Putin says displaced Kursk residents to return home safely
Moscow: Displaced residents of Russia's Kursk region will be able to return home safely despite ongoing challenges, Russian President Vladimir Putin has said during his visit to the region.
The President assured that citizens that have been temporarily displaced following Ukraine's incursion into the region would return home, noting that it is important to ensure security by demining populated areas, local media reported Wednesday, citing the Russian leader during a meeting with local officials.
During his work visit on Tuesday, Putin met with representatives from volunteer organisations and held a meeting with acting governor of the Kursk region Alexander Khinshtein, Xinhua news agency reported. The Russian leader also toured the construction site of Kursk-2 Nuclear Power Plant (NPP) and met with municipal leaders.
The President backed a proposal to extend the special economic zone to the entire Kursk region. He also approved funds to restore damaged homes in the region, and agreed to continue monthly payments to citizens who have been temporarily displaced.
"We have shown the whole world ... and primarily ourselves that we are a united people. In times of hardship, this unity becomes especially clear," Putin said.
In August 2024, the Ukrainian army launched an offensive into Russia's southern Kursk region. On April 26, Putin announced that Russia had regained full control of the region.
Chief of the General Staff of the Russian Armed Forces Valery Gerasimov, in his last month's report to President Vladimir Putin on regaining control of the Kursk region, had commended the role of North Korean troops in the Kursk campaign.
"I want specially to note the participation of servicemen of the Democratic People's Republic of Korea ... who in accordance with the Treaty on the Comprehensive Strategic Partnership between our countries rendered considerable assistance," Gerasimov was quoted as saying by the TASS news agency.
On April 28, the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (DPRK) announced that its military operations in Russia's Kursk region "were victoriously concluded," marking the first official confirmation of its miliary involvement.
Kim Jong Un, General Secretary of the Workers' Party of Korea (WPK) and President of the State Affairs of the DPRK, decided to send armed forces to Russia as "the prevailing situation was conformed to the invocation of Article 4 of the treaty on comprehensive strategic partnership" between the two countries, the official Korean Central News Agency (KCNA) reported on April 28, citing a statement from the Central Military Commission of the WPK.
The military activities "conducted within the boundary of the Russian Federation fully conform to all the provisions and the spirit of the UN Charter and other international laws," according to the statement.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
31 minutes ago
- Indian Express
What Ukraine's drone attack on Russia means for peace talks
How can the Ukrainian attack on Russian air assets affect the negotiations? What will Russia be looking for as it investigates the drone strikes? What does the attack mean for President Putin? Alind Chauhan put these questions to one of India's foremost experts on Russia. Ukraine's massive drone attack on Russia on Sunday came a day before the second round of peace talks between the two sides in Istanbul. The talks ended within an hour — the two sides agreed to swap thousands of dead and wounded soldiers, but there was no progress towards ending the war. The first round of talks in mid-May had also ended without a consensus on a ceasefire agreement. This was the first time that such large numbers of Ukrainian drones attacked Russian airfields. At least five of them were attacked, and some of them are located very deep inside Russian territory, including in the Far East. If the attacked sites have facilities that contain nuclear-related equipment such as strategic bombers and nuclear weapons, then the Russians will take a serious view. So far in the war, the Ukrainians have not needed to target Russia's nuclear weapons facilities as the Russians will not use nuclear weapons as long as the NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organization) does not get involved. That's why the Russians would be concerned if their nuclear facilities were targeted. They would be investigating if the attack was just an adventure by Ukraine — an attempt by President Volodymyr Zelenskyy to get President Donald Trump on his side somehow and get him involved in the war — or if someone in NATO put the Ukrainians to it, trying to achieve some greater goals. The Russians would be investigating the second angle because drones typically do not fly by themselves and need navigation, which Ukraine cannot do without the help of United States satellites. No. Over the past month, both sides have been attacking each other quite heavily with drones. Ukrainian drones attempted to attack Moscow during Russia's Victory Day parade on May 9. More than 20 leaders from various countries had gone to attend the parade. It was the depth at which the Ukrainians hit Russia which was unexpected. They attacked airfields in the Irkutsk region, which is deep in Siberia, and far from where the military action has been taking place. The method of launching the drones was also unusual. The Ukrainians launched drones from trucks that are used to haul loads over long distances. It is unusual for the Russians to realise that they can be hit so deep. But they are too far gone in the war against Ukraine. And the support for Putin is way too solid for this attack to make any significant difference. So from a military and a strategic perspective, the Russians may be worried. However, from a political perspective, Putin will not be concerned too much. Currently, both countries are looking at some technicalities as they have not been able to square the fundamental disagreement. The Ukrainians are saying that before any negotiations start, the Russians should agree to a month-long ceasefire. The West, except the US, has supported this demand. The Russians are saying that they are not opposed to a ceasefire, provided there is a roadmap to the ultimate resolution. That's because the Russians have got initiative on the ground. Although they are advancing slowly, they are advancing — and the Ukrainians are just trying to hold on to territory. The Ukrainians are also exhausted and running out of material for the war. The Russians do not want to give up this advantage and allow the Ukrainians a whole month to regroup and replenish their stocks. Also, the Russians have said there are certain reasons why the war began — such as the question of Ukraine's neutrality and the protection of the Russian-speaking population in Ukraine. Unless there is a possibility of an agreement on these issues, the Russians say, there is no point in a ceasefire. The Russians also do not want to give up territory that they have captured. That's why the Russians had earlier suggested that the two sides come up with plans or outlines of how they visualise peace, and meet on June 2 to compare notes. The negotiations are still at a very preliminary stage and involve second-level officials. Both Russia and Ukraine are under pressure from the US which wants to see a peace deal soon. However, both sides have red lines on what they want to talk about. The Russian delegation is led by Vladimir Medinsky, a former Cultural Minister, and includes some officials from the security services and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. The Ukrainian delegation is led by the country's Defence Minister Rustem Umerov. However, these delegations do not have the authority to make the final decision. They are just trying to narrow down the differences and come to a document that is acceptable to both sides, which will be presented to Putin and Zelenskyy for a decision. Nandan Unnikrishnan is Distinguished Fellow at Observer Research Foundation.
Mint
41 minutes ago
- Mint
Ukraine's drone strike is a warning—for the US
By now Americans know about Ukraine's remarkable drone strike on Sunday that damaged as many as 40 aircraft deep inside Russia as strategic bombers sat like ducks in a row on military bases. One urgent lesson beyond that conflict is that the U.S. homeland is far more vulnerable than most Americans realize. The details about Ukraine's daring operation are few, but Kyiv managed to sneak cheap drones across the border and use them to destroy costly Russian military assets. The bang for Ukraine's buck was considerable. You don't have to be a fan of thrillers to imagine a similar scenario in the United States. 'Could those have been B-2s at the hands of Iranian drones flying out of containers, let alone Chinese?" military analyst Fred Kagan asked this week. The U.S. strategic bomber fleet is small (about one-third the size it was in the Cold War) and concentrated at a handful of bases. See the aerial photo flying across social media of B-52 bombers lined up at Barksdale Air Force Base in Louisiana. The story is similar for fighters and capital assets like aircraft carriers. One lesson is that President Trump's planned Golden Dome missile-defense shield isn't the boondoggle it's portrayed to be in the press. The headlines are preoccupied with space-based interceptors. But the U.S. is exposed to many threats besides ballistic missiles—from drones and spy blimps to cruise missiles launched off submarines. The bipartisan Strategic Posture Commission warned in 2023 that the U.S. needs better integrated air and missile defenses against 'coercive attacks" from Russia and China, and such an attack could come from conventional weapons. In a crisis over the Taiwan Strait, Xi Jinping might threaten the Commander in Chief: Stay out of the Western Pacific or you never know what might happen to your pricey F-22s in Alaska. That's one reason the U.S. needs a layered missile shield that exploits new technology and existing systems like the Patriot. Israel's recent success shooting down drones with lasers shows that innovative and affluent societies can meet new threats. President Trump deserves credit for elevating missile defense as a presidential priority. But the U.S. has lost some basic muscle memory since the Cold War on living in a dangerous world. A prescient report this year from Thomas Shugart and Timothy Walton at the Hudson Institute warned about highly vulnerable U.S. airfields, especially in the Western Pacific. For the new B-21 bomber, the Air Force is looking at shelters 'akin to sunshades," Messrs. Shugart and Walton write, that could leave the aircraft 'exposed to threats, including lethal" unmanned aerial vehicles. 'Not building approximately $30 million" hardened aircraft shelters 'for over-$600 million B-21 bombers is an unwise decision that could endanger the US's ability to strike globally," they write. Such shelters always end up being a low budget priority compared with airplanes and missiles, and the message here is that defense spending can't stay at 3% of the economy and provide the security Americans expect. The bill moving through Congress puts up $25 billion for Golden Dome. But a national air defense won't be built by a one-time cash infusion, and the Administration is ducking a sustained defense buildup to mollify its fiscal hawks. Americans are accustomed to wars fought far from home by a force of volunteers, but everyone in the U.S. will be on the front lines of the next conflict. Political leaders could be doing much more to educate the country about this vulnerability, rather than boasting that the U.S. military is the best it has ever been. It isn't. Ukraine did the U.S. a favor by destroying bombers of a U.S. adversary—and sending America a wake up call about its own complacency.
Time of India
42 minutes ago
- Time of India
Ukraine says it struck Crimea bridge
KYIV: Ukraine said on Tuesday that it had struck the Crimean bridge for the third time since the start of Russia's invasion, after spending months planting explosives on support structure beneath the water. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The extent of the damage was not immediately clear, but the Security Service of Ukraine, the intelligence agency known as the SBU, released a statement and a video that it said showed one of the detonations. "Today, at 4.44am, without any civilian casualties, the first explosive device was detonated," the agency said in a statement. "The underwater support pillars were severely damaged at the seabed level - aided by the equivalent of 1,100 kg of TNT." Surveillance footage released by the agency and verified by NYT shows an explosion under the Kerch Strait Bridge, which connects Russia's mainland and the Crimean peninsula. The attack appeared to target support features of the bridge. It was not clear how much damage the bridge sustained. A photo from the agency shows some damage to its railing. Traffic on the bridge was suspended for about three hours Tuesday morning, and then later in the day, about an hour after the SBU published its report, it was closed again for about two hours, according to the Telegram channel that tracks the bridge's operation. The reasons for the closures were not disclosed. The bridge reopened by late afternoon. The head of the SBU, Vasyl Malyuk, wrote in a statement that Russia had continued to use the bridge "as a logistical artery to supply its troops," making it a legitimate target. A Russian military blog, Rybar, run by a former Russian army service member, Mikhail Zvinchuk, said in a Telegram post that a Ukrainian underwater drone had attacked the bridge early Tuesday but that it had hit only a defensive barrier around one of the pylons. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The strike on the bridge came two days after Ukraine conducted one of the most ambitious operations of the war deep inside Russia, targeting the Russian strategic bombing fleet. The Kerch Strait Bridge stretches for 19km and is a primary supply route for Moscow's forces fighting in southern Ukraine. It is deeply symbolic for President Putin, who presided over its opening in 2018. In Oct 2022, a truck laden with explosives was detonated as it crossed the bridge, causing a fireball large enough to rupture fuel tanks on a passing train and setting it on fire. The blast pulled part of the roadway off its joints and into the sea. The Russians set about repairs, but 10 months later, the bridge was hit again, this using maritime drones to target support pillars.
