Business Is Buzzing In Porirua
While the sold-out BizFest 2025: Kōpū i te pae - Light up the Horizon will be a great opportunity to learn, network and connect, there are a number of other events in Porirua to help boost businesses.
BizFest is at Te Rauparaha Arena on 1 July, with double Olympic gold winner, Dame Valerie Adams, and Black Grace founder and director Neil Ieremia among the speakers.
With an awesome lineup of sessions and kōrero, Porirua Mayor Anita Baker says it will be a fantastic day for the city's business sector.
"Porirua is a great place to do business and with the events we have on the calendar now, it means our city is humming. We're always looking to keep moving forward," she says.
A new pop-up initiative - BizHub - will kick off at Kai Tahi from 1 August. BizHub aims to keep the momentum from BizFest going and bring the business community together every second Friday, as a hub for advice, connections and support.
"BizFest and BizHub are both collaborations between Porirua City Council and Te Rūnanga o Toa Rangatira and it's a partnership approach that's focusing on uplifting and connecting Porirua businesses," Mayor Baker says.
Earlier this month the Love Local Expo showcased the best of our local products, services, crafts and community services - with more than 130 stalls and thousands of people coming through the Arena on 7 June.
Other events coming up on the calendar are Visa Wellington on a Plate and the ever-popular ChoctoberFest.
Visa WOAP will be held from 1-31 August in Porirua and there'll be outstanding burger creations to tempt your tastebuds from businesses across Porirua. It's not to be missed.
ChoctoberFest is always a sweet spot with Porirua locals, visitors and businesses. In 2024, the third year of the festival, 20 cafes, eateries and bars took part. More than 13,000 baked treats and drinks were consumed in October, pumping $131,000 into the Porirua economy.
"What I love about the events that we host now for businesses is that they're not just for residents, but they attract visitors to our city," Mayor Baker says.
Also coming up is a three-day Bizezi Spark Programme on 30 and 31 July and 1 August. It's a hands-on business incubator programme, for those thinking about starting a business or wanting to build stronger foundations. You'll work with experts over three days to shape your business plan and set yourself up for success.
Later in the month, on 20 August, there's a subsidised half-day workshop Business Growth and Resilience through the Circular Economy, where you can learn how the circular economy can unlock new revenue streams, reduce costs, and future-proof your business.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
14 hours ago
- RNZ News
More people making losses when selling their homes
The number of people losing money on home sales is at the level since 2014. Photo: RNZ / REECE BAKER The number of people making losses when they sell their homes is at the highest level since 2014, property data firm Cotality says, and Auckland sellers are being hit particularly hard. In three months, there was $128,362,612 lost by sellers. Cotality has released its latest Pain and Gain report, which shows the proportion of sellers making a loss or a gain on sales across the country. In the second quarter of this year, 89.4 percent of sellers made a gross profit - 10.6 percent made a loss. This does not include the cost of the sale, such as real estate commission. But in Auckland, the number losing money increased to 15.9 percent. In Tauranga, it was 13.2 percent and Wellington 11.9 percent. Christchurch had the smallest proportion of loss-making sales, at 4.9 percent. Cotality chief property economist Kelvin Davidson said it reflected how much prices had fallen in Auckland, and the higher number of apartments, which were more likely to lose money. The median profit among those who sold for a gain was $279,000. That is well down on the $440,000 median gain recorded during the 2021 peak, but higher than anything recorded before the end of 2020. The median loss was $52,500. Combined, the total gain made by sellers in the quarter was $4.9 billion. Cotality chief property economist Kelvin Davidson. Photo: SUPPLIED Davidson said the length of time that someone had owned a property played a big part in whether they made a gain or a loss. "Almost 50 percent of the loss-making resales in the three months to June had been held for less than three-and-a-half years." Those who made a gain had held their properties for 9.4 years. Davidson said that was the longest hold period for a gain since the mid-1990s. He said the weakness in property values could be encouraging some owners to hold for longer to allow gains to accumulate. "In other cases it may just reflect the fact that in a quiet market a lot of sellers simply have to wait longer for a deal to be achieved. "Indeed, some property owners may also just be choosing to hold for a bit longer if they're uncertain about their job prospects or don't want to pay transactions costs such as an estate agent's commission or conveyancing fees as regularly. In addition, lending restraints such as the loan to value ratio rules may have kept more people where they are for longer." He said investors could sometimes choose when to make a move but owner-occupiers were often driven by life events. It was not always a bad thing to move in a soft market, he said. "You might get less than what you might like for your own house but you may well get a bargain on the next one. "You might come out better off." He said there were hints that some sellers were choosing to take their properties off the market rather than accept a disappointing price. Wellington real estate salesperson Mike Robbers said he was seeing that. He said separating couples would sometimes put a house on the market, and then when offers came in lower than they wanted, one person would buy the other out instead . Standalone houses were less likely to sell for a loss. Almost 34 percent of apartments sold for less than they were bought for. Investors' experience was very similar to that of owner-occupiers, at 10.7 percent of sales making a loss compared to 10.1 percent for owner-occupiers. Investors had slightly larger gains when they made a profit and slightly bigger losses. In Auckland, 17 percent of investors were making a loss. Gareth Kiernan, chief forecaster at Infometrics, said the current downturn was so far shorter than one recorded from 1998 to 2001 and from 2008 to 2012. But he said there were signs that people who bought in the peak might have to hold on longer than in previous downturns to get back to neutral. "It's worth noting that house prices are currently still sitting about 13 percent below their 2021 peak. At the same stage of the cycle, 13 quarters after the December 1997 and December 2007 peaks, house prices were only 2.0 percent and 5.5 percent below those respective peaks. In other words, although the 1998-2001 and 2008-2012 loss-making periods were getting close to ending by this stage of the cycle, this time around we're still a long time away from everyone not facing a loss when selling property. Our current house price forecasts could see people in 2030 who bought at the peak of the market in 2021 still be making a loss if trying to sell. In the context of the NZ housing market experience of the last 75 years, that would be an incredibly long time to still be making a loss." Davidson agreed the downturn was "fairly prolonged". "The current cycle is deeper - in the GFC prices only fell about 10 percent peak to trough. This time they were down closer to 17 or 18 percent, we're three-and-a-half years into the cycle and nowhere near the peak. This has been a deeper and more drawn out episode. In some ways we're only halfway through or even less. "It's taking longer to accumulate gains and I guess it's also taking longer to avoid losses." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
The Spinoff
28-07-2025
- The Spinoff
Windbag: Why the Taxpayers' Union endorsed this Green Party policy
They say politics makes strange bedfellows, and there are few stranger pairings than this. Wellington is the remnant of a failed startup. The New Zealand Company, which established the city, was a for-profit enterprise with a clear business model: sell land to wealthy people, and use the proceeds to bring working-class people to New Zealand for free. In theory, the mix of capital and labour would work in perfect harmony: founding businesses, working the land, and creating a functioning economy that would improve everyone's property values. So what went wrong? There are many factors, but one of the most important was absentee landlords. Many investors stayed in London, hoping the value of their land would increase due to the work of others, while contributing nothing themselves. The New Zealand Company brought more labourers than could be employed by independent businesses, so it had to provide them with work, which eventually drove the company to bankruptcy. From the very beginning of British-style property ownership in Aotearoa, land banking has been one of our biggest problems, dragging down productivity and hindering the growth of our cities. It's still the case today. There are empty lots and surface car parks in the centre city, underdeveloped sections in city-fringe neighbourhoods, and a single family owns almost all of Wellington's remaining greenfield land. The Wellington Green Party is targeting this issue with a policy to change the rates system to be based on land value rather than the current combination of the capital value of buildings and land. Several other councils have already adopted land value rates, including Nelson, New Plymouth, Napier and Whangarei. The Greens found an unlikely ally in their campaign last week when the policy was endorsed by the Taxpayers' Union – which even the Taxpayers' Union seemed surprised by. 'The Greens are right on this one,' executive director Jordan Williams said in a statement. 'Taxing land, rather than housing and development on land, creates the right incentive of avoiding land banking or not putting land to its most productive use, such as housing.' Williams went even further than the Greens' policy, calling for local government minister Simon Watts to embrace land value rates nationwide, saying he 'should reach over the aisle and grab this phenomenal policy'. Alex Baker, the Green-ish mayoral candidate who isn't officially endorsed by the Greens, is also campaigning on a switch to land value rates. This story in The Post implies it's suspicious that Baker and the party could have come up with the same idea separately. It's not. Land value taxes are the big current thing in the Yimby movement. Henry George is Sabrina Carpenter for online urbanists. 'The current setting is inefficient,' Baker told The Spinoff. 'It discourages capital investment, business, new houses and intense developments and encourages the accumulation of under-utilised land. I simply want to change to a system that is more efficient. The long-run impact of that is improved housing supply, which will mean rents come down and quality lifts, which will attract more people and bring down rates.' The alliance between Wellington's Greens and the free-market TPU is rare, but it's not the first time it has happened. The TPU was strongly supportive of the zoning reforms in last year's District Plan, which were led by Wellington's progressive councillors. This ability to form cross-partisan consensus is one of the things that has made the Yimby movement so successful. The TPU sees zoning reform as giving more property owners more rights to develop their land, and land value rates as an economic incentive to do so. The Greens see it as a way to improve housing supply, quality and affordability. The motivations might be different, but the outcomes are the same. 'The TPU-Green coalition is exactly where I see myself as a candidate,' Baker said. 'It's a free-market change. A more efficient tax. But it will result in change, which is something that conservatives who don't want the city to grow or improve will always be against. I expect over time the business community will get aligned with me, because no amount of taking a blunt axe to the council will improve outcomes for the city.' The two conservative councillors who have put up their hands for mayor, Ray Chung and Diane Calvert, both oppose a switch to land value rates. Calvert said debating rates reform was 'like moving deck chairs while the ship takes on water. The real problems run deeper and we need to fix those first. Chung told The Post the policy was 'built on a false ideology that anyone who gets ahead should pay more' – which is not an accurate analysis of how land value rates work. The TPU specifically called out Chung in its statement. 'It is sad to see Ray Chung further disgrace himself by coming out against this policy. We'd urge him to reconsider and put policy ahead of partisanship,' Williams said. Andrew Little, who is widely considered the frontrunner in the Wellington mayoral race, said he was open to the idea. 'Land value-based rates is an idea worth considering,' Little told The Spinoff. 'We can also use rates loading to incentivise better land use, and we should do so to make sure Wellington gets proper housing density in key areas.' Baker is claiming Little's soft support as a victory. He doesn't believe Little would be talking about land value rates if it weren't for his and the Greens' policy. Baker said he entered the race after Tory Whanau left because he felt someone needed to drive the debate from the progressive side. 'I wasn't seeing anything from any other candidates that indicated they would turn things around,' he said. Wellington City Council considered a switch to land value rates last year as part of its rates review, but basically decided to put the idea in the too-hard basket. In the short term, that's probably a fair approach. It's looking increasingly inevitable that a Wellington supercity will be back on the table soon. Porirua and Hutt City voters will both vote in non-binding referendums on amalgamation at this year's election, and the region's chief executives seem to be largely united on the idea. It probably doesn't make much sense for Wellington City Council to upend its rating system right now, given the likelihood of such a major restructure in the next few years. But with the possibility of major reform happening soon, this is the perfect time to have the debate.
Scoop
30-06-2025
- Scoop
Metropolitan Wellington Councils Confirm New Water Services Delivery Model
Press Release – Porirua City Council The decision to move to this new model for water services delivery has been prompted by the Governments Local Water Done Well policy, which has mandated that all councils must review how water services are delivered. Five councils covering the Wellington metropolitan area – Hutt City Council, Porirua City Council, Upper Hutt City Council, Wellington City Council and Greater Wellington Regional Council – have all now confirmed they will establish a new, jointly-owned organisation to deliver water services to their communities. The decision to move to this new model for water services delivery has been prompted by the Government's Local Water Done Well policy, which has mandated that all councils must review how water services are delivered. In March and April 2025 the councils publicly consulted on water service delivery options. Across all five councils, submissions showed solid support for the preferred option of a multi-council-owned water organisation, ranging from 69 to 84 percent of submissions in favour. The five councils have now all voted to go ahead with the new organisation, which will take accountability for water services on 1 July 2026. Mana whenua iwi Ngāti Toa Rangitira and Taranaki Whānui ki Te Upoko o Te Ika support this decision and are partnering with councils on improving water services delivery. The new organisation, with the interim name Metro Water, will own and operate public drinking water, wastewater and reticulated stormwater assets for a population of around 430,000 people. Advisory Oversight Group chair Dame Kerry Prendergast says councils and mana whenua have been clear throughout the process that the intent is to provide better levels of service for communities through reduced leaks, outages and unplanned disruptions, while also enabling growth and delivering cleaner harbours and waterways. 'By establishing a council-owned organisation, we are ensuring assets are retained in public ownership and there is no privatisation. It also means councils, representing their communities, and mana whenua will have ongoing oversight.' 'Metro Water will have the resources, independence and region-wide perspective to effectively manage and improve three waters services for current and future communities,' says Dame Kerry. The next steps are to finalise key foundation documents for the new organisation, finalise a Water Services Delivery Plan for submission to the Government, and appoint interim board directors and an interim Chief Executive. Factsheet – what's planned for water services in Metropolitan Wellington New water organisation accountable for water services from 1 July 2026 There will be a new multi-council-owned water organisation that will take charge of drinking water, wastewater and reticulated stormwater services within the boundaries of Hutt City, Porirua City, Upper Hutt City and Wellington City, from 1 July 2026. For planning purposes, a temporary, placeholder name of Metro Water is being used for the new organisation. This is not intended to be the permanent name. Metro Water will have new governance and ownership arrangements, new leadership and new strategic direction that will distinguish it from Wellington Water. To ensure ongoing service delivery and to retain expertise and experience, it is the intent of councils that Metro Water will absorb Wellington Water operational and support staff below senior management (known as tier 3 and below). Governance and oversight Metro Water will have an independent Board, appointed by a steering committee of representatives of the five council owners and representatives of Ngāti Toa Rangitira and Taranaki Whānui ki Te Upoko o Te Ika. Councils and mana whenua will set the framework for Metro Water through foundation documents (currently being developed) – Stakeholder Agreement, Constitution, Statement of Expectations and Consumer Charter. These will be in final draft by October 2025 and ratified by councils in late 2025. Metro Water will operate in line with new water services legislation and regulatory oversight will be provided by the Commerce Commission (consumer protection and charging), the Water Services Authority – Taumata Arowai (water standards) and Greater Wellington Regional Council (environmental compliance). Charging Metro Water will charge directly for water services. Initially, interim billing arrangements are likely to be in place until Metro Water has established systems and processes. Regardless of billing arrangements, water charges will be clearly separate from rates. Charges will have to increase over the next decade, as the backlog of long-overdue upgrades is tackled. Economic and financial modelling indicates that Metro Water will keep costs about a third lower than would be the case if the status quo continued. That's because Metro Water will have greater ability to borrow money than councils currently do and costs can be spread over a longer period of time. It's also expected to deliver economies of scale and efficiencies. The exact amount of water charges will be influenced by a number of factors including how costs are shared between commercial water users and households, the scheduling of upgrade works and investment, and moving to consistent charges across the metropolitan area. Currently households and commercial water users pay different amounts through rates in each city. Water services delivery plan All councils are required to present a Water Services Delivery Plan to Government by 3 September 2025. The Metropolitan Wellington Water Services Delivery Plan will set out how the five councils will meet requirements of the Government's Local Water Done Well reforms, including statutory requirements under the Local Government (Water Services Preliminary Arrangements) Act 2024. Implementation Interim Board Directors will be appointed prior to October 2025 by the council representatives on the existing Advisory Oversight Group. The interim board will appoint an interim Chief Executive and oversee establishment of Metro Water. In due course, the interim board will be replaced by an enduring board appointed by the Stakeholder Committee. Some initial work is already underway on interim director recruitment and planning for IT and customer systems and processes for Metro Water. Implementation is being jointly funded by the five councils.
