Small Modular Reactors: A strategic opportunity for South Africa's energy future
Image: Supplied
The global energy landscape is undergoing profound change. Among the most promising innovations is the small modular reactor (SMR), a nuclear technology being promoted as an alternative not only to large conventional nuclear plants but also to fossil fuel-based generation. For South Africa, SMRs represent both a technological advance and an economic opportunity.
The 'small' in SMR refers to its generating capacity — typically between 50 and 300 megawatts electric (MWe) per unit. By comparison, a conventional large reactor such as Koeberg's units generates around 970 MWe each. SMRs are often deployed in clusters such as four-pack, six-pack, ten-pack or more, depending on the electricity needs of a region.
The 'modular' aspect means that these reactors can be manufactured on a factory floor, shipped to site, and added incrementally. A single module can be installed and commissioned, with more units added over time as demand and financing allow. This phased approach lowers upfront capital requirements and accelerates deployment.
The compact footprint of SMRs makes them suitable for sites where large plants would be impractical. Koeberg, for example, occupies a vast area due to its size and the 'source term', or the potential release of radioactivity in an accident. Larger plants require extensive emergency planning zones, creating buffers between the reactor and residential areas. SMRs, with their smaller source term, can be sited closer to demand centres because any potential release would be far smaller and more easily diluted.
This reduced land requirement also opens possibilities for locating SMRs near existing industrial hubs. They can be placed closer to the grid, reducing costly transmission infrastructure. In some cases, they could operate entirely off-grid, directly powering energy-intensive industries such as mines and smelters.
Consider South Africa's mining sector. Large gold or platinum mining complexes in areas such as Rustenburg or Carletonville could be powered by dedicated SMRs, eliminating the need for long transmission lines. Similarly, smelters — which have suffered output cuts due to Eskom's supply constraints — could secure reliable 24/7 power from on-site SMRs. This would cut carbon intensity and help meet ESG commitments. Excess electricity could be sold into the grid, providing both operational resilience and an additional revenue stream.
Factory fabrication is another major advantage. Traditional nuclear construction involves assembling vast quantities of components on site, often in challenging conditions. SMRs, by contrast, can be built under controlled conditions — creating opportunities to localise production and develop a domestic manufacturing value chain — subject to rigorous quality checks and regulatory inspections before shipping. This approach shortens construction timelines, reduces labour requirements on site, and minimises the risk of cost overruns.
Some SMRs, particularly high-temperature gas-cooled reactors such as the pebble bed design pioneered in South Africa, use fuel that is inherently safe. Each fuel particle is coated in layers of graphite and silicon carbide, creating a robust barrier to the release of radioactive material. Even in the event of an accident, the reactor is designed to shut itself down without operator intervention if temperatures exceed safe limits. This intrinsic safety significantly reduces the risk of major incidents.
SMRs are not theoretical concepts. Two are already operational: China's high-temperature gas-cooled reactor (the HTR-PM), connected to the grid in 2021, and Russia's floating nuclear power plant, the Akademik Lomonosov, which can be moored near coastal demand centres. In the United States, designs such as NuScale's light water SMR and TerraPower's advanced reactor (backed by Bill Gates) are progressing. Argentina is building its own version, and other countries are investing heavily in similar projects.
For South Africa, SMRs offer several strategic benefits. Their smaller capacity makes them more affordable to build in stages, easing the financing burden. A 300 MWe SMR produces less than a third of Koeberg's output but could be replicated over time to meet growing demand. Deploying them at or near mines, smelters, industrial parks, or even large data centres could boost productivity, protect jobs, and attract investment.
The rise of artificial intelligence and cloud computing is driving demand for data centres. These are massive facilities that require uninterrupted, high-capacity electricity. Locating such centres in South Africa, powered by dedicated SMRs, could position the country as a continental hub for digital infrastructure.
However, for this potential to be realised, South Africa's regulatory framework must adapt. The Independent Power Producer (IPP) programme has opened space for private investment in renewables, but nuclear is not currently included. Extending the IPP framework to allow privately owned nuclear plants, particularly SMRs, could unlock significant investment. Such a move would encourage participation from local and international companies that are wary of building large, centralised plants but are keen to deploy smaller, modular units.
SMRs could also replace ageing coal-fired stations, particularly in Mpumalanga. By siting new pebble bed modular reactors on or near existing coal plant locations, transmission infrastructure could be reused, reducing costs and speeding up integration into the grid.
The case for SMRs in South Africa is compelling. They offer flexibility in siting, whether on-grid or off-grid, and scalability, with capacity added as needed. Their advanced fuel designs and passive shutdown systems provide enhanced safety, while their ability to power energy-intensive industries and attract new sectors can stimulate economic growth. Furthermore, factory fabrication shortens construction timelines, making them a faster, more efficient option for expanding the country's energy mix.
To seize this opportunity, South Africa must act decisively. That means establishing clear regulations for private nuclear generation, incentivising industrial users to adopt SMRs, and reviving domestic expertise in pebble bed reactor technology. The technology exists, international examples prove its viability, and the need for reliable, low-carbon power has never been greater.
Small modular reactors will not replace the entire energy system, but they could become a cornerstone of a diversified, resilient, and sustainable South African grid. The time to prepare for their deployment is now.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Maverick
6 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
Activists raise concerns as nuclear site close to Cape Town given go-ahead
South Africa is one step closer to a second nuclear power station after Forestry, Fisheries and the Environment Minister Dion George last week upheld a contested, almost decade-old environmental authorisation. South Africa's long-running bid to expand its nuclear power capacity has cleared a key and contentious hurdle. Environment Minister Dion George has upheld an environmental authorisation allowing Eskom to develop a new 4,000MW nuclear power station at Duynefontein, about 35km north of Cape Town. The decision affirms a 2017 approval that had been under appeal for years. It paves the way for Eskom to pursue a nuclear build at the roughly 265-hectare site. That, however, does not mean shovels will hit the ground any time soon. 'In the end, my decision was made in respect of the principles of the National Environmental Management Act, 1998 (Act No. 107 of 1998), and with full appreciation of the environmental, social and economic considerations involved,' said George. He said that the granting of an environmental authorisation 'does not exempt an applicant from complying with any other applicable legal requirements or obtaining permits from other competent authorities'. The news is one step forward after a previous step back on the contested journey towards new nuclear capacity. Daily Maverick previously reported that at the end of 2023, Minister of Energy and Electricity Kgosientsho Ramokgopa announced that all the 'suspensive conditions' to start procuring 2,500MW of new nuclear power immediately had been met. Months later, in August 2024, Ramokgopa announced that he would withdraw that gazette to procure new nuclear power capacity in response to the 'substantive' legal challenges posed by the Southern African Faith Communities' Environment Institute and Earthlife Africa Johannesburg — and that is where things have stood until George's announcement last week. Government and industry proponents have hailed the move as a milestone. The South African Nuclear Energy Corporation (Necsa), in a statement, said it reflected confidence in nuclear technology as a contributor to the country's energy mix. Necsa CEO Loyiso Tyabashe added that 'this approval marks an important milestone for the nuclear industry and South Africa's journey towards implementing a balanced energy mix that enables socioeconomic development and is climate friendly. The minister's decision shows rigour of the process that was followed to choose an appropriate site for nuclear new build and reflects confidence in nuclear technology as a safe, clean and reliable energy solution.' While the environmental approval is a prerequisite, Eskom still faces a gauntlet of steps before any concrete is poured. These include securing licences, obtaining design and construction approvals, sourcing financing for what is likely to be a multihundred-billion-rand project, and government sign-off on procurement. This drawn-out pathway is not just procedural. South Africa's last major nuclear procurement drive under former president Jacob Zuma collapsed amid allegations of secrecy and corruption risks and procedural failures. Environmental activists, however, are not as welcoming of the news, warning that the country's financial, operational and governance challenges make a major nuclear build risky and unnecessary. The 2018 Goldman Environmental Prize winners and anti-nuclear activists, Makoma Lekalakala and Liziwe McDaid, said in a statement that 'Earthlife Africa is considering the minister's decision and our next steps. Our concerns include the length of time taken to conduct the environmental impact assessment and to make the appeal decision. 'We are also deeply concerned about the affordability of nuclear power, particularly the high upfront capital costs, the risk of construction delays, and the cost overruns that have been experienced worldwide. 'In addition, there has been no assessment of the socioeconomic impacts of a major beyond-design-basis nuclear incident, nor of the generation of long-lived high-level radioactive waste for which no final disposal solution yet exists.' Peter Becker, a former board member of the National Nuclear Regulator and anti-nuclear activist, told Daily Maverick that above and beyond these concerns, South Africa had bled the requisite nuclear industry expertise to safely operate a nuclear power station. He also questioned the logic and application of timelines as they related to environmental authorisations. 'When an Environmental Assessment (EA) is issued, it has a time limit. This one had a 10-year limit. So the idea of having a 10-year expiry date on environmental authorisation is an acknowledgement that the environment might change. 'The surrounding population might change, the needs and desirability of the projects might change, and that is particularly true when it comes to such a fast-changing environment as the electricity sector where we are seeing disruptive changes. And those disruptive changes are in terms of dramatic learning curves and dropping of prices of alternative sources of energy, such as renewables, battery storage, etc, and also vast changes in demographics. 'So there's a bit of a gap in the legal system in this country in that once an EA is issued, you can appeal it, and that suspends the EA, but when does the expiry start?' Becker explained that depending on how this was interpreted legally, it could either mean Eskom would need to begin construction at the site within less than two years, or the 10-year period started only on Friday after the minister's approval. In the time since the original approval, the underlying expert information that informed that original authorisation may have significantly changed. The July 2023 Review of Environmental Impact Report and Specialist Studies commissioned for Eskom largely confirms as much. That review concluded that the 2017 Environmental Authorisation can still stand without re-assessing impacts, even though much of the underlying data and assumptions are more than 10 years old. This is significant because the review was not a technical re-evaluation. It assumed the original data and impact findings were correct, focusing instead on whether or not they were still relevant. Moreover, the review admits that the original statement that renewables 'could not provide adequate baseload' may 'no longer be correct' due to rapid renewable energy development since the Environmental Impact Assessment was finalised. This is important because it validates a key argument used by those opposed to new nuclear capacity: that the energy context has changed and might affect the rationale for new nuclear energy. DM

IOL News
15 hours ago
- IOL News
Young scientists shine at Eskom West Coast Expo
Marcelle Adams from Eskom with top achievers Zewah Engelbrecht; Ovayo Somhlahlo; Dawid Bierman; Duran Farmer; Tiaan Lamminga; and Kyle Cookson of Eskom. Image: Eskom PARTICIPANTS in this year's Eskom Expo for Young Scientists West Coast regional science fair impressed the judges with their creativity, critical thinking, and innovative solutions to real-world challenges facing South Africa. The event held at the White City Multipurpose Centre, Saldanha on Thursday featured 85 projects showcased by 129 young scientists in Grades 4–12 and Technical and Vocational Education and Training (TVET) NC(V) Level 2 to NC(V) Level 4 students. These learners progressed in their Expo journeys after taking part in various activities throughout the year, including workshops and District Expos. The most popular category at this year's fair was Social Sciences, with 23 entries, followed by strong participation in Energy (17), Engineering (15) and Chemistry and Biochemistry (eight). Umoya Energy director Johanna Stoffels with Zewah Engelbrecht and Ovayo Somhlahlo. Image: Eskom Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ Eskom Expo's West Coast Provincial Coordinator, Ursula Boys, extended her heartfelt gratitude to sponsors, partners, educators, volunteers, judges, and learners for their contributions in making this year's event a success, and inspiring the next generation of innovators. 'To the teachers, parents, volunteers and judges, your dedication, expertise, and enthusiasm have been instrumental in guiding and supporting our learners throughout their scientific journeys. To the learners themselves, I offer my warmest congratulations on their outstanding achievements and innovative projects. Your passion for science and your commitment to excellence have been truly inspiring, and we are proud to have you as part of our science fair community. 'I would like to extend an invitation to more schools and learners to get involved in the Eskom Expo West Coast,' said Boys. Judges at the Eskom Expo for Young Scientists West Coast regional science fair. Image: Eskom During the awards ceremony, learners were recognised for excellence in research and innovation. A total of 13 Gold medals, 25 Silver medals, and 47 Bronze medals were awarded. The outstanding young scientists were honoured with prestigious Special Awards from Eskom. Winners who received Bluetooth wireless speakers with wireless chargers sponsored by Eskom include Zewah Engelbrecht and Ovayo Somhlahlo from Jurie Hayes Primary School, Duran Farmer from Vredendal High School, Dawid Bierman from Swartland High School, Tiaan Lamminga from Curro Langebaan. Acting Chief Executive Officer of the Eskom Development Foundation Mologadi Motshele said: 'As the only initiative of its kind operating at scale across all provinces, the Eskom Expo for Young Scientists plays a critical role in developing the country's Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics, and Innovation (STEMI) skills. This initiative equips young learners with the tools, knowledge, and opportunities they need to pursue careers that will ultimately contribute to solving the country's most pressing developmental challenges.' Other prizes were awarded for exceptional efforts and creativity in various categories. Kropz awarded Bluetooth speakers and water bottles to top performing participants. Umoya Energy also awarded a number of special awards. Eskom Expo Executive Director, Parthy Chetty, said the Regional Science Fair is an exciting opportunity and a unique platform for young scientists to showcase their creativity, innovation, and passion for solving real-world problems while still at school. 'It's more than just a science competition; it's the only national platform to innovate, explore, and develop ideas that can shape a better future for our struggling communities and our country. Whether it's in agricultural sciences, technology and innovation, the environment, or everyday challenges, their solutions can make a real difference. By participating, learners take the first step toward becoming problem-solvers and future leaders in Science and Innovation. The Expo encourages learners to collaborate with like-minded young scientists to build a brighter tomorrow. Their ideas matter, their efforts count, and their curiosity could be the key to the next big breakthrough,' he said. For more information, visit: Cape Times

IOL News
19 hours ago
- IOL News
NECSA backs Eskom's Duynefontein nuclear power station for energy security
Eskom has received environmental authorisation to proceed with the construction of the 4 000 megawatt (MW) power station in Duynefontein, near the Koeberg Nuclear Power Station in the Western Cape. Image: Mike Hutchings/Reuters Banele Ginidza The South African Nuclear Energy Corporation (Necsa) has voiced robust support for Eskom's plans to initiate the construction of a new nuclear power station in Duynefontein, situated adjacent to the Koeberg facility. This initiative signifies a critical move towards enhancing South Africa's energy security and is set to adhere to the highest standards of safety, environmental protection, and regulatory compliance, as previously demonstrated by Eskom at the Koeberg nuclear power plant. Necsa is keen on expanding its role in nuclear fuel manufacturing and, in April, signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with the China National Nuclear Corporation (CNNC). In this context, the organisation on Monday welcomed the Minister of Forestry, Fisheries and the Environment (DFFE), Dion George's announcement that Eskom has received environmental authorisation to proceed with the construction of the 4 000 megawatt (MW) power station in Duynefontein, following a successful appeal against an earlier decision issued in 2017. This announcement unlocks the pathway for Eskom to secure several essential statutory authorisations. These include a Nuclear Installation Licence from the National Nuclear Regulator (NNR), approval from the National Energy Regulator of South Africa (Nersa), and a water use licence from the Department of Water and Sanitation, alongside various other approvals from the Minister of Mineral and Petroleum Resources. "This approval marks an important milestone for the nuclear industry and South Africa's journey towards implementing a balanced energy mix that enables socio-economic development and is climate friendly," said Necsa CEO, Loyiso Tyabashe. "The Minister's decision shows rigour of the process that was followed to choose an appropriate site for nuclear new build and reflects confidence in nuclear technology as a safe, clean, and reliable energy solution." Tyabashe said nuclear power remained a crucial component of South Africa's baseload energy mix, and part of the government's strategy to reduce greenhouse emission. "Necsa supports initiatives that reinforce the use of nuclear technology and its applications for power and beyond power for peaceful means and development," Tyabashe said. "Necsa continues to work with the Department of Electricity and Energy as well as Eskom as a partner and commits to contribute its technical expertise to maximise the benefits of nuclear energy." In addition to expanding its role in nuclear fuel manufacturing and intergrating small modular reactors (SMRs) into South Africa's energy plans, Necsa is also pursuing a R60 billion nuclear build programme. Environmentalists and civil society advocates are objecting to the decision to uphold Eskom's 2017 environmental authorisation, particularly due to reliance on outdated Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) studies, which raised alarms about the risks posed by high seismic activity and dense human populations in the area. In reaction to this announcement, Koeberg Action Alliance (KAA) spokesperson Peter Becker described the decision as a surprise, adding that civil society will be meeting to discuss the options. Becker said as the EIA process was started in 2007, and so much has changed since then, including population density, and the cost of alternatives, thus it was not rational to ignore these changes in the environment of the proposed plant and to base such a crucial decision on thoroughly outdated studies. "It is of note that the EIA consultants found that Duynefontein (Koeberg) was not the best site for a new plant, due to seismic risks and population density in the area," Becker said. "It appears the DFFE has been pressured to override the consultants' view due to economic factors. It is of course far cheaper to build a new plant where there is already existing infrastructure." BUSINESS REPORT