Which states have rising electricity costs? See map
Power demand from data centers in the U.S. is expected to nearly triple over the next three years, consuming as much as 12% of the country's electricity, according to a Department of Energy-backed study, as reported by Reuters.
How will this influx in energy demand impact residential electricity bills? Here's what we know about the change in electricity prices for the average consumer:
Which states are paying more for electricity?
Between May 2024 and May 2025, the average retail residential price for 1 kilowatt-hour of electricity increased about 6.5%, according to the most recent available data from the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA).
Electricity costs can vary due to energy rates, taxes, and utility fees in your area. A report from Choose Energy, an energy broker, has identified which states are facing higher electricity prices this year.
Residents in Idaho currently pay the cheapest residential electricity rates in the country at 11.88 cents per kWh, while Hawaii's residents pay the highest electricity rates at 41.03 cents per kWh.
What is causing electricity prices to increase?
Many factors influence the price of electricity, including infrastructure costs, fuel prices, weather conditions, record-high temperatures and the balance of supply and demand, according to the EIA.
On July 28 from 7 to 8 p.m. ET, Americans consumed 758,149 megawatt-hours of electricity – a new national record, according to EIA. The extraordinary demand for power resulted from large, densely populated areas of the U.S. experiencing a slow-moving 'heat dome,' which trapped high temperatures and humidity for days at a time, as previously reported by USA TODAY.
In addition to the extreme weather causing an overall increase in residential electricity consumption, the demand from artificial intelligence data centers has also been linked to rising electricity bills in some areas.
A recent report from The Washington Post found that some customers in areas serviced by PJM Interconnection, which coordinates the movement of wholesale electricity in all or part of 13 states (Delaware, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Maryland, Michigan, New Jersey, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Virginia and West Virginia) and the District of Columbia, have seen their electricity bills increase because of data centers. Electricity bills for some consumers in New Jersey have increased by 20% and in Ohio, prices rose between 10% and 15%.
Read more about the pros and cons of data centers:
Worst regions for clean energy: Are US data centers fueling climate change?
Data centers are on the rise in AZ: Are they a good idea in the desert?
CONTRIBUTING: Terry Collins, Trevor Hughes, USA TODAY, Sarah Lapidus, Sasha Hupka, Arizona Republic
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
2 minutes ago
- New York Times
America Will Suffer From Trump's Assault on Facts
President Trump treats facts in the same way that he treats people: He expects them to line up in support of his goals, and if they don't, he seeks to get rid of them. Last week Mr. Trump was confronted by the inconvenient truth that job growth has been in a three-month slump. A more grounded president might have considered whether the data raised questions about his agenda. Mr. Trump characteristically insisted that the questions were about the data. He charged that the beige functionaries of the Bureau of Labor Statistics were engaged in a conspiracy to discredit his administration, and he fired the head of the bureau. The firing is so clearly damaging to the credibility of the federal government that it drew objections from some Senate Republicans. Mr. Trump's allegations against Erika McEntarfer, the longtime public servant whom he summarily fired, have no foundation in reality. The government's monthly report on the labor market is produced by the bureau's nonpartisan staff. Estimates for different parts of the economy are compiled separately and then pulled together into a national report, which is completed before it reaches the desk of whichever political appointee happens to be running the bureau. Experts, including past leaders of the agency nominated by presidents from both parties, said that it was effectively impossible for the bureau's leader to manipulate those numbers. One kernel of comfort is that Dr. McEntarfer's departure won't necessarily prevent the agency from continuing to produce reliable data. At the very least, we may hope that if the administration seeks to influence future jobs reports, some of the people responsible for producing the data will have the courage to speak out and tell the public. But there is no doubt that Mr. Trump's actions will cast a shadow over the rest of the government that he leads. Public servants must now do their work while fearing that they may be fired merely for producing information that displeases the president. Mr. Trump is also making it harder for the government to obtain information, as people and businesses asked to respond to questions now have reason to doubt whether the answers will be accurately reported. The president says that he fired Dr. McEntarfer because he wanted to preserve the integrity of federal data. The reality is that Mr. Trump's actions will create the very problem he claims to be fixing. Instead of improving the quality of information gathered and reported by the government, he is sowing doubts about the ability of federal agencies to produce reliable data. And in doing so, he is leaving Americans ever more reliant on whatever he declares to be the truth. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Buzz Feed
3 minutes ago
- Buzz Feed
Trump's Poll Claims Fact-Checked Live On Air
President Donald Trump repeatedly boasted that he has 'the best poll numbers [he's] ever had' in an interview with CNBC on Tuesday morning, even though the majority of Americans disapprove of his performance in the job. Asked whether he would run for a third term in office despite the fact that the US Constitution's 22nd Amendment bars him from doing so, Trump replied 'probably not,' before going on to say he would like to do so. 'I'd like to run. I have the best poll numbers I've ever had. You know why? Because people love the tariffs and they love the trade deal and they love that foreign countries aren't ripping us off anymore. For years they ripped us off, friend and foe,' Trump said, even though voter surveys suggest otherwise. Kernen interjected, clarifying that the president enjoys high support among Republican voters, but not the overall electorate. Trump didn't seem to blink. 'I have the best poll numbers I've ever had,' Trump said. 'I have poll numbers where I'm 71%.' 'Those are among Republicans,' Kernen replied. Trump would not relent, insisting Kernen was wrong. Trump also claimed that polls that showed him faring poorly with voters were 'fake.' The source for the figures cited by Trump is unclear. His approval rating currently stands at 44%, according to an average of polls compiled by the New York Times. An issue that has garnered much attention in recent weeks appears to be a thorn in Trump's side as a majority of Americans disapprove of his administration's handling of documents related to the investigation into late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, according to an Economics/YouGov poll conducted late last month.
Business Insider
4 minutes ago
- Business Insider
Here are the top recession indicators economic forecasters are watching for
Murmurs about a potential recession are rising again after a weak July jobs report, and there are a few signals that forecasters are watching for as early warning signs. The US added just 73,000 jobs for the month, while job gains for May and June were revised downward by a combined 258,000. Besides revisions that took place during the pandemic, that was largest two-month downward revision in about 46 years, according to an analysis from Morgan Stanley. To markets, the message is getting clearer: the US economy is on shakier footing than originally thought — and the odds of a recession might be higher despite most forecasters still calling for a soft landing in 2025. "The economy is on the precipice of recession. That's the clear takeaway from last week's economic data dump," Mark Zandi, the chief economist at Moody's wrote in a post on X over the weekend, pointing to weaker jobs data in a separate post. "There was a definite narrative shift in the economics community on Friday given the severity of the payroll revisions for May and June," Kevin Gordon, a senior investment strategist at Charles Schwab, wrote in a note on Monday. Economists are now focusing on a handful of key indicators in the coming months that could be early warning signs of a recession around the corner. The next jobs reports are key The job market is now in the spotlight. Any additional signs of weakness could send a strong signal that the economy is turning a corner into a recession, Schwab's Gordon said. "As always, no single report should be obsessed over or extrapolated; but if we continue to see a sharp slowdown in job growth and drift higher in the unemployment rate—consistent with the trends from May to July—it would bring forward the possibility that recessionary conditions are forming quickly," he added. Economists will be sifting through one more month of labor market data before the Fed's next policy meeting in September, when the central bank is expected to trim interest rates by 25 basis points. Economists at Goldman Sachs said they believed the US job market was now approaching "stall speed" — a state where the labor market begins to weaken in a "self-reinforcing fashion." The bank added that its estimates of underlying jobs growth had "plummeted" as a result of the downward revisions, which were on par with other two-month payrolls revisions that have been associated with recessions in the past: The magnitude of the latest drop implies a 9 percentage point increase in the risk of a coming recession, Morgan Stanley economists wrote. Consumer spending Wall Street is also on high alert for signs that Americans are reining in their spending. The view that the US economy is on solid footing is starting to look "rather perilous," according to Michael Brown, a senior research strategist at Pepperstone, given that a weaker job market could cut into consumer spending in the coming months. Americans are already beginning to tighten their wallets. Though consumer spending ticked higher overall in June, personal consumption expenditures on durable goods, one measure of how much Americans are spending on items, declined to $2.24 trillion in June, down around $40 billion from its peak in April, according to the Bureau of Economic Analysis. The Institute for Supply Management Services Index also ticked lower to 50.1 from 50.8, in July, a sign Americans are beginning to pull back on services spending as well, according to Oliver Allen, a senior US economist at Pantheon Macroeconomics. "Spending on services has already slowed significantly from its solid pace last year, and the clear deterioration in the labor market and drag on real incomes from tariffs suggest a marked recovery is unlikely," Allen wrote in a note, though added that he believed a "stagnation" was more likely in the coming months than a collapse in spending. "Consumer spending has flatlined, construction and manufacturing are contracting, and employment is set to fall. And with inflation on the rise, it is tough for the Fed to come to the rescue," Moody's Zandi wrote on X.
