Blue Ghost lander captures first Moon photos after stunning 'Blue Marble' Earth image
Firefly Aerospace's Blue Ghost lander launched on a SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket from NASA's Kennedy Space Center on Jan. 15, carrying 10 Nasa payloads to the Moon.
About a week after launch, the spacecraft looked back on Earth during its second Earth-orbit burn, capturing the "Blue Marble" from where it came from.
In the next few years, NASA astronauts will have a similar view of Earth in the rearview mirror as they head toward the Moon on the space agency's Orion spacecraft.
According to Firefly Aerospace, the image was taken about 4,163 miles above Earth.
"Firefly captured the beauty of our home planet during another Earth orbit burn," the company said.
Over the weekend, Blue Ghost got its first look at its final destination: the Moon. Firefly shared new images of Earth's only natural satellite in the distance.
How To Watch Fox Weather
After 45 days of spaceflight, Blue Ghost will attempt to land on the near side of the Moon near a volcanic feature called Mons Latreille within Mare Crisium.
The company is targeting a soft touchdown on March 2.Original article source: Blue Ghost lander captures first Moon photos after stunning 'Blue Marble' Earth image
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
40 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The Webb telescope's look at an Earth-size alien planet was bleak
As scientists delve deeper into a star system with seven rocky worlds, the prospect of one being a habitable planet seems to be quickly fading. Researchers who used the James Webb Space Telescope, a joint partnership of NASA and its European and Canadian counterparts, determined the third planet from the TRAPPIST-1 star is unlikely to have air. For anyone keeping count, that's strike three for the system, which lies about 40 light-years away from Earth in space. The new findings on exoplanet TRAPPIST-1d, published in The Astrophysical Journal on Wednesday, mirror similar results for TRAPPIST-1b and TRAPPIST-1c, which orbit closer to their red dwarf host, a tiny-yet-violent type of star found throughout the galaxy. "On a personal level, of course, there's a part of me that would have loved to see signs of air on TRAPPIST-1d," Caroline Piaulet-Ghorayeb, a University of Chicago fellow and lead author of the paper, told Mashable. "Science isn't about hoping for a yes, it's about finding what's real. So here we've learned that TRAPPIST-1d is not an Earth twin." Astronomers discovered the TRAPPIST-1 system about eight years ago with the now-retired Spitzer Space Telescope. Soon they made the swarming exoplanets a priority for investigating their potential for life, with all seven roughly the size of Earth. Scientists were particularly interested in finding out whether the TRAPPIST planets have atmospheres, because red dwarfs are the most ubiquitous kind of star in the Milky Way. If these planets can retain atmospheres, even while subjected to close-range blasts of stellar radiation, perhaps an abundance of other worlds out there could, too. When TRAPPIST-1b and TRAPPIST-1c didn't appear to have atmospheres, the research community wasn't deterred, as neither sibling planet was predicted to have one, given how close they are to the star. But TRAPPIST-1d, which circles the star every four days, is a different story. This exoplanet is on the cusp of the star's theorized habitable zone — the region of space where worlds might be able to have lakes and oceans on their surfaces. "Science isn't about hoping for a yes, it's about finding what's real." Webb observed TRAPPIST-1d with a method called transmission spectroscopy. When a planet crosses in front of its host star, starlight should shine through its atmosphere, if there is one. Molecules within an atmosphere absorb certain light wavelengths, or colors, so astronomers can look for missing segments of the rainbow to figure out chemicals in its composition. The researchers looked for things like water vapor, methane, carbon dioxide, and sulfur dioxide. But first, the team had to account for so-called "stellar contamination." Just like the sun, red dwarfs can get sunspots, so their starlight isn't completely uniform. Variability in the light signals can obscure or even imitate signals coming from a planet. After correcting for this problem in the data, the researchers found no clear signs of gases. That means scientists can rule out certain types of atmospheres, like the thick hydrogen-rich atmosphere of Neptune, or a cloud-free atmosphere akin to that of early Earth. But a few other potential scenarios could explain the results without the planet having to be a barren rock. It could have an extremely thin atmosphere, sort of like Mars, that would be difficult to detect with this method, Piaulet-Ghorayeb said, or it could have thick, high-altitude clouds blocking atmospheric signatures, perhaps like Venus. "We also learned something about what the best way to even look for water in the atmosphere of these temperate planets might be," she said. "Maybe transmission spectroscopy isn't it." Whether red dwarf stars, sometimes called M-type, can harbor planets with atmospheres is a key question for Webb to answer. The observatory has begun a massive study of rocky worlds, first reported by Mashable, specifically to figure out if planets orbiting closely around them could have air. Rather than transmission spectroscopy, the survey will rely on a different method, called the secondary eclipse technique, which avoids some of the stellar contamination issues. The team says not to give up on the TRAPPIST system just yet. After all, planets E, F, G, and H could have a better chance of holding onto their atmospheres because they're farther from the star's flares, which can strip away a planet's atmosphere. In particular, TRAPPIST researchers are looking forward to studying E, the fourth planet from the star. The challenge for Webb will be overcoming the planets' more extreme distance and colder environments, which make atmospheric readings more difficult. What makes Piaulet-Ghorayeb hopeful about the continued quest for rocky worlds with water and air is the milestone achieved. "For the first time, if there had been an Earth-like atmosphere on a temperate terrestrial planet, we could have found it," she said. "And I don't think that in any study before, with any instrument that we had before, we could really get to that level of precision." Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Opinion - Sean Duffy is doing his a great job at NASA, but it might not be enough
The naming of Secretary of Transportation Sean Duffy as interim NASA administrator was as much of a surprise as was President Trump's withdrawal of his nomination of Jared Isaacman to the same post. So, how is Duffy doing, trying to bring the space agency out from its summer of discontent? Duffy has been spending a lot of his time boosting the Artemis program, designed to return astronauts to the moon and, eventually, to Mars. He recently posted that he 'spoke with the smart leaders of our mission directorates' and the consensus was 'America MUST dominate space and our critical moon mission, #ARTEMIS, must be as known and supported by America just as Apollo was!' He finished saying he was 'fired up and ready to launch.' Duffy repeated his advocacy of the Artemis program on the Fox News show 'Hannity.' He noted that Artemis would proceed in three phases: a return to the moon, establishing a lunar base or outpost and crewed expeditions to Mars. Considering how well the Artemis program polls, Duffy is pursuing a sound political strategy. The trick is that the steps he laid out have to happen on a sensible schedule. Fortunately, Artemis II, the crewed trip around the moon, is slated to occur early in 2026. On the other hand, science journalist Robert Zimmerman gave Duffy the back of his hand for stating on Hannity that Artemis III, the next moon landing, is still a go for 2027. Considering the problems the SpaceX Starship has been having, few people believe that date is valid. However, SpaceX's Gwynne Shotwell has assured Duffy that it is. We shall see. According to Politico, Duffy has called for a 100-kilowatt nuclear reactor to be deployed on the moon by 2030, to provide power for a lunar base. He has also called for the acceleration of commercial space stations that would replace the International Space Station when it ends its operational life. The new plan promises to be very disruptive. Duffy also had a meeting at the Kennedy Space Center with his Russian counterpart. Joey Roulette of Reuters reported that the meeting discussed ''cooperation on lunar programs' and 'joint exploration of deep space' as well as ISS cooperation,' according to Roscosmos. International Space Station cooperation is a natural topic of conversation between the head of NASA and the head of Roscosmos. The U.S. and Russia have been partners on the space station since early in the Clinton administration. The partnership exists in its own little universe, separate from the tensions between the two countries brought about by Russia's invasion of Ukraine. Ars Technica reports that Bakanov brought up the possibility of using Russian hardware to deorbit the ISS in 2030. Clearly, he was attempting to take advantage of the feud between Trump and Elon Musk, whose SpaceX currently has the contract. Roscosmos would get a much-needed infusion of cash if it replaced SpaceX. However, the mention of cooperation on lunar programs and the joint exploration of deep space catches the eye. Russia has turned down participation in the Artemis program, preferring to be a partner on China's planned International Lunar Research Station. Russian participation in Artemis was likely dangled as an enticement for Putin to make peace in Ukraine on terms short of conquering the entire country. It would also serve as a way to separate Russia from China, something that has been a center of American foreign policy since the Nixon administration. Finally, Duffy has to deal with the NASA spending war that has developed between the Congress and the White House. A group of Democratic senators sent him a letter expressing their concerns not only about the planned cuts for the next fiscal year but plans to rescind some allocated money for the current fiscal year. They are also concerned about a planned buyout program that would cut 4,000 NASA civil servants. The Senate and House are concerned about NASA's plans to implement the spending plans in the 'big, beautiful bill.' They are demanding answers by Sept. 1. Duffy will need the diplomatic skills of a Henry Kissinger to reconcile the positions of the two branches over NASA funding. As able as he is, the situation cries out for a permanent NASA administrator, someone with the respect of both President Trump and the Congress. Otherwise, the chaos will just continue, hampering the space agency's ability to fulfill its mandate to explore space, for the betterment of the United States and all humankind. Mark R. Whittington, who writes frequently about space policy, has published a political study of space exploration entitled 'Why is It So Hard to Go Back to the Moon?' as well as 'The Moon, Mars and Beyond' and, most recently, 'is America Going Back to the Moon' He blogs at Curmudgeons Corner. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Solve the daily Crossword
New York Post
3 hours ago
- New York Post
NASA rover spots rock shaped like medieval helmet on Mars
NASA's Perseverance rover stationed on Mars spotted a dome-shaped rock with a striking resemblance to a helmet used during medieval times. The martian rock, captured by Perseverance's primary camera on Aug. 5, is pointed at the top and dome-shaped on top of a flared brim. It has a rough, textured surface covered in small bumps. 3 NASA's Perseverance rover spotted a rock shaped like a medieval helmet on Mars. NASA/JPL-Caltech/ASU / SWNS Advertisement The image was selected as Perseverance's best photo during its 234th week on Mars, though scientists working on its team noted it's not the first time the rover has encountered that type of igneous rock. 'This rock's target name is Horneflya and it's distinctive less because of its hat shape (which looks to me to be generally consistent with the pyramid shape we often see in of wind-eroded float blocks on the surface of Mars) and more because it's made almost entirely of spherules,' David Agle, a spokesperson for the Perseverance team at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, told 3 Perseverance launched in July 2020. NASA/JPL-Caltech/ASUS / SWNS Advertisement The rock's odd composition will help scientists further understand how Mars' environmental history, including its 'internal processes,' formed the unique landscape over billions of years, the outlet reported. Perseverance's primary mission, though, isn't to collect baubles. The rover was launched on July 30, 2020 to search for ancient microbial life on the Red Planet to aid scientists in studying its habitability. Its research will help scientists get closer to sending a person to Mars as NASA inches ever closer to its final goal in the Artemis program, which seeks to establish a permanent base on the Moon to oversee the first astronaut landing on the Red Planet. Advertisement SpaceX CEO and former Department of Government Efficiency head Elon Musk is also eyeing interests on Mars with loose plans to launch uncrewed trips as early as 2028. 3 There are currently five NASA rovers on Mars. ESA/MPS et al. / SWNS In the meantime, Perseverance has been working overtime. It was first sent to survey the Jezero Crater to probe Mars' 'wet history' — a trek it only just completed in December 2024 three years after landing. Advertisement 'Conceivably, microbial life could have lived in Jezero during one or more of these wet times. If so, signs of their remains might be found in lakebed or shoreline sediments,' NASA says on the home page for the mission. NASA currently has four other rovers on Mars. Sojourner, the oldest and most antiquated of the five, landed on Mars in July 1997, according to NASA. The second-eldest rover, Opportunity, was originally built to last just three months on Mars. Instead, it pressed on for a staggering 15 years before shutting down in 2019.
