The great British pub is not dead yet
The pub trade has troubles, no question. Energy bills, up a fifth in a year, are choking profits. National Insurance hikes, the return of the full charge of VAT and rocketing business rates (some landlords face £20,000 a year) make pouring pints costly. A Birmingham mate, running a local, says his takings had dropped 15 per cent since 2023; punters, skint from inflation, are picking Netflix and a supermarket Merlot over a bar stool.
But another nail in the coffin of pub life as we knew it is now looming. Labour's Employment Rights Bill contains some daft proposed new rules which could force us to police 'third-party harassment' against our staff (think a punter's cheeky quip). This risks turning taprooms into courtrooms, censoring the laughter that makes them hum.
Each closure, the real ale consumer organisation CAMRA warns, tears at the community's weave. Pubs aren't just boozers, they're schools where brickies, poets, old soldiers, students and all and sundry learn to share a chuckle and, most importantly, laugh at themselves.
Meanwhile, health-mad Gen Z is swapping lager for Heineken 0.0, Guinness 0.0, Nosecco. Low- and no-alcohol sales are up a third, and the demand keeps growing. Supermarket wines, cheaper and better quality every year, tempt folk to sip at home – a bottle, after all, is cheaper than a round.
Society has been infected with a puritan streak which prizes sobriety over revelry. The leisure pound is being split across the likes of escape rooms, yoga classes and virtual reality dens, all flashier lures than the pub's weathered oak. But don't mourn the British pub quite yet.
There are signs of a resurgence. Yes, drinking has turned a little fussy for many, a world away from carefree pints. Punters book tables like they're at some swanky bistro, they chase curated nights, craft ale flights with daft tasting notes, small-batch gins with even dafter tonics: all of this Instagram-ready charm is hooking a new generation. Leading the charge is Guinness, its black-gold pints pulling in young punters like never before.
Diageo's marketing played a blinder; campaigns like #GuinnessTime, full of moody filters, matey vibes, have made that creamy stout the drink for twenty-somethings craving something unique. Guinness sales jumped 20 per cent in 2024. Last Christmas's keg drought left landlords like me scrambling for supplies as Gen Z snapped selfies with their pints.
But the fightback is just starting. Small, freehold, wet-led pubs are storming back, nailing the basics: quality beer, fair prices, real pubs serving the proper communities who are packing their bars.
In Worle, Somerset, Glynn and Lindsey Smith, the couple running the Old Kings Head, have raised £21,000 for charities since 2019. Their bar is rammed with loyal regulars who'd rather die than drink elsewhere.
In Lincoln, Jez Nash's Strait and Narrow smashed its Good Friday record, punters were three-deep by noon, supping craft beers, ciders, torrents of Guinness, free from pubco chains. David Bentley's Old Bowling Green in Derbyshire, a 15th-century gem, ditched its gastro guff for drinks-led trade, keeping pints cheap and profits plump.
The micropub boom is a joy: since 2015, tiny boozers like the Two Pigs in Cheltenham pack 'em in with local ales, quirky stouts, and no-frills charm. The Star in Godalming, with Greene King's nano-brewery, pulls crowds with house-brewed ales, quiz nights, and a buzzing community vibe. These freehold pubs, cut loose from brewery ties, pick their stock. Guinness is a staple, they keep prices low and show punters love: a decent pint in a decent place and prices that don't make you feel robbed.
Still, some things seem to be going for good: the bar queue, once a lively scrum of wit and patience, taught natural democracy, with everyone served regardless of colour, creed or class. Lockdown mucked it up. Youngsters, drilled in single-file order, stand stiff as boards; missing out on the banter that thickens skins and builds bonds.
My nearest competitor grumbles constantly about twenty-somethings with no spark, no chat. The pub's old code, that a nod got you your pint but a jest won respect, wobbles under this primness. But there's fire yet. At the Civic Future Start Up Society Summit, a gathering of young entrepreneurs and innovators that I attended last month, I met twenty-somethings, bright as polished brass, brimming with rebel spirit.
They drank, ate and argued with gusto about politics, religion and everything in between; they laughed at themselves and each other. They were charming, brilliant and clever. A tech genius in her twenties told me she'd take a shared stout over a TikTok reel any day; she craved the real stuff. These aren't the po-faced puritans you'd expect. I left feeling more hopeful about Britain's future than I had in a long time.
Pubs face a scrap, but the path is clear. Rate reform, the £1 billion needed to save 1,000 local jobs, community grants like Devon's, could ease the pinch. Landlords like Jez and Glynn will lead the charge, keep it simple, keep it true. As I stack crates and scrub toilets, I raise a toast: the pub's not dead yet. It's teaching its lessons and providing a service still, not taking yourself too seriously, manners, sharing a space with strangers, and forcing us to interact with the real world. Do your bit, visit the local and let's keep the bar swinging.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
30 minutes ago
- BBC News
Hounslow councillor attends and votes at panel meeting 'by mistake'
Hounslow Council has apologised after a councillor attended and voted at a meeting when he was not meant to do Gill, Labour councillor for Chiswick, attended a meeting of the council's licensing panel on 15 July, where he voted on a licensing he had not yet been officially appointed to the panel in what the council called a "misunderstanding", according to the Local Democracy Reporting means the decision is null and void and the meeting must be held again in the coming weeks, which the council said could cost up to £500. Gill had not initially been appointed to the panel when most selections were made in was later nominated after the council said further changes to the committee were then undertook licensing training, but was not yet an official member of the council officers believed he had already been appointed, so he was mistakenly included in the 15 July meeting. The issue was raised at a full council meeting on 22 July, when Conservative councillor Jack Emsley called Gill's attendance at the licensing panel a "breach of the constitution".Benita Edwards, the council's director of law and governance, confirmed there had been a breach and apologised for the added: "I have concluded that the meeting of the licensing panel wasn't properly convened; it is as if the meeting never took place, and any decisions are effectively null and void." After the meeting, Emsley said: "Residents in Chiswick will rightly feel frustrated not only that Gill's actions jeopardised the decision taken by the panel and caused an unnecessary delay, but that taxpayer money will now be wasted in having to reconvene the meeting." A council spokesperson said that they cannot confirm an exact cost of holding another meeting, but that it is expected to be between £250 to £ is to cover the additional costs for legal support.
Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Telegraph
Here's proof that Labour's private school tax raid was never about money
As sure as night follows day, when a new tax is introduced, people will do their very best to avoid it. This is what has happened with Labour's imposition of VAT at 20pc on school fees in January. The Telegraph recently revealed that Britain's top 50 independent schools held £515m in advance fees last year, up from £121m in 2023. This potentially avoids more than £100m in VAT. There are over 2,600 independent schools in the UK, of which 1,423 are members of the Independent Schools Council (ISC). In January, 582,477 pupils attended independent schools in England. The Telegraph figures thus cover just 2pc of all fee-paying establishments.
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Private school parents who paid fees in advance to face fresh tax grab from HMRC
Parents with pupils in private school who pre-paid fees in advance of January's VAT hike are facing a fresh attack from the taxman. HM Revenue and Customs is set to probe so-called advance-fee schemes which swathes of parents used in a bid to avoid larger fees, it has emerged. Advance fee or payment schemes have been in used in private schools for years but they began to surge in popularity as early as December, 2023. They allow parents of students at private schools to pay upfront for tuition fees for future school years, often with a discount. The pre-paid funds act like a deposit and are used to cover most of the fees each year, instead of locking in a price. VAT had never before been charged on private school payments but Labour's manifesto revealed it would scrap the exemption for private schools, which saw them free of the 20 per cent tax. This came into force in January of this year in a bid to bolster the Treasury's dwindling coffers. Droves of families paid advanced fees for future school years before the change in January, hoping to avoid the VAT hike of up to 20 per cent. Parents with pupils at the top 50 private schools in the country pre-paid fees to the tune of £515million last a year – up from £121million the year before. This means that as much as £103million in tax may have been avoided in these top 50 schools alone. However, their efforts may have been in vain as the tax office prepares a fresh assault on these prepayments to ensure all private schools pay their 'fair share'. Official sources said HMRC will now 'carefully scrutinise' prepayments, the Telegraph reports. These fees paid in advance may still be liable for VAT because of the way the schools structured the schemes. The taxman is likely to target schools that use the advance fees like a deposit or those quickly set up such a scheme ahead of the VAT hike. Investigations could take several years to complete. Tax experts have warned VAT applies to the year fees are invoiced so there's a chance the prepayments didn't work in the way parents had hoped. It means parents who used these pre-paid fee schemes to mitigate the impact of the VAT hike could be liable for unpaid VAT. It could also not only spark lengthy legal battles between the tax office and private schools, but also between parents and schools over who is liable for the potential tax bill. Chancellor Rachel Reeves attempted to curb such schemes by applying VAT to pre-paid fees made from July 29 last year. But parents had already funnelled millions of pounds into the schemes to avoid the punitive tax measures. Alex Pugh, financial planner at wealth manager Saltus, said that many parents started to make strategic decisions including advance fee payments back in December 2023. He said: 'However, it seems that the efficacy of these schemes is now in doubt, as VAT may still be due on these prepayments. Two in five parents will make a change to their child's private education before term starts in September. 'As this number may well rise if it transpires that those who thought they'd avoided the VAT through pre-payments are still liable, professional advice is key. 'Should HMRC successfully unravel advance fee schemes, the financial pressures facing all private schools will be exacerbated. 'In an attempt to avoid the VAT liability parents may claim they were misled about the tax benefits of advance schemes, potentially sparking long-running, costly legal battles with schools. 'Such disputes could result in the schools themselves ultimately being liable. The full impact of this tax change cannot be avoided.' A government spokesman said: 'The Office for Budget Responsibility has already factored in the increased use of pre-payment schemes in its revenue forecasts. 'Removing tax breaks for private schools is expected to raise £1.8billion a year by 2029/30. 'This funding will help us recruit 6,500 new teachers and improve standards in state schools, which educate 94 per cent of children.'
