logo
Vietnam's robust domestic activity in July buoys growth amid trade strains

Vietnam's robust domestic activity in July buoys growth amid trade strains

[HO CHI MINH CITY] Vietnam's domestic economic activity was buoyant in July, supported by robust spending and investment, while exports braced for a potential slowdown in the coming months as higher US tariffs kick in on Aug 7 .
Estimates from the Vietnamese government's statistics agency (NSO) on Wednesday (Aug 6) pointed to retail sales having grown by 9.2 per cent in July, accelerating from the eight-month low of 8.3 per cent in June.
In the first seven months of 2025, retail activity expanded by 9.3 per cent year on year, stronger than the year-ago period's 8.9 per cent.
This underscores 'resilient private spending, driven in part by strong real wages', noted Adam Ahmad Samdin, economist at Oxford Economics.
Credit growth also hit a 10-year high – 9.64 per cent – in the year to Jul 28, indicating robust economic activity, he added.
Vietnam's central bank on Tuesday (Aug 5) even urged lenders to further slash interest rates and keep deposit rates stable to boost lending and support the country's growth target.
A NEWSLETTER FOR YOU
Friday, 8.30 am Asean Business
Business insights centering on South-east Asia's fast-growing economies.
Sign Up
Sign Up
The Vietnamese government is targeting economic growth of 8.3 to 8.5 per cent in 2025, up from 7.09 per cent in 2024.
On the production front, soft data from S&P Global's latest purchasing managers' survey for July showed that strengthening domestic demand drove new orders, which expanded for the first time in four months, growing at the fastest pace since November 2024.
While new export orders remained in contraction for the ninth consecutive month due to the US tariff hikes, manufacturers secured sufficient domestic business to return total new orders to growth.
Foreign and government investments have also accelerated, supporting the country's growth outlook this year.
In a recent note, Maybank analysts, citing the improved business landscape resulting from reduced red tape and a more predictable legal environment, wrote: 'The steady rollout of private-sector reforms will cushion the headwinds to external trade from the US tariffs by promoting domestic investment and enhancing competitiveness for foreign direct investment (FDI).'
Public investment disbursement in the first seven months came in at 388 trillion dong (S$19 billion), almost 40 per cent of the sum for the full-year plan. This is a marked increase from the 27.8 per cent for the corresponding period in 2024.
Disbursed FDI from January to July also hit the highest level for a seven-month period in at least nine years, rising by 8.4 per cent from the year before, to US$13.6 billion.
FDI pledges, which indicate future inflows, grew 27.3 per cent year on year to hit US$24.09 billion.
Given that the 20 per cent US tariff on Vietnam is now broadly on par with the 19 per cent imposed on other key Asean exporters, 'Vietnam's comparative advantage as a favoured investment destination remains', said Yun Liu, Asean economist at HSBC.
Export growth likely to ease
Exports in July continued to grow strongly, at 16 per cent year on year, bringing the year-to-July turnover to US$42.27 billion. This was driven largely by shipments in two sectors – that for computers and electronics, and for machinery and equipment.
In the first seven months, Vietnam recorded a trade surplus of US$10.2 billion, with exports and imports expanding by 14.8 per cent and 17.9 per cent, respectively.
In line with the robust export performance, industrial production rose by 8.5 per cent from the same period last year.
'We expect export momentum to slow, given that the tariff-pause is slated to end on Aug 7,' said Oxford Economics' Samdin.
He pointed out that front-loaded orders had temporarily boosted exports ahead of the tariff deadline, so he is expecting a payback effect in the coming period.
Uncertainties also persist, largely due to the lack of clarity on the definition of 'transhipment' – such goods will be subject to a higher 40 per cent tariff imposed by the US – as well as upcoming sector-specific levies.
HSBC's Liu added: 'Downside risks to (Vietnam's) growth have not faded in this challenging trade environment, as the situation remains fluid.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Bank of England cuts rates to 4% after narrow 5-4 vote
Bank of England cuts rates to 4% after narrow 5-4 vote

Straits Times

time2 hours ago

  • Straits Times

Bank of England cuts rates to 4% after narrow 5-4 vote

Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Bank of England Governor Andrew Bailey and four colleagues backed lowering bank rate to 4 per cent from 4.25 per cent. LONDON - The Bank of England cut interest rates on Aug 7 but four of its nine policymakers – worried about high inflation – sought to keep borrowing costs on hold, suggesting the BOE's run of rate cuts might be nearing an end. The contrasting views of the BOE's top officials meant the Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) held two votes for the first time since it was created in 1997 in order to reach a decision. With the MPC facing the conflicting risks posed by an inflation rate that the BOE forecasts will soon be double its 2 per cent target and a worsening of job losses, governor Andrew Bailey and four colleagues backed lowering bank rate to 4 per cent from 4.25 per cent. But that was only after a first round of voting ended in a 4-4-1 split, with external MPC member Alan Taylor initially backing a half-point cut. 'It remains important that we do not cut bank rate too quickly or by too much,' Mr Bailey told a press conference after the decision, highlighting that the rise in inflation was expected to be short-lived. 'We stand ready to adjust our course if we see shifts in the balance of risk to the medium-term outlook for inflation.' The four members of the MPC who backed keeping rates on hold included Ms Clare Lombardelli, the deputy governor for monetary policy, who broke from the majority for the first time. Chief economist Huw Pill also voted to keep bank rate at 4.25 per cent. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Liquor licences for F&B, nightlife venues extended to 4am in Boat Quay, Clarke Quay Singapore Chikungunya cases in Singapore double; authorities monitoring situation closely Singapore Student found with vape taken to hospital after behaving aggressively in school; HSA investigating Asia Cambodia, Thailand agree on Asean observers monitoring truce, but fundamental differences remain Asia Trump ratchets up tariff pressure on India, sparking despair among exporters and growth fears Singapore CDC and SG60 vouchers listed on e-commerce platforms will be taken down: CDCs Asia Australia's purchase of Japanese frigates signals a new era for Indo-Pacific security Singapore Some ageing condos in Singapore struggle with failing infrastructure, inadequate sinking funds British short-term government bond yields rose sharply and stocks fell after the announcement. Sterling jumped by about half a cent against the US dollar. Investors trimmed their bets on the possibility of another BOE rate cut by the end of 2025 and were only fully pricing in a cut to 3.75 per cent in February 2026, according to data from LSEG. 'The close vote split and the minutes of the meeting underscore the division on the MPC,' KPMG UK's chief economist Yael Selfin said. 'The division reflects the two-sided risks to the inflation outlook and the uncertainty under which policymakers are operating.' Ms Selfin said she expected one final BOE rate cut in November. The central bank repeated its guidance about 'a gradual and careful approach' to further cuts in borrowing costs but added a new line to its message on the outlook. 'The restrictiveness of monetary policy had fallen as bank rate had been reduced,' it said. It repeated that there was no pre-set path for borrowing costs. A halt to the process of cutting rates would be a blow for Finance Minister Rachel Reeves and Prime Minister Keir Starmer, who have struggled to meet their promise to voters to speed up Britain's slow economic growth. Mr Bailey said rates were still on a downward path but added there was 'genuine uncertainty now about the course of that direction of rates... I think that the path has become more uncertain.' Mr James Smith, an economist with ING, said he still thought the next rate cut would come in November. 'But were the next couple of inflation reports to surprise to the upside, or if the recent falls in private-sector employment start to ease off, then we'll be rethinking,' he added. Conflicting risks The BOE is being pulled in different directions, leaving analysts as well as its own policymakers divided on its most likely moves in the coming months. Britain's jobs market has weakened in recent months, in part due to a tax hike by Finance Minister Reeves on employers and US President Donald Trump's trade war. But inflation is rising. The BOE revised up its forecast for a peak in inflation to 4 per cent in September from 3.7 per cent and said it would remain alert to the risk that rising prices – especially for food – could push up wage deals and longer-term price pressures. 'Overall, the MPC judges that the upside risks around medium-term inflationary pressures have moved slightly higher since May,' the summary of the meeting said. The BOE said it expected inflation to return to its 2 per cent target only in the second quarter of 2027, three months later than its previous forecast. By contrast, the European Central Bank expects inflation in the euro zone to hold below 2 per cent. It has cut borrowing costs eight times since June of last year, three more reductions than those of the BOE. Inflation has been above the BOE's 2 per cent target almost constantly since May 2021. It said on Aug 7 that it expected economic growth of 0.3 per cent in the July-to-September period, up from 0.1 per cent in the second quarter. Longer-term growth forecasts were little changed from its report in May, with annual growth of just over 1 per cent expected in the coming years. REUTERS

Relief in Taiwan as Trump's 100% chip tariff fails to bite, but experts say it's too early to relax
Relief in Taiwan as Trump's 100% chip tariff fails to bite, but experts say it's too early to relax

Straits Times

time2 hours ago

  • Straits Times

Relief in Taiwan as Trump's 100% chip tariff fails to bite, but experts say it's too early to relax

Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company has so far pledged a total of US$165 billion (S$212 billion) in investment to build six state-of-the-art fabs in Arizona. TAIPEI – Taipei heaved a temporary sigh of relief even as US President Donald Trump said that he would slap a shocking 100 per cent tariff on imports of semiconductors, the crucial components that form the backbone of Taiwan's economy. That is because companies that commit to making chips in the US would be exempted – according to Mr Trump – which would mean that Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC), the crown jewel of the island's tech industry, would likely be spared. The firm, which is the world's largest contract manufacturer of chips, has so far pledged a total of US$165 billion (S$212 billion) in investment to build six state-of-the-art fabs , or semiconductor plants , in the US state of Arizona. But while things don't look too dire now, the impact of the tariff on Taiwan's chip industry could yet be far-reaching. Large clients of smaller Taiwanese chip suppliers could demand that they move some of their production to the US to sidestep the punishing duties; this could lead to a decline in Taiwan-based chip production and affect the island's position as a key part of the global tech supply chain, say analysts. And while Mr Trump's latest tariff measure is part of a push to boost domestic chip manufacturing, it could lead to higher prices of electronic devices such as smartphones, which could in turn depress demand for such devices and the chips that drive them. Such an outcome would mean uncertainty for Taiwan's semiconductor industry. Still, on Aug 7, TSMC stocks surged nearly 5 per cent to close at a record high of NT$1,180 (S$51), reflecting investor confidence in the wake of Mr Trump's announcement. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Liquor licences for F&B, nightlife venues extended to 4am in Boat Quay, Clarke Quay Singapore Chikungunya cases in Singapore double; authorities monitoring situation closely Singapore Student found with vape taken to hospital after behaving aggressively in school; HSA investigating Asia Cambodia, Thailand agree on Asean observers monitoring truce, but fundamental differences remain Singapore CDC and SG60 vouchers listed on e-commerce platforms will be taken down: CDCs Asia Australia's purchase of Japanese frigates signals a new era for Indo-Pacific security Singapore Jail for driver who drove over leg of special needs woman in accident on church driveway Singapore Some ageing condos in Singapore struggle with failing infrastructure, inadequate sinking funds Officials in Taiwan were also cautiously optimistic. Speaking to lawmakers during a parliamentary briefing on Aug 7, National Development Council chief Liu Chin-ching argued that a steep 100 per cent tariff rate would not necessarily be disastrous even for Taiwan's smaller chipmakers that do not have a US presence. 'Taiwan currently holds a leading position in the world (in chipmaking) and I believe that if the leader and competitors are all on the same starting line, the leader will continue to lead,' he said. Taiwan is a global powerhouse in chipmaking, with 60 per cent of the world's chips and almost all of the most advanced ones produced there. But experts warned that the lack of details about how the new tariff would be applied means that it is still early days yet to assess its full impact. 'The scope and mechanism of the chip tariff remain unclear. Further developments will need to be closely monitored,' said Ms Joanne Chiao, assistant research manager at Trendforce, a Taiwanese tech research firm. For starters, how much manufacturing a company would need to commit to the US to qualify for a tariff exemption is unclear. It is also unknown if Mr Trump's exemption would cover only chips produced entirely on domestic soil, or also the semiconductors that foreign companies with a US presence , such as British firm Arm, or American companies import from overseas. American chip designers such as Qualcomm typically send their designs to TSMC to be manufactured in Taiwan, before the chips are imported into the US. Moreover, more clarity is needed on whether the new tariff would apply to raw semiconductors and integrated circuits, or also chips in end devices such as smartphones and laptops. During the first quarter of 2025, only around 4 per cent of Taiwan's total exports of electronic components, including semiconductors, were shipped directly to the US. The vast majority of Taiwan-made chips were sent to other countries where they were assembled into consumer electronics. But Professor Julien Chaisse, an international trade expert at City University of Hong Kong, said that it would be 'misleading' to think this would mean that Taiwan's chip exports could be naturally immune to Mr Trump's tariff measure. 'The US government doesn't need a direct shipment to apply pressure – it can change how it interprets rules of origin,' he told The Straits Times. 'If Washington starts insisting that any product with a certain percentage of Taiwanese-made components falls under the tariff, then the effect spreads quickly,' he said. Prof Chaisse added that Mr Trump's tariff also posed a threat to Taiwan's future position in the global tech supply chain. 'Larger buyers may start demanding more Taiwanese capacity be built inside the US, just to sidestep tariffs,' he said, noting that this would, in turn, drain investment from domestic expansion in Taiwan. 'This will have consequences for how Taiwan grows its chip sector over the next five years,' he added. Ultimately, Mr Trump's push to rebuild chip manufacturing in the US will drive up costs for everyone in the supply chain. 'A high tariff on chips would inevitably raise the price of smartphones and laptops, which would also hurt demand for electronic products,' said Ms Liu Pei-chen, an analyst at Taiwan Institute of Economic Research. 'This will bring a lot of uncertainty to the chip industry,' she added. For now, however, Taiwan retains a major advantage – the US will still need to rely on the island for its semiconductor needs, particularly for advanced chips. Taiwan's intricately connected semiconductor ecosystem, which was built up over decades, is not easily replicated. The island's dominance in the sector extends to the technical prowess and efficiency among its chip engineers, which means it is not a simple matter of plonking a factory wherever one wishes. 'Even with the big investments happening in US fabs, it will take years before local production can cover demand,' said Prof Chaisse. 'In the end, this feels like pressure aimed at getting more investment from Taipei. Not because Taiwan is a threat, but because Trump wants quick wins he can point to.'

Who pays for Trump's tariffs?
Who pays for Trump's tariffs?

Straits Times

time2 hours ago

  • Straits Times

Who pays for Trump's tariffs?

Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Higher tariffs on goods from dozens of trading partners kicked in on Aug 7, ranging between 15 per cent and 41 per cent. PARIS - US President Donald Trump says the United States will reap billions of dollars from his tariff blitz, but who pays the bill? Higher tariffs on goods from dozens of trading partners kicked in on Aug 7 , ranging between 15 per cent and 41 per cent. Here is a look at the effects of Trump's tariff onslaught. Higher prices for US consumers? The tariffs are paid by US-based companies to US customs when they import goods from abroad. US consumers could see a range of products become more expensive if companies choose to raise prices to offset the higher costs of importing goods. For instance, Japanese cars face a 15 per cent tariff, while made-in-Vietnam T-shirts now have a 20 per cent duty. But companies have other options: they can absorb the higher cost, which would hit their bottom line, or they can try to negotiate lower prices with exporters. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Liquor licences for F&B, nightlife venues extended to 4am in Boat Quay, Clarke Quay Singapore Chikungunya cases in Singapore double; authorities monitoring situation closely Singapore Student found with vape taken to hospital after behaving aggressively in school; HSA investigating Asia Cambodia, Thailand agree on Asean observers monitoring truce, but fundamental differences remain Singapore CDC and SG60 vouchers listed on e-commerce platforms will be taken down: CDCs Asia Australia's purchase of Japanese frigates signals a new era for Indo-Pacific security Singapore Jail for driver who drove over leg of special needs woman in accident on church driveway Singapore Some ageing condos in Singapore struggle with failing infrastructure, inadequate sinking funds US Federal Reserve chairman Jerome Powell estimated at the end of July that higher tariffs were beginning to be felt on certain goods. For example, the US toy company Hasbro, maker of the Monopoly board game and the owlish electronic toy Furby and which imports half of its products from China, began raising prices in May and June. Procter & Gamble, the maker of Tide laundry detergent and Pampers diapers, has projected a US$1 billion (S$1.29 billion) hit from US tariffs over the next year said it would institute limited price hikes in the United States. The tariffs are even more problematic for US economic sectors which don't have an option to switch to local suppliers, said Dr Philippe Chalmin, emeritus professor at Paris-Dauphine University. The United States imports lots of copper, a key metal in electrical machinery and wiring, which Mr Trump announced would face a 50 per cent tariff on August 1. 'Half of what the United States needs is imported from Chile, and following the announcement the price of copper on the US market rose 25 per cent compared with the global reference price,' said Dr Chalmin. In the end, however, the Trump administration backpedalled and applied the tariff only to semi-finished copper products such as pipes and wires. Loss of competitiveness The bill could also weigh on companies which depend heavily on exports, with the rising prices of their products in the United States leading to a loss of competitiveness. This is the concern for the European wine and spirits sector, which has yet to obtain an exception from US tariffs. Higher prices on Champagne or Chianti could easily push US consumers to grab a bottle of Californian wine. The impact 'will be all the harsher' since in addition to the tariffs the value of the dollar has fallen, which further increases the price of the bottles on shelves in US shops, warned Mr Gabriel Picard, president of the French Federation of Wine and Spirits Exporters. He estimated that this combined effect could result in a €1 billion (S$1.49 billion) loss for French producers. 'There will be sectoral differences and even within the same sector, it will depend on the negotiating power' between the producer, the wholesaler, and the retailer, said Mr Bruno de Moura Fernandes, head of macroeconomic research at Coface, a firm which provides insurance and financial services for exporters. However, he said that the effect will be especially significant for industries already facing difficulties remaining competitive against their American counterparts, notably in chemicals and steel sectors. Thinning margins Some companies have already announced that they will cut into their profit margins to offset the effects of US tariffs. Automakers, among the first affected by US tariffs, have already seen sales and profits hit. German auto giant Volkswagen said in July that US tariffs had cost it €1.3 billion in the first half of the year as it reported falling profit. It now forecasts a profit margin for the year of between four and five per cent, down from 5.5 to 6.5 per cent previously, amounting to billions of euros for the group. US tariffs prompted Japanese auto giant Toyota – the world's largest carmaker by sales, to cut its annual net profit forecast by 14 per cent. AFP

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store