broken out... over a playground
A plan to build a playground in Alkrington has been delayed once again. The suburb, on the edge of Middleton, had seen a number of playgrounds close down in recent years. The decision over where to build a new one has dragged on for years, with squabbles between politicians and locals over the most suitable spot. READ MORE: Blankety Blank viewers in shock after learning winning contestant died since filming show READ MORE: DWP confirms Winter Fuel Payment will only be £100 for some pensioners Last month, it appeared the matter was finally settled when rochdale-council>Rochdale council's township committee in Middleton approved funding of £84,840 for the new playground on a field off Mainway and Moss Lane. The money is expected to go towards paths, fencing, swings, see-saws and other play equipment. But now Labour councillors, who approved the funding, have been left furious after two Middleton Independent Party (MIP) politicians called in the decision. 'Calling in' a decision opens up the matter for further scrutiny if politicians feel there is an issue that hasn't properly been addressed. The call-in will mean further delays to a project that has already dragged since 2023. A statement issued by Middleton Labour read: 'The South Middleton councillors believe it is a disgrace that a legitimately arrived and very popular decision can be delayed without good cause by the MIP councillors' petty behaviour, especially when they do not have any seats in the South Middleton Ward. 'The decision taken to go ahead on May 22 was taken with 12 Labour councillors voting for, and two MIPs not even voting against - they abstained. 'Now they want to revoke the decision depriving kids of a long awaited play park in South Alkrington. We must add 1,200 Alkrington residents have signed a petition in favour of this new play park, backing our decision. 'The 'call-in' decision will take place at the end of July. However, South Middleton councillors had hoped to get spades in the ground this year to start building the play park. 'This will prevent planning and organisation until this 'call-in' decision is taken, which will inevitably delay the erection of the play park for many months.' Although other sites were considered by the local authority, Mainway field was the largest open space available, meaning potential noise and antisocial behaviour would be less of an issue. A council report went on to say they will look into mine shafts under the field as well as drainage issues before any building work. Lee Wolf, leader of the MIP, believes there was a lack of consultation before the process and has questioned the impartiality of the decision making. He said: "Our involvement in this matter began last year when I stood as the MIP candidate for Middleton South. From the outset, the site of the proposed play park in Alkrington emerged as a key issue for local residents. 'We have always supported the development of new recreational facilities across Middleton. These spaces are vital for families and young people, and we believe they should be delivered through a process that is fair, transparent, and inclusive of the community's voice. 'However, we have serious concerns about how the decision to site the play park at Mainway Field was reached. 'Our two MIP councillors could not support the report, as it failed to provide a clear and consistent rationale for selecting Mainway Field. 'Throughout this process, our aim has never been to obstruct progress. We want to work collaboratively with all stakeholders, including our Labour colleagues, to find a solution that genuinely reflects the needs and wishes of the community. There is still room for compromise, whether that means revisiting alternative sites or reconsidering the exact positioning within Mainway Field. 'We remain committed to ensuring that decisions about our shared spaces are made openly, fairly, and with the full involvement of the people who live here. Our community deserves nothing less.' Rochdale council confirmed the matter has been called in and will be discussed further at meeting next month.
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
What we know about how the Texas National Guard trains for protests, what they'll bring
AUSTIN (KXAN) — Texas Gov. Greg Abbott announced he's deploying 5,000 Texas National Guard members to cities with planned anti-Trump protests this weekend. Abbott said on social media those troops 'will use every tool & strategy to help law enforcement maintain order.' But how exactly the Texas National Guard will be used in cities, like Austin, is still relatively unclear, as the Texas Department of Public Safety and governor's office have maintained giving away those details could jeopardize the safety of their mission. When asked about difference in training and tactics between Austin Police and state troops, Austin Mayor Kirk Watson said he didn't know, 'but the quick comment that I would make is it's the difference between someone being trained to be in the military and someone being trained to provide law enforcement and be peace officers and we can all imagine what the difference is in that.' A spokesperson for the Texas National Guard sent KXAN the following statement about how those troops train and what they will bring with them. 'The Texas National Guard routinely conducts civil disturbance training which encompasses defensive techniques, de-escalation, and rules for the use of force. Deployed units are equipped with riot gear, assigned weapons, and less-than-lethal devices.' Dennis Farris, president of the Austin Police Retired Officers Association said local law enforcement and National Guard members regularly train together — including here in Austin — to prepare for situations just like we'll see this weekend. 'It's not like this is the regular Army who's going to come in here as if they're invading a country, right. They're here as a force multiplier for the DPS and APD to a lesser extent,' Farris said. The city of Austin made clear, they believe they have the law enforcement staffing to protect people and property this weekend without those additional forces. 'That's it, these are people that come in for the weekend, they get college money, they come and they serve their country and that's a fantastic thing but this community deserves well trained police officers, community and respect and that's what we have,' Austin Police Chief Lisa Davis said. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
Texas politicians react to Israel's attack on Iran
AUSTIN (KXAN) — Several Texas leaders have shared their thoughts and reactions after Israel attacked Iran's capital early Friday. The International Atomic Energy Agency confirmed Israel struck Iran's nuclear enrichment facility at Natanz, and Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said Israel will face a 'severe punishment' over its attack on the country. Iranian missiles later struck Israel in retaliation. The Latest: Israel hit by missiles as Iran retaliates for strikes on nuclear sites News of the attacks has stirred up concern on social media, and several world leaders have posted their reactions. Lawmakers and politicians in Texas have also taken to the internet or issued statements in response to the attacks. Texas Gov. Greg Abbott posted on X Friday morning, 'Israel was forced to defend itself — and American interests — from the Iranian regime that was hell bent on building nuclear weapons that would have endangered the globe. Texas stands with our ally taking necessary action to protect its people & restore global stability.' Congressman Michael McCaul, chairman emeritus of the House Committee on Foreign Affairs, released the following statement: 'President Trump gave Iran every chance to negotiate in good faith and to dismantle their nuclear program. 'Prime Minister Netanyahu was also clear: The alternative to diplomacy would be strikes on Iran — a message he reiterated to me when I met with him this month. Unfortunately, the regime chose not to take the path of peace — to prioritize their own interests over their people's. They brought this calamity on themselves. 'One thing is certain: Iran will not acquire a nuclear weapon, and our world is safer for it. They would be wise to come to the table and make an agreement with President Trump while the offer still stands. If they instead choose to harm U.S. troops in the region, they will once again regret it.' Senator Ted Cruz appeared on Newsmax with Greg Kelly late Thursday and posted the clip on X. 'Iran said they would not dismantle their advanced centrifuges. That was a giant middle finger to President Trump,' Cruz said in the post. 'Tonight, we saw the consequences of Iran's defiance.' He also appeared on Fox News, asking viewers to pray for Israel, posting the same message in a another post on X. 'Here's my message to the Ayatollah: If you strike at America, I have every confidence that President Trump will respond with overwhelming force,' Cruz said in the post. Senator John Cornyn posted a message in solidarity with Israel on X Thursday night. 'Israel has an unquestionable right to defend itself. I am proud to stand with Israel. #AmYisraelChai,' the post said. Democratic Congressman Greg Casar posted in opposition to Israel's strikes. 'Netanyahu's reckless strike risks provoking a wider war and pulling in the United States. Trump must oppose Netanyahu's escalation and pursue a diplomatic path to deal with Iran's nuclear program. Trump must not violate the Constitution by involving American troops in Netanyahu's war without coming to Congress,' Casar said in a post on X. Casar followed that up with another post, criticizing President Trump. 'Trump promised peace and stability. Then, he picked reckless partisans for top foreign policy jobs. Now he's egging on escalation in a conflict he already made worse by tearing up a nuclear deal that was working. Trump's recklessness is undermining stability abroad and putting American lives at risk. Trump must reverse course and deescalate the situation.' Rep. Lloyd Doggett also opposed Israel's preemptive strike and criticized President Trump. Doggett posted the link to a New York Times story headlined, 'What to Know About Israel's Strikes on Iran's Nuclear Program and Military Leaders,' along with his thoughts on the strikes. 'Trump's weakness again on full display,' Doggett said in the post on X. 'Just as he is too weak to stand up to war criminal Putin on Ukraine, Trump is too weak to restrain Netanyahu from interfering in ongoing negotiations for a peaceful way to prevent Iran from going nuclear. George W. Bush restrained Netanyahu from launching such an attack, but Trump is incapable of doing the same. Trump's weakness heightens the danger of the US being pulled into another deadly and costly Mideast war.' Rep. August Pfluger backed Israel. 'Israel has every right to defend itself. The United States stands firmly behind Israel,' he said in an X post. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
