Federal Court rules 5-day police notice for assemblies unconstitutional
Chief Justice Tun Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat, leading a five-member panel, stated the provision imposes disproportionate penalties, effectively prohibiting rather than regulating the right to assemble.
According to FMT, the court found the law exceeded constitutional limits under Article 10(1)(b), which safeguards freedom of speech and assembly.
The case originated from charges against former Muda secretary-general Amir Hadi, who organised a 2022 protest outside Kuala Lumpur's Sogo complex without prior notice. The demonstration, attended by 200 people, demanded accountability over the delayed littoral combat ship project.
Amir faced a RM10,000 fine under Section 9(5) but challenged its constitutionality. The High Court referred the matter to the Federal Court, which has now nullified the penalty clause.
As such Tengku Maimun ordered Amir's case to return to the High Court for dismissal in line with the ruling. Legal experts say the decision reinforces constitutional protections while limiting excessive state control over public gatherings.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Free Malaysia Today
39 minutes ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Najib did not show urgency on addendum existence, says AG
Former prime minister Najib Razak is currently serving a six-year jail sentence in connection with the SRC International Sdn Bhd case, following the Federal Court's dismissal of his appeal and review application. PUTRAJAYA : Najib Razak did not exercise reasonable diligence to show that the royal addendum allegedly allowing him to serve his sentence under house arrest existed when the High Court heard his application for judicial review last year, the Federal Court heard today. Attorney-General Dusuki Mokhtar said the former prime minister had claimed to have received credible information that the former Yang di-Pertuan Agong, Al-Sultan Abdullah Sultan Ahmad Shah, had issued the addendum. 'However, he did not show that he tried to communicate with Istana Negara or Istana Pahang on the addendum order,' Dusuki said before a three-member bench chaired by Chief Judge of Malaya Hasnah Hashim. Also on the panel to hear the attorney-general's appeal to set aside the 2-1 majority ruling on Jan 6 that allowed Najib's appeal to obtain leave were Justices Zabariah Yusof and Hanipah Farikullah. Last July, the High Court refused to grant leave on the grounds that affidavits filed in support of Najib's application were hearsay evidence. Najib's son, Nizar, had filed an affidavit just before the Court of Appeal hearing in support of his father's application to also adduce fresh evidence, which the appellate court also allowed. Nizar claimed the comptroller of the Sultan of Pahang's royal household, Ahmad Khirrizal Ab Rahman, had confirmed the existence of the addendum order and verified its authenticity. Today, Dusuki said the minority judgment of the Court of Appeal was correct in finding that reasonable diligence was lacking. 'The respondent (Najib) also did not attempt to get in touch with Istana Pahang on the authenticity of the addendum that was attached to the main order on Jan 29, 2024,' he said. Hanipah interjected and said Nizar's affidavit in support of the fresh evidence was filed after the High Court ruling as Nizar had to get the ruler's consent to use a copy of the addendum in the court proceedings. Dusuki said Najib was in Kajang prison, but was allowed to use all facilities to contact the authorities. 'He who asserts the existence of the addendum must prove it,' he said. Hanipah also remarked that at the leave stage, the attorney-general ought to assist the court in determining whether Najib's application was frivolous or whether it crossed the threshold for leave. Zabariah said right-thinking people would question if the addendum co-existed with the main order. 'We are trying to clarify if this matter can be raised at the leave stage or should be argued at the substantive stage,' she said. Dusuki, who was assisted by senior federal counsel Shamsul Bolhassan and Ahmad Hanir Hambaly, said the only decision made at the Jan 29, 2024 Federal Territories Pardons Board meeting was that Najib be allowed to have his 12-year jail sentence halved and fine reduced from RM210 million to RM50 million. 'The early release order which bears the king's signature and official seal is addressed to the relevant authority, and especially makes reference to the advice tendered by the Pardons Board before the monarch,' he said. In contrast, he said, the addendum lacked Al-Sultan Abdullah's official seal and signature, and was addressed to the former attorney-general and not the director-general of prisons. 'It lacks the signature of the federal territories minister and differs materially in format and structure from the early release order,' he said, adding that Najib has failed to prove that the addendum was authentic. Dusuki said the majority in the Court of Appeal erred in relying on the Ladd v Marshall case on adducing fresh evidence, as it is a common law principle. 'The minority was correct to rely on Rule 7(3A) of the Rules of Court of Appeal 1994, which is federal law,' he said. He said this rule required a higher threshold compared with the common law principle. Najib is serving a six-year jail sentence in connection with the SRC International Sdn Bhd case, following the Federal Court's dismissal of his appeal and review application.
The Star
an hour ago
- The Star
Housing Ministry pledges full cooperation in MACC's probe of the MyKiosk tender
PUTRAJAYA: The Housing and Local Government Ministry has pledged full cooperation with the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) in its investigation into alleged irregularities in the tender process of the MyKiosk initiative. The Ministry affirmed that it will not compromise with any party found involved in corruption or abuse of power. The Ministry voluntarily handed over all documents related to the implementation of the MyKiosk initiative to the MACC on May 22, 2025. 'This move reflects the Ministry's strong commitment to upholding the principles of integrity and transparency. "We welcome the MACC's investigation as a vital step to ensure every government initiative is carried out with accountability, transparency, and free from any element of corruption," the Ministry stated on Wednesday (July 2). MyKiosk, one of the Ministry's economic empowerment initiatives, aims to support small-scale traders by providing affordable kiosks nationwide. The ceiling cost for each MyKiosk 2.0 unit was set at RM25,000 by the Department of Local Government. "All procurement processes and contractor appointments under MyKiosk were carried out via open quotations by 133 local authorities across the country. "A total of 795 contractors have been appointed by the respective local authorities to undertake the supply and placement of the kiosks," it added. The Ministry reiterated that it would not tolerate any misconduct or corrupt practices at any stage of procurement or implementation, including at the local authority level. To further strengthen internal integrity, the Ministry has implemented several preventive measures, including the Traffic Light System and the establishment of Integrity Units at every local authority. These units are tasked with monitoring and assessing integrity performance while combating corrupt practices within their respective jurisdictions. Earlier, MACC Investigation Division senior director Datuk Zainul Darus confirmed that the commission had launched a preliminary investigation following a complaint lodged by a political party. "The Governance Investigation Division has also begun a parallel inquiry into the project. Besides the Ministry, which has submitted a comprehensive report on the tender process and award, several other parties involved have also submitted relevant documents," he said.
Sinar Daily
an hour ago
- Sinar Daily
Federal Court rules in favour of IRB over RM1.8 billion tax appeal against TNB
The court held that TNB's claim for reinvestment allowance under Schedule 7A of the Income Tax Act 1967 was misconceived and not in accordance with the provisions of the Act. 02 Jul 2025 05:21pm The Federal Court allowed the Inland Revenue Board's appeal to reinstate an additional tax assessment of RM1.8 billion against Tenaga Nasional Berhad for the 2018 assessment year. PUTRAJAYA - The Federal Court today allowed the Inland Revenue Board's (IRB) appeal to reinstate an additional tax assessment of RM1.8 billion against Tenaga Nasional Berhad (TNB) for the 2018 assessment year. A five-member panel chaired by Court of Appeal President Tan Sri Abang Iskandar Abang Hashim unanimously overturned the earlier decisions of both the High Court and the Court of Appeal, which had ruled in favour of TNB and quashed the IRB's tax assessment. The other members of the panel were Federal Court judges Tan Sri Nallini Pathmanathan, Datuk Zabariah Mohd Yusof, Datuk Rhodzariah Bujang and Datuk Abu Bakar Jais. No order as to costs was made, with the court noting that the matter involved issues of public interest. Delivering the court's judgment, Justice Rhodzariah held that TNB's claim for reinvestment allowance (RA) under Schedule 7A of the Income Tax Act 1967 (ITA) was misconceived and not in accordance with the provisions of the Act. She added that TNB ought to have applied for an investment allowance under Schedule 7B of the ITA, rather than seeking RA under Schedule 7A. She explained that the legislative intent behind Schedule 7A was to incentivise manufacturing companies to reinvest in their existing operations in Malaysia. In contrast, Schedule 7B provides for investment allowance incentives specifically tailored to companies in the services sector, as approved by the Finance Minister. Justice Rhodzariah further noted that TNB is authorised to impose a service charge under the Service Tax Act 2018, which reinforces its status as a service provider. As such, the court found that TNB falls within the ambit of the services sector and is therefore subject to Schedule 7B, not Schedule 7A. The IRB argued that TNB, as a utility provider, does not qualify as a manufacturer and is thus not entitled to the RA granted to entities engaged in manufacturing activities. On July 21, 2020, TNB filed a judicial review application seeking, among others, to quash the IRB's decision dated July 13, 2020, which had disallowed its RA claim amounting to RM1,812,506,384.64. The company also sought a declaration that it was entitled to claim the RA under Schedule 7A of the ITA. TNB had included its RA claim for the year of assessment 2018 in its tax return. However, the IRB informed the company that the claim had been disallowed in a letter dated July 3, 2020. Subsequently, on July 13, 2020, the IRB issued a notice of additional assessment against TNB for RM1,812,506,384.64 in tax. TNB then initiated judicial review proceedings to challenge the assessment. In February 2022, the High Court allowed the application and set aside the IRB's additional assessment for the year 2018. The Court of Appeal, in a decision delivered in May 2023, affirmed the High Court's ruling. Despite the dispute, TNB has already paid the assessed sum. At today's hearing, the IRB was represented by Datuk Dr Cyrus Das and senior revenue counsel Ashrina Ramzan Ali, while counsels Datuk D. P. Naban and S. Saravana Kumar appeared for TNB. - BERNAMA More Like This
