
Starmer to commit to spending 5% of GDP on defence by 2035 at Nato summit
The target, expected to be formally agreed by Nato countries at a summit in The Hague this week, includes spending 3.5% on 'core defence' and another 1.5% on 'resilience and security'.
It represents a significant jump from the current 2% Nato target, and from the UK Government's aim of spending 2.5% of GDP on defence from 2027 and 3% at some point after the next election.
But the figure is in line with the demands of US President Donald Trump, who has called for Nato allies to shoulder more of the burden of European defence.
Ahead of his trip to the Netherlands, Sir Keir Starmer said the increased spending target was 'an opportunity to deepen our commitment to Nato and drive greater investment in the nation's wider security and resilience'.
He said: 'We must navigate this era of radical uncertainty with agility, speed and a clear-eyed sense of the national interest to deliver security for working people and keep them safe.'
The Government expects to spend 1.5% of GDP on resilience and security by 2027. The details of what counts towards that target are due to be set out during this week's summit, but it is likely to include spending on energy and border security as well as intelligence agencies.
But increasing core defence spending to 3.5% will not happen until 2035, with at least two elections likely to take place before then.
Nor would Downing Street say how the increase would be paid for, with a spokesman describing the figure as 'a projected target' that allies would review in 2029 when Nato carries out its next capability assessment.
The Royal United Services Institute has estimated that increasing core defence spending to 3.5% by 2035 would cost £40 billion a year more than keeping the figure at 2.5%.
Conservative shadow defence secretary James Cartlidge said the Tories welcomed the higher Nato target, but said the Government's commitment was 'both unfunded and a decade away, when the threat we face is real and imminent.'
He said: 'The Chancellor failed to set a path to 3% in the spending review, and this is another announcement without a plan.
'Instead of using smoke and mirrors to inflate defence spending, Labour must get to 3% this parliament and back our country's defence with a fully funded plan.'
Sir Keir's announcement came as the Prime Minister prepared to fly to the Netherlands for the two-day Nato summit against the background of both the war in Ukraine and escalating hostilities in the Middle East.
The Prime Minister's official spokesman said Sir Keir would continue to press for a diplomatic solution to the Israel-Iran crisis.
Volodymyr Zelensky, who met Sir Keir Starmer at Downing Street on Monday, is also expected to attend the summit (Jeff Moore/PA)
He will also urge allies to help secure a 'just and lasting peace' in Ukraine by showing strength and providing Kyiv with 'the support it needs to defend itself against continued Russian aggression'.
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky is also expected to attend the summit, but not take part in the main discussions of the North Atlantic Council.
Ahead of the summit, Nato secretary-general Mark Rutte described the move to spend more on defence as a 'quantum leap' that would make the organisation 'a stronger, a fairer and a more lethal alliance'.
But it was reported on Sunday that Spain had reached a deal that would see it exempted from the 5% target.
Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez said that Spain would be able to keep its commitments to the 32-nation military alliance by spending 2.1% of GDP on defence needs.
Tuesday will also see the publication of the UK's national security strategy, which is expected to call for the whole of society to become more resilient and recognise national security 'means more than it used to'.
The document will tie together a series of reviews commissioned by the Government, including the recent strategic defence review, a review of the Aukus alliance with the US and Australia and an audit of relations with China.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Reuters
14 minutes ago
- Reuters
Russian deputy foreign minister sees little chance now of reviving Iran nuclear deal
June 24 (Reuters) - Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov said in an interview published on Tuesday that he saw little chance at the moment of reviving a 2015 deal to limit Iran's nuclear programme. Ryabkov made the comments to the Izvestia news outlet before U.S. President Donald Trump announced an agreement for a ceasefire between Iran and Israel after more than a week of trading air strikes. Ryabkov was speaking after the United States launched its own strikes against Iranian nuclear sites, claiming to have "completely and totally obliterated" Iran's key nuclear enrichment facilities. "I do not see at the moment, conditions for restoring the (Iran deal)," Ryabkov told Izvestia, referring to the 2015 accord, known as the JCPOA. "But this does not mean abandoning diplomacy, quite the opposite. Now is the time to redouble our efforts to achieve to come to some decisions that would help stabilise the situation." Ryabkov said Russia "understood the logic and argumentation of our friends in Tehran, and of course this means an end to the strikes an end to further escalation by the other side. "This is the clear pre-condition for our Iranian colleagues to consider their political-diplomatic options." Russia has denounced Israel's strikes on Iranian targets and Russian President Vladimir Putin said on Monday that "unjustified" U.S. attacks on Iran's nuclear sites were pushing the world towards great danger. Russia's U.N. ambassador described U.S. arguments that Iran was moving towards creating nuclear bombs as a resumption of U.S. "fairy tales" about the Middle East. The Iran nuclear deal was clinched in 2015 with the aim of limiting Iran's nuclear programme in exchange for relief from sanctions imposed on Tehran. U.S. President Donald Trump pulled Washington out of the pact in 2018 during his first term in office. The United States and Iran had been holding talks on the programme, but Iran cancelled the latest meeting after the first Israeli strikes.


Daily Mail
18 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
DAN HODGES: In a moment of crisis, spineless Keir Starmer is cowering. He is happy to keep his hands clean while his allies do the dirty work of keeping Iran in check... what an embarrassment
Yesterday morning armed forces minister Luke Pollard appeared on LBC radio to present the Government's view on the US strikes on Iran. Unfortunately for Pollard, his government didn't have a view. 'Are we opposing the action?' Nick Ferrari asked him not once, but seven times. ' be absolutely clear...' Pollard stammered.


Daily Mail
20 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Does Palestine Action's cash trail lead all the way to Iran? Probe launched into group in the wake of clash between police and protesters on the streets of London
The Home Office has claimed Iran could be funding Palestine Action as the government moves to designate it a terrorist organisation. Officials are understood to be investigating the group's source of donations amid concerns its status as a charity means it is not bound by financial transparency rules. There are fears Iran could be providing money, via proxies, given their objectives of 'dismantling the apartheid regime in Israel ' are aligned. Home Secretary Yvette Cooper is due to update MPs next week on the proposals to make it a criminal offence to belong to or support Palestine Action. The move comes after the group posted footage online showing two people inside the base at RAF Brize Norton in Oxfordshire. One person was recorded riding an electric scooter up to an Airbus Voyager air-to-air refuelling tanker and appearing to spray paint into its jet engine. Yesterday, protesters crashed with police in London in response to the Government's plans. Ms Cooper's secondary legislation to add Palestine Action to the list of proscribed groups will be published next Monday. MPs will then vote on the motion the following Wednesday; if passed, the House of would have the final say the next day, with the proscription order coming into effect on July 4. Palestine Action invites donations directly through its website but does not publish financial information. The Home Office has voiced concerns around where the group is raising the significant sums it requires for its legal costs as it has instructed lawyers to pursue 'all avenues for legal challenge'. Palestine Action states on its website it is a grassroots movement and accepts funding is 'sometimes inconsistent'. Donations are said to go towards supporting members who are arrested and imprisoned. NGO Monitor a research institute that aims to promote transparency, has said the group's lack of public financial information 'reflects a lack of transparency and accountability'. But one of its known public donors is James 'Fergie' Chambers - an American communist and philanthropist who is heir to a multi-billion conflomerate. Mr Chambers stated in 2023 he had paid the legal fees of Palestine Action members. Beyond concerns around transparency, the Home Office is yet to state direct evidence that links Palestine Action with Iran. Ms Cooper has attempted to justify her move in banning the group by pointing to a series of attacks by Palestine Action since its inception in 2022. She also claimed its media output promotes its attacks involving 'serious property damage, as well as celebrating the perpetrators'. Among the groups' staging of demonstrations in recent months are the spraying of London offices of Allianz Insurance with red paint over its alleged links to the Israeli defence company Elbit, and vandalising President Trump's Turnberry golf course in South Ayrshire. Ms Cooper went on to say Palestine Action's activity had increased since last year and claimed its methods had become 'more aggressive'. She said attacks at the Thales defence factory in Glasgow in 2022, as well as Instro Precision in Sandwich, Kent, and in Bristol last year, had caused damage costing millions of pounds. Palestine Action has argued Ms Cooper made 'a series of categorically false claims' and called the reaction 'unhinged'. A spokesman said: 'This is an unhinged reaction to an action spraying paint in protest at the UK government arming Israel's slaughter of the Palestinian people. 'We are teachers, nurses, students and parents who take part in actions disrupting the private companies who are arming Israel's genocide, by spray-painting or entering their factory premises. 'It is plainly preposterous to rank us with terrorist groups like Isis, National Action and Boko Haram.' Baroness Chakrabarti, former head of the human rights group Liberty, also said banning the group 'may be an escalation too far'. But Ms Cooper has said the ban would allow law enforcement to 'effectively disrupt the escalating actions of this serious group'. She added: 'Proscription represents a legitimate response to the threat posed by Palestine Action.' Palestine Action's protest on Monday was supported by 35 other protest groups, including Just Stop Oil. Yesterday, hundreds of protesters waving Palestinian flags and holding placards gathered at Trafalgar Square. A Met spokesman said: 'While the protest initially began in a peaceful manner, officers faced violence when they went into the crowd to speak to three individuals whose behaviour was arousing suspicion. 'This sequence of events repeated itself on multiple occasions, with officers being surrounded on each occasion they tried to deal with an incident.' Diana Neslen, 85, who said she was a 'regular' at marches in support of Palestine, attended the protest on crutches. She added in response to police restrictions: 'Look at this, we should have the right to stand in front of parliament and show our faith until the MPs see why we think what they're doing is wrong. 'Instead we're herded into little tiny spaces so that hardly anyone can see us, and certainly not the politicians.'