Spread the love with Valentine's Day food deals! Get heart-shaped pizza, pasta and more
Valentine's Day is here, and most romantics don't plan to let inflation ruin their holiday.
One in seven (71.8%) expect to spend more this Valentine's Day than they did in 2024, a survey by restaurant tech firm Snappy found. An annual survey by the National Retail Foundation predicts Americans will spend a record-breaking $27.5 billion on the 2025 holiday, with the average shopper spending nearly $189.
Of the 1,084 U.S. adults surveyed by Snappy, a majority (60%) plan to spend $50 to $100 a person on dining out on Valentine's Day this year. The survey found that for many, important factors in choosing where to dine include Valentine's Day specials (45.9%) and price (34.1%). Also important, they said, is ambiance (41.2%) and reservation availability (32.9%).
Speaking of reservations, many said they made them two to four weeks in advance (47.1% did), while another 12.9% made them even over a month ahead of time, the survey found.
But you can still get in on reservations and specials for Valentine's Day. Here are some options — and don't forget to check your local restaurants' social media accounts for more deals.
Valentine's Day candies to avoid due to Red Dye 3 — the newly FDA-banned color additive
: A Sweet Deal for Two (starts at $55, for dine-in and takeout) available from Feb. 10 to 16 includes one starter, two entrées – including heart-shaped pizzas – and a dessert.
: You can get Heart-Shaped Pizzas with your favorite toppings (starting at about $26.99) and add a slice of Sweetheart Cherry Pie Dessert Pizza for $5.99 with any pizza purchase (excluding mini pizzas).
: Get a heart-shaped pizza until Feb. 16 for $11.99.
: When you buy a heart-shaped pizza through Feb. 28, Peter Piper will donate $1 to local Children's Miracle Network Hospitals in 11 cities across Arizona, California, New Mexico and Texas.
: Get heart-shaped pizzas starting at $11.99 nationwide until Feb. 17.
Bellita Pasta: Get Bellita's "Valentino," a festive and gluten-free pasta made from red beets online for $10.95.
: Barilla Love, another heart-shaped pasta, is available for purchase online, or in-person at a select Barilla retailer near you. Barilla's Love will also be served at Nordstrom Restaurant Group locations throughout February.
: Get heart-shaped trays through Feb. 22, while supplies last. Customers interested in purchasing a Heart-Shaped Tray can choose from various sweet and savory menu options, including 30-count nuggets, 10-count Chick-n-Minis, 12 fudge brownie halves, or six chocolate chunk cookies.
: All biscuits are heart-shaped through Feb. 16. Members of the My Rewards loyalty program can get a BOGO biscuit deal through Feb. 16, too.
The bakery chain has a special BOGO deal on Asiago Bagel Stack sandwiches on Feb. 13-14 with code BAEGEL. Select cafes in the New York City area will also free heart-shaped Cinnamon Crunch BAEgels, while supplies last.
: Get a heart-shaped "Crazy for You Cake" made with your favorite ice cream and cake flavors and topped with fudge accents, chocolate drips and Oreo and buttercream rosettes for $21.99, or try Love Potion #31, a limited-edition ice cream flavor made with white chocolate and raspberry ice creams, raspberry-filled chocolate hearts, raspberry swirls and chocolate-flavored chips.
: Limited-time Valentine's Day treats include the Red Velvet Cake Blizzard Treat, made with red velvet cake pieces and cream cheese icing, and the Red Velvet Blizzard Cupid Cake, which has red velvet cake pieces and cream cheese icing in layers of vanilla soft serve, topped with Red Velvet Cake Blizzard Treat.
Dunkin': In honor of the "sweetest day over," Dunkin' is offering customers the chance to purchase "Cupid's Choice Specialty Donut" a strawberry sprinkled doughnut filled with Bavarian Kreme and the "Brownie Batter Specialty Donut," a chocolate sprinkled doughnut filled with brownie batter-flavored butter creme. Other classic doughnuts are also available in heart shapes with pink, red and white sprinkles, as will the seasonal Pink Velvet Macchiato and Frosty Red Velvet doughnuts.
: Limited-time cookie specials available through Feb. 23 include Red Velvet, Red Velvet Cheesecake Filled Classic and Cupid's Cookies 'N Cream – and Heart Cookie Cakes (available through Feb. 16, require a 2-hour lead time).
: Choose from four new heart-shaped doughnuts, which includes the "You Make My Daisy Doughnut," "Blooming Heart Doughnut," "Love You Bunches Doughnut," and the "You Are My Sunshine Doughnut" from Krispy Kreme's "Hearts In Bloom" collection through Valentine's Day. Doughnuts from the Valentine's Day drop can be found at Krispy Kreme, or in select grocery stores.
: The Valentine's Day menu includes individual cheesecakes with chocolate topping and a conversation heart topper, chocolate-covered strawberries, Linzer Heart cookies, plus sugar and frosted sugar cookies.
: The bakery chain's Valentine's Day menu includes Chocolate-Covered Strawberry Heart Cake, Valentine's Double Chocolate Frasier Cake and Valentine's Chocolate-Covered Strawberry Supreme Croissants and more special foods. Members of the PB Rewards loyalty program can also get 2x Points on all Valentine's Day menu item purchases through Feb. 14 and get a BOGO pastry deal on Feb. 17 for Random Acts of Kindness Day.
: The French-Asian bakery chain has a special limited-time 'Fall in Love with Chocolate" collection including items Heart Chocolate Cake, made with chocolate buttercream and decorative chocolate hearts, Chocolate Lovers Cake, Red Velvet Bliss and Valentine's Cloud Cake.
: Choose from two limited-time frozen yogurt flavors — Salted Caramel Cheesecake and Chocolate Strawberry Swirl — and limited-time-only Gummy Diamond Hearts toppings, plus get a collectible Teddy Bear Heart promotional spoon.
— USA TODAY contributed to this report.
This article originally appeared on Austin American-Statesman: Valentine's Day 2025: Where to get heart-shaped foods in Texas
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
25 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Trump hails limited trade agreement with China after talks in London
Advertisement Less than two weeks after accusing China of violating a trade-war truce, Trump on Wednesday had nothing but praise for the Chinese leader. 'President Xi and I are going to work closely together to open up China to American Trade. This would be a great WIN for both countries!!!' the president wrote in a second Truth Social post. Under the renewed truce, the United States will impose a 55 percent tariff on Chinese goods, and China will hit American products with a 10 percent import tax, the president said. Those are both higher rates than before Trump took office, but lower than the triple-digit tariff levels that each nation imposed this spring. US and Chinese negotiators agreed late Tuesday to try again to implement the trade-war truce that collapsed amid recriminations on both sides just weeks after it was reached during an earlier round of talks in Geneva. Advertisement Speaking near midnight in London, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick announced what he called a 'handshake' deal to put into effect the terms of the May 12 US-China agreement that called for both nations to lower their tariffs and take additional steps to facilitate trade. 'We have reached a framework to implement the Geneva consensus and the call between the two presidents,' Lutnick told reporters, referring to a June 5 telephone conversation between Trump and Xi. 'I think it's really beneficial to the United States of America. It's very beneficial to the Chinese and the China economy.' Negotiators released no text of either the London framework or the earlier Geneva accord to de-escalate the US-China trade war. But Lutnick said both nations would remove new trade barriers they had erected as the truce broke down. That means China is expected to permit an increased flow of critical materials known as 'rare earths' for auto and defense production. As those shipments increase, the United States will lift measures that it imposed recently 'in a balanced way,' Lutnick said. 'We do absolutely expect that the topic of rare-earth minerals and magnets, with respect to the United States of America, will be resolved in this framework implementation,' Lutnick said. He did not specify which US measures would be lifted in response. But his department has implemented a number of restrictions on exports to China of aerospace technology and advanced semiconductor equipment, which Chinese officials urgently want removed. Lutnick described the diplomatic breakthrough as the first step toward expanding US-China trade, which topped $580 billion last year. The United States buys more than three times as much from China as Chinese customers buy from Americans, a trade deficit that the president has inveighed against for years as a measure of industrial decline. Advertisement 'We have an existing, significant trade deficit, and President Trump's fundamental goal is to reduce the trade deficit and increase trade. So this was the first step of the framework by which we will then approach and discuss growing trade . But first we had to sort of get the negativity out," Lutnick said. Briefing reporters outside Lancaster House, the 19th-century mansion in London's West End that hosted two days of talks, Lutnick credited the involvement of both presidents with producing quick results. 'You have to get things done if you're working for President Trump. I'm sure they felt they had to get it done because they were working for President Xi,' he said. The US delegation also included Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer. Bessent left the talks a few hours early to return to Washington in time to appear before Congress on Wednesday. The Chinese team was led by Vice Premier He Lifeng, a close associate of Xi. In China, Li Chenggang, China's vice commerce minister, said the talks were 'professional, rational, in-depth and candid,' according to Chinese state media, and Beijing hopes the discussions will 'be conducive to increasing trust between China and the United States.' Yao Yang, an economist at Peking University, said the fact that Beijing and Washington engaged in negotiations amid bitter trade tensions is positive. 'The Chinese government's stance has always been, if you want to fight, we are going to take it. But the purpose of fighting is not just for the sake of fighting, it is to prepare for negotiation or to bring the other side to the negotiation table,' he said. Advertisement Yet even as the latest attempt to put US-China relations on a sound footing moved forward, Greer nodded to the long list of issues that divide the two sides. The Trump administration has complained about Chinese policies that fuel what it sees as excess production of manufactured goods, which depress global prices and hurt American factory workers. 'There are some things that the Chinese and US economies, they just don't fit together very well. Other things, maybe they do. And there'll be a time for broader conversations on that,' he said. The 90-day pause on triple-digit tariffs that amounted to a de facto US-China trade embargo expires Aug. 12. In response to a question about prospects for an extension, Greer said that would be up to the president. Further talks are expected, though no date has been agreed to yet. The Trump administration notched a legal win Tuesday when a federal appeals court ruled that many of the tariffs the president imposed on China can remain while the government appeals a lower-court ruling that found they were illegal. The Court of International Trade, a little-known specialized court in New York, ruled last month that Trump exceeded his authority by invoking emergency powers to impose tariffs on imports from China and other nations. The Trump administration quickly appealed and the appeals court temporarily paused the lower court's decision. On Tuesday, it said that pause could stay in place while the appeal was decided. Advertisement 'The court also concludes that these cases present issues of exceptional importance warranting expedited en banc consideration of the merits in the first instance,' the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit said Tuesday. The appeals court said it would expedite the issue and hear arguments July 31.
Yahoo
40 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Why Trump Is Losing His Trade War
The Atlantic Daily, a newsletter that guides you through the biggest stories of the day, helps you discover new ideas, and recommends the best in culture. Sign up for it here. Donald Trump's trade war is fast turning into a fiasco. When the president started the war, Team Trump advertised it as certain to be fast, easy, and cheap. Trump would impose tariffs. The world would yield to his will. The tariffs would do everything at once. They would protect U.S. industry from foreign competition without raising prices, and generate vast revenues that would finance other tax cuts. Americans could eat their cake, continue to have the cake, and trade the same cake for pie—all at the same time. 'There's not going to be any pain for American workers,' Trump's press secretary, Karoline Leavitt, vowed in April. The advertising rapidly proved false. The U.S. economy is slowing because of the Trump tariffs; China's is thriving in spite of them. Team Trump falsely promotes vague five-page outlines with alienated former allies as big deals; China is successfully wooing some of its former rivals, such as Vietnam. America's standing in the world is measurably sinking; China's is measurably rising. Courts are ruling that Trump's tariffs are illegal; public opinion mistrusts the tariffs, regarding them as expensive and unproductive. The promise of huge flows of painless money from tariff revenues is evanescing as the fantasy it always was. Oh, and the country's largest chain of Halloween retailers canceled its traditional summer grand opening because of Trump-caused supply disruptions. What comes next, as things go wrong? Trump's first instinct is to blame the targets of his economic aggression for not cooperating with his wishes. On May 30, Trump accused China of violating an imaginary agreement with him. On June 4, he complained that Xi Jinping was 'extremely hard to make a deal with.' But Trump seldom chooses to quarrel with foreign dictators, saying in the same breath, 'I like President Xi of China, always have, and always will.' Today, in all-caps emphasis, Trump announced that a deal had been done, declaring that his 'RELATIONSHIP IS EXCELLENT' with the Chinese president-for-life. The lack of details in the announcement strongly suggests that Trump yielded more and gained less than his publicity apparatus wants Americans to believe. That's because, in reality, Trump's global trade war has always been subordinate to his domestic culture war. Trump much prefers to vent his rage against enemies within. Get ready for him to blame the failure of his trade war on fellow Americans who did not support him enough. The Trump tariffs will be ballyhooed as an act of patriotism, a necessary sacrifice to be laid on the altar of the nation. One of Trump's television talkers reminded viewers that Americans melted down their pots and pans to win the Second World War. If the president needs to ration dolls and colored pencils, how dare any true American raise a contrary voice? The coming call for national solidarity with Trump's Great Patriotic War against imported Halloween costumes deserves all the scoffing it will get and more. Trump ordered the nation into economic warfare. He did not do any of the things necessary to create any hope of success in that war. The impending defeat is his personal doing, entirely his own fault. [Jonathan Chait: The good news about Trump's tariffs] Recall the classic Norm Macdonald bit in which the comedian marvels that in the 20th century, Germany decided to go to war with 'the world,' twice. That was meant as a joke. Trump adopted it as his actual strategy. Trump's rationalizers invoke anxiety about China as his justification. Yes, China numbered among the targets of Trump's 'Liberation Day' tariffs. But so did Australia. So did Brazil. So did Canada. So did Denmark. So did Egypt. And on and on, through the whole alphabet of American allies and trading partners. The United States is by far the planet's strongest national economy, producing slightly more than one-quarter of the planet's goods and services. Including its historic and recent partners, the United States could potentially lead a group of nations sufficiently influential to write economic rules that everybody would need to take into account. That fact underpinned the Trans-Pacific Partnership concept of the Obama years: Form a large-enough and attractive-enough club, and China will have no choice but to comply with the founding members' terms. Trump's alternative concept is for a quarter of the world economy to cut itself off from the other three-quarters, and then wait for the three-quarters to beg for mercy from the one-quarter. Unsurprisingly, that concept is fast proving a stinker. But suppose the president sincerely believed that the U.S. had no choice: The one-quarter must fight the three-quarters as a matter of national survival, or 'liberation,' from the tyranny of foreign goods and services, foreign fruits and vegetables. Crazy, but suppose he did. What would follow? A rational president would grasp that a U.S. economic war against the rest of the world would be a big, protracted, and painful undertaking. Such an enormous commitment would require democratic consent from a large majority of the public, all the more so because the United States is starting the war itself. Trump's trade conflict is very much a war of choice. The president must explain why he chose it. A rational president determined to fight an economic war would try to mobilize broad support from the public and from Congress. He would seek allies in Congress, and not only from his own party. He might, for example, compromise on some of his other goals. If he also wanted to tighten immigration at the same time as waging a global trade war, or to roll back DEI programs, or to cut taxes for the wealthy, or to relax anti-corruption measures, or to pardon the crimes of his violent supporters, or to plan any other ambitious but divisive project, he might think twice about pursuing them. You can't ask your opponents to pay more and do without if you won't forgo even a scrap of your partisan agenda. You can ask anyway, but don't be shocked when they answer with a Bronx cheer. That president would also lead from the front. A president seeking to inspire Americans to endure hardship for the greater good would certainly not throw himself a multimillion-dollar birthday parade at public expense. He would not accept lavish gifts from foreign governments, would not operate a pay-for-access business that collected billions of dollars for himself and his family from undisclosed favor-seekers. While asking other Americans to accept less, he would not brazenly help himself to more. He certainly would not troll, insult, and demean those who may not have voted for him, but whose cooperation he needs now. This president has, of course, done the most egregious version of every item above. His economic war is adjunct to his partisan culture war. He did not seek broad support. He gleefully offends and alienates everyone outside his base. Which works for him as long as times are prosperous, as they were in the first three years of his first administration. Allow things to get tough, though, and it's a different story. Trump cannot ask for patience and trust, because at least half the country has unalterably judged him as untrustworthy and out only for himself. [David Frum: The ultimate bait and switch of Trump's tariffs] Trump bet his presidency on the theory that trade wars are 'good and easy to win,' as he posted during his first term. His second-term trade war, however, is proving not so easy, and not so good, either. He is fighting it alone, without global allies or domestic consent, because that's his nature. It's now also his problem. In the 1983 movie WarGames, a computer thinks its way through dozens of terrifying nuclear scenarios and concludes: 'The only winning move is not to play.' In other words, the only safe way to conduct a nuclear exchange is never to have one. The same could be said of trade wars, at least when fought by one nation, however big and rich, against all the others, all at once. Trump decided he did not care about Americans' support for his economic war. He did not ask for their backing. He did not make any effort to win it. He willfully alienated at least half of the public. Now that he's losing, his supporters want to scold the country because it rejects the whole misbegotten project as stupid and doomed. Don't listen to their reproaches. This is Trump's war, and his alone. The only way to win now is to end Trump's trade war as rapidly as possible. And then end the excessive, unilateral trade powers of a corrupt president who blundered into a pointless and doomed conflict without justification, plan, or consent. Article originally published at The Atlantic
New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
Trump voters get smacked by inflation in shopping aisles — and some blame tariffs
Shoppers vote with their wallets – and even those who supported President Trump are having a tough time swallowing prices that are surging because of his trade war, The Post has learned. Omar — a Los Angeles-based long-haul truck driver who spoke to The Post on the condition his last name not be given — said he convinced his wife, grown children and father-in-law to vote for Trump last fall. His pitch: Trump was 'a businessman and everything was going to better because he was going to be good for the economy,' he told The Post in an interview. Since then, however, parts and services for his rig have gone through the roof. An oil change now costs $480 compared with the $360 he paid a year ago. He recently forked out $600 each for Firestone tires. Last year, they were $390 each. 'He's doing things that are making the economy worse,' Omar said. 'Tariffs are hurting everyone.' 8 Retailers have signaled that they will raise prices while some have already done so on some items. Reddit/Plus_Astronaut_420 On Wednesday, the US Bureau of Labor Statistics said inflation in May rose 2.4%. That was in line with the expectations of economists, who said the effects of Trump's tariffs still haven't had a broad and significant impact on prices. Some shoppers aren't buying it, as many of the the 40% of Americans who are living paycheck to paycheck see their purchasing power as vanishing. Retailers including Walmart, Dollar General, Target, Costco and Best Buy have warned they will be raising prices due to tariffs – and some have been caught doing it already. At Walmart, a 'Jurassic World' T. Rex figure had spiked by nearly 38% to $55 on May 21 from just a month ago. A heating pad costs 25% more $24.96 this year, according to employees who posted photos of the price hikes on social media. A fishing reel at Walmart jumped to $83.26 from $57.37. 8 A fishing reel at Walmart jumped in price this year, according to Walmart employees. Reddit/Majestickenny12 Joe — a regular Walmart shopper who also asked that his last name not be used — told The Post last week he was eyeing new air conditioners at the store in Cortlandt Manor, NY. Last year, he said, a small unit that cools off a 300-square-foot room cost $115 — up from $100 a year earlier. Now, that same unit costs $139. A resident of nearby Peekskill, NY, he adds that he's cooking at home more and cutting back on visits to McDonald's, Panera Bread and his favorite local diner — where a steak now costs $30 versus $22 last year — to about three times a month versus eight times a month last year. 'I don't like the fact that I'm paying more for the same thing that used to cost me less,' he told The Post. 8 Peekskill resident, Joe, says a small air conditioner at Walmart cost $115 last year– and this year it's $139. Google Maps Last week, Campbell's CEO Mick Beekhuizen said during an earnings call with analysts that the company is seeing 'the highest levels of meals prepared at home since early 2020.' Campbell's is selling more canned soup, Italian sauces and meals, Beekhuizen said as consumers choose 'ingredients that help stretch tighter food budgets.' As of April, prices on groceries and key household goods had risen by 56% during the past six years, according to a Gordon Haskett pricing study looking at 20 common items at a Texas Walmart store. Shoppers at that location paid $99.40 in April for the same 20 items that cost them $63.52 in April 2019, including a 111% increase for a two-liter bottle of Pepsi to $2.64, a 41% increase to $8.44 for 12 rolls of Angel Soft toilet paper and a 56% increase to $3.48 for a 20-ounce Heinz ketchup bottle. The pain has only increased in recent weeks, according to grocery store owners. 8 President Trump shows off a chart of tariffs on 'Liberation Day.' AFP via Getty Images 8 Walmart workers are sharing pictures of price hikes at stores around the country. Reddit/Nvalee A 10.8 oz box of Honey Nut Cheerios and a 9.6 oz box of Kellogg's Corn Flakes each went up by 50 cents since March to $5.99 at three Key Food stores in the New York metro area and Massachusetts, according to an owner, Anthony Pena. A 59 oz bottle of Tropicana orange juice meanwhile went up by 10% to $5.59 over the same period and bananas have risen by as much as 5 cents to 15 cents per pound in New York City. 'Our distributors don't tell us why the prices went up,' Pena added. 'They just post the new prices.' Milton and Nettie Hargrove, a retired couple living in Peekskill, NY, were out last week at a nearby Five Below buying candy – one of the few treats they allow themselves these days. They live on Social Security and have to budget carefully or they will wind up borrowing from friends and family to pay for food and gas, they told The Post. Meanwhile, southern states including Louisiana, Mississippi, Arkansas, Georgia, Texas, and North Carolina are 'experiencing some of the greatest consumer credit stress,' said Moody's economist Justin Begley. The 30-plus day delinquency rates on credit cards, auto and student loans in those states have all risen the most this year, according to Moody's data. 8 A 59-ounce Tropicana orange juice costs 10% more since March at several Key Food grocery stores. Tropicana 'A lot of people have been relying on debt to make ends meet,' said Richard Barrington, a financial analyst for Credit Sesame. Credit-card debt has grown at a faster rate than any other type of debt over the past 5 years. 'It's not like prices reset to where they were before,' Barrington added. 'They are still higher than they were and they are eating up a higher portion of people's budget.' While inflation has tracked lower than many economists expected, it could ratchet up to 4% later this year depending on what happens with tariffs, according to Moody's chief economist, Mark Zandi. 8 Honey Nut Cheerios is 50 cents more expensive since March at some Key Food stores. General Mills 8 Kellogg's Corn Flakes is 50 cents more expensive since March. Kellogg's Thanks to a 25% tariff on automobiles, new car buyers paid 2.5% more for their vehicles in April compared to March – or $48,699, according to Kelley Blue Book, which notes that a monthly increase that steep is 'rare.' Used cars ticked up by $367 to $25,547 over the same period. Older vehicles priced less than $15,000 are in 'short supply' as shoppers rushed to scoop up deals before tariffs kicked in, according to the Blue Book. 'We are at the precipice of a storm and you want to say 'look up, look at what's coming and protect yourself,' Jeff Mandel, founder of IDIQ, which offers financial services and advice to consumers in financial distress.
