She was missing, found, bipolar, schizophrenic, and ended up stabbed and shot in Indianapolis
In a cramped Evansville home, Shawnnetta Small's early years unfolded in a room alongside her siblings, locked away from most of the world.
Shawnnetta Small always had to stay in one room with her brother and sister, and was afraid of ever coming out, lest she be beaten brutally by their father, according to her family. In 1986, when Small was 5, her aunt visited and witnessed the situation her sister and the children were enduring.
"Even when he went to work, those kids never wanted to come out of the room," Judy Perkins told IndyStar.
Perkins helped her sister escape the abuse, and the family moved to a new home. But the effects of the abuse were already taking hold of her young niece.
Small was diagnosed in her 20s with bipolar disorder and schizotypal personality disorder. Childhood trauma, abuse, and neglect are significant risk factors for developing a personality disorder, while being bipolar isn't a direct effect of child abuse, but can influence the disorder's severity over time, experts say.
Small's life has been chronicled through public missing persons reports, arrests, and psychiatric hospital visits all over the country. It would end with her being stabbed and shot inside an Indianapolis house on July 12, 2025. Her family believes Small was likely unmedicated and had an episode before being killed.
She was 44.
Eventually, Perkins would move to Ohio, leaving her sister and her kids in Indiana, but a few years after that, in the early 90s, she learned the kids were placed in foster care. Their mother was accused of being neglectful, and the family became strained in communication.
Perkins hasn't seen her sister in over 30 years, which would become a trend for the family. Small would often go missing with strangers trying to get her help and bring her to some kind of home.
Four years ago, Small reached out to Perkins asking if she could live with her in Ohio. The next few months would be a roller coaster with Perkins noticing Small "acted real weird." She would "talk in riddles."
She didn't clean up after herself and often slept in a bed with trash and food.
"She'd just throw a coat over it and go to sleep," Perkins said.
Knowing she needed help, Perkins took her to see a doctor who gave her an official diagnosis. But Small would skip taking medications.
Small would often leave Perkins' home for weeks on end. One day, she left, and Perkins didn't think anything of it until she got a strange package in the mail, prompting her to put out a missing persons report.
It was Small's ID, her social security card, and other personal items.
"After I put out the report, this woman called me from Orlando, Florida, saying Shawnnetta was mentally challenged," Perkins said. "The lady was feeding her and begging her to come stay with her, but Shawnnetta said no."
In 2018, Perkins said a search and rescue team spotted Small in Missouri, where she had been sleeping in a restroom. Concerned calls to local police came in about her walking along the highway. Missouri State Highway Patrol and others offered her food, water, money and rides that she declined. She was eventually taken to a St. Louis hospital before being discharged.
"She called me speaking in riddles again, so I knew she wasn't on medication," Perkins said.
Eventually, Small got a bus ticket to Cleveland and stayed with Perkins, but would leave again after a few months.
Small was banking on coming into money from a lawsuit she'd filed in 2022 while in Missouri that tapped 28 defendants, including Megabus, Walmart, and T-Mobile Metro PCS, Perkins said.
"She told me she was moving to Indianapolis, and that was the last I saw her," Perkins said.
But that lawsuit was the ramblings of someone struggling with borderline schizophrenia, and a judge dismissed the case.
At 8:04 p.m., on July 11, Indianapolis Metropolitan Police were called about a disturbance with a weapon between roommates at a home in the 1500 block of North Downey Avenue on the city's east side. The caller was Small and said her roommate had assaulted her and was possibly armed. She told police he and his girlfriend were "talking sh*t" about paying rent. She lived in a bedroom house with multiple rooms rented out.
Officers began searching the house room by room. They went to a downstairs basement room, forced open a door, and found Small with at least one stab wound. She was pronounced dead at the scene. Items collected nearby were a spent shell casing, pepper spray and a box cutter. She had trauma to her neck and a gunshot wound to the chest.
One neighbor told police the roommate knocked on her door and told them that Small smeared feces and spit on him. According to court documents, he explained that Small was defecating in a bathroom with the door open. He asked her to close the door, and tried to close the door for her when Small smeared feces on him and called him derogatory names, court records state.
Later, the neighbor, Small, and the roommate were upstairs when he asked Small if they were good.
"No, we ain't good. Do you want to fight?" Small told him, according to the neighbor.
That's when Small threatened the man with a gun, according to court documents.
The roommate was later arrested on preliminary charges of murder. IndyStar is not naming the roommate because formal charges are pending.
Perkins said the local sheriff's office informed her about Small's killing. That's when Perkins learned she was listed as a next of kin, although she hadn't seen Small in years.
"They were asking me all types of questions that I could not answer," Perkins said. "She had her mental issues, but she did not deserve this."

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Indianapolis Star
a day ago
- Indianapolis Star
FBI confirms it assisted Avon police and ICE with traffic stop arrests on July 22
The Federal Bureau of Investigation confirmed that it provided federal warrants to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents and the Avon Police Department, who were conducting arrests of undocumented migrants on July 22. Fox59 first broke the news on July 23 that ICE and Avon police were working together to conduct a "traffic blitz" in Avon, Indiana, approximately three miles from the Marion County border. The "traffic blitz" resulted in the arrests of approximately 20 people after police conducted traffic stops based on traffic violations, registration violations and aggressive driving, according to Fox59. When Avon officers encountered individuals who were "undocumented and/or unlicensed foreign nationals," officers contacted ICE agents to investigate the person, according to a statement Avon Police Chief Sean Stoops provided to Fox59. It's unclear where the people arrested currently are. They did not appear in the Hendricks County jail roster on July 23 or July 24. In an email to the IndyStar, an FBI spokesperson confirmed that the agency had been assisting ICE with operations for several months, and that it provided federal agents with federal warrants "as needed." The spokesperson added that FBI agents did not physically assist in July 22 arrests. IndyStar reached out to the Avon Police Department for comment but did not receive an answer by the time of publication. Neither the Avon Police Department nor the Hendricks County Sheriff's office have sent in a formal application to participate in ICE's 287(g) program, which allows ICE Enforcement and Removal Operations to partner with state and local law enforcement agencies to identify and remove criminal migrants who agree to leave the U.S. In late May, Stephen Miller, a deputy White House chief of staff and architect of Trump's immigration agenda, set a quota for at least 3,000 arrests per day and told ICE leadership to target anyone without legal status. This call to action has led to a significant spike in migrants detained by ICE, according to data collected by the Deportation Data Project, which is a dataset built by journalists, researchers, lawyers, and policymakers using the Freedom of Information Act. The database showcases that in June 2025 the number of non-criminal arrests had surpassed the number of people being arrested with either a criminal conviction or pending charges. Axios Indianapolis recently reported that in June, "23% of the 309 people ICE arrested in the state had no criminal charge," according to Axios. Indiana Governor Mike Braun told Axios that, "If that data is correct, I'd say that should raise eyebrows." "Because I've been clearly on record: the worst first. And there are many of them out there," he said. In June 2025, IndyStar reported on several ICE detainments that had either been captured on file or shared by community leaders. These detainments were a notable contrast to how federal agents had conducted arrests in prior months. Witnesses told IndyStar that some of those arrests started off as traffic stops before the person found themselves detained by federal agents. In July 2025, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement posted on social media that its Indianapolis team had made more than 30 arrests in a 24-hour period, saying that this number was due to the "cooperative agencies across Indiana, including 287(g) partners."


Bloomberg
4 days ago
- Bloomberg
UK to Freeze Assets of Financiers Involved in People Smuggling
By The UK will freeze the properties and bank accounts of financiers that the government says are facilitating people-smuggling, as it introduces a new sanctions regime to stem the flow of irregular migration. Dozens of individuals and companies, spanning gang leaders, those trading fake passports and firms selling small boat equipment used to cross the channel from France to Britain, will be targeted by sanctions when they are imposed on Wednesday, the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development office said late Monday in a statement. They will be publicly named, making it illegal for the UK financial system to engage with them, the government said.


Indianapolis Star
4 days ago
- Indianapolis Star
Indiana school banned mom for recording principal. Think tank says it's unconstitutional
After Northeast Indiana mom recorded a meeting with her daughter's principal last year and then posted it online, she was banned from school grounds and limited in her communications with school employees. Nicole Graves was disciplined after twice violating a Whitley County district policy not to record meetings without the building administrator's permission, according to a district letter sent to her. The Goldwater Institute, a conservative-leaning Arizona-based think tank, is pushing to rescind the policy, arguing that it violates the right to free expression protected under the First Amendment. It's a policy found in other schools around the state and the country. "We're very hopeful that the school district will simply just change the recording policy," attorney Adam Shelton said. "However, we are still open to litigation depending on how the conversation with the school district continues to go." If the school restricted Graves from talking about the meeting or drafting a transcript, Shelton said, it would undoubtedly violate the First Amendment. He questions why a recording would be any different. "This is just a measure the school's adopted to prevent the most accurate record of conversation from being taken," he said. The school has since lifted its punishments as part of a typical end-of-school-year review, said Laura McDermott, superintendent of Whitley County Consolidated Schools, in a statement. The statement did not mention the recording policy, and McDermott has not responded to additional IndyStar questions. In a prior statement to Fort Wayne TV station WPTA, she said Graves violated the recording policy meant to protect student privacy. "The parent was not restricted from school property for expressing concerns, but rather due to a pattern of aggressive interactions with school staff and public commentary involving children other than her own," the statement to IndyStar reads. "As a school district, we have an obligation to protect the privacy and well-being of all students and to maintain a safe, respectful environment for staff and families." Nicole Graves asked to meet with Indian Springs Middle School principal, Wesley Mullett, after her daughter reported an incident on the school bus. In a video produced by Goldwater, Graves said her daughter's school bus driver was smacking his belt against his hand and had his underwear visible. Graves asked to meet with Mullett to ask about the incident and why she wasn't notified when her daughter reported the driver's behavior. She also previously had issues with other bus drivers in the district, Shelton said. Graves said she lost confidence in the school after hearing Mullett's explanations about the situation and later posted the meeting recording on social media. She decided to record the meeting so she could accurately recount what was said, according to Goldwater. Graves received a letter detailing punishments for violating the district's recording policy. She was asked to take down the audio clip, according to the letter. Goldwater argues Graves' Fourteenth Amendment rights to control her child's education were violated. Shelton said Graves should have been notified about her child's report of the bus driver, and there are concerns about her subsequent punishment limiting access to her daughter's education. In a letter sent to school officials in May, Shelton and Goldwater argue that the school's policy violates her rights to free expression. Though Graves is no longer banned from school grounds, Shelton said the think tank wants to see this policy rolled back. McDermott did not respond to an IndyStar question about the details of the policy and whether it is under review. The First Amendment extends to conduct that is inherently expressive, which courts have decided does include video and audio recordings in some cases. Goldwater's argument lands in a legal gray area. Shelton believes the right to record government officials is protected and argues that freedom should not be limited to a public setting if there are no other privacy concerns at play. "There's no meaningful constitutional difference between speaking about what happened at a meeting and recording what happened at a meeting," Shelton said. Still, there isn't clear case law on this issue. The USA TODAY Network - Indiana's coverage of First Amendment issues is funded through a collaboration between the Freedom Forum and Journalism Funding Partners.