logo
GRAHAM GRANT: Will Swinney swallow his pride and give us all a tax break next week? Only the most foolhardy would get their hopes up

GRAHAM GRANT: Will Swinney swallow his pride and give us all a tax break next week? Only the most foolhardy would get their hopes up

Daily Mail​28-04-2025

Have you lost count of the number of times 'full-on John' Swinney has tried to re-set his failing government?
You're not alone, but the next refresh is on Thursday next week - when he will produce a policy agenda for the year ahead.
These announcements are normally made in September - but the Scottish election is looming, in May 2026.
The First Minister has brought the programme for government forward this year because he wants to stress that he's 'laser-focused on delivery'.
So, he's really firing the starting pistol on the SNP 's election campaign - but it hasn't delivered anything other than failure and division for much of the past 20 years.
The smart money is on a continuation of the status quo - with some more 'freebies' thrown in as a sweetener.
But times are lean for public coffers thanks to the SNP's financial incompetence, so the chances of anything spectacular are limited - and then there's the sensitive topic of Scottish independence.
Mr Swinney will have to bang the drum for his party's raison d'être - but he knows it's toxic territory for the majority of Scots.
Yet May 6 is an opportunity to tackle one of the greatest injustices of the SNP's long reign – one for which it is responsible.
The cross-Border tax gap is a barrier to economic growth – something which Mr Swinney says he wants to promote.
It means the hard-working young professionals we desperately want to attract and retain are giving Scotland a wide berth.
As we reported yesterday, business leaders have demanded an independent review into whether SNP taxes are killing Scotland's competitiveness.
CBI Scotland wants Mr Swinney to commission a study on 'tax divergence' with the rest of the UK as part of his plans for the final year of this parliament.
A review isn't necessary but there is a need for urgent action to tear up an iniquitous tax regime which penalises anyone with a shred of ambition.
Under the SNP budget for 2025/26, Scots earning more than £30,318 will pay more income tax than people elsewhere in the UK.
Workers earning £50,000 will have to pay £1,528 more in tax, those earning £75,000 an extra £2,082, and those earning £100,000 will see £3,332 added to tax bills.
In his speech to the STUC Congress in Dundee yesterday, Mr Swinney said 'we must ensure we have the highly qualified and skilled workforce needed to make Scotland an attractive place to invest.'
That is incompatible with high-tax policies, no matter how much the SNP boasts about how 'progressive' it is to launch raid after raid on our rapidly diminishing bank balances, or ballooning overdrafts.
The squeeze on household finances - from rising energy bills to soaring council tax - is pushing many families towards the breadline, or beyond it.
According to the Scottish Government, it is estimated that 20 per cent of Scotland's population (1,070,000 people each year) were living in relative poverty after housing costs in 2021-24.
A person is in 'relative poverty' if their current household income is less than 60 per cent of the current UK median.
We can expect to hear a lot from Mr Swinney about tackling child poverty - but his own government's figures show the number of children in relative poverty after housing costs is 'likely to be somewhere between 180,000 and 300,000 children'.
The SNP's flagship Scottish Child Payment (SCP) is fantastically expensive - and woefully ineffectual.
It will cost £471million in 2025-26 - but in September last year a damning study found 'no evidence' that the payouts are effective.
The Scottish Health Equity Research Unit said that even if the payments were working, Scotland 'would still be a long way from meeting its statutory target of reducing relative child poverty'.
More of our taxes are being poured into handouts rather than galvanising the economy, to little effect.
Wrong-headed policies and a burgeoning, dysfunctional public sector have swallowed up our extra taxes – and the NHS, which was supposed to benefit most, remains in a state of permanent crisis.
Reducing rampant waste and easing the tax burden are the only ways of boosting productivity and bolstering growth, with the proceeds directed towards rescuing failing public services.
Businesses have been hit with Labour's hike on employers' contributions on National Insurance – a crippling increase which demonstrates the fiscal illiteracy of a party which pays lip service to defending workers, while destroying their jobs.
The SNP's sky-high taxes and business rates are piling more pressure on firms clinging to survival.
That means Mr Swinney faces a big test next week – can he swallow his pride and announce the end of the tax disparity with the rest of the UK?
He should go much further, with a commitment to cut taxes across the board, but most of us would settle for baby steps.
Past record suggests this may be wishful thinking; yet while the SNP is in electioneering mode, only the foolhardy would get their hopes up for a big U-turn on taxes.
Yet the case for change is inarguable - it's worth remembering that less than £1 has been spent on public services from every £5 raised by hammering us with higher taxes than the rest of the UK.
Scots have paid an extra £3.4billion of income tax since the SNP opened up a tax gap with the rest of the UK in 2017.
But it has only generated £629million of extra budget revenue for the Scottish Government due to the impact on the block grant of slower economic growth north of the Border.
The reality is that the SNP demanded new powers for Holyrood - and then used them to make Scotland the most heavily taxed part of the UK.
It's a move that has hit businesses hard while contributing to moribund growth rates which have been running at roughly half the UK level for the past decade.
A government which drove the economy into the doldrums is now telling us that we should trust it to turn it around.
This is a fag-end administration which long ago ran out of ideas and momentum – and is now engaged in a last-ditch bid to regain credibility.
Many years have been wasted on botched transgender reforms and the doomed crusade for independence.
This is precious time that could have been devoted to driving up growth, creating jobs, and cutting taxes to make Scotland a magnet for investment.
Mr Swinney has a chance to start rowing back on his party's high-tax lunacy next week, and he should seize it as any sane leader would – but voters won't be holding their breath.
Undoing the economic damage the SNP has inflicted on Scotland will take longer than a year - and the only thing Mr Swinney is likely to 'deliver' before next May is yet more failure.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Winter fuel U-turn should have come a long time ago, Reeves told
Winter fuel U-turn should have come a long time ago, Reeves told

Powys County Times

time11 minutes ago

  • Powys County Times

Winter fuel U-turn should have come a long time ago, Reeves told

The decision to reinstate the winter fuel payment should have been made 'a long time ago', Scotland's Social Justice Secretary has said. Chancellor Rachel Reeves said on Monday that nine million pensioners will be in receipt of the payment this year after a cut was announced in the first weeks of the Labour Government last summer. The initial decision was met with heavy backlash and forced the Scottish Government to delay the implementation of its own devolved benefit. John Swinney's administration later announced a similar payment for pensioners which would be tapered and see those on the highest incomes receiving £100, compared to £305.10 for those on the least. Monday's announcement will result in cash being sent to the devolved administration at Holyrood, and Scottish Labour has urged the Government to increase its payments. But Scotland's Social Justice Secretary Shirley-Anne Somerville said the decision was 'a betrayal' of pensioners. 'I welcome any extension of eligibility by the UK Government, but this is a U-turn the Chancellor should have made a long time ago,' she said. 'But there is still no detail about how the Chancellor intends to go about that. Unfortunately, it still sounds as if many pensioners will miss out.' Ms Somerville added that the Scottish Government had not been consulted on the decision and urged UK ministers to 'ensure the Scottish Government is fully appraised of the proposed changes as soon as possible'. 'The Cabinet Secretary for Finance and Local Government wrote to the Chief Secretary to the Treasury last week to urge the UK Government to share its plans with us as quickly as possible, so that we can understand any implications for our own programmes and, crucially, our budget,' she said. Scottish Labour MSP Paul O'Kane said: 'The winter fuel payment is a devolved payment in Scotland and Scottish Labour has long been clear that we want to see it reinstated for the majority of pensioners up here – but despite their loud spin, the SNP voted against our attempts to do so. 'The SNP must not go ahead with plans that would rob poorer pensioners in order to fund payments for millionaires. 'The SNP must re-examine their own proposals in light of this game-changing announcement, ensure payments reach those most in need, and give a cast-iron guarantee that no struggling Scottish pensioners will be left out of pocket under their plans.' The Scottish Government's plans were initially to provide a universal payment to pensioners, but the proposals were scuppered by the Chancellor's announcement of the cut last summer, forcing ministers to create a different system for this winter.

East Lothian Council set to review parking in new developments
East Lothian Council set to review parking in new developments

Edinburgh Reporter

time13 minutes ago

  • Edinburgh Reporter

East Lothian Council set to review parking in new developments

Housebuilders in East Lothian may have to provide far fewer parking spaces in the future as the council considers changes aimed at reducing car use in towns. Midlothian Council is set to give the go ahead to changes this week which will drastically reduce the number of spaces required at new developments and East Lothian Council has said it will also be reviewing its current guidelines. The changes follow new Scottish Government policies which give priority to developers who propose ambitious low or no car parking plans. A report due to go before Midlothian's elected councillors this week from officers outlines changes including reducing the number of car park spaces for visitors to housing estates from one for every two homes to one for every 20 on urban sites. They will also reduce the number of spaces for users of new sports facilities with any stadium built with over 1500 capacity allowed no more than one space for every 150 seats. A report due to go before Midlothian Council's planning committee next week for agreement says the new standards have been influenced by the Scottish Government's goal of reducing private car use. It says previous policy which advised developers the minimum number of spaces required for housing will be replaced with new rules setting out the maximum allowed. The new standards will also require that 10 per cent of visitor spaces provided have an electric charger in place alongside minimum cycle parking places and EV charger spaces being introduced across all new developments. A spokesperson for East Lothian Council said that while no changes have been made to its parking standards policy 'yet' it was about to be reviewed. They said: 'These standards will be reviewed as part of the preparation of our new Local Development Plan. 'This review will have regard to the Scottish Government's recent national planning policy stating that development proposals which are ambitious in terms of low/no car parking will be supported, particularly in urban locations well-served by sustainable transport modes and where they do not create barriers to access by disabled people.' By Marie Sharp Local Democracy Reporter Like this: Like Related

Council approves purchase of more homes on Dreghorn Estate
Council approves purchase of more homes on Dreghorn Estate

Edinburgh Reporter

time13 minutes ago

  • Edinburgh Reporter

Council approves purchase of more homes on Dreghorn Estate

The council's Finance Committee has approved spending £6.65 million to purchase 38 homes currently owned by the Ministry of Defence, bringing the total number bought in this development for rent by the council to 78. The council says this action, unanimously approved on Monday morning, will prevent 15 civilian households becoming homeless, and will help the local authority deal with the housing emergency. There was a lot of comment during the meeting on the positive way that the collaboration between council officers and the residents had been conducted. But one member of the committee, Cllr Simita Kumar, who leads the SNP group, said that she had to rely on social media for much of her information. She said: ''Securing these 38 homes is a step forward for residents and local housing, but this is just the start of the process. The uncertainty tenants have faced shows the Council and Ministry of Defence must do much better on communication. 'As we await condition surveys, it's clear significant investment will be needed to make these homes safe, energy-efficient, and truly fit to live in.' Cllr Watt said she and the officers had tried to be disciplined about communication but there were several stakeholders involved who had been quick to share information. As part of what was approved today the council officers will set up regular periodic calls with residents which councillors can join to receive the most up to date information. At the meeting Most councillors attended the Special Meeting online, as is usual for a special meeting, although Cllrs Simita Kumar, Joan Griffiths and Phil Doggart as well as the Convener Cllr Mandy Watt were in the Dean of Guild Court Room along with council officers. Local councillor Conor Savage also sat in the public gallery supporting the residents who were there to present a deputation. Finance and Resources Convener Mandy Watt said: 'We're doing everything we can to make sure these residents will remain in their homes and to increase the amount of affordable and social housing we have in the city – and I know the residents are very grateful that this proposal has had so much support from councillors. 'Purchasing these homes is a sensible way to boost the housing we have, and Dreghorn is a community that provides a great place for council tenants to have a suitable, safe and affordable place to call home. 'Council colleagues have worked over many months to negotiate this purchase from the Ministry of Defence, listening to the concerns of Dreghorn residents at every turn and ensuring good value for the council. This is a huge step towards a positive outcome – a fantastic example of doing things differently to make sure we address our housing emergency.' The financial details are set out in the council report: 6.1 The net purchase price of £6,650,000 will be funded with £3,289,000 from the Scottish Government National Acquisition Fund grant delivered through the Affordable Housing Supply Programme with the balance of £3,361,000 funded through rental income and prudentially borrowed over a 30-year period. 6.2 In addition to the purchase price, additional capital works for asbestos removal, lettable standard works, net zero carbon and lifecycle costs have been estimated at £4,737,232 in total (£124,664 per unit). 6.3 The principal re-payment for the net purchase costs, asbestos removal and lettable standard works, is estimated at £4,794,772 plus interest costs of £3,972,565 at 5.25% interest rate, a total loans charge cost of £8,767,337 over the 30-year period. Annual average costs are £292,245. 6.4 The funding requirements for net zero carbon and lifecycle costs will be factored into future years' HRA budgets and approved through the relevant annual budget setting process. 6.5 The purchase of the 38 properties is estimated to generate additional net income to the HRA of £135,522 by year 10, which increases to £1,967,023 by year 30. This has been calculated using the same percentage rental income increase assumptions as used in the 2025/26 HRA Business Plan. Dreghorn residents Deputation Three of the residents from Dreghorn addressed the committee, and spoke of the uncertainty they were living under for the last six months. Reident Mandy Burgen said: 'What sits before you this morning is a proposal that is a testament of determination and what can be achieved when we all work together collaboratively. 'It proves that solutions can be found and that circumstances can be changed. In March, we sat before you with the support of Living Rent and raised awareness of the desolate prospects that were evolving for the families of the Dreghorn Estate. 'Today proves you listened, and now we ask you to act and that our voices be heard again. 'Since November 2024 the families in the Dreghorn community have been no strangers to the feelings of dejection. Imagine feelings of deprived aspirations, a constant sense of futurelessness and having to hit the pause button on every aspect of your lives. It isn't about losing a house. It's about losing our homes, our family security and livelihoods and the fear of being ejected from our community connections on a micro and macro sociological level.' Another resident, Amy Monaghan, explained that she is a worried single disabled mother of two children, both of whom are neurodivergent. She said: 'I work as a dinner lady at one of the schools local to Dreghorn Estate and also care for my autistic brother part-time. November of last year, I've been living under a cloud of constant fear and anxiety that I would lose my house, possibly lose my job because of it, and that my children will lose their friends and stability that's been hard earned over the past few difficult years. 'For my family this house represents more than four walls to shelter in. We've built relationships within our community, discovered support systems, and adapted out lives around a space that is perfect for the complex needs of my children. Our neighbours have become our extended family through this ordeal and having the community is what has helped us cope – and beyond that will help us thrive.' Catherine Lomax spoke on behalf of her daughter who is a disabled adult living independently in the Dreghorn Estate, but who has been affected by the threat of eviction. She said: 'The situation was hopeless, and Sarah was in the depths of depression and anxiety. The threat of eviction was devastating. She was desperately stressed and stopped doing all her normal activities as her mind was entirely focused on becoming homeless. Her coping mechanism was to run away and hide. Since then, the whole community has pulled together to support each other. Losing her home would be a terrible upheaval of her life, but now we have hope that she will keep it and as an added bonus, the campaign has resulted in deep friendships and support within the community.' Cllr Kumar commented that the residents had painted a really positive picture of their dealings with the council officers and elected members, but wondered if they had an ask for what would happen now. The residents replied that the future of Dreghorn is to keep building the community and that working together is testament to the housing policy – and 'that we can make these things work'. Cllr Younie also asked about the new residents association and what they would like the council to do to better support them moving forward. The reply was the same: 'Going forward it is about building sustainable communities. Through this we have bonded even tighter together.' The Finance Convener asked what it would mean to the residents and Ms Burgen said that personally it would allow her to make plans again. She said: 'The incredible amount of work means security. When this news broke six months ago I was in America at my daughter's wedding. She wanted me to go and see her in August. I have had to hit the pause button on that as I didn't know – I could have been homeless going forward. When we saw this proposal today we were over the moon about it and we just ask everybody to pass this proposal today.' Cllr Savage began his address to the committee with thank yous – particularly for council officers and councillors. He said: I want to thank the residents for their patience and engagement, especially given the pressure and uncertainty they've been under. I am confident the residents association will grow going forward. 'These are homes not just houses, and today we have a unique opportunity to save the community, tackle the housing crisis and homelessness in the city.' Cllr Savage said to The Edinburgh Reporter after the meeting: 'I am incredibly happy. We heard from the deputation the impact this whole situation has had on them, so I am happy to see that the committee has approved this. There has been so much hard work done on this by council officers, by the council, other elected officials and as I said to the meeting the work done on collaborating and engaging has been absolutely essential.' Asked about the unknown level of costs – which could be as much as £4.737 million to remedy asbestos in the properties and upgrade them to net zero carbon homes, Cllr Savage did not reply, saying instead: 'I think we have a unique opportunity to save a community to tackle the housing crisis in the city as well as homelessness, in what in my opinion is a good deal as well.' Cllr Doggart asked for more clarity about the repairs needing done to these houses. He said: 'Are we buying properties that are not in a particularly good state at the moment?' He was assured by the council officers that there will be condition surveys carried out as part of the conditions of purchase. Council officers believe there will only be a little work required on the basis of the condition of previous homes purchased. When the purchase is settled the existing leases will be terminated, and capital spending will afterwards be incurred on the repairs. Cllr Doggart asked about the future level of rents receivable. Council officers said that these would be individual conversations with tenants and so had not yet been finalised. Cllr Doggart was assured the purchase price reflects current condition and an officer confirmed that when the houses are purchased – probably in September or October – any remedial works will then be scheduled. Green councillor Alex Staniforth asked that the council maintains the green space around the development to a high standard. The council will become liable for a charge for this common area when they take over ownership, and this was agreed as part of the committee decision. In summing up Cllr Watt said she was happy about the level of support this proposal has had, and this decision of the committee will be referred to full council next week for ratification. Like this: Like Related

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store