logo
Curses! A Swearing Expert Mulls the State of Profanity.

Curses! A Swearing Expert Mulls the State of Profanity.

New York Times08-02-2025

Cursing is coursing through society. Words once too blue to publicly utter have become increasingly commonplace. 'Language is just part of the whole shift to a more casual lifestyle,' said Timothy Jay, a professor emeritus of psychology at the Massachusetts College of Liberal Arts in North Adams, Mass.
Dr. Jay has spent a career studying the use of profanity, from what motivates it to the ways in which it satisfies, signals meaning and offends. Although officially retired, he has continued to edit studies on profanity and he recently offered an expert opinion in an ongoing legal dispute in Michigan over whether the phrase 'Let's go Brandon' (a euphemism used to denigrate former President Joseph R. Biden Jr.) should be reasonably interpreted as 'profane.' (It should not, Dr. Jay opined.)
Dr. Jay posits that the increasingly casual nature of the spoken word derives in part from the way people communicate on social media. One study, published in 2014 by other researchers in the field, found that curse words on Twitter, now known as X, appeared in 7.7 percent of posts, with profanity representing about 1 in every 10 words on the platform. That compared to a swearing rate of 0.5 to 0.7 percent in spoken language, the study found.
If that data troubles you, Dr. Jay has some thoughts on how to dial back the profanity. F*@%-free February, anyone?
Tis interview has been condensed and edited for clarity, and scrubbed of some of the vernacular that Dr. Jay conceded he regularly uses on the golf course.
Why does social media contribute to more casual use of language?
People are remote, so they can be aggressive without any physical retaliation. By and large, you're anonymous, so there's no personal consequence. It's also part of a larger shift to a more casual lifestyle. What kids are wearing to school these days would have been disgraceful in my day.
Is that a problem — not the clothes, the swearing?
Our culture is constantly evolving and will continue to evolve. One place it is a problem is the way that women are increasingly attacked online and harassed.
So you don't really see this development as positive or negative?
Slang is made to confront authority and to create a code that identifies one as an in-group member. Misuse of slang means you are an outsider. Slang must change with time.
The casualness of language coexists with the casualness of clothing styles, workplace behaviors, music lyrics, television content, table manners, et cetera, which have trended in general to a more relaxed state post-World War II, especially notable in the 1960s.
You're saying that curse words that people once avoided they now say regularly.
For years, I asked people to rank swear words on a scale of one to 10 of which words were the worst. A five would be 'damn' or 'hell.' That was the middle range. A hundred years ago you couldn't have used them on the radio; now they're in the comic strips in the newspaper.
What ranks as a 1?
'Sugar.'
What about other alternatives to longstanding curse words? Can I run a few by you?
Go ahead.
'Fudge' — satisfying?
Not to me.
I hear a lot of people say 'flipping' or 'freaking.' Which one do you prefer?
I like 'frickin'' — I've used, 'Shut the frickin' door!'
What do you like about that?
It's similarity to … [expletive].
So if something is phonetically similar, that makes it satisfying?
It's how it feels in your entire body — an autonomic nervous-system reaction to hearing someone say [expletive] or saying [expletive] yourself. It raises your pulse, heart rate, breathing rate all above the use of a nonoffensive word such as 'calendar.' We recorded skin-conductance tests that demonstrated that taboo words produce a more emotional reaction than nontaboo words. The word arouses us in knowing that we are going to say it and continues to arouse us even after speaking.
Do these words provoke physical aggression?
My research group has recorded over 10,000 people swearing in public. Not once have we seen these usages turn into aggression or violence. Most swearing is casual, conversational and pretty harmless. At the same time, we are more sensitive to language issues surrounding sexual harassment, racial-ethnic-gender discrimination, verbal abuse and threatening language than in the past.
What draws us to a particular word?
It's personal. One's psychological history with hearing and saying a word mainly in childhood, and then the consequence of using the word again, brings about the feelings previously associated with the word.
It's social, meaning the words that are important emotionally not only depend on the speaker's psychological relationship with the word but also the value and valence of the word within a speaker's community.
And it's physical.
Does that suggest that euphemisms may not satisfy, and that therefore we can't curb our cursing?
The key to breaking a habit is being aware that you do it and then trying to circumvent that.
So you can change the pattern should you wish to?
Yes. If you think about how memory works, what you've done is you've activated the new word in your brain. And so by activating 'freakin'' or 'sugar,' you're making that more salient.
In other words, with practice, you can diminish the potency of the curse word and strengthen the lure of the euphemism.
Yes, but you have to be aware of both pieces and that one of them has natural salience.
Recently, I was watching my grandson, a mogul skier, when he went off course. And I just said, 'dang.' He's 18 years old, and I try not to swear around him. But I have to think about it, especially when I play golf.
From where you sit in retirement, do you feel that swearing research is in good hands?
I gave a keynote speech to a group of international scholars meeting on swearing and cursing in Cologne, Germany, in 2015, two years before I retired. I was 65 years old at the time and most of the speakers were in their 30s and 40s. I realized that there was a new generation continuing to study taboo words in a manner that I pioneered in the 1970s. It was about time to step aside and let them have the glory.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Firefighters run to every fire station across North Yorkshire in gruelling challenge
Firefighters run to every fire station across North Yorkshire in gruelling challenge

Yahoo

time17 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Firefighters run to every fire station across North Yorkshire in gruelling challenge

Two firefighters have completed a punishing 420-mile challenge across North Yorkshire. The effort raised more than £8,000 for The Firefighters Charity and veteran's charity VTRN Reset. North Yorkshire firefighter Jay Taylor and Tyne and Wear firefighter Robyn Foster embarked on the "FireCallRun" which saw them run to every fire station across the county in just 14 days. Firefighter Jay Taylor enjoyed an ice bath at the end of each day (Image: Supplied) The challenge began at Richmond Fire Station on May 18 and saw the pair cover an average of 30 miles each day. They journeyed through numerous towns and villages, with key stops in Northallerton, Scarborough, York, Skipton, Harrogate, and Whitby before returning to Richmond. Robyn said: "We didn't realise how big a challenge it was going to be. L-R Jon Dyson (Lythe Station Manager), Jonathan Dyson Fire Chief, Jay Taylor and Robyn Foster at Whitby Fire Station (Image: Supplied) "We knew it was going to be tough, but it was mammoth. "We both suffered injuries to the tendons in the front of our feet from so much running, so had to swallow our pride a bit and get on the bike—which was just as hard with all the hills we encountered going through the Dales." Despite the fatigue and injuries, the duo was buoyed by the support they received. Jay said: "The support we received was unbelievable. Fylingdales CofE Primary (Image: Supplied) "The Fire Chief, Jonathan Dyson, joined us in Lythe and ran to Whitby with us, as well as firefighters from various stations joining us for parts of the fortnight. "We have to say a massive thank you to the support team, mostly made up from Richmond Fire Station, and our partners. "We didn't have to do any thinking for ourselves — we just had to run. "They were absolutely fantastic." Day two (Image: Supplied) Their effort was driven by a desire to aid two organisations dear to them. Jay said: "The Firefighters Charity provides vital support to colleagues and friends facing physical and mental health challenges, even helping one friend create precious family memories during terminal illness. "As a veteran of the Princess of Wales's Royal Regiment, I've seen the struggles many face when leaving the military. "VTRN Reset is doing incredible work to address this, and I'm proud to support their efforts." Although they have already raised £8,000, Jay and Robyn aim to reach the £10,000 target. They are considering another challenge, but for now, they urge people to continue supporting their cause through their JustGiving page.

Two saved after climbing down cliff for dropped phone, California officials say
Two saved after climbing down cliff for dropped phone, California officials say

Miami Herald

timea day ago

  • Miami Herald

Two saved after climbing down cliff for dropped phone, California officials say

Two tourists who climbed down a cliff near San Francisco seeking a dropped phone had to be rescued, California firefighters reported. The rescue took place between Mile Rock Beach and Deadman's Point on Saturday, June 7, the San Francisco Fire Department said in a post on X, formerly known as Twitter. The visitors were enjoying a view of the Golden Gate Bridge when one dropped a phone over the edge at about 3:30 p.m., firefighters reported on Instagram. They climbed down the cliff after the phone and became stuck, firefighters said. Rescuers used ropes to save the two in an operation that took about one hour, the department said. The tourists were not injured but were issued a ticket. They could be fined up to $300 apiece, SF Gate reported. The visitors are from Seattle, KRON reported.

Millennials Are Called Out For The Way They Use "LOL"
Millennials Are Called Out For The Way They Use "LOL"

Buzz Feed

timea day ago

  • Buzz Feed

Millennials Are Called Out For The Way They Use "LOL"

There I was, just being a millennial, enjoying my day and reminiscing about Pogs and Orbitz drinks and Beanie Babies, when suddenly, I was jolted from my "won't-ever-be-able-to-afford-to-buy-a-home" haze. Why, you ask? Well, I happened upon this blatant attack upon my generation from @gaulicsmith on Twitter (now known as X): And I quickly discovered the conversation has been happening all over the internet, including X, Threads, and Reddit. Unsurprisingly, my fellow millennials immediately felt called out. "Feeling attacked lol," said one person. "They're onto us lol first they came for our cheugy lol then our side part lol then our computer y2k crisis but they made it fashion lol" "my apartments on fire and i haven't felt joy since 2012 lol" And it will come as no surprise that millennials, the kindest generation, who have never done anything to anyone (except "kill" a bunch of industries and part our hair on the side and wear skinny jeans), quickly started apologizing, lol. "Sorry ( ) resisting the urge..." Then they moved on to their next tactic: trying to explain themselves. "lol does not mean LAUGH OUT LOUD! It means please don't be mad at me," this person said. "CLOSE! It actually means: 'I have anxiety so say it back or I'll think you hate me.'" "It is our way of communicating tone. We are a generation of people who feel like we are always in trouble/everyone is mad at us. lol" "If I don't put lol at the end of a sentence you might get mad at me. I blame having parents raised by traumatized WWII vets." "we cannot abide someone thinking we're mad at them" And one person hilariously added, "Remember when all our Nanas thought it meant 'lots of love'?" Of course, millennials also had to get in a few solid jabs at some other generations while they were at it. "at least i don't have tiktok voice," said one. "'Lol' is to millennials as '...' is to boomers." "frfr zoomers use 'frfr' like 'loud and clear' for radio comms." "Why does Gen Z wear pajamas everywhere lol" And finally, "At least we can read lol." To my fellow millennials, just remember: If you're a millennial, what do you think? Are you going to keep using "lol" despite the harsh and entirely unfair judgment? Let us know in the comments. And if you're not a millennial, give us a break lol.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store