
Germany to raise 'mother's pension' – DW – 08/04/2025
The Christian Social Union (CSU), the Bavarian sister-party to Chancellor Friedrich Merz's conservative Christian Democratic Union (CDU), appears to have persuaded its big sibling to implement one of its own pet projects: Raising the pension subsidy for older parents — colloquially known as the or "mother's pension" — one year earlier than planned.
The pension rise for parents who had children before 1992 comes with a price tag of around €5 billion annually and is now set to be implemented on January 1, 2027, despite major cuts elsewhere in Germany's federal budget.
According to German media reports, the government still has a gap of some €172 billion ($198 billion) for its financial planning for the years 2027 to 2029.
The planned rise in 2027 is the third of three steps and adds an extra half a percentage point to the pension — that works out at around €20 per child per month for children born before 1992. Previously, parents whose children were born after 1992 received a slightly higher percentage.
CSU General Secretary Martin Huber called the move the "completion" of the mother's pension plan, and said that 10 million women would profit. "For many female pensioners, this rise makes a big difference," he told the news network.
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
Though the change will iron out a disparity between the pensions received by older and younger generations, experts say the measure does nothing to close the gender pay gap between men and women, or indeed overall inequality in the country. Despite the name, all parents are eligible for the "mother's pension," as are foster parents and grandparents, if the child lived with them for a significant amount of time.
Peter Haan, specialist in state finance policy at the German Institute for Economic Research (DIW), and co-author of a study on the pension, thinks it's not an effective way to close the "gender pension gap."
The key question, as far as Haan is concerned, is who actually benefits. It does, he admitted, make superficial sense for older mothers to get the same benefits as those who had their children after 1992. "But the pensions for that generation were significantly higher than for the younger generation," Haan told DW. "And secondly, it's a 'watering can' measure that is equal for all mothers, and so doesn't specifically do anything to combat poverty among older people."
The €20 per child per month might certainly be useful for many older people with lower incomes, but the very poorest women won't profit from it anyway — because the "mother's pension" is actually deducted from any welfare benefits they receive.
The mother's pension dates back to 2013, when the CSU pushed through the plan under Angela Merkel's government as a way to compensate parents — in practice mainly mothers — who took time off to raise children and therefore paid less into the pension system.
Since then, the CSU has made the plan one of its key policies, not least because it is popular among its own Bavarian electorate — many of whom are older people. In the intervening years, keeping the mother's pension has been the CSU's line in the sand in negotiations with its coalition partners the CDU and the center-left Social Democratic Party (SPD).
"Backing down on this issue would be unthinkable for a CSU leader," political scientist Ursula Münch, director of the Tutzing Academy for Political Education in Bavaria, told DW. "If the other parties do not meet it, it will refuse to support their proposals while playing on public opinion in an ageing society."
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
But the idea is also unpopular among Germany's business community, who have been hoping that Merz's conservative government would, instead of increasing pensions, do more to keep more people on the job market. "All this is going completely in the wrong direction," said Judith Röder of the Federal Association of Wholesale, Foreign Trade and Services (BGA). "Everything that leads to increased welfare spending is a problem, and anything that signals less employment in an ageing society is also bad. And the mother's pension is both of those things."
"[Raising the mother's pension] is another signal that more and more tax money or social insurance money is being distributed to older generations at the expense of active workers," Röder told DW. "It has to be financed somehow, and this is just a big loan to be paid in the future." This money would be better invested in infrastructure, she added, which benefits both businesses and society at large, rather than a particular group.
Röder also argued that older parents are already financially privileged, because they benefited from pension conditions that favored mothers in the past — for instance, before 1999, women could legally start drawing an old age pension earlier than men.
According to Haan, there are cheaper ways to help older poor people, such as checking income and wealth so that only those who actually need it get the extra money. "If you really want to reduce the gender pension gap, you have to change the labor market relations between men and women, by promoting more participation on the labor market for women," said Haan. "For example, with better childcare."
"In times when the state pension coffers are under pressure, it is difficult to take on such an expansion of costs," he concluded. "Especially for a measure like this. Of course, you can see the justification for it, but there are other measures that I think are more important."While you're here: Every Tuesday, DW editors round up what is happening in German politics and society. You can sign up here for the weekly email newsletter, Berlin Briefing.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


DW
10 hours ago
- DW
Ukraine: Trump hails 'progress' after envoy meets Putin – DW – 08/06/2025
Donald Trump said a meeting between US envoy Steve Wikoff and Vladimir Putin in Moscow was "highly productive." Despite this, this White House says new US sanctions on Russia are still coming. DW has more. Russian President Vladimir Putin has met with Steve Witkoff, US President Donald Trump's special envoy, for talks in Moscow. The meeting comes just days before a deadline set by Trump for Putin to agree to a ceasefire in the war in Ukraine. The Kremlin has urged patience regarding US-Russia relations, as anticipation builds around a potential meeting between Trump and Putin that has yet to be reserves in Ukraine are at their lowest in 12 years, analysis firm ExPro said on Wednesday. Storage facilities are currently less than a third full and the revelation comes after Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky earlier on Wednesday accused Moscow of deliberately undermining its preparations for winter by striking a gas facility in the Odesa region. It is not yet clear how Wednesday's attack on the the southern region's gas interconnector, which is used to supply US and Azeri gas through Bulgaria and Romania, will affect future gas collection. Kremlin foreign policy aide Yuri Ushakov said the meeting between Russian President Vladimir Putin and US envoy Steve Witkoff lasted around three hours. "A quite useful and constructive conversation took place," Ushakov told journalists. Putin and Witkoff discussed the conflict in Ukraine and the potential for improving US-Russia ties, Ushakov said. He added that Moscow had received certain "signals" from US President Donald Trump and had sent messages in return, without elaborating on details. The meeting comes just days ahead of a deadline set by Trump to agree to a Ukraine peace deal or face US sanctions. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video German politicians are debating whether to slash financial assistance for Ukrainian refugees. How does the country stack up against its EU neighbors when it comes to generosity in helping those fleeing war? Read the full story on aid provided for Ukrainian refugees in Germany and across Europe. Russian drones struck a gas pumping station in southern Ukraine, part of an LNG imports scheme from the United States and Azerbaijan, Kyiv's energy ministry said Wednesday. The ministry said the attack on the site near the Ukraine-Romania border was aimed "purely against civilian infrastructure" and targeting relations with Azerbaijan, the US and European partners. There was no immediate comment from Russia. The Kremlin said Russian President Vladimir Putin is hosting US President Donald Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff for talks. The Kremlin did not immediately provide more information regarding the meeting. There had been doubts as to whether the two would meet during Witkoff's visit to Moscow but Russian state media said the meeting was to take place on Wednesday. Donald Trump has put a Friday deadline for Putin to agree to a peace deal with Ukraine or potentially face economic penalties that could also hit countries buying its oil. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said on Wednesday two people were killed after a Russian attack set ablaze a holiday camp in central Ukraine. Describing it as a "zero military sense" strike, Zelenskyy condemned the "cruelty" of the attack, "aimed at instilling fear." "Right now in the Zaporizhzhia district, our medics and first responders are helping those wounded in a Russian strike on an ordinary recreation center," Zelenskyy posted on X. "Twelve people have been injured. As of now, sadly, two people are confirmed dead." The Kremlin claims the Zaporizhzhia region as part of Russia. Ukraine's defense minister has expressed gratitude toward the US for approving more than $200 million (€175 million) in deals to supply arms to Ukraine, funded by allies and arising from agreements between the US and Ukrainian presidents. "Grateful to the U.S. for approving over $200M in Foreign Military Sales for Ukraine," Denys Shmyhal posted on X. "The first package includes equipment, repairs, and technical support for M777 howitzers, valued at $104 million. The second package, worth $99.5 million, covers transportation and cargo consolidation and other logistical services." Entirely funded by partner countries, these packages are a boost to Ukraine's defense and regional security," he added. Patience is required over Russian-US relations, the Kremlin said Wednesday. In remarks carried by the Russian TASS state news agency, spokesman Dmitry Peskov said: "There is, of course, inertia in this process," referring to the prolonged absence of a meeting between Russian President Vladimir Putin and US President Donald Trump. "It takes time for efforts to bring bilateral relations back onto a normal track." TASS reported that for the first time in modern Russian history more than six months have passed without a summit between the leaders of the two nuclear powers. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video US envoy Steve Witkoff arrived in Moscow on Wednesday, state media reported, where he will meet with Russian officials , with President Donald Trump's deadline to impose fresh sanctions over the war in Ukraine just days away. It is unclear whether Witkoff will meet with Russian President Vladimir Putin. Trump has given the Kremlin until Friday to halt its offensive in Ukraine or face further sanctions. The White House has not been specific regarding potential penalties, but Trump has previously threatened to impose "secondary tariffs" targeting Moscow's remaining trade partners, including China and India. Trump said Tuesday that he would await the outcome of Witkoff's visit before moving forward. "We're going to see what happens," he told reporters. "We'll make that determination at that time." After arriving in the Russian capital, Witkoff was met by presidential special representative Kirill Dmitriev, Russian state news agency TASS said. Volodymyr Zelenskyy said he had had a "productive" conversation with his US counterpart Donald Trump. The Ukrainian president said "the key focus" of their conversation centered around "ending the war." "Many months could have already passed without war, had Russia not been prolonging it," he continued. "Today, we coordinated our positions, Ukraine and the United States. We exchanged assessments of the situation: The Russians have intensified the brutality of their attacks. President Trump is fully informed about Russian strikes on Kyiv and other cities and communities." Zelenskyy said the pair also spoke about sanctions on Russia with Trump's August 8 deadline for Putin to end the war looming large. "Their economy continues to decline, and that's exactly why Moscow is so sensitive to this prospect and President Trump's resolve," Zelenskyy said. Today's spotlight is firmly on Moscow, where US Special Envoy Steve Witkoff is meeting with Russian officials, just days ahead of a deadline set by his boss. President Donald Trump has warned that if Russia fails to agree to a ceasefire in Ukraine by Friday, it will face new sanctions. However, the lack of urgency in Moscow over the past few days suggests Witkoff may leave empty handed. In fact, sources close to the Kremlin say Russian President Vladimir Putin believes he is gaining ground in Ukraine, and that takes precedence over improving relations with the United States. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has used this moment to press his case for tougher sanctions on Moscow in a call with Trump ahead of Witkoff's visit. We'll be covering all these topics in this blog, with a focus on the ongoing war in Ukraine.


DW
10 hours ago
- DW
Immigration: Germany seeks 'safe countries of origin' – DW – 08/06/2025
A verdict by the European Court of Justice is set to impact Germany's policies aiming to curb irregular immigration. It will stimy plans to determine 'safe countries of origin' for possible deportations. Safe countries of origin are those whose citizens do not have to fear state persecution, according to assessments by the German government or the European Union. Whether such assessments are accurate is a matter for debate that often ends up in court. Last week, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) ruled that EU countries are allowed to designate safe countries of origin to fast-track asylum procedures if authorities disclose the sources for their assessment. The court also found that for a country to be designated as safe, it must offer adequate protection to the entire population, including minorities. The Luxembourg-based court also said that while having a fast-track procedure does not violate EU law, the designation of safe countries must be subject to judicial scrutiny so migrants can challenge decisions made on their asylum claims. Germany has its own list of safe countries of origin. Asylum seekers from these countries hardly stand a chance of being granted asylum in Germany. Currently, eight European non-EU and two African countries are on this list. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video The new German coalition government of center-right Christian Democrats and Christian Social Union (CDU/CSU) and the center-left Social Democrats (SPD) had agreed to add more countries to the list. "We are continuously assessing whether more countries meet the requirements. In particular, a country will be classified as safe if fewer than 5% of asylum seekers from that country have been accepted over at least a five-year period." It remains to be seen whether these plans will be as easy to implement as it sounds in the coalition agreement following the ECJ ruling. A spokesperson for the interior ministry, which is responsible for asylum policy, said that the ruling will be reviewed. Yet the German government still intends to reform the process for determining whether a country of origin is safe. In the future, safe countries of origin are to be determined by decree. This would mean that neither the Bundestag nor the Bundesrat (the upper house of parliament representing the 16 federal states) would have a say in the matter. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video The coalition has already submitted a draft bill on this issue, which is to be voted on after the parliament's summer recess. The first debate already took place last July. Interior Minister Alexander Dobrindt took that opportunity to criticize what he sees as an insufficient number of deportations of rejected asylum seekers: "Our goal now is to remove the obstacles to effectively limiting illegal migration," he said. One such obstacle that the CSU politician highlighted was the fact that, under current law, people who have been ordered to leave the country are entitled to legal representation before their planned deportation can be enforced. This is one of the regulations that is to be abolished. Dobrindt hopes that this will also speed up deportations to countries already listed as safe. Within the European Union, there are already discussions about setting up joint centers for the repatriation of rejected asylum seekers. The interior ministers of EU member states discussed this at their meeting in Copenhagen last July. This is an idea that Dobrindt is in favor of. He pointed out that it can be difficult for individual member states to reach deals with non-EU countries, while it could be more expedient when several EU countries work together. Several countries already have concrete plans in place. "I wouldn't rule this out for Germany either," said the German interior minister. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video In Dobrindt's view, many of the people who came to Germany in the past were not eligible for asylum. He hopes that the planned reform will send a clear message: "People who come from a safe country of origin should not make the journey. Those who cannot stay should not come in the first place." Some members of the political opposition in Germany hope that the European Court of Justice's ruling will force the federal government to change its course on asylum policy. "The ECJ ruling on safe countries of origin is a major success for human rights and the individual right to asylum in Europe," said Green Party MP Filiz Polat. She added that the plan to classify safe countries of origin by means of a legal directive without oversight by the Bundestag and Bundesrat is not possible. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Clara Bünger of the Left Party has also called on the governing coalition to carry out a comprehensive review of the list of safe countries of origin."Georgia and Moldova should be removed from this list immediately. The reason given was the precarious human rights situation in the breakaway regions of Abkhazia and South Ossetia. Also, the EU member state Czechia considers only parts of Moldova as safe, while the Transnistria region is controlled by pro-Russian separatists and therefore considered unsafe. The ECJ ruling, according to Bünger, "also represents a clear repudiation of the federal government's plans to classify other countries, such as Tunisia and Algeria, as safe." Same-sex sexual relations are punishable by law in both Tunisia and Algeria. Classifying these countries as safe would conflict with a key criterion established by the European Court of Justice's ruling: countries deemed safe third countries must ensure the safety of their entire you're here: Every Tuesday, DW editors round up what is happening in German politics and society. You can sign up here for the weekly email newsletter, Berlin Briefing.


DW
10 hours ago
- DW
Israel army chief warns against full Gaza takeover: reports – DW – 08/06/2025
Israeli media have reported army chief Eyal Zamir expressed concern to PM Netanyahu during talks about expanding the war in Gaza. A decision could come during a cabinet meeting tomorrow. After Israeli Defense Forces' (IDF) Chief of Staff Eyal Zamir met with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahuon Tuesday, reports in Israeli media have indicated Zamir expressed concern over Netanyahu's reported plan to fully occupy the Gaza Strip. According to public broadcaster Kan, Zamir warned such move would be like "walking into a trap." Unnamed Israeli officials also told Reuters news agency that Zamir warned pushing into areas of Gaza not already under Israeli control could result in harm to the remaining hostages. After Tuesday's meeting Netanyahu's office said in a statement that the prime minister and Zamir held a three-hour "limited security discussion," during which the army chief presented "the options for continuing the campaign in Gaza." No further details were shared. Netyanyahu has not publicly commented on reports that he is leaning towards a full occupation of Gaza. Such a move would have to be approved by Israel's security cabinet, which is due to meet on Thursday after a meeting slated for Tuesday was postponed. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz on Wednesday said that while the head of the IDF has the right to voice his concerns, the military would carry out any decision made by the government. "Once decisions are made by the political echelon, the IDF will execute them with determination and professionalism," Katz posted on X. Opposition leader Yair Lapid said he met Netanyahu on Wednesday, and warned that "occupying Gaza is a very bad idea... operationally, morally and economically." Lapid has insisted that the Israeli public does not want a full occupation of Gaza. Much of the Gaza Strip currently lies in ruins after almost two years of war that started after the terrorist attack by Palestinian militant group Hamas and its affiliate groups on Israel's south in October 2023 that killed 1,200 people, with over 250 taken hostage. Much of the Gaza's basic infrastructure has been destroyed, including hospitals, schools and mosques. Netanyahu is under international pressure to secure a ceasefire, and the release of hostages held in Gaza. Hamas and fellow Palestinian militant group Islamic Jihad are still holding 50 Israeli hostages, with some 20 of them believed to be still alive. But the latest ceasefire negotiations between Israel and Hamas have borne no fruit, and Gazans continues to suffer from lack of food, medicine and other basic necessities. The UN and international aid organizations insist more food aid must be allowed into Gaza. Close to 200 people have died from starvation in the Gaza since the war began, according to Gaza's health ministry. Some 60,000 people have been killed since the fighting began. On Wednesday, the IDF called for evacuations in parts of Gaza City, in the north, and Khan Yunis in the south, where a spokesman said ground troops were preparing to "expand the scope of combat operations." To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video