
From how to get rid of wee in space to items left on the moon, take our horribly tricky quiz
Sun Reporter
Published: Invalid Date,
HERE'S a question: do you know what happens to pee in space?
If yes, urine with a chance of nailing this quiz.
6
6
If not, you (and the kids) can swot up with the new CBeebies series Horrible Science, starting May 9.
From the award-winning brains behind Horrible Histories, it promises to make science fun.
In the meantime, give our quiz a go and find out if your science know-how is out of this world . . .
Q1 IF astronauts throw up while they're in space, what happens to their sick?
a) It turns blue
b) It turns ball-shaped
c) It smells of flowers
Q2 WHICH method has NEVER been used to get rid of pee in space?
a) Throwing pee straight out of the spacecraft
b) Turning pee into drinking water
c) Using the pee as rocket fuel
Q3 NASA plans to return to the Moon next year with the Artemis project.
Which of the following items have been left on the moon during previous missions?
a) Golf balls
b) A hammer and a feather
c) 96 bags of poo
Weirdest things spotted on Mars revealed
Q4 SOME parts of the Moon have hugely horrible names – which TWO are real ones?
a) The Sea of Blood
b) The Ocean of Pain
c) The Marsh of Decay
d) The Lake of Death
5. The Horribly Huge Grand Tour
This takes you to the edge of the solar system (our Sun and planets).
Simply answer a question at each stop on the way.
Stop 1: The Sun
The Sun is so big that it takes up 99.8 per cent of all the matter in the solar system.
And it is super-powerful. Imagine a piece of sun the size of a postage stamp – how much light would it produce?
a) Equal to a dim light bulb
b) Equal to over 1,000 light bulbs
c) Nothing – it would explode
Stop 2: Mercury
During the day Mercury gets hotter than 430C. Why do scientists think there's ice on Mercury?
a) It's special ice that only melts at very high temperatures.
b) The ice is at the centre of the planet.
c) The ice is in deep craters that stay in shadow.
Stop 3: Venus
Venus is hotter than a pizza oven. What weird weather might you find there?
a) Acid clouds and metal snow
b) Natural toffee rain caused by sugars heating in the atmosphere
c) Stinky-steamy fog – imagine a hot shower in a blocked toilet
Stop 4: Earth
Planet Earth ought to be Planet Water because it's mostly covered by the wet stuff.
Like all planets, Earth orbits the Sun. But how fast is our planet moving?
a) It moved 27km in the time you took to read this question
b) It moved 27million km in the time you took to read this question
c) It moved 27cm in the time you took to read this question.
6
6
Stop 5: Mars
Mars is a grim planet. It's icy cold and there's nothing to breathe. It does have two little moons.
Deimos is the smallest – it has weak gravity. How weak?
a) If you fart, you'll fly into space
b) If you let the air out of a balloon, you'll fly into space
c) If you ride a bike, you'll fly into space
Stop 6: The Asteroid Belt
Between Mars and Jupiter there's a dwarf planet called Ceres and millions of asteroids (space rocks, remember?).
Asteroids come in all shapes and sizes but there's one thing they don't have – what is it?
a) Gold
b) Atmosphere
c) Moons
Stop 7: Jupiter
It is so big all the other planets can fit inside it. Why does Jupiter have a big red spot?
a) It's a horribly huge infection caused by alien bacteria
b) It's a horribly huge hurricane bigger than the entirety of Earth
c) It's a horribly huge area of red rocks
Stop 8: Saturn
Saturn's famous rings are made from rocks – some as big as houses and some as small as bugs. Why do the rings vanish every 15 years?
a) They reflect sunlight but only do this from certain angles
b) They break apart and need to re-form from time to time
c) The rings are very thin and you can't see them when they're end-on to Earth
Stop 9: Uranus
Uranus is mainly made up of gas – its atmosphere stinks of farts (that's due to hydrogen sulphide). Why is the winter especially cold and miserable?
a) Uranus is a slow-spinning planet
b) The planet spins at an odd angle and has a long year
c) The stinky atmosphere is like a deep-freeze keeping the planet cold
Stop 10: Neptune
Neptune is another cold, gassy planet. How windy is Neptune?
a) The wind blows at 2,000km
per hour
b) The wind blows at 50km
per hour
c) No one knows – a robot space probe was sent to measure the weather, but it got blown back to Uranus
Q6 WHICH of the following can happen to astronauts when they're in space?
a) They get taller
b) They need to pee more regularly
c) Their fingernails can fall off
6
Answers
A1 b) It turns ball-shaped.
With no gravity to pull it downward, vomit comes out in free-floating blobs of chunky fluid.
The blobs can drift and break into small blobs, which can be a big problem in a sealed, sensitive environment like the International Space Station.
NASA prepares for this by training astronauts to vomit into special 'barf bags' that are designed for space.
Unlike regular sick bags, these space ones have a one-way valve to prevent anything from floating back out.
But if anyone misses the bag, the crew must treat it as a biohazard.
As the vomit is free-floating, it could get into equipment and short-circuit the electronics or clog up air filters, risking the air flow into the spaceship.
WHY A BALL? On Earth, when you vomit, gravity pulls the liquid downward – into a toilet, a bag, the floor (hopefully not the last one).
But in space, gravity isn't pulling things down.
On the ISS, astronauts are in microgravity, which means they're constantly free-falling around Earth – essentially experiencing weightlessness.
When you throw up in microgravity, the vomit comes out of your mouth, but instead of falling, it just floats.
Liquids in space naturally clump into blobs due to surface tension – the force that makes water form droplets.
So vomit in space forms a gross, sticky sphere that just hovers there until it hits something – like a face. In space, surface tension dominates, so ALL fluids – water, sweat, pee and vomit – will float around in blobs unless contained.
Vomiting in space is totally a thing, especially during the first few days when astronauts are getting used to floating around in microgravity.
'Space Sickness' affects about two thirds of astronauts in the first 48 hours; the brain gets confused because the inner ear is used to gravity-based cues for balance and in space everything is floaty and weird!
A2 c) It has never been used as rocket fuel.
The space shuttles of the 1980s dumped pee into space.
One astronaut described how it froze into shiny crystals that twinkled as the Sun set behind Earth. That's beautiful.
On the International Space Station, the astronauts drink their own purified pee – fancy a glug?
A3 a), b) and c): There's no way of refuelling on the moon, so Nasa had to send the heavy fuel that would be needed to blast back off again from the moon and return to Earth, along with the astronauts when they originally blasted off into space.
To save any further weight, the missions that went to the moon also left as much behind as possible to save on the amount of fuel then needed to get back home – hence there are quite a lot of items still up there!
Alan Shephard left golf balls on the moon after taking two shots during the Apollo 14 mission in 1971.
George Scott left a hammer and a feather on the moon during the Apollo 15 mission, also in 1971, after proving Galileo's theory that in the absence of air resistance, objects fall at the same rate regardless of their mass.
During a moonwalk, he held a geologist's hammer (heavy and solid) and a falcon's feather (light and delicate).
He dropped them at the same time on the lunar surface and . . . they hit the ground at exactly the same time. It was a beautiful, simple demonstration of physics, proving Galileo's famous theory from around 380 years earlier.
The Moon gave a perfect laboratory to test the theory as it has no atmosphere, so no air resistance, to cause the feather to flutter as it fell.
NASA also deliberately placed long-term science experi-ments on the surface, including seismo-meters to detect Moonquakes.
The Apollo missions also left messages for future generations, and symbols of peace including a gold olive branch and a plaque that says 'We came in peace for all mankind'.
A4 c) and d): One day they might have to change these names – they're sure to put off space tourists!
A5 1. b) The Sun is seriously bright. But you know that already – the Sun is 148million km away from us and it is still dazzling!
c) The craters are at the poles which get less sunlight than the rest of the planet.
a) Venus is a really stupid place to go on holiday.
a) Earth moves at 107,000km per hour – and don't forget it spins too. How come we aren't totally dizzy?
b) Deimos looks amazingly like a potato but it's actually covered in about 100 metres of space dust. Dusty old potatoes – yuck!
b) Asteroids don't have enough gravity to stop an atmosphere floating into space. Some have gold and some have their own tiny moons!
b) The hurricane has been raging for centuries and no one knows why it's red! It may be due to coloured chemicals in the hurricane.
c) The rings are tens of thousands of kilometres wide but less than one kilometre thick!
b) Uranus actually spins sideways in space so its poles face the Sun in turn. The other pole is very cold and dark. And since one year lasts 84 Earth years, winter takes 21 years! No wonder it's so cold and miserable.
a) Neptune is actually the windiest place in the solar system.
A6 1. a), b) and c): In space, astronauts get a little taller because there's no gravity to squish their spines.
Without gravity, their bones can stretch out, making them about two inches taller.
But when they return to Earth, gravity pulls everything back to normal and they shrink back to their regular height.
In space, astronauts also pee more. Normally, gravity pulls fluids down to their legs but in space there's no gravity to hold things down.
So, all the fluids in their body float up to their chest and head.
Their body notices the shift and starts making extra pee to get rid of the extra fluid.
After a few days, their body gets used to space and everything goes back to normal.
It's like their body has to adjust to the weirdness of space before things settle down.
Astronauts' fingernails can fall off in space because their gloves are super tight, which puts pressure on their hands and nails.
Plus, in space, their blood flow changes, so their nails don't get the nutrients they need to stay strong.
The result? Sometimes their nails just fall off. It's one of the weird things astronauts have to deal with.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Guardian
3 hours ago
- The Guardian
Chris Hadfield: ‘Worst space chore? Fixing the toilet. It's even worse when it's weightless'
What's the most chaotic thing that's ever happened to you in space? Launch – you go from no speed at all to 17,500 miles an hour in under nine minutes. The chaos is spectacular, the power of it is just wild, the physical vibration and force of it is mind-numbing – and it all happens so blisteringly fast. In the time it takes to drink a cup of tea, you go from lying on your back in Florida to being weightless in space. It's just the most amazing, chaotic, spectacular, rare human experience I've ever had. As an astronaut you have to master so many skills; have you ever not known something in space and wished you did? Onboard a spaceship, if you have an electrical problem, an attitude control problem, a propulsion problem, a computer problem – one of the first things you lose is communications with Earth. So it's really important to have all the skills on board. I served as an astronaut for 21 years and I was only in space for six months – that gave me 20-and-a-half years to not have to be surprised or flummoxed while I was in space. As an example, I qualified as an emergency medical technician. I worked in the cadaver lab [of Hermann hospital in Houston, near Nasa] to get familiar with the human body and then I worked in all of the wards of the hospital. I assisted a surgeon who was doing full abdominal surgery on an accident victim and then I worked in emergency, doing all the immediate triage. I had to get all of those skills just in case we had a medical problem on the spaceship. We take preparation really seriously so that we won't just be tourists up there. You've written six books; which book or author do you always return to? It depends which book I'm writing. I've written three nonfiction and three thrillers, and when I'm writing thriller fiction I tend to read that, because it gets your mind in the groove. I have lots of favourite thriller authors – Robert Ludlum, John D MacDonald and Jonathan Kellerman … I go back and read those, study how they make you feel so compelled. What about favourite sci-fi? [Growing up] I read Asimov and Arthur C Clarke. I got to spend a day with Arthur C Clarke – he came to the Kennedy Space Centre, I spent a whole day showing him the space shuttle and the launch site, and it was like a dream come true because he'd been one of my science fiction idols growing up. [In 2015] Ray Bradbury's family asked me to write an introduction for the Folio Society re-release of The Martian Chronicles – I'd read it once a long time ago but I'd forgotten just what an exquisitely good writer he was. The Martian Chronicles was written just after the second world war, so after the first two atomic bombs had been released and killed so many people but before the very first space flight. It was a really interesting moment in time – of both despair and disgust at human behaviour and then hope. And it's a beautiful book. How likely do you think it is that there is intelligent life in space? We have found no evidence but we know that every star has at least one planet, and our telescopes are so good now that we can actually find how many of those planets are close enough to Earth that they could support life as we know it, and it's around 5%. And so if 5% of every planet could sustain life, we can count the stars in the universe and [estimate] how many planets there are that could sustain life. And the number is staggeringly huge – it's like a quintillion of planets. So the odds are overwhelming that there's got to be life in other places … [But] it was only quite recently that life on Earth evolved – through time and chance – into multi-cellular life, and then complex life, and then to be self-aware and have intelligence. My conclusion is that life will be common: we'll find slime and scum all over the place. But intelligent life I think is exquisitely rare and I think we should internalise that and think about the level of responsibility that we should adopt. What's your favourite space movie? 2001: A Space Odyssey. I just find it fascinating and intriguing and a beautiful Stanley Kubrick adaptation of Arthur C Clarke's vision of things. It's very thought-provoking even almost 60 years later. I think The Martian is a very good movie and the Andy Weir book [it's based on] – I love that. I think Ron Howard did a beautiful job with Apollo 13 – it's almost a documentary. He worked so hard, he spent time with the astronauts, he filmed in a zero G aeroplane. Tell us your favourite fact. The most experienced astronaut in all of American history is a woman named Peggy Whitson. She's flown in space multiple times [and] been longer in space than any other American. She's commanded the space station twice. She's done 10 spacewalks and she's been the chief astronaut for Nasa. She's a tour de force. She's a good friend. She's a great person. Do you have a party trick? I'm a musician, I play guitar and sing – and I have the type of head that remembers lyrics. So my party trick is that I have probably 500 songs that I can play at any moment and know every single word and every single chord all the way from the start to the finish. It's just the way my brain works. It's kind of silly but it's really fun to be a human jukebox and have people say, 'Hey, can you play that song?' When I'm on stage in Australia, I'll have a guitar and I'll play a few songs. What's the worst space chore? Fixing the toilet. They break all the time. Being elbows deep in a toilet anywhere is no fun – it's even worse when it's weightless. And the trouble with our toilets is they have really nasty, poisonous chemicals and filters in them to try and process what's going through so that we can turn our urine and sweat back into drinking water, because we recycle about 93-94% of the water on board. What's the best lesson you learned from someone you've worked with? We were in the space shuttle simulator [with commander Kent Vernon 'Rommel' Rominger] and one of the crew members, Scott, had this cool and exciting idea. He came ripping up to the cockpit and plunked his laptop down to show him the solution to the problem and he knocked over Rommel's can of Coke – it flipped upside down and started emptying itself into all of his checklists. Rommel turned the can right side up and didn't say a thing. What this guy had come up with would be hugely important in the success of our mission. A little Coke spilled is unimportant – you can get more checklists. The natural reaction would have been, 'What the heck are you doing? Don't be so clumsy and look at the mess you made.' Instead, Rommel was like, 'Who cares? What I don't want Scott to think about next time he's got a great idea is, 'Oh, I gotta be careful I don't spill the commander's Coke.'' He should be excited about new ideas. And so, for me, it was a really great study of leadership. What song do you want played at your funeral? Danny Boy. It's a lovely reversal of how people normally look at death and who's grieving and why, and how you anticipate the grieving of death. It is an exquisitely and hauntingly beautiful song, and it's worth knowing the lyrics. Chris Hadfield's Journey to The Cosmos is touring Australia: Perth (27 June), Sydney (28 June), Brisbane (29 June), Melbourne (1 July) and Adelaide (3 July)


Daily Mail
3 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Dramatic move by Pentagon hint Trump could be siding with another billionaire amid Musk fallout
The Pentagon appears to be contemplating pivoting away from Elon Musk 's SpaceX following the almighty blowup between President Donald Trump and the world's richest man earlier this week. The fallout appears to be impacting the nation's space program as the Trump administration looks toward another billionaire to replace Musk in the race to Mars. Officials at NASA and the Pentagon quietly reached out to SpaceX's competitors, urging them to accelerate development of alternative rockets and spacecraft. Decisions appear to have been taken quickly after Musk made a defiant threat to pull SpaceX's Dragon spacecraft, a lifeline to the International Space Station, after Trump first threatened to cancel SpaceX's lucrative government contracts. 'It turned really terrifying,' one NASA official admitted to the Washington Post after initially finding the feud 'entertaining.' Although Musk eventually walked back his threat, the damage was done. Officials from NASA and the Pentagon, already uneasy with their reliance on SpaceX, were rattled to the core. SpaceX has become indispensable as it transports astronauts and cargo to the ISS, launches sensitive military satellites, and operates Starlink, the world's largest satellite constellation. The flare-up served to remind officials of the risks of tying national interests to a mercurial billionaire. 'When you realize that he's willing to shut everything down just on an impulse … that kind of behavior and the dependence on him is dangerous,' a former space agency official said. NASA insiders said Musk's threat 'crossed a line,' invoking memories of the 2018 episode when Musk smoked marijuana during a podcast interview, which prompted NASA to launch a safety investigation into SpaceX. The clash was also inflamed by the White House's decision to abruptly withdraw Jared Isaacman's nomination as NASA Administrator. Isaacman, closely aligned with Musk, had twice flown to space aboard SpaceX vehicles. In the aftermath, government officials reached out to Jeff Bezos's Blue Origin, RocketLab, and Stoke Space, querying when their rockets might be ready to shoulder critical missions. Fatih Ozmen, CEO of Sierra Space, which is developing the Dream Chaser spaceplane, confirmed that NASA was 'working closely' with his company stating, 'NASA mentioned to us that they want diversity and do not want to rely on a single provider.' For some insiders, it wasn't hard to connect the dots: Jeff Bezos, the founder of Blue Origin, has long been a rival to Musk. Now, with the Biden-era antagonism between Trump and Bezos thawing, some see a political recalibration. Bezos' Blue Origin has lagged behind SpaceX for years, but its New Glenn rocket is finally gaining traction, albeit slowly. The Pentagon's recent 'lanes' strategy to diversify launch providers now looks prescient, with officials seeking to avoid 'overreliance on any single provider or solution.' A source familiar with the Defense Department's strategy said the White House sees an opening to back Bezos as a counterweight to Musk's volatility. 'They want someone who's predictable,' the person said to The Post. Even Congress appeared to be spooked by the behavior. A key committee demanded updates on Boeing's long-delayed Starliner capsule, which has struggled to match the reliability of Musk's Dragon. NASA, under pressure, said Friday that Starliner's next mission could come 'early 2026,' though it remains unclear whether it will fly astronauts or cargo only. Indeed, just how reliant NASA were on SpaceX was illustrated last year when American astronauts Butch Wilmore and Suni Williams were left on the International Space Station by Boeing's troubled Starliner capsule. Wilmore and Williams had set off for an eight-day Starliner test flight that swelled into a nine-month stay in space Boeing, which has taken $2 billion in charges on its Starliner development, faces a looming decision by NASA to refly the spacecraft uncrewed before it carries humans again. Boeing spent $410 million to fly a similar uncrewed mission in 2022 after a 2019 testing failure. Reflying Starliner uncrewed 'seems like the logical thing to do,' Williams said, drawing comparisons with Elon Musk's SpaceX and Russian capsules that flew uncrewed missions before putting humans aboard. She and NASA are pushing for that outcome, Williams added. 'I think that's the correct path,' said Williams, who is 'hoping Boeing and NASA will decide on that same course of action' soon. Results from Starliner testing planned throughout the summer are expected to determine whether the spacecraft can fly humans on its next flight, NASA officials have said. Todd Harrison, a defense analyst at the American Enterprise Institute, likened Musk's social media post to 'an embargo of the space station.' 'Musk was saying he is going to cut NASA off from its own laboratory in space,' he added. Harrison also recalled Musk's refusal to activate Starlink Internet for a Ukrainian military strike in 2022, a decision that raised alarms about national defense being at the mercy of a single CEO. 'The nation's missile defenses could be held hostage to the twittering whims of Elon Musk,' Harrison warned. Former NASA astronaut Garrett Reisman, who worked at SpaceX, voiced the fears of many in the astronaut corps: 'When your hopes and dreams are tied up in this, you can't help but think, "Oh my goodness, am I going to fly in space?"' Meanwhile, Trump, who once championed Musk as a visionary, appears to be cooling. His allies note that the president has no tolerance for perceived disloyalty and Musk's defiance has not gone unnoticed. Some aides believe Trump's sharp pivot is personal as much as political. RocketLab's CEO Peter Beck had previously warned how Musk's acquisition of Twitter, now rebranded as X, and his flirtation with politics could backfire. 'It certainly makes people uncomfortable. At the end of the day, if you're delivering important national security missions, the buck stops with the CEO,' Beck said. Pentagon officials remain wary, not least because few companies have rockets certified for critical national security missions. Blue Origin's New Glenn has flown once, and United Launch Alliance's Vulcan only twice. RocketLab's Neutron has yet to launch at all. SpaceX's Falcon 9 still dominates, launching with near clockwork precision. But now, Trump's administration appears ready to gamble on fostering competition, even if it means leaning more heavily on Bezos. 'Sierra Space stands ready,' Ozmen declared. Others in the sector are similarly jockeying for position, sensing that Musk's once-unshakable grip may be loosening.


BBC News
4 hours ago
- BBC News
Trump-Musk row fuels 'biggest crisis ever' at Nasa
The row between Donald Trump and Elon Musk over a major spending bill has exacerbated uncertainty over the future of Nasa's budget, which is facing deep cuts. The space agency has published its budget request to Congress, which would see funding for science projects cut by nearly a science missions, which are in development or in space already, are in line to be stood president has threatened to withdraw federal contracts with Musk's company, Space X. Nasa relies on the firm's Falcon 9 rocket fleet to resupply the International Space Station with crew and supplies. The space agency also expects to use its Starship rocket to send astronauts to the Moon and eventually to Mars once it has been Simeon Barber, a space scientist at the Open University said that the uncertainty was having a "chilling impact" on the human space programme."The astonishing exchanges, snap decisions and U turns we've witnessed in the last week undermine the very foundations that we build our ambitions on."Space science and exploration relies upon long term planning and cooperation between government, companies and academic institutions." Aside from the feud between the President and Mr Musk, there is also concern about deep cuts requested by the White House to Nasa's budget. All sectors have been earmarked for savings, apart from an effort to send astronauts to Mars, which has received a $100m (£736,000) to Casey Dreier, chief of space policy for the Pasadena-based Planetary Society, which promotes space exploration, the potential cuts represent "the biggest crisis ever to face the US space programme". Nasa has said that its request to reduce its overall budget by nearly a quarter "aligns (its) science and technology portfolios to missions essential for the exploration of the Moon and Mars".Dr Adam Baker, a space analyst at Cranfield University told BBC News that if these proposals are approved by Congress, it would fundamentally shift the agency's focus."President Trump is repurposing Nasa for two things: to land astronauts on the Moon before the Chinese and to have astronauts plant a US flag on Mars. Everything else is secondary." Those who back the proposals say the White House's budget has given Nasa a clear purpose, for the first time since the days of the Apollo Moon landings of the 1960s and 70s, when the aim was to beat the Soviet Union to the Moon. Nasa's critics say that since then the space agency has become a bloated, unfocussed bureaucracy which routinely goes massively over budget in its space missions and wastes taxpayer's money. One of the most egregious examples of this is Nasa's new rocket for its plans to return American astronauts to the Moon, the Space Launch System (SLS). Its development has been delayed, and costs have spiralled such that it costs $4.1bn (£3.3bn) for each and every launch. By contrast, SpaceX's equivalent rocket system, Starship, is estimated to cost around $100m (£80m) per launch because it is designed to be reusable. Jeff Bezos's Blue Origin space company promises similar savings for its proposed New Glenn no one's surprise, SLS will be phased out under the White House proposals, in the hope that Starship and New Glenn can take its place. But the past three development launches of Starship have been unsuccessful, and Blue Origin has only recently begun to test its Moon rocket."The worry is that Nasa may be jumping out of the frying pan, into the fire," says Dr Barber."The development of these alternatives to SLS is being bankrolled by Elon Musk and Jeff Bezos. "If they lose their appetite for this endeavor and SpaceX or Blue Origin say they need more money to develop their systems, Congress will have to give it to them," says Dr Barber. Of greater concern, says Dr Barber, is the potential loss of 40 missions to explore other planets and to monitor the impact of climate change on Earth from space, many of which involve collaborations with international partners."I think it is very sad that what has taken so long to build can be knocked down with a wrecking ball so quickly with no plan to rebuild it afterwards."The projects facing the axe include dozens of planetary missions already in space for which most of the development and launch costs have already been paid for, with relatively small savings proposed on their operating costs. Also under threat are two collaborations with the European Space Agency: An ambitious plan to bring martian rocks collected by Nasa's Perseverance Rover back to Earth and a mission to send Europe's Rosalind Franklin Rover to the red planet to search for signs of past Sir Martin Sweeting, head of the UK space firm Surrey Satellite Technology Ltd, and co-author of a Royal Society report on the future of space says that while the development was "unwelcome", there may be an upside for Europe as it takes greater responsibility for its own space exploration programme."Maybe we have been too reliant on Nasa the big player to carry a lot of the emphasis in space," he told BBC News."It is an opportunity to think about how Europe wants to get a better balance in its space activities."But there is much more downside for Europe in the short term. As well as the return of Mars samples and its Rover, ESA risks reduced access to the International Space Station if it is wound down, and the budget cuts cancel Nasa's extensive contributions to its successor, the Lunar Gateway, a multinational space station planned for orbit around the Moon. In its recently published strategy ESA stated it "will be seeking to build a more autonomous space capability, and to continue being a reliable, strong and desirable partner with space agencies from around the globe," with the implication that it would do so with or without facing cuts are numerous current and proposed Earth Observation programmes according to Dr Baker."These Earth observation programmes are our canary in the coal mine," he told BBC News."Our ability to predict the impact of climate change and mitigate against it could be drastically reduced. If we turn off this early warning system it is a frightening prospect".The budget proposals have yet to be approved by Congress. The planetary Society's Casey Dreier has told BBC News that many Republicans have told lobbyists privately that they are prepared to vote against the Mr Dreier worries that there is a strong possibility that political gridlock might mean that no budget will be agreed. It is likely that the reduced White House budget would be put in place as an interim measure, which could then not easily be reversed, because once space missions are turned off it is hard, if not impossible, to start them up again.