logo
New generation of Afghan women shift from burqa

New generation of Afghan women shift from burqa

Yahoo19-03-2025

Young, urban women in Afghanistan are increasingly ditching the all-enveloping blue burqa with a face mesh that has become a symbol of the Taliban's oppression of women.
Since their return to power in 2021, the Taliban have imposed an ultra-strict vision of Islamic law, modelled on their previous rule from 1996 to 2001.
But while women must still have their bodies and faces covered, restrictions from the feared religious police do not specifically mention the burqa.
So young women are instead following fashions seen in many Gulf nations.
Many prefer a flowing abaya robe, worn with a hijab headscarf and often a face covering as well -- sometimes a medical mask, or a Saudi-style cloth niqab veil that exposes only the eyes.
"The new generation would never accept wearing a burqa, because of the design and colour," said 23-year-old Tahmina Adel in the capital Kabul.
With social media, "everybody follows the trends", Adel added, who was forced to quit her economics degree because of the Taliban government's ban on women's education.
"I prefer wearing an abaya because I am comfortable in that," she said.
Young women in Kabul and the northern city of Mazar-i-Sharif said that abayas and headscarves offer more freedom of expression than burqas, with a variation in colour, material and pattern.
"Only elders wear a burqa," said Razia Khaliq, as she embroidered one at a workshop in Mazar-i-Sharif.
Khaliq began wearing the billowing head-to-toe burqa aged 13, like her mother and grandmother before her.
But her daughter, in her 20s, prefers the abaya.
"Young people wear the abaya because it is more comfortable," Khaliq said.
- 'Stifling' -
The burqa has long roots in Afghanistan.
It was strictly enforced during the first Taliban government rule of Afghanistan, when women were lashed for failing to wear one in public.
But the abaya and hijab headscarf combination grew in popularity during the time of the foreign-backed government.
When the Taliban recaptured Kabul in 2021, they had promised to be more flexible than during their first rule, when women were deprived of almost all their rights.
They have gradually erased Afghan women from public space, imposing what the United Nations has called a "gender apartheid".
They outlawed the loose headscarves commonly worn by urban women.
Billboards were erected ordering women to once again wear the burqa -- or an abaya, headscarf and a face covering.
A law in August confirmed restrictions imposed on men and women by the religious police.
It stipulates that, while women can go out "in case of necessity", they must cover up.
"Whether a burqa or hijab, there is no difference," said Saif ul Islam Khyber, spokesman for the morality police, known officially as the Ministry for the Propagation of Virtue and the Prevention of Vice.
Nasima, in her 40s, insisted that "showing your face is a sin".
But she admitted to sometimes wearing an abaya and headscarf to free her nose and mouth from the "stifling" burqa.
- 'Very strange' -
Niha, 22, said she was reprimanded for not wearing a burqa in public buildings, which are guarded by the Taliban authority's security forces.
It is common to be asked to readjust the headscarf, or ordered to add a medical mask.
"As soon as we enter offices, we are mistreated," said Niha, who did not give her surname.
Hayatullah Rafiqi, a specialist in Pashtun culture, said the burqa was "strictly imposed" under the first Taliban government -- when some women were "whipped if they did not wear it" -- but that "today it is worn less."
Burqas vary only in colour according to province, from blue to light brown, and green to pink.
Gul Mohammad has been selling burqas in Kabul for 40 years, and said many now come from China -- made of nylon rather than cotton, making them cheaper and stronger but less breathable.
"The Chinese burqa is very cold in winter, and it is like fire in summer," said Gul. "This makes the women sweat."
For Sabrina, 23, from the Taliban's spiritual cradle of Kandahar, life under a burqa is fraught with pitfalls.
She is regularly lectured if she does not wear it.
The first time she wore it was after the Taliban government seized back control in 2021, and it was not her choice.
"I couldn't see my way, I didn't know if I was going right or left," she said. "It was very strange."
qb-ash/sbh/ecl/pbt/pjm/tym

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Israel vows to stop aid ship from reaching Gaza
Israel vows to stop aid ship from reaching Gaza

Boston Globe

timean hour ago

  • Boston Globe

Israel vows to stop aid ship from reaching Gaza

Israel imposed the blockade on Gaza, with Egypt's help, after Hamas, the Islamic militant group, took over the coastal strip in 2007. Israeli officials have said the blockade is necessary to prevent weapons smuggling into the enclave. Conditions in Gaza have worsened considerably since the deadly Hamas-led attack on Israel in October 2023, which ignited the current war, now in its 20th month. Israel recently banned the entry of any humanitarian aid for 80 days, bringing the territory to the brink of famine, according to international aid organizations. Advertisement The Madleen is probably carrying only a symbolic amount of humanitarian aid. The coalition said in a statement that it was bringing urgently needed goods, including baby formula, flour, rice, diapers, medical supplies, and children's prosthetics. But Israel's defense minister, Israel Katz, said he had instructed the country's military to prevent the vessel from reaching Gaza. Advertisement In a blunt statement, he said, 'To Greta the antisemite and her friends, propagandists for Hamas — I say clearly: You would do well to turn back, because you won't get to Gaza. Israel will act against any attempt to breach the blockade or aid terrorist organizations by sea, air or land.' Thunberg has been an outspoken opponent of Israel's naval blockade of Gaza and its actions in the enclave. 'We are doing this because, no matter what odds we are against, we have to keep trying,' Thunberg said last week. 'Because the moment we stop trying is when we lose our humanity. And no matter how dangerous this mission is, it's not even near as dangerous as the silence of the entire world in the face of the livestreamed genocide.' Israel's military has blocked past attempts by pro-Palestinian activists to bring aid to Gaza by sea, including by force. In 2010, nine passengers aboard the Mavi Marmara, part of a flotilla carrying aid from Turkey to Gaza, were killed in an Israeli commando raid, stirring international outrage and damaging Turkish-Israeli relations. A 10th passenger died from his wounds years later. Israel said at the time that its soldiers, some of whom had rappelled onto the ship from helicopters, fell into an ambush and were attacked with clubs, metal rods, and knives. The Freedom Flotilla Coalition has described the interception of the Mavi Marmara as 'an unlawful and deadly attack' and said the Madleen's mission is 'a continuation of that legacy -- a refusal to surrender to silence, fear or complicity' in the face of the siege of Gaza. Another recent attempt by the coalition to challenge the blockade was thwarted. A ship called Conscience left Tunisia in late April carrying human rights activists and aid and was scheduled to stop in Malta to pick up more people, including Thunberg. But the ship was rocked by explosions off the coast of Malta, setting it on fire. Advertisement The passengers and crew were not harmed, but the mission was abandoned. Israel has since lifted its total ban on the entry of humanitarian aid and, in recent weeks, has backed a new system aimed at getting help to Palestinians without Hamas being able to divert or benefit from it. The effort got off to a troubled start as Israeli forces fired at hungry and desperate Palestinians on their way to collect boxes of food at a distribution site in southern Gaza, killing and wounding scores of them. The distribution sites are being operated by American security contractors under the auspices of a new organization, the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation. That effort has been boycotted by the United Nations and other prominent aid groups, which accuse Israel of using aid as a weapon. The foundation said it had distributed more than 1.1 million meals Sunday across three distribution sites. In addition, the group said it had delivered 11 truckloads of food directly to community leaders through local merchants as part of a pilot project aimed at easing crowding at the existing distribution points. On Saturday, the foundation said it was 'impossible to proceed' with the distribution of aid that day, accusing Hamas of threatening its operations. A group spokesperson Sunday shared a written warning he said local staff members had received, threatening them with 'serious consequences' if they continued working for the program. Advertisement This article originally appeared in

Israel strikes Syria again, claims to have killed alleged Hamas member
Israel strikes Syria again, claims to have killed alleged Hamas member

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Israel strikes Syria again, claims to have killed alleged Hamas member

The Israeli army has again bombed Syria, claiming it killed a Hamas member during an air strike in the south of the country, in the latest in its series of attacks on Syria in the wake of former President Bashar al-Assad's ouster last December. In a statement on Telegram on Sunday morning, the Israeli army said it had struck the alleged Hamas member in the Mazraat Beit Jin area. The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights reported that one person was killed and two others were wounded in the Israeli attack targeting a vehicle in the town near the United Nations-patrolled buffer zone. Hamas has not yet commented on the death of the alleged member. The observatory says Israel has carried out 61 attacks – 51 by air and 10 by ground – in Syria so far this year. Two rockets launched from Syria targeted Israel earlier this week, a first since the fall of groups claimed responsibility for the attack. The first group, named the 'Martyr Mohammed Deif Brigades', is a little-known group named after the Hamas military commander who was killed last year. A second little-known group, the 'Islamic Resistance Front in Syria', called for action against Israel from southern Syria a few months ago. Israel struck southern Syria shortly afterwards, with Israeli Defence Minister Israel Katz saying that he was holding Syria 'directly responsible'. Syria's Foreign Minister Asaad al-Shaibani condemned Israel's attacks and called them 'coordinated provocations aimed at undermining Syria's progress and stability'. 'These actions create an opening for outlawed groups to exploit the resulting chaos,' he said, adding, 'Syria has made its intentions clear: we are not seeking war, but rather reconstruction'. Syria and Israel had recently engaged in indirect talks to ease tensions, a significant development in relations between states that have been on opposite sides of conflicts in the Middle East for decades. But Israel has relentlessly waged a campaign of aerial bombardment that has destroyed much of Syria's military infrastructure. It has occupied the Syrian Golan Heights since the 1967 Arab-Israeli war and taken more territory in the aftermath of al-Assad's removal, citing lingering concerns over the country's new government led by President Ahmed al-Sharaa, who it dismisses as a 'jihadist.' Syria's new government has taken several major steps towards international acceptance after the United States and European Union lifted sanctions on the country last month, giving a nation devastated by nearly 14 years of civil war a lifeline to recovery.

Iran says no sanctions relief in US nuclear proposal
Iran says no sanctions relief in US nuclear proposal

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Iran says no sanctions relief in US nuclear proposal

Iran's parliament speaker said on Sunday that the latest US proposal for a nuclear deal does not include the lifting of sanctions, state media reported as negotiations appeared to have hit a roadblock. The two foes have held five rounds of Omani-mediated talks since April, seeking to replace a landmark agreement between Tehran and world powers that set restrictions on Iran's nuclear activities in return for sanctions relief, before US President Donald Trump abandoned the accord in 2018 during his first term. In a video aired on Iranian state TV, parliament speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf said that "the US plan does not even mention the lifting of sanctions". He called it a sign of dishonesty, accusing the Americans of seeking to impose a "unilateral" agreement that Tehran would not accept. "The delusional US president should know better and change his approach if he is really looking for a deal," Ghalibaf said. On May 31, after the fifth round of talks, Iran said it had received "elements" of a US proposal, with officials later taking issue with "ambiguities" in the draft text. The US and its Western allies have long accused the Islamic republic of seeking to acquire nuclear weapons, a charge Iran has consistently denied, insisting that its atomic programme was solely for peaceful purposes. Key issues in the negotiations have been the removal of biting economic sanctions and uranium enrichment. Tehran says it has the right to enrich uranium under the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, while the Trump administration has called any Iranian enrichment a "red line". Trump, who has revived his "maximum pressure" campaign of sanctions on Iran since taking office in January, has repeatedly said it will not be allowed any uranium enrichment under a potential deal. On Tuesday, Iran's top negotiator, Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi, said the country "will not ask anyone for permission to continue enriching uranium". - IAEA meeting - According to the UN nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Iran is the only non-nuclear-weapon state in the world that enriches uranium up to 60 percent -- close to the 90 percent threshold needed for a nuclear warhead. Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei on Wednesday rejected the latest US proposal and said enrichment was "key" to Iran's nuclear programme. The IAEA Board of Governors is scheduled to meet in Vienna starting Monday and discuss Iran's nuclear activities. On Sunday the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran warned it could reduce its level of cooperation with the UN nuclear watchdog if it adopts a resolution against it. "Certainly, the IAEA should not expect the Islamic Republic of Iran to continue its broad and friendly cooperation," the Iranian agency's spokesman Behrouz Kamalvandi told state TV. Araghchi on Friday accused European powers of "opting for malign action against Iran at the IAEA Board of Governors", warning on X that "Iran will react strongly against any violation of its rights". A quarterly report from the IAEA issued last week cited a "general lack of cooperation" from Iran and raised concerns over undeclared nuclear material. Tehran has rejected the report as politically motivated and based on "forged documents" it said had been provided by its arch foe Israel. pdm/ami/dcp

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store