
Buy now, pay later plans will soon impact your credit score—what you need to know
FICO, the company that calculates most of Americans' credit scores, announced Monday it would be releasing a credit score model this fall that considers BNPL loans, The Wall Street Journal first reported.
Banks and lenders will be able to see one score that considers users' BNPL loans and one that does not, and decide which to use as they consider borrowers' creditworthiness, WSJ reports. The three credit reporting bureaus — Equifax, Experian and TransUnion — can then decide which score borrowers see and what's included in their credit reports.
"This is an area where I welcome greater controls when it comes to borrowing," says Douglas Boneparth, a certified financial planner and founder of Bone Fide Wealth. Boneparth recently called BNPL plans a "scam" in a LinkedIn post.
"If someone who's demonstrated bad borrowing behavior in the past is trying to continue that behavior through buy now, pay later programs, but now is unable to do that because [of] credit reporting, then I welcome those types of controls," he added.
Currently, BNPL plans don't directly impact users' credit scores. There's no hard inquiry for users to get approved for the installment loans and if they don't make their payments on time, they typically incur late fees or interest fees. However, they could eventually have their debt sold to a debt collector, at which point the loans could affect their credit scores.
Around 40% of BNPL users say no impact to their credit score is one of the top benefits of the plans, according to a recent survey of over 1,000 Americans by affiliate marketing agency PartnerCentric. The same survey found that 45% of users wouldn't change their BNPL use if the plans started affecting their credit score.
On the surface, BNPL plans could be useful tools for consumers who may have limited or poor credit histories but need to finance major purchases. In 2022, nearly two-thirds of BNPL loans went to users with low credit scores, a Consumer Finance Protection Bureau analysis found.
But data shows some concerning behavior among BNPL users, including taking out multiple loans at once and carrying higher balances, on average, than non-BNPL users, CFPB found. Around 63% of BNPL users took out multiple loans at the same time in the last year and 33% of users borrowed from multiple lenders.
Further, partnerships like delivery app Doordash's partnership with Klarna have critics like Boneparth sounding alarm bells because they seem to encourage users to finance smaller purchases that generally shouldn't require a loan.
"I think there's a world where buy now, pay later could be a useful tool to help young or early borrowers build good credit, but given the current framework and behaviors, it just doesn't seem that way," Boneparth says.
BNPL users routinely spend more than non-users, a recent study showed. Plus, 41% of BNPL users were late on a payment in the last year, a recent LendingTree study found.
More traditional methods of building credit, such as using a secured credit card or opening a regular credit card with a relatively small limit, have guardrails in place to help prevent consumers from overextending themselves financially, Boneparth says. But BNPL plans typically don't have those kinds of limits or credit checks, which can allow users to overspend or take on numerous loans at once.
Of course, plenty of people get themselves into trouble using traditional financing like credit cards. Ultimately, it's up to individuals to learn how to use financing options wisely.
"Using credit requires discipline," Boneparth says. "Whether it's credit card lenders or buy now pay later programs, it is not a great consequence when you cannot make good on [your loans]."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
McDonald's is cutting prices of its combo meals to convince customers it's affordable again
McDonald's is slashing the prices of its combo meals just a few weeks after the CEO publicly admitted that its menu has gotten too expensive and pledged to fix the problem. McDonald's and its US franchisees agreed to price eight popular combo meals at 15% less than the total cost of buying the items separately, with the chain offering financial support to franchisees if they agree to lower prices, according to a source familiar with the company's plans. The lower prices will go into effect next month. The Wall Street Journal first reported the news. McDonald's declined to comment. McDonald's will also expand its combo offerings with a $5 breakfast deal and an $8 Big Mac and McNugget special in the coming months with the reintroduction of the 'Extra Value Meals' branding. McDonald's CEO Chris Kempczinski said in its August 6 earnings call that 'consumers' value perceptions are most influenced by our core menu pricing,' a nod to the perception from many customers that the chain has become unaffordable over the past several years. The inflation crisis that followed the pandemic altered many customers' views of McDonald's — from a cheap place to get a quick meal to a pricey fast food restaurant that barely undercut a higher-quality sit-down restaurant alternatives like Applebee's or Chili's, with the latter thriving over the past few years. Value-minded consumers are 'too often' seeing combination meals that cost more than $10 and that is 'shaping value perceptions in a negative way,' Kempczinski admitted earlier this month. 'The single biggest driver of what shapes a consumer's overall perception of McDonald's value is the menu board,' Kempczinski told analysts on McDonald's earnings call. 'And it's when they drive up to the restaurant and they see the menu board, that's what's shaping the that's the number one driver.' 'We've got to get that fixed,' he added. In 2023, an $18 Big Mac combo meal went viral, sparking a debate that the chain has drifted from its affordability roots. The meal was a one-off at a rest stop – but it sparked furor online, and it later prompted a rare open letter from the president of McDonald's USA saying the pricey meal was an 'exception,' and the chain's prices haven't outpaced inflation. McDonald's has since focused its efforts on expanding its value menu and improving other parts of its menu, including its revamped chicken strips and new drinks. McDonald's $5 value meal debuted last year and stabilized sales, at least temporarily, after the company bet correctly that customers were in search of combinations that stretched their dollars. Themed meals, like a recent collaboration with 'A Minecraft Movie,' have also proven to be a winner for the chain, recently putting an end to two consecutive quarters of sinking sales. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Should step siblings get some of your inheritance? Dave Ramsey gave him some blunt advice
Moneywise and Yahoo Finance LLC may earn commission or revenue through links in the content below. Dividing an inheritance is rarely straightforward, but in blended families, the stakes and emotions can be particularly high. On a recent episode of The Ramsey Show, Jared from Phoenix, Arizona called in to discuss whether he should give some of the $3 million inheritance he received from his late father to his stepsister, since she wasn't happy about being left out of the will. He has already built a nest egg of roughly $750,000 for himself, so he felt guilty for denying her money that could potentially help her later in life. Don't miss Thanks to Jeff Bezos, you can now become a landlord for as little as $100 — and no, you don't have to deal with tenants or fix freezers. Here's how I'm 49 years old and have nothing saved for retirement — what should I do? Don't panic. Here are 6 of the easiest ways you can catch up (and fast) Want an extra $1,300,000 when you retire? Dave Ramsey says this 7-step plan 'works every single time' to kill debt, get rich in America — and that 'anyone' can do it 'She got upset because of the numbers involved,' recounting his stepsister saying: ''I don't understand why we can't all just share?'' Ramsey had a blunt response: 'Because we're not communists.' The situation highlights how difficult it can be to manage the expectations of your loved ones even if you have a simple estate plan in place. Simple plan, complicated emotions Jared described his father's estate plan as relatively simple on paper: both he and his brother received $3 million to $4 million each. However, the fact that his step-siblings have been left out of the will has ignited strong emotions and family drama. This isn't unusual — but at least the direction was clear. Tensions can be amplified if there's no plan at all. According to a 2023 survey by LegalShield, nearly 60% of Americans don't have an estate plan and 58% of people have experienced family disputes due to a lack of a plan. Families can have disputes even when there is an end-of-life plan in place. Of those that had wills, 36% of respondents said their will had surprises for their beneficiaries. Assuming some of these are unpleasant surprises, the potential for family drama is high. Seeking out the help of a professional wills and estates lawyer to proactively prepare a robust estate plan can mitigate some of these issues – though a study by found that 13% of Americans believe that it's too expensive to make a will, while 12% find the process to be cumbersome. But securing your family's future doesn't need to cost an arm and a leg. With Ethos Will & Trust, you can create a will for as little as $149. In as little as 20 minutes, you can create a custom will online. For eligible policies, you can make edits to your will in the future with no additional costs. Plus, you can get a will for free from Ethos Will & Trust with your purchase of a life insurance policy. You can get term life insurance in 5 minutes, with no medical exams or blood tests. You can get a policy with up to $2 million in coverage, starting at just $2/day. Ethos' application process ensures you get flexible coverage options quickly and transparently, allowing you to focus on what matters most. Read more: Do you own rental properties in the US? Avoiding family drama To avoid creating tension within the family over your estate, it makes sense to not only have a plan, but also to talk about it with all your loved ones. By taking the time to inform your family about your plan and all the reasons and motivations behind your decisions, you can eliminate any room for ambiguity. Conflicts can be further reduced if you discuss your will not just with your beneficiaries but also with any other family members who may have been excluded. If you're unsure of the best approach for you, it might be worth speaking with a financial advisor who can help craft a strategy that fits your goals — and gives you peace of mind. can help you find someone that's right for you. This online platform connects you with vetted financial advisors in minutes. How it works is easy: Just answer a few quick questions about yourself and your finances, and the platform will match you with a financial advisor best suited to helping you make your money last in retirement. From here, you can view their profile, read past client reviews and schedule an initial consultation for free with no obligation to hire. Also, having your will vetted by an experienced lawyer can help you ensure your wishes are upheld, even if disputes arise. Wills created through Ethos Will & Trust are vetted by attorneys with decades of experience under their belt. This may make it easier for your beneficiaries in the event your will is contested in probate court. Unfortunately, 35% of Americans don't plan on discussing their inheritance plans with their family, according to a 2024 survey by Edward Jones in partnership with NEXT360 Partners and Morning Consult. Jared's father presumably did not explain to his stepchildren why he was leaving them out of the will. Without this conversation, the family must now follow what's outlined on paper, according to Ramsey. 'Dad already clearly said what he wanted to have happen,' he told Jared. Cohost John Delony agreed: 'Yes, behavior's a language and he was loud and clear.' With this in mind, both hosts encouraged Jared to turn down his stepsister's request. What to read next Robert Kiyosaki warns of a 'Greater Depression' coming to the US — with millions of Americans going poor. But he says these 2 'easy-money' assets will bring in 'great wealth'. How to get in now The biggest myth in real estate investing? That you need big money. Here are 5 ways to grow your wealth — starting with just $10 This tiny hot Costco item has skyrocketed 74% in price in under 2 years — but now the retail giant is restricting purchase. Here's how to buy the coveted asset in bulk Dave Ramsey warns nearly 50% of Americans are making 1 big Social Security mistake — here's what it is and 3 simple steps to fix it ASAP Stay in the know. Join 200,000+ readers and get the best of Moneywise sent straight to your inbox every week for free. This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind.


The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
FTC sues LA Fitness for making it too hard to cancel gym memberships
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) filed a lawsuit against the operators of LA Fitness on Wednesday, alleging the popular gym chain makes the process of canceling memberships too difficult for consumers. 'The FTC's complaint describes a scenario that too many Americans have experienced – a gym membership that seems impossible to cancel,' Bureau of Consumer Protection Director Christopher Mufarrige said in a statement, noting 'tens of thousands of LA Fitness customers reported difficulties.' 'The FTC will not hesitate to act on behalf of consumers when it believes companies are stifling consumers' ability to choose which recurring charges they want to keep,' he continued. LA Fitness did not immediately respond to request for comment. The complaint was filed in federal court in the Central District of California against Fitness International, LLC and Fitness & Sports Clubs, LLC. The companies operate gyms including LA Fitness, Esporta Fitness, City Sports Club and Club Studio, covering more than 600 locations and over 3.7 million members. The gym memberships cost anywhere from $30 to $299 per month and often involve annual fees. To cancel, LA Fitness requires consumers to go to the gym in person or send a cancelation notice by mail. But the FTC says it's not that simple. In the complaint, the FTC outlines the 'opaque and complicated methods' that LA Fitness allegedly uses to 'to make it extremely difficult for consumers to cancel their memberships.' First, consumers must print out cancelation forms by logging into its website. If consumers forget their log-in credentials, LA Fitness requires them to provide a 'key tag' number assigned to them at sign-up and to provide the first five digits of their credit card or bank account number to reset the account. They do not tell consumers, according to the FTC, that members have the option of submitting a written cancelation notice, nor did they specify what that request should include. The gyms also told consumers that the mail-in cancelations should be sent by certified or registered mail, according to the FTC. When consumers tried to cancel in person, the FTC said, they similarly faced obstacles. Members could only cancel with one specific employee — even though several were authorized to oversee cancelations — and only during designated hours when most people were working—even though most locations were open for 19 hours a day, according to the FTC. The FTC further alleges that LA Fitness has 'trained staff to reject escalated requests and to deny cancellations requested by phone or email, reiterating that all cancellations must be done in person with one specific employee or by mail.' 'Consumers who try to cancel their memberships by stopping charges to their bank or credit card find they are rebilled, often under new account numbers,' the FTC said. The FTC says these practices violate the FTC Act and the Restore Online Shoppers' Confidence Act (ROSCA) and it is seeking money back for consumers allegedly harmed by the practices.