
Meghalaya honeymoon murder: Raja Raghuvanshi killed after 3 failed attempts, wife Sonam's role revealed by police
Meghalaya Honeymoon Murders: As shocking details emerge in the murder case of Raja Raghuvanshi, Meghalaya police have disclosed that the Indore-based transporter was killed on the fourth attempt after three previous failed plots by the accused, including his wife Sonam Raghuvanshi and her alleged boyfriend Raj Kushwaha.
The murder took place during the couple's honeymoon in Meghalaya, revealing a sinister conspiracy that unfolded over several months.
Superintendent of Police Vivek Syiem stated in a press briefing that the first attempt to kill Raja Raghuvanshi was made in Guwahati, followed by two unsuccessful attempts in Meghalaya's Sohra (also known as Cherrapunji) region.
The killers finally succeeded at Weisawdong Falls.
'They wanted to get rid of him in different places earlier. They also wanted to get rid of Raja's body somewhere in Guwahati, but it did not materialise,' Syiem explained.
The conspirators had planned to eliminate Raja Raghuvanshi at various locations, including Nongriat and between Mawlakhiat and Weisawdong, but these plans failed to materialise until the fatal attack at Weisawdong.
The murder was premeditated, with the accused having reached Guwahati on 19 May, ahead of Raja and Sonam, who had come to visit Kamakhya after their marriage.
The initial plan to kill Raja in Guwahati was abandoned as Sonam Raghuvanshi planned to travel to Shillong and Sohra, prompting the conspirators to adjust their scheme accordingly.
"Sonam and Raja reached Guwahati to visit Kamakhya after marriage. The killers had already reached on 19 May. Their initial plan was to kill Raja in Guwahati, but Sonam had planned to go to Shillong and Sohra. Therefore, this plan was shelved," the SP added.
In the wake of the sensational murder case, family members of Raj Kushwaha, accused of being Sonam's boyfriend and the alleged mastermind behind the murder of Raja Raghuvanshi, have come forward to assert his innocence.
Raj's grandparents and extended family from Fatehpur district in Uttar Pradesh vehemently denied any romantic involvement between Raj and Sonam, according to a News18 report.
Raj's grandmother, Ram Lalli, told News18, 'My grandson is innocent. He had nothing to do with that woman. He's being trapped. Big people can do anything."
She added, 'My grandson can't kill, he gave away his slippers to the poor, how can he be a murderer."
Raj's grandfather, Darbari Singh, emphasised Raj's dedication to his family and lack of any romantic history: 'He's been working hard to support his mother and three sisters ever since his father passed away five years ago. What Sonam, what affair? He only minded his own business."
The family also clarified that Raj and Sonam were merely colleagues at a factory owned by Sonam's brother in Indore. 'Talking at work doesn't mean an affair," said Ram Lalli.
Raj's maternal uncle, Ranjeet Singh, vouched for his character, stating, 'If even one person in the village says Raj has ever done anything wrong, hang him. But he is innocent".
Police investigations have revealed that the Raja Raghuvanshi murder plot was hatched well before Raja and Sonam Raghuvanshi's marriage, with Raj Kushwaha identified as the mastermind and Sonam complicit in the plan.
In police custody, Sonam has claimed that she killed her husband under pressure from Raj, while Raj has insisted that Sonam planned and executed the murder herself, manipulating him into involvement.
The accused had considered various methods, including making Sonam disappear and even killing another woman to pass her off as Sonam, but these plans did not come to fruition, according to police statements.
All five accused, including Sonam, Raj Kushwaha, and three others, have have been arrested. The murder was not a contract killing but carried out as a favour to Raj, according to police statements.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New Indian Express
34 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
Ponmudy case: Madras HC notice to DGP, Chennai commissioner
CHENNAI: The Madras High Court on Friday issued notices to the Director General of Police/Head of Police Force of Tamil Nadu and the Greater Chennai Commissioner of Police on a suo motu writ petition taken up by the court for registering a criminal case against DMK MLA and former minister K Ponmudy for his derogatory remarks against Saivism and Vaishnavism. The order to take up a suo motu case was passed by Justice N Anand Venkatesh in April, following which it was numbered with the concurrence of the Chief Justice and came up for hearing before Justice P Velmurugan on Friday. The controversial remark was made by Ponmudy at an event organised by Thanthai Periyar Dravidar Kazhagam in Chennai on April 8 in which he recalled a 'joke' frequently used in the past on the platforms of the Dravidian movement, with references to symbols used in Saivism, Vaishnavism and sex workers. After the issue snowballed into a controversy, Ponmudy was first stripped of his party post as deputy general secretary and later his cabinet berth. Justice Anand Venkatesh had earlier asked the Tamil Nadu police to register an FIR against Ponmudy for his remarks. However, on learning that no FIR has been registered when the case came up again for hearing on April 23, he directed the court's registry to take up a suo motu writ petition in this regard.


NDTV
an hour ago
- NDTV
US Court Extends Detention Of Pro-Palestinian Protest Leader Mahmoud Khalil
A U.S. judge on Friday denied Mahmoud Khalil's request to be released from detention, after federal prosecutors changed their rationale for holding the Columbia graduate student as part of its crackdown on pro-Palestinian activists. Newark, New Jersey-based U.S. District Judge Michael Farbiarz on Wednesday said the government could not use foreign policy interests to justify Khalil's detention. On Friday the government said it was also holding Khalil, a legal permanent resident of the United States, on a charge of immigration fraud. In response, Farbiarz said Khalil's lawyers had not successfully argued why it was unlawful for the government to hold him on the charge, which he has denied. The ruling marked the latest turn in Khalil's fight to be freed from a Louisiana detention center after his March arrest for involvement in the pro-Palestinian protest movement, which President Donald Trump has called antisemitic. His detention was condemned by civil rights groups as an attack on protected political speech. Marc Van Der Hout, a lawyer for Khalil, said the government practically never detained people for immigration fraud and the Syrian-born student was being punished for opposing Israel's U.S.-backed war in Gaza following Hamas' October 2023 attack. "Detaining someone on a charge like this is highly unusual and frankly outrageous," said Van Der Hout. "There continues to be no constitutional basis for his detention." Farbiarz had previously suggested legal residents like Khalil were rarely detained on the basis of immigration fraud. On Friday he said Khalil should seek bail from the immigration lawyer in his case. As lawyers for the Syrian-born activist sought his release, Kilmar Abrego Garcia, another immigrant targeted by the Trump administration, pleaded not guilty to migrant smuggling charges after his wrongful deportation. Khalil, a graduate student at Columbia's School of International and Public Affairs, was arrested by immigration agents in the lobby of his university residence in Manhattan on March 8. His U.S. citizen wife, Dr. Noor Abdalla, gave birth to the couple's first child while Khalil was detained in April. Ahead of Father's Day in the U.S., a group of celebrities including actors Mahershala Ali, Mark Ruffalo and Mo Amer, called for Khalil to be freed. They also sent him a video showing the celebrities reading aloud a letter that the activist had sent to his infant son.


Hindustan Times
2 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Kurla bus accident: Court orders police to return bus to wet-lease operator
MUMBAI: The sessions court has directed the Kurla police to hand over the electric bus that crashed into several vehicles and pedestrians in Kurla on December 9 last year, resulting in the death of nine people, to Evey Trans Private Limited, which supplied the vehicle on a wet-lease contract with the BEST. The court, in an order passed on Thursday, stated that the vehicle should be produced before the court as and when required for trial. The plea moved by Evey Trans sought the return of the Olectra Greentech Limited model vehicle, saying it is the lawful owner of the vehicle. The advocate representing the company argued that the investigation is already completed and chargesheet is filed, due to which the vehicle is no longer needed for investigation or trial purpose. The prosecution did not object to the plea. The bus accident took the lives of nine people and injured 37 others after the driver of the electric bus, Sanjay More, lost control while driving. The incident occurred around 9:30 pm on SG Barve Marg in Kurla West. The chargesheet filed in February this year has cited 'human error' on the part of the driver because of the inadequate training he received to operate the bus. 'Considering the stage of investigation and fact that the applicant's company is the registered owner, I find no reason to deny return of property,' observed additional sessions judge Avinash Kulkarni. Handing over the custody of the bus, the court imposed certain conditions. It directed the company to execute an indemnity bond of ₹1.25 crore and not to change the vital parts and colour of the vehicle till the matter is disposed off. 'Applicant shall not transfer the said vehicle to anybody by any mode, till disposal of the case,' added the court. More and two top executives of BEST's wet-lease contractors - Ramesh Katigandla, director of EveyTrans Private Limited, and Ram Anand Suryawanshi, CEO of Morya Trans India Limited - stand accused in the case. More was employed by Pune-based Morya Trans India, a subcontractor of EveyTrans, which supplied the bus on a wet-lease contract with BEST. He had alleged that he abruptly shifted from manual, geared, diesel vehicles to an automatic electric bus on December 1 and only got three brief training sessions.