
Spotify playlist designed to help you drive more safely
Allianz has launched a new data-driven initiative on Spotify that encourages motorists to drive more safely by changing the beat of their music. 'Seat Belters' is a free in-app experience for Spotify users that creates a personalised playlist featuring songs that have lower beats per minute (BPM).
Studies show that music can have a direct influence on how we drive. Songs with a fast tempo - over 120 BPM - can subconsciously encourage drivers to speed up and change lanes more often. In contrast, music that matches the average resting heart rate - around 60–80 BPM - is associated with calmer, more focused driving.
Younger adults are most inclined to stream music while driving. Studies indicate that faster music can lead to increased heart rate variability, elevated mental workload, and more unpredictable driving patterns, suggesting motorists could benefit from a more mindful music curation approach while on the road.
Allianz's new campaign on Spotify aims to help drivers tune into a more mindful, more aware pace that is just as enjoyable, for better driving. Each playlist is unique, leveraging Spotify's unique streaming intelligence but filtered for music in a safer tempo range (60–80 BPM).
While the specific songs will vary, tracks by some of the UK's most iconic artists fall into the 'safe category'.
To launch Seat Belters, music artist Big Manny and Police drummer Stewart Copeland have been explaining more about why music is vital for safe driving – watch here.
Matt Cox, Allianz UK Chief Claims Officer, said: 'The music we listen to can play a big part in changing our mood and actions, and it's no different when we're behind the wheel. Our claims data shows we can always do better when it comes to driving safe. We're excited to work with Spotify and offer an experience which isn't just personalised, but will potentially help keep the roads safer.'
To create your personalised playlist, visit: https://open.spotify.com/site/allianz

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
4 hours ago
- The Independent
Is mass surveillance the way forward to police society?
Most sources suggest that Britain, in terms of CCTV cameras and coverage per head in cities, is one of the most surveilled nations in the world, albeit coming some way behind China, where it seems to be even more routine. The trend towards 'snooping' on British folk seems to be accelerating. More live facial recognition vans are to be deployed across seven police forces in England in a mass-surveillance trial. The aim is to identify and locate suspects in some of the crimes that most worry the public, such as sexual offences, violent assaults and murder. Ticket touts are also targets. Crime is a major concern among voters, but so are their civil liberties... How will it work? Quite passively, as has been the case for some years. Just like in films, the police can place vans in crowded places such as high streets and automatically scan the faces of people walking past, checking them against a databank of images of wanted people. If it relies on busy officers spooling through hours of footage, it might not always be worth the effort; they have enough trouble at present trying to find shoplifters. Does it work? Yes. There have been many successes over the years, though it obviously works best in the big cities, where it operates like a fishing boat trawling for a catch. Ministers say that in London over the past year, facial recognition technology has helped to secure 580 arrests, including the detention of 52 registered sex offenders who breached their conditions. At a time of shrivelled police budgets, a shortage of officers and concerns about 'lawless Britain' (it isn't, by the way), facial recognition harnessed to AI could transform police productivity – and cut crime. It could quite conceivably lower the risk of mass murder through terrorism, for example, which tends to take place in urban centres. Win-win? Not quite. There are practical problems. The software can make mistakes, leading to embarrassment for innocent parties. Twins don't like it, for obvious reasons. The system can't work if people change their appearance or wear a face-covering, and if villains steer clear of the big cities. People wearing face-coverings for religious or health reasons could be stigmatised as 'camera dodgers'. What about the human right to a private life? Quite. One glaring issue is that there is no legislation covering this area of police work, and no national debate has taken place about the creeping ubiquity of various types of surveillance – online as well as on the streets. Parliament does need to create some kind of framework, and one that is consistent with existing laws and international commitments on human rights. So are we becoming a 'big brother' society? With 5 million CCTV cameras, plus an unknown number in offices, plus dashcams in cars and doorbell cameras, the British can hardly cough without it being captured in high definition. Civil liberties groups claim that the UK is becoming a 'big brother society', a 'surveillance state' where privacy is at risk. There's certainly the possibility of a 'Coldplay moment', where someone having an affair is caught on camera and the evidence finds its way into the public domain. Former health secretary Matt Hancock springs to mind. Plenty more risks like that... What does the government say? Dame Diana Johnson, the minister responsible, pleads that it is 'a powerful tool for policing' and will only be used in 'a very measured, proportionate way' to find individuals suspected of serious offences. But there's dissent. Shami Chakrabarti, who served as shadow attorney general under Jeremy Corbyn, says the technology is 'incredibly intrusive', remarking: 'Some would say this is yet another move towards a total surveillance society.' Some would indeed. And the opposition? Well, the present shadow home secretary, Chris Philp, in his role as a Home Office minister a few years ago, oversaw a substantial increase in CCTV use. In October 2023, for example, he suggested that police force leaders in England and Wales should aim to exceed 200,000 searches of still images against the police national database. Predictably, Nigel Farage, despite his summer crime campaign (to clarify, a campaign against crime), simply declared that he 'doesn't want to live in China'.


Times
5 hours ago
- Times
Driver who said electric car ‘went rogue' denies fraud charges
A man who claimed his electric vehicle accelerated 'on its own', leading him to lose control on a motorway has appeared in court charged with fraud. Nathan Owen, 32, of Prestatyn, north Wales, called police on March 6 last year to report his Jaguar I-Pace was speeding out of control and the brakes were not working on the M62. Officers from three forces had to ram the £80,000 vehicle to bring it to a stop, blocking it between patrol cars. The incident in Merseyside led to lane closures and traffic delays of almost an hour just before rush hour. On Wednesday at Liverpool magistrates' court, Owen indicated not guilty pleas to dangerous driving, intentionally or recklessly causing a public nuisance and two counts of fraud. It was alleged he made a false representation to CA Auto Finance, claiming the Jaguar was faulty and was accelerating on its own with the brakes proving unresponsive. It was also said that he made the same claims to The Sun and Daily Mail newspapers, with the intention of causing loss to the Jaguar company or exposing it to risk of loss. Renee Southern, for the prosecution, told the court that Owen wanted to 'get rid' of the vehicle and therefore avoid further payments to the finance company totalling £4,426. She said Owen had 'persistently and dishonestly' claimed the vehicle was defective. The Jaguar travelled along the eastbound carriageways of the M57, M62 and M58 motorways before it was stopped. Owen previously said he was returning from his first day at a new job when the car started malfunctioning. He was arrested on suspicion of dangerous driving after a detailed investigation by police and Jaguar Land Rover, which said that it 'seeks to investigate all reports of issues relating to product safety'. Owen was released on unconditional bail to attend a further hearing at Liverpool crown court on September 10, when he is expected to enter formal pleas. Jaguar has discontinued the I-Pace, its first all-electric car, before its relaunch as an all-electric car manufacturer next year.


The Guardian
7 hours ago
- The Guardian
Tell us: have you been affected by antisocial driving of luxury cars in west London?
Police have seized dozens of supercars collectively worth more than £6m, including Ferraris, Lamborghinis and Bentleys, during a crackdown on antisocial driving in London. Seventy-two luxury vehicles were taken off the streets in an operation targeting nuisance driving in the West End after complaints from residents, businesses and visitors about high-value cars causing disruption in and around Hyde Park, Kensington and Chelsea. Have you been affected by antisocial driving of luxury cars in London? Do you have concerns? Share your experiences in the form below or by messaging us. Please include as much detail as possible. Please note, the maximum file size is 5.7 MB. Your contact details are helpful so we can contact you for more information. They will only be seen by the Guardian. Your contact details are helpful so we can contact you for more information. They will only be seen by the Guardian. If you include other people's names please ask them first. Contact us on WhatsApp at +447766780300. For more information, please see our guidance on contacting us via WhatsApp. For true anonymity please use our SecureDrop service instead.