T-Mobile Might Finally Switch to 36-Month Phone Payment Plans
If you're a T-Mobile customer, the next time you upgrade your phone you may be asked to keep it for an extra year. New leaks suggest T-Mobile is preparing to introduce 36-month payment plans for the first time.
According to The Mobile Report, an internal T-Mobile document shows multiple references to 36-month Equipment Installment Plans (EIP). The carrier currently doesn't have these plans, though rivals AT&T and Verizon moved to a 36-month structure in 2021 and 2022, respectively.
Alongside the internal document, T-Mobile briefly changed its website for Galaxy Watch EIPs to show 36-month deals. The website read, 'Starting at $10.56/month for 36 months' on a listing for the Samsung Galaxy Watch 7 in its 44mm version. It's unclear if anyone managed to sign up.
These deals have since been removed, and T-Mobile has moved back to 24-month offers. It's now showing a price of $15.84 a month over a two-year period. Both of these offers come out to $380.16, which is as close as possible to the watch's $379.99 price.
If T-Mobile does move to 36-month EIPs, it's likely because the carrier wants to lock customers into services for longer periods rather than increase the amount made from the product loan. Other carriers that have moved to 36 months as the norm have said it's better for customers as the monthly repayment is lower.
For some customers, that may be true, but others will be frustrated by the fact they won't be able to upgrade as quickly, or that they won't be able to easily switch wireless providers.
We asked T-Mobile for comment, and we'll update this story when we hear more.
T-Mobile has stood out compared with AT&T and Verizon by not making this move over the last few years. It could continue that goodwill with customers if it chooses to offer both 24-month and 36-month options for EIPs at the same time.
T-Mobile's app was recently updated to record your phone's screen when you're navigating around its T-Life service. The feature was brought in to help the brand 'troubleshoot' issues, but it can be turned off within the settings of the app.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
The rich already know how private equity mints money — and it's not from a 401(k)
The ultrawealthy are envied for many reasons. For instance, we wish we could access the same private-market investments that they favor. Now, after the White House issued an executive order on Aug. 7, you may be able to invest like the billionaires do. Homeowners rush to refinance as mortgage-rate plunge opens window of opportunity My wife and I are in our 50s and have $11 million. We're not leaving it to our kids. Is that wrong? You could receive up to $7,500 from the AT&T settlement. Here's how class-action suits work. But would you want to? The executive order allows ordinary retirement savers to invest in private assets and cryptocurrency. This will expand investment options for anyone with a 401(k) or similar tax-advantaged retirement plan. It is a big deal — opening part of America's $12.4 trillion defined-contribution market to private-asset managers. The largest private-equity firms and other asset managers are salivating at the opportunity to pitch this untapped market of retirement savers. Private assets encompass a range of investments that do not trade on a public exchange. Examples include hedge funds, private equity, private credit and infrastructure. The case for private assets is they can provide a buffer against inflation — plus steady returns. The downsides include high fees, illiquidity and complexity. The nation's biggest asset managers welcome the executive order. They want to develop funds that make private assets easier for people to buy, and argue that the added diversification serves savers' best interests. Larry Fink, chief executive of BlackRock BLK, says retirement savers should replace the traditional 60% stocks/40% bonds asset-allocation model with a 50/30/20 split: 50% stocks, 30% bonds and 20% private assets. Read: Larry Fink proposes an alternative to the 60/40 portfolio. It means more fees. Should you be excited about this widening menu of investment choices? It depends on whom you ask. Some investment professionals like the idea of making private assets more available to more people. 'Historically, a number of private-market strategies have produced higher performance and additional diversification in defined-benefit pensions,' says Peter von Lehe, head of investment solutions and strategy at Neuberger Berman. 'It's appropriate that a broader range of investors have access to private assets in their defined-contribution plans because of the potential for return and diversification that these long-term investments can provide.' However, von Lehe cautions that these investments are illiquid and 'have a higher degree of complexity.' He says his 'most appropriate use case' for private-market investments is through professionally managed target-date funds or other funds that allocate a percentage of defined-contribution money to these complex but potentially more lucrative alternatives. Read: Here's something the rich know about managing investment risk that can help you, too Financial advisers have differing views on the role of private assets in client portfolios. Steven Roge, a certified financial planner in Bohemia, N.Y., says private markets are not for everyone. 'It's for people in the wealth-accumulation phase, say 40 to 50 years old, who have a long time horizon and a high risk tolerance,' Roge says. 'And they have to be sophisticated enough to understand it. We know if they don't understand it, they may not stick with it.' Of the firm's 300 clients, he says that 'only about a dozen' fit the bill for adding private-market assets to their retirement accounts. Even with the expanded investment options that may result from the White House's action, Roge remains a fan of passive strategies for most investors. 'Indexing is how they will win over the long run,' he says. 'But some clients want something that's special and different' as they seek market-beating returns. Given the illiquidity of private assets, Roge anticipates setting expectations for those clients who tend to monitor their portfolio daily — and who engage in frequent trading. 'These private investments may only price four times a year,' Roge says. 'That's not enough action for certain clients who track their portfolio like a hawk.' In his personal portfolio, Roge uses private markets — especially private equity — to diversify his holdings. He says he allocates about 25% to alternative assets. 'It helps me sleep at night knowing my portfolio isn't being pushed around by the volatility of public markets,' he says. Roge adds that he is not concerned about the current high valuations of private-equity funds. 'The valuations [of private-equity funds] are more realistic than the erratic valuations we see in public markets on a daily basis,' he says. Other advisers are more skeptical of the White House executive order. 'It's less being done out of interest for the general public and more for private industry lobbying the [Trump] administration,' says Alex Ruda, an adviser in Silver Spring, Md. The executive order undoubtedly pleases asset managers and private-equity firms. For years, they've wanted to attract retirement savers' money. These savers bear primary responsibility for managing their 401(k) compared with today's older retirees, many of whom receive employer-funded defined-benefit pensions. While some younger savers enjoy picking their investments, others dread it. 'The average American worker isn't equipped to navigate these complex [private-market] investments,' Ruda says. 'And they may fall prey to a little performance chasing given where we are in the market cycle' — as private markets have outperformed publicly traded stocks since 2000. Ruda feels so strongly about not incorporating private assets into client portfolios that he's willing to forgo newcomers who express such interest. 'If I wanted to broaden my client base, I'd have to play to what they want,' he says. 'But I don't have to do that. So I'd say to them, 'I'm not the best fit.'' Read next: Here's what it's like to invest in private equity — and why you don't want it in your 401(k) More: As private equity enters retirement plans, is it too dangerous for average investors to jump in? I'm a senior who barely survives on $1,300 a month. No way could I live on $1,000. 'I am a senior citizen': My car needs $3,500 for repairs, but only has a trade-in value of $6,000. Do I bother fixing it?
Android Authority
4 hours ago
- Android Authority
Pairing your Galaxy Watch with a non-Samsung phone? Here's what you're missing out on
Andy Walker / Android Authority Samsung's smartwatches (and the Galaxy Ring) are compatible with most Android phones, but you'll only get the full experience when paired with Samsung Galaxy smartphones. This applies to older Galaxy Watch models up to the latest Galaxy Watch 8 series and Galaxy Watch Ultra 2025. But what are these features, and are they worth considering switching smartphones for? Do you use a Galaxy Watch with a Samsung smartphone? 0 votes Yes, I do. NaN % No, I pair my Galaxy Watch with another Android phone. NaN % No, I use a Samsung phone paired with another smartwatch. NaN % No, I don't own a Galaxy Watch or a Samsung phone. NaN % There are many features, but only a few truly make the partnership worthwhile, at least for me. I don't own a Galaxy Ring, but I can comment on the synergy between my Galaxy Watch 4 and Galaxy S24 FE. While most benefits are health-related, several ecosystem features make owning Samsung products more attractive and worth considering. Don't want to miss the best from Android Authority? Set us as a preferred source in Google Search to support us and make sure you never miss our latest exclusive reports, expert analysis, and much more. Additional health features Kaitlyn Cimino / Android Authority I use my Galaxy Watch primarily as a fitness tracker, so I prioritize features that monitor health issues. Most fitness tracking features are available across all Android phones, including basic heart rate tracking, step tracking, sleep, and SpO2 insights. However, if you want to use your wearable specifically to check your heartbeat or blood pressure, you need to pair it with a Samsung smartphone and download the exclusive Samsung Health Monitor app. This app is also limited to specific markets, so check availability if these features are essential to you. Notably, the app enables the Galaxy Watch 4 and newer models' ECG capabilities, or electrocardiogram, which samples your heart's rhythm and offers guidance if it detects irregularities. Thankfully, my heart's still strong, but I regularly use this feature when I feel unusually tired or stressed. Health Monitor also unlocks the Galaxy Watch series' blood pressure monitoring feature, which requires calibration with a standalone monitor before use. This feature is great for quick checkups if you're away from home without a dedicated monitor. Other Galaxy Watch features that require a Samsung smartphone include stress reminders, sleep apnea monitoring, and Energy Score insight. Sleep apnea monitoring samples your breathing and heart rate rhythm at night, checking for any concerning dips in blood oxygen levels. It then provides further guidance. I use this feature a few times a year, and it offers great insight into my overall sleep health. Energy Score insight adds AI-powered context to your Energy Score — a figure that quantifies your daily readiness based on previous activity and rest. Energy Score works without a Samsung phone, but you'll only get the number and not much else. Several new Galaxy Watch health tracking features aren't exclusive to Samsung smartphones but are available in newer versions of One UI Watch. This includes Vascular Load, Antioxidant Index, Running Coach, and Bedtime Guidance. Galaxy AI Andy Walker / Android Authority I agree, the constant chatter about AI can be annoying, but Galaxy AI on the Galaxy Watch is quite helpful. I've highlighted how it enables some health features on the wearable, but it's also found in more general applications. Samsung's use of AI isn't particularly intrusive and improves the experience of several features and apps on the small screen. Notably, Galaxy AI features require the watch to be paired with a compatible Samsung smartphone. So what are these features? One that I find particularly useful is Smart Replies, which provides context-aware response options to messages sent via a messaging app. While this feature is available through Samsung Messages, it also works well with WhatsApp and Google Messages. Bixby Andy Walker / Android Authority Believe it or not, Samsung's often criticized voice assistant is actually quite good. I ditched Google Gemini for a week to use Bixby exclusively, and I enjoyed it. Its availability across both the Galaxy Watch and Samsung smartphones makes pairing the two devices worthwhile. I find that Bixby triggers settings faster on these devices than Gemini, making it a better utility for controlling your device on your wrist. I use it to set timers, adjust alarms, and start exercises. Tapping the Bixby button and talking to my watch is often easier than scrolling across its tiny display to tap an even smaller button. I wouldn't consider the voice assistant better than Gemini for online tasks. Google's product is still better for anything you need fetched from the web. But, personally, I usually use my phone for these tasks. You can use both on your watch using different wake words or physical shortcuts for each. Modes and Routines Ryan Haines / Android Authority Modes and Routines are a core part of my digital life that I couldn't imagine living without them. This is perhaps the one feature I'd miss most if I separated my Galaxy Watch and Galaxy phone. In short, Modes and Routines allow me to trigger specific settings conditionally, based on location, time of day, or connected network. But this is just skimming the surface. In another article, I elaborated on the various uses of Modes and Routines, including activating power-saving mode on my watch when I don't need all its features, flipping through watch faces automatically, or making full use of my phone's Driving mode to make content on my watch more legible. There are various integrations possible with this tool. Some modes trigger automatically, too. A Samsung smartphone and Galaxy Watch will also sync other settings with one another, including alarms (via Sleep mode) and Do Not Disturb status. Camera Control Andy Walker / Android Authority I'll admit, this is one quirky reason to pair a Samsung smartphone with a Galaxy Watch, but I've grown to like it. Using a tripod for smartphone photography is a boon, especially if you want to capture nighttime shots without jittering the device's hardware. In these cases, the camera control feature is convenient. Annoyingly, it doesn't support specific camera modes that would make it genuinely helpful, like Slow Motion or Hyperlapse. Nevertheless, I have used this feature more than I thought I would. As the Galaxy Ring lacks a screen, you cannot use it to control the camera of your Galaxy phone or any Android phone. While some of these features have workarounds or alternatives, many of the above features genuinely enhance the Galaxy Watch and Ring experience. I wouldn't suggest you rush out and purchase a Samsung phone today if you own a Galaxy Watch, but it's something to consider going forward. As Samsung continues developing more Galaxy AI-heavy features that require its smartphone hardware, don't be surprised to see more features locked behind its walled garden. Follow
CNN
5 hours ago
- CNN
AT&T may pay customers up to $7,500 in $177 million data breach settlement
Millions of AT&T customers can file claims worth up to $7,500 in cash payments as part of a $177 million settlement related to data breaches in 2024. The telecommunications company had faced a pair of data breaches, announced in March and July 2024, that were met with lawsuits. Here's a breakdown. On March 30, 2024, AT&T announced it was investigating a data leak that had occurred roughly two weeks prior. The breach had affected data until 2019, including Social Security numbers, and the information of 73 million former and current customers was found in a dataset on the dark web. Four months later, the company blamed an 'illegal download' on a third-party cloud platform that it learned about in April for a separate breach. This leak included telephone numbers of 'nearly all' of AT&T cellular customers and customers of providers that used the AT&T network between May 1 and October 31, 2022, the company said. The class-action settlement includes a $149 million cash fund for the first breach and a $28 million payout for the second breach. AT&T customers whose data was involved in either breach, or both, will be eligible. Customers eligible to file a claim will receive an email notice, according to the settlement website. AT&T said Kroll Settlement Administration is notifying current and former customers. The deadline to submit a claim is November 18. The final approval hearing for the settlement is December 3, according to the settlement website, and there could be appeals following an approval 'and resolving them can take time.' 'Settlement Class Member Benefits will begin after the Settlement has obtained Court approval and the time for all appeals has expired,' the website states. Customers impacted by the March incident are eligible for a cash payment of up to $5,000. Claims must include documentation of losses that happened in 2019 or later, and that are 'fairly traceable' to the AT&T breach. For the breach announced in July, cash payments go up to $2,500. Documentation is needed for 'losses that occurred on or after April 14, 2024.' A customer affected by both breaches could be eligible for up to $7,500, but documentation for each loss must be unique, according to the website. Alternatively, customers can file a claim for a tier cash payment. According to the settlement website, anyone whose Social Security Number was exposed in the March breach would receive five times the payment of the second tier, including anyone who had another data element exposed. Anyone impacted by the second breach would receive an equal share of remaining funds. However, there's no guarantee that customers would get a substantial payout. 'The amount of money that will be available for Settlement Class Member Cash Payments is unknown at this time,' according to the settlement website. AT&T said in a statement that it denies allegations from the lawsuits that it was responsible 'for these criminal acts' from the date breach, but 'agreed to this settlement to avoid the expense and uncertainty of protracted litigation.' 'We remain committed to protecting our customers' data and ensuring their continued trust in us,' the company wrote. In 2024, an AT&T spokesperson told CNN that the March breach had 'no connection in any way' to the July announcement. AT&T said it expects the settlement will be approved by the end of the year. Eva Rothenberg contributed to this report.
