logo
Do I Have to Let My Brother Crash With Me Forever?

Do I Have to Let My Brother Crash With Me Forever?

New York Times4 days ago
I come from a large family; my siblings and I are now in our 50s to 70s. Our parents, worn out by so many children, ended up neglecting our needs, physically and emotionally, in different ways. I hold no grudge; they did their best, and they've been gone for decades.
Unfortunately, my younger brother has been couch-surfing with me and other siblings for about 20 years. He spent some time living in inexpensive countries on his inheritance, but now the money is gone, and he has no job. He has been living with me for the last few years, and as I approach 60, I'm exhausted. I don't feel I can host him much longer.
For years, I and others have urged him to get counseling for his anxiety and his difficulties with executive function. We've also suggested that he see a social worker and start building independence, especially as he gets older. He insists he's working on tech projects that will bring in passive income — he's highly intelligent and has big dreams — but nothing has panned out.
None of my other siblings can take him in again. I do think he needs counseling and maybe medication. I'm empathetic by nature, and I hate the idea of putting him on the street — but would that be what finally gets him to seek professional help? I'm not equipped to be his case worker. Am I enabling him to avoid the help he needs by continuing to provide him with a place to stay? — Name Withheld
From the Ethicist:
From what you say, it sounds as if you're carrying a lot, especially as you get older yourself. It's clear you care about your younger brother and don't want to see him suffer. Still, you're right to wonder whether you're simply enabling a middle-aged man to avoid facing reality and getting the assistance he needs, with respect to his mental health and his ability to function. Our obligations to adult siblings — unless they are truly incapable of independence — are real but not unlimited. Most people in our society accept that while family bonds matter, there comes a point when adults are expected to take responsibility for their own lives, or at least to make a genuine effort to do so.
You might start by setting clear boundaries: Explain that your home is open to him only if he takes concrete steps toward getting help. But you have to mean it. And you have to convey from the outset that this is not a permanent solution. Your hope is that, with support — perhaps some combination of counseling and medication — he'll be able to live on his own. You'll have to set a timeline for that. If he is just going through the motions, you'll know soon enough. If he genuinely commits, you can decide together what independence looks like and how he might get there.
Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Mother-in-Law Says Grandmas 'Can Do What They Want.' Mom Says She Won't Be Babysitting Anymore
Mother-in-Law Says Grandmas 'Can Do What They Want.' Mom Says She Won't Be Babysitting Anymore

Yahoo

time13 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Mother-in-Law Says Grandmas 'Can Do What They Want.' Mom Says She Won't Be Babysitting Anymore

After repeatedly ignoring basic rules with her newborn, one woman says her mother-in-law is no longer welcomed to babysitNEED TO KNOW A mom set clear rules for her newborn, but her mother-in-law had other ideas A simple request turned into a months-long power struggle Now, she's drawing a line, and not everyone in the family agreesA woman looks to the Reddit community for advice following a tense fallout with her mother-in-law over a series of ignored boundaries with her newborn daughter. In a heartfelt post titled 'AITA for not allowing my MIL to babysit anymore?' she shares the details of a situation that has left her feeling disrespected and unheard. 'From the moment my baby was born, I was very clear about the basic boundaries I had with the baby,' the new mom writes. Her requests were simple: no kissing, wash hands before touching the baby and ask before taking the baby from her arms. She describes how she and her husband were living with his mother shortly after their baby girl was born, hoping for some extra support. But instead of feeling supported, she says, her boundaries were crossed 'within the first week after the baby was born.' Despite clearly explaining her expectations, she says her mother-in-law refused to listen. 'She responded with 'I'm the grandma and grandmas can do what they want,' ' the mom reveals, adding that this attitude only continued. She notes that she and her husband both spoke to his mother multiple times, attempting to reinforce the importance of their rules. But instead of improving, the situation escalated as her MIL 'completely disregarded our rules and continued to [ignore] them.' In addition to boundary violations, she says her mother-in-law started referring to the baby in a way that made her deeply uncomfortable. 'She also began to call our child 'her child,' ' she writes, explaining that her MIL would reach for the baby, saying, 'Give me my child.' These moments were not taken lightly by the new mom, who says the behavior 'made me very uncomfortable.' She also shares that each time she and her husband addressed the issue, it 'would continue to become defensive and start big arguments.' Feeling overwhelmed and increasingly isolated, the couple decided to make a major change. 'After our baby turned 2 months old, we moved out of state due to my husband's military assignment,' she explains. But the space didn't end the tension. Soon after the move, her MIL began making plans to visit and babysit, which led to the mom putting her foot down. 'I've told her and my husband that I don't feel comfortable with her babysitting anymore,' she says. Her reasoning was clear: 'Until she can respect the rules and boundaries I've had in place and until she can respect me as a mother, I no longer want her in my home.' Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer​​, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. The Reddit post ends with a direct question to the community: 'So, AITA for saying these things?' And the comments come pouring in with strong support for her stance. One commenter writes, 'This is just a sign of much worse to come,' warning her not to let her mother-in-law take away precious memories from this time in her life. 'Don't let her rob you of what's supposed to be happy times that you'll never get back.' Another user echoes the sentiment and applauds her strength in taking a stand. 'Not overreacting,' they say. 'I think it's good you are setting these boundaries now.' Read the original article on People Solve the daily Crossword

How We Avoided World War III
How We Avoided World War III

Bloomberg

timean hour ago

  • Bloomberg

How We Avoided World War III

The dropping of the atomic bomb on Hiroshima 80 years ago this week is something to commemorate but not celebrate. It was also the beginning of a new era: the Atomic Age. Growing up in the latter stages of the Cold War, my generation didn't live with the sense of menace and the Bert the Turtle duck-and-cover drills baby boomers endured. But both cohorts were blessed by the absence of a large-scale war, conventional or nuclear, between the US and the Soviet Union. Which brings up an 80-year-old question: Did the development of atomic weapons keep the peace during the Cold War? And if so, what accounts for this paradoxical result? The simple answer is the unsatisfying one: It's complicated.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store