logo
Games Inbox: Is an Xbox Game Pass subscription worth it?

Games Inbox: Is an Xbox Game Pass subscription worth it?

Metro5 days ago
The Wednesday letters page has some detailed advice for anyone trying to build their own gaming PC, as one reader enjoys Fast Fusion on Switch 2.
To join in with the discussions yourself email gamecentral@metro.co.uk
Too much of a good thing
Back when I bought my Xbox Series X I got 24 months of Game Pass included. I tried a few games now and then, but mostly for 20 minutes or so, and then tried another and after a few months I didn't use it at all really.
I think having so much choice actually made it feel cheapened, if that makes any sense. I think if I'd paid £40 for a game I'd feel more inclined to play it but Game Pass was like a buffet just to sample lots of games but not actually play them properly. I didn't renew it when my sub expired a couple of years ago now.
Mark Matthews
GC: It's a common sentiment, but not one anyone really anticipated before game subscriptions became a thing.
Executive logic
With the next generation of consoles just around the corner, and with the Switch 2 kind of starting it off, will developers be held back by the difficulties of getting their games to work on all consoles? We saw how the Xbox Series S complicated releases on both it and the Xbox Series X (Baldur's Gate 3). Will developers now have to think about the Xbox Series S, Xbox Series X, and Switch 2 when making the next generations games?
When new generations of consoles come out they usually make sure that their new games can be played on their older iterations of their systems. With development time and costs skyrocketing, I think the video games industry is in serious trouble, and I don't think kickstarting the next generation is the right answer. There's plenty of life left in the PlayStation 5 (and Xbox to a lesser extent) and it feels like the next generation is more trouble than its work. But then again what do I know?
dan69247
Sign up to the GameCentral newsletter for a unique take on the week in gaming, alongside the latest reviews and more. Delivered to your inbox every Saturday morning.
Life after death
RE: the short life cycle of the beloved Dreamcast. Two years and four months from start to finish is very, very short. But suppose I don't dump a console once it's shut down, there are still plenty of games to seek out and play. I would suppose I had it for at least another two years after that, all while quietly having an affair with the GameCube.
I gave it to my nephews when I finally left her for the GameCube full time and they still have it bundled away in the back of a cupboard somewhere, promising to show me that the apprentices have become the masters at Soul Blade/Edge/Calibur. I'll bet those LED Chao memory card Tamagotchis don't work though!
big boy bent
Email your comments to: gamecentral@metro.co.uk
Do it yourself
I never cease to be amazed at the amount of technical know-how and skill you can happen upon after just a cursory search on YouTube. If you have a problem, any kind of problem, chances are someone's already made a how-to video about it.
I've had a long-standing issue with my original Xbox, in that the DVD drive has been reluctant to open and close. It turns out this is a common problem that can be solved by fitting a new drive belt, which can be purchased easily online. These belts are so much smaller than you'd think. A spare Xbox DVD drive belt (I bought two) is no bigger than an American quarter (25 cents). Fitting the belt was a fiddly but non-invasive procedure akin to keyhole surgery using tweezers, but I saw how to do it on a YouTube video.
Last night I watched some guy revive an old non-working Xbox that he'd bought. Apparently, the capacitor had leaked over the motherboard (another common problem with the original Xbox) and he expertly mended the console and got it working again. Impressive stuff. It's so gratifying when experts turn what might be considered worthless junk back into something useful.
I guess the advice that you'd give to anyone with a malfunctioning console that's over two decades old is to get a professional to fix it and I believe retro console repair shops are scattered around the UK. I expect a lot of people would be inclined to buy another old console and commit their malfunctioning machine to landfill but I wanted to try and fix mine myself.
Michael Veal / @msv858 (X)
Bad timing
I think Game Pass is a really good idea, the only problem is it came about 20 years too late. Just hear me out! 20 years ago games were so cheap to make. I mean, 20 years ago games were around £40, half the price to make compared to now. That means a shorter time to make them, which means they could of made more in the same time frame to be able to keep the list fresh.
Also, now everyone has had enough of subscriptions. Not only have you got the video subscriptions online, everything is going on a subscription – even going to the gym. And I think everyone is saying not another subscription. But 20 odd years ago there wasn't any subscription services, which would of been perfect for Game Pass. So it's really a great idea, just a shame it was 20 years too late.
David
GC: 20 years ago, nobody downloaded AAA games, due to slower broadband speeds and limited hard drive space.
Fast catch-up
Just picked up Fast Fusion on Switch 2. Bought it mainly for the Switch 2 graphics showcase but the gameplay is rather good. I've jumped in just as the game has had a free update. The new additions are another graphics option and also three extra new circuits. Not bad for free DLC. I shall wait for more of that.
GC, is there any point me buying the older games in the series or should I leave them alone? Is it going to be a big step backwards playing fast RMX?
Nick The Greek
GC: They're all just minor variations of each other, so we'd stick with Fusion. Even if the Fusion gimmick is one of the worst things about it.
Under budget
Regarding Andrew J.'s PC purchase, as others have said, you'll get a very capable machine for £2,000 if that's what you want to spend, easily capable of at least 1440p at 60fps in most games for many years to come. PCPartPicker has good user submitted build guidesif you want to get an idea of which CPUs and GPUs are within your budget, and r/buildapc subreddit is also good for advice.
Generally speaking, I'd say an AMD CPU is probably your best bet unless you have a good reason to go with Intel: a 7800X3D (or 9800X3D, if you're willing to pay a wee bit more) would do you for years to come. On the GPU side it's worth getting something with 12GB VRAM minimum as the 8GB cards are struggling to keep up – a RTX 5070 or 5070Ti (if you can stretch to it) would also keep you going for a while, and gives you access to Nvidia's full feature set (upscaling, frame generation).
If you're not too bothered about that, then the 9070XT is a really good AMD card which has better ray-tracing and machine learning powered upscaling capabilities than the previous generation cards (I have a 7800XT which is fine for my needs, but relatively rubbish for ray-tracing).
This build (from the website you suggested) comes in around £2,000 and could be a good starting point:
If you really just want a 1080p machine then you can lower your budget a lot , but you'll maybe need to upgrade sooner. I really like what Intel are doing in the budget GPU space – they have some nice cards with good VRAM capacity that would make great 1080p/1440p machines.
Happy hunting!
Magnumstache
Skimping on power
As others in the comments have mentioned, £2,000 to target 1080p at 60fps is overkill and could be achieved for less than half that price.
Assuming you actually do want to spend £2,000 then I'd recommend a 7800X3D processor with ideally a 5070 Ti graphics card (Ti over the base 5070 for the extra VRAM), although if you need to shave £150 on your spend this could drop to the 5070. You could probably run many current games at 4K 60fps with this set-up.
Ultimately, I would recommend getting in touch with whichever company you plan to use to build the PC and discuss the requirements in more detail with them. I just put a theoretical build through Parts Picker and it came in at £1,900 but there is no upcharge on parts for building it this way.
Two suggestions, though. Firstly, add a second 2TB drive. You won't be running games off your old mechanical drive so having extra space now and being able to dump game installs on a separate drive to the operating system is worth the extra £100 at the build stage.
Secondly, don't skimp on the power supply, I often see build sites using the cheapest PSU possible, so ensure you're getting a good rated one (gold+ or better). 750w should be fine but you can always go a little higher if you think you might swap out GPUs at a later date to something more powerful.
Adam W
Inbox also-rans
Not an exact response to Andrew J but if he's struggling on compatibility between parts then this is a great site which when you start building out your machine it only shows compatible parts.
Steve
And people thought GTA 6 would have a big price! Thanks for this great sale at Very, it's more affordable.
Mark Matthews
Email your comments to: gamecentral@metro.co.uk More Trending
The small print
New Inbox updates appear every weekday morning, with special Hot Topic Inboxes at the weekend. Readers' letters are used on merit and may be edited for length and content.
You can also submit your own 500 to 600-word Reader's Feature at any time via email or our Submit Stuff page, which if used will be shown in the next available weekend slot.
You can also leave your comments below and don't forget to follow us on Twitter.
MORE: Games Inbox: Does it matter that physical video games are dying?
MORE: Games Inbox: What's the best way to play Nintendo Switch 2?
MORE: Games Inbox: When will Switch 2 get a new 3D Mario game?
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

EA is going to make a new Battlefield game every year claims source
EA is going to make a new Battlefield game every year claims source

Metro

time7 hours ago

  • Metro

EA is going to make a new Battlefield game every year claims source

As excitement mounts for Battlefield 6, a prominent analyst claims that EA is planning to copy the release schedule and studio set-up for Call Of Duty. Not for the first time, EA is getting excited about the prospect of Battlefield becoming a true rival to Call Of Duty. This has happened multiple times in the past, with previous entries, but the hype behind Battlefield 6 does seem especially potent, especially given how many people have been playing the open beta. It's still unlikely to come very close to the sales figures or player numbers for this year's Call Of Duty: Black Ops 7 but if it does well then it will encourage EA to plough more resources into the franchise and, inevitably, create more sequels. According to one industry figure the plan is to eventually have yearly sequels, by mimicking the way Call Of Duty works, with three separate studios working in rotation. Ignoring the fact that the Call Of Duty system has become increasingly unpredictable in recent years, as games take longer to make, the comments suggests that it will be five or six years before EA is able to churn out sequels at the rate they want. That sounds believable enough, and getting carried away with the potential success of Battlefield, before it's had a chance to prove itself, is certainly something EA has done multiple times before, but the problem with the rumour is that it comes from controversial industry analyst Michael Patcher. Not only that but the information is from the same podcast in which Patcher claims that Sony's live service game Fairgame$ had been cancelled. Something which he ended up retracting just hours later, while admitting, 'I have no info on the game at all.' Sign up to the GameCentral newsletter for a unique take on the week in gaming, alongside the latest reviews and more. Delivered to your inbox every Saturday morning. That was a rumour though, which Pachter does not usually peddle in, whereas the Battlefield information supposedly comes from personal conversations with EA developers. 'I talked to EA, Byron Beede, good dude, former Activision guy who worked at Infinity Ward with Vince [Zampella]. He's running the Battlefield franchise. And their goal is three studios making Battlefield on a three year basis. So they can get to Battlefield annually,' said Patcher. 'He said it's going to take five or six years before they can get two in a row, so we're not going to get there for a while. But that's their plan.' More Trending If that information had come from anyone other than Pachter it would have had few doubters, but so far there's been no attempt from Byron Beede to deny the story, which is something at least. Especially since it became available on Game Pass, there's been some debate as to whether it still makes sense to have a new Call Of Duty game ever year, especially as publishers now make more money from microtransactions than they do game sales. While yearly sequels used to be commonplace in the games industry they're now almost exclusively limited to sports titles and Call Of Duty. Whether Battlefield will be added to that list remains to be seen, as even if Battlefield 6 is a major hit a lot can change in the five years necessary to set up the new studio system Pachter is describing. Email gamecentral@ leave a comment below, follow us on Twitter. To submit Inbox letters and Reader's Features more easily, without the need to send an email, just use our Submit Stuff page here. For more stories like this, check our Gaming page. MORE: Games Inbox: What is the best generation of video game console? MORE: Here's the one reason why I'm not buying Battlefield 6 – Reader's Feature MORE: PETA gives Nintendo free advertising by complaining about the cows in Mario Kart

Games Inbox: What is the best generation of video game console?
Games Inbox: What is the best generation of video game console?

Metro

time8 hours ago

  • Metro

Games Inbox: What is the best generation of video game console?

The Monday letters page has some interesting ideas for the next God Of War game, as one reader looks forward to a Donkey Kong Bananza sequel. To join in with the discussions yourself email gamecentral@ Anytime but now As we head towards another, unwanted, new generation I'm still using my PlayStation 4 and wondering whether it's worth upgrading to a PlayStation 6, let alone a 5. Maybe it feels different if you own one, but I can't imagine anyone saying this generation of consoles has been the best but that started me think on what was the best? I think there's three obvious contenders: the SNES/Mega Drive, the Xbox 360/Wii, and the PlayStation 4. It's difficult because I feel nostalgia gets in the way and it's hard to look at things definitively. You also tend to only remember the good stuff. No matter how many classics it had, there was a ton lot of identikit platformers in the Mega Drive era. Likewise, I think we forget how many brown coloured shooters there were on the Xbox 360. You then start worrying about recency bias, but I really do think the PlayStation 4 was the best, especially if you include the Nintendo Switch. Two great consoles, tons of all-time exclusives, and Sony and Nintendo at arguably their best. Curious to know what others think but that's what I'd choose if they were giving out awards. Kogan Dragging it out RE: Unicorn Overlord. It was mentioned in the Inbox the other day and I have to say how great it is. I'm about 50 hours in and I'm nearing the end, but I'll make sure I drag it out, doing all of the side and liberation missions. It's such a great game, especially on the big story missions where you have to send different units off to fight different targets (although my Alain unit is so buffed and varied that if I'm struggling I just send them in to beat almost anyone). Simon PS: I wrote in the other week mentioning Resistance 3 and how good it was. I have finished it, and it is an absolute classic – I'm surprised this game doesn't ever seem to get mentioned. I've got out my old PlayStation 3 and will go through the original God Of War games. The Xbox 360/PlayStation 3 generation was one the best in gaming history, in my opinion. Sign up to the GameCentral newsletter for a unique take on the week in gaming, alongside the latest reviews and more. Delivered to your inbox every Saturday morning. Recurring issue I feel like no matter how much hype there is for Battlefield 6, the real problem with the series is that it always falls flat on its face at launch. That's why Battlefield 4 didn't beat Call Of Duty and almost all of the games have had the same problem, to some degree or another. The cause always seems to be the same too: EA unwilling to wait until the game is finished and being so full of themselves they're convinced the game is too big to fail. The fact that has happened so many times makes me believe that EA is never going to learn their lesson. Maybe the open betas have been enough to iron out any problems, but they seem more like marketing schemes than something that's being done as a genuine test. Zeiss Email your comments to: gamecentral@ Reaction time So there's going to be five weeks between Battlefield 6 and Call Of Duty: Black Ops 7? I'm not sure why Activision is leaving EA an open goal like that, but if that's proof of them thinking that it's no threat to them I'll laugh if they end up wishing they'd taken things a bit more seriously. I don't think there's any chance that Battlefield 6 will 'beat' Black Ops 7, but if it proves itself to be a real contender than that means there's huge pressure on next year's Call Of Duty, which we've already had leaks on. They seem to plan them all at least three years in advance, so there's no way Activision will be able to react until there's a Battlefield 7, at which time EA can try and outfox them again. I don't really have a horse in this race – I'd much rather see a new game take over dominance – but anything that shakes up the status quo for me is good. The more complacent a publisher is, the worse the games are. Focus Final purchase On the subject of buying a new gaming PC. I spoke to PC Specialist for an hour on Friday and they recommended a few changes to Magnum's pre-build PC, not many, mainly the graphics card and tower. Could GameCentral readers and the Underbox give me advice on this build that PC Specialist recommended, please? Is it good, in your opinion? They did say if I spent another £340 I would get a really good 4K graphics card but I couldn't afford that, so went with the next one they recommended after the more expensive one. Thank you in advance for any advice you can give. Andrew J. Going bananas I've just finished Donkey Kong Bananza and I'm kind of in two minds. It was 80% great, but it was surprisingly janky for a Nintendo game and the camera can be a nightmare. You could argue there's no way round that problem but that doesn't stop it from seeming annoying while you're playing. I'd also say it was fairly inconsistent in terms of level design, with some amazing ones and some that dragged on (that Zebra level). I'm willing to bet the desert island level was made after they knew that this was going to be a Switch 2 game, because it's awesome and seems to be pushing the console the most. The ending is also great, and I think that does a lot to leave you with a good overall impression of the game, once you've finished. It's a shame it and the other boss fighters weren't tougher though. Some of them I beat so quickly I never really understood exactly what was going on, which is a shame as a lot of them seemed quite clever. I think it's the sort of game that needs a sequel to really perfect what it's trying to do, and I would be interested in playing that if they made it. In terms of positives, I think it makes Donkey Kong a much more interesting character with more defined abilities (was he ever meant to be super strong before? I don't really remember that). In terms of negatives, I think the lack of challenge and the amount of jank is going to upset some people and stop it from winning any game of the year awards, even though it is definitely one of the best games I've played in a while. Coolsbane No parity I really don't think we should be treating the fact that the Switch 2 can't run a game at exactly the same level as the PlayStation 5 as some sort of surprise. That was never going to happen, especially with Borderlands 4 being open world. I'm not advocating getting the Switch 2 version over the other others, but anyone expecting to buy any multiformat game and having it run the same as the PlayStation 5, or the Xbox Series X/S, hasn't been paying attention. Personally, I think getting anywhere close is pretty impressive. The more important test will be if it can run things like Elden Ring as good or better than the PlayStation 4 version. Tolly Modern gods A few months ago there were rumours of a new 'half-sequel' God Of War game, but I see that never got announced and the rumours have gone away. Does that mean it's been cancelled? Or maybe that it's been upgraded into a full game, as sometimes seems to happen. I don't envy Sony working out what to do next, as even as a fan I'm not sure what would be best. I know I don't want to play as Atreus but has Kratos got any story left to tell? His character arc seems to be over and while it would be funny to have him running around as a pure good guy, I don't think that leaves much room for anything interesting to happen to him. There's also what seems like the inevitability of setting it in Egypt, but so inevitable that it risks feeling like it's just going through the motions. We all know how the formula works by now and pop culture means most people have a fairly good idea of the basics of Ancient Egyptian mythology. I think what I would do is set the game in the modern day. Maybe after Kratos has destroyed all gods everywhere and what that kind of world would look like. Maybe the gods are trying to get back in and have people worship them again or something like that. I feel something new and daring has to happen or otherwise we're just going to be going round all the ancient world religions, then rebooting at the end to start again in Greece. And who wouldn't want to see Kratos in jeans and a T-shirt? Paulie GC: The last rumour, from June, was of a 2D Metroidvania. But as with all the other rumours, there's no evidence and things have gone quiet since then. Inbox also-ransIf there's really going to be a Capcom Vs. SNK 3 I hope it includes more than just fighting game characters. The other ones were just a bit too hardcore for me. Either that or do a different team-up and have wackier fighting. I mean… the DCU is just sitting there now, if Capcom's ben jilted by Marvel. Limpton Will you be playing Hollow Knight: Silksong at Gamescom? I don't see how that game is ever going to live up to the hype, but I'm curious. Milo GC: We should be. It's supposed to be at both the Xbox and Nintendo stands. But we won't believe anything until we see it. More Trending Email your comments to: gamecentral@ The small print New Inbox updates appear every weekday morning, with special Hot Topic Inboxes at the weekend. Readers' letters are used on merit and may be edited for length and content. You can also submit your own 500 to 600-word Reader's Feature at any time via email or our Submit Stuff page, which if used will be shown in the next available weekend slot. You can also leave your comments below and don't forget to follow us on Twitter. MORE: Games Inbox: Has Nintendo lost their touch with Switch 2? MORE: Games Inbox: Should Leon die in Resident Evil Requiem? MORE: Games Inbox: Is an Xbox Game Pass subscription worth it?

There's no reason to make a PS6 or a next gen Xbox - Reader's Feature
There's no reason to make a PS6 or a next gen Xbox - Reader's Feature

Metro

timea day ago

  • Metro

There's no reason to make a PS6 or a next gen Xbox - Reader's Feature

A reader feels a new generation of video games consoles is currently unnecessary, unless the new hardware and games are shown to do some different. The advent of a new console generation is an exciting and unpredictable time. Faster processors, beefier graphics cards and more teraflops than anybody knows what to do with. But with the recent PlayStation 6 rumours swirling, I can't help but wonder…do we really need that next leap right now? Technology is an ever-evolving thing and with it, so expand its capabilities. When a new console generation was released there was always a lot of fervour about what was new. Just think about some of the general leaps. 2D to 3D, SD to HD, long loading screens to near seamless worlds. But what can the PlayStation 6 and the Xbox (whatever it will be called, I mean who can guess at this point?) provide us? Just because they will be exponentially more powerful than their older brothers doesn't mean they'll offer anything truly new, problems we've already seen with the PlayStation 5 and the Xbox Series X. They both delivered iteration rather than revolution. I mean yes, they did give us practically zero load times, depending on the game, and we do have games running at native 4K, but what, if anything, did they give us over the previous gens? An example of this is the Nintendo Switch 2. Nintendo, known for their out-there designs like the N64 controller, and unique and engaging play systems (Wii motion controls), have just taken what was good about the Switch and plopped it into a bigger, sexier design and made it more powerful. Is this wrong? I'd say no, I think it's a great system, but it is missing some of that Nintendo charm and magic that they are known for. Sign up to the GameCentral newsletter for a unique take on the week in gaming, alongside the latest reviews and more. Delivered to your inbox every Saturday morning. So why is this going to matter to gamers? Don't we all want something new? To which the answer is usually yes. I mean for example, Sony once again released a PS5 Pro model, which can run a lot more games at 4K and a steady 60 frames per second, while toying with some ray-tracing. Most people don't need this, but for those who like to push boundaries, this is a great system. But my goodness, does this come at a cost! The cheapest PlayStation 5 is £430, while the Pro comes in at £690. That's a £260 difference, and amazingly, neither of those prices includes disc drives. If you want one of those, then that's another £70. So, can we possibly imagine how much a new console generation can start at? It's a little concerning. These companies know what they're doing, for the most part, and can potentially bring us some exciting and amazing surprises. More power is great, and I hope that the new generation can be a locked 4K 60fps gaming machine straight off the bat. But I do hope that outside of shinier and smoother graphics, we get these systems being used more creatively. Gaming is a creative space; let's keep it that way. More Trending If the PlayStation 6 is coming, I hope it's something more than just a PlayStation 5 in a nicer suit. I want to see something that surprises us, something that makes it feel like it's a true generational leap forward, something worth getting excited about. Otherwise, we're just buying the same console in a sharper tux. By reader Mike Wilson The reader's features do not necessarily represent the views of GameCentral or Metro. You can submit your own 500 to 600-word reader feature at any time, which if used will be published in the next appropriate weekend slot. Just contact us at gamecentral@ or use our Submit Stuff page and you won't need to send an email. MORE: I know what the gimmick for the next Zelda game could be - Reader's Feature MORE: Here's the one reason why I'm not buying Battlefield 6 - Reader's Feature MORE: Top 5 video game developers that have wasted their talents - Reader's Feature

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store