Rapid Response Underway To Remove Invasive Seaweed Found Near Little Barrier Island
Press Release – Ngati Manuhiri
Patches of the invasive seaweed Exotic Caulerpa have been located at three sites off the North-East coast of Te Hauturu-o-Toi (Little Barrier Island).
Nicola Rata-MacDonald, Chief Executive of the Ngāti Manuhiri Settlement Trust, says the discovery of caulerpa at Hauturu is yet another indication that Te Moananui-a-toi (the Hauraki Gulf) is under threat, and is in need of urgent restorative action.
'Hauturu is one of the most significant conservation areas in the world—New Zealand's first ever nature reserve—and decisive action is needed to protect this taonga.' Nicola says.
'Today, our team marked the beginning of the Hauturu Rapid Response by laying a karakia over the area, and we will lead the attack on Caulerpa at Hauturu to eliminate this pest from our rohe moana.
'Our work with officials has shown that swift operational action is not hindered by a culturally informed response—it has been Ngāti Manuhiri pushing for action since this incursion was first discovered at Hauturu.'
Despite claims that Caulerpa cannot be eradicated, the Trust successfully removed an infestation at Omaha Cove in Leigh in June 2024—the first and only instance of this happening in New Zealand. Ms Rata-MacDonald says that time is of the essence to ensure a successful response.
'While the patch of caulerpa we managed to eradicate at Leigh was small, we were successful because we didn't wait for it to spread and get out of hand.' Nicola says.
'Our kaitiaki responded immediately to treat the infestation, in partnership with Te Kaunihera o Tamaki Makaurau and supported by the University of Auckland, showing that if treated with the urgency that any biosecurity incursion deserves, we can get on top of this invasive pest.
'We cannot continue to treat caulerpa as a case study, it must be confronted with action which recognises the existential threat to our moana that it is. That's what our team will be doing over the coming days.'
Recent comments from the Minister for Oceans and Fisheries confirming the Government will not take action to prevent bottom trawling in the Gulf has alarmed the Trust, who say that trawling will only help to spread exotic caulerpa further throughout the Gulf.
'Almost three-quarters of the Hauraki Gulf is open to bottom trawling and Danish seining – a destructive fishing method where weighted nets are dragged along the seafloor, ripping up everything in their path.' Nicola says.
'Caulerpa is already spreading throughout the Gulf, and allowing bottom trawling to continue only increases the risk of fragmentation and further spreading of this invasive seaweed.
'We are under siege from this pest, and rather than committing the investment needed to remove and eliminate exotic caulerpa, the Minister has confirmed the Government will only make it easier to destroy our benthic habitats, whether with nets or with weeds.
'We're calling on the Government to protect the Gulf by banning bottom trawling, investing in the eradication of exotic caulerpa, and urgently progressing the Hauraki Gulf / Tīkapa Moana Marine Protection Bill —without amendment—to ensure we can restore the waiora and mauri of the Gulf.'
NOTES:
Exotic Caulerpa was first detected at Hauturu on 6 May 2025 at the following sites:
Site 1 – The Queen South (-36.1727, 175.1082)
Site 2 – Waimaomao Bay (-36.1677, 175.0968)
Site 3 – Waimaomao Bay (-36.1693451, 175.0952474)
About Ngāti Manuhiri Settlement Trust
Ngāti Manuhiri Settlement Trust is the post settlement governance entity (PSGE) responsible for representing the Ngāti Manuhiri hapū and iwi members, giving effect to the Ngāti Manuhiri Claims Settlement Act 2012. Established in 2011, the Trust is committed to ensuring a prosperous future for Ngāti Manuhiri whānau.
Our rohe, moana, and interests are across Te Moananui-ā-Toi including the inner and outer islands and rocky outcrops from Aotea, to Te Paepae o Tu, to Hauturu, and Takapuna. Te Moananui-ā-Toi is the greater oceans encompassing the Hauraki Gulf and Hauraki marine park and so, we refer to the Hauraki Gulf / Tīkapa Moana as Te Moananui-ā-Toi.
The Trust's work centres on the protection of the taiao, reinvigoration of community purpose and service, maintenance of cultural integrity and investing to support the economic prosperity of future generations. More information on Ngāti Manuhiri Settlement Trust can be found at www.ngatimanuhiri.iwi.nz.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NZ Herald
a day ago
- NZ Herald
Fieldays boost farmer innovation despite science reorganisation: Dr Jacqueline Rowarth
Sheep, also flightless, are decreasing 'thanks' to Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) settings favouring pine trees, but also reflecting changes in markets. The field days, at least in the case of the National Fieldays held at Mystery Creek in June (except during the Covid disruptions), go from strength to strength, despite the fog that is common in June in Waikato. The point about field days, whether national, local or on-farm, is that they allow farmer-to-farmer exchange of information, as well as farmer-to-researcher, rural professionals, policymakers and interested urban-dwellers. They also allow researchers, rural professionals and policymakers to interact with each other – and the people who have left the big cities to embrace whatever the field days have on offer. Field days are, to quote an advertisement for a popular car, a real charcuterie of activity and people. It is the charcuterie that stimulates innovation – new thinking about a problem, challenge or issue. Farmers might be there to gather information and kick a few tyres of potential replacement tractors, but the value of the conversation is often to the person listening. Scientists, researchers and developers frequently get their ideas from farmers, saying that they've met a problem or explaining how they overcame that problem. This stimulates the scientist to think about how the problem might be solved or how the solution might be tested more widely. And then they do the research. At least, that is how it has worked in the past. The reorganisations in the science sector won't stop the ideas, but how the 'action' will follow has yet to be decided. Dr Shane Reti, the Minister for Science, Innovation and Technology (coincidentally a good description of what can be seen at National Fieldays), and also the Minister for Universities, inherited the reorganisation in the Cabinet reshuffle at the beginning of the year. Dr Jacqueline Rowarth says farmer innovation defines New Zealand. Reti is clear that the reorganisation aligns with the Government's priorities of driving economic growth and will allow the new organisations to be 'in a better position to deliver excellent science'. 'It will also make sure they're adopting more collaborative ways of working with universities and seeking partnerships with private sector investors, sooner,' he says. The focus is on generating money and it is hardly surprising that the new Science Advisory Panel, chaired by the Prime Minister's new chief science advisor, Dr John Roche, has members with a track record of investment, as well as engineering and science. Comments have been made about the apparent predominance of dairy, but it is the track record of achievement behind current roles that should be examined. Further, New Zealand should be reassured that people who have an interest in the greatest revenue-earning sector are involved in the future of investment. The big question remains whether the investment will be enough to stimulate what is needed. The budget-shuffling indicated an emphasis on commercially viable science, but the quantum of investment is still below what has been urged repeatedly by the science sector. Reti has said: 'Clear direction for the science, innovation and technology sector will give the public and private sector confidence to forge ahead with critical research that will help grow our economy.' This suggests that co-investment is expected from companies and from the levy bodies that support the different sectors in primary production. This is not a new plan. 'User-pays' dominated the thinking in the creation of the Crown Research Institutes (CRIs) in 1992. This was when most of the government funding became contestable. Unintended consequences included bidding for safe science (outcome known) and reduced collaboration (explained in Dr Doug Edmeades' paper Is the Commercial Model Appropriate for Science?). To encourage collaboration, the National Science Challenges (NSCs, 2014-2024) 'brought together the country's top scientists to work collaboratively across disciplines, institutions and borders to achieve their objectives'. Getting going, however, took longer than anticipated because of the cross-party negotiations that had to occur before the collaboration could start. Reti's statement on collaboration for the new system is important. The lessons from the CRIs and the NSCs are the foundation for a better future and, knowing the focus is the primary sector, the National Fieldays are a great place to start talking with the farmers. Along with clouds, kiwi, sheep and, more recently, cows, it is farmer innovation that defines New Zealand, allowing the country to have a first-world economy on the basis of agricultural exports. That is an extraordinary achievement. Whether the future continues in the same vein will depend upon how the science reorganisation plays out and the talks that are held with the primary sector. Farmers continue to be the key.
Newsroom
4 days ago
- Newsroom
The science sector sounds the alarm
New Zealand's science sector, once hailed for its agility and ingenuity during the pandemic and natural disasters, is now grappling with what researchers say is a crisis of confidence, fuelled by shrinking budgets, unstable funding pathways, and policy decisions that increasingly favour commercial returns over long-term public good. Last month, a total of $212 million was cut from the science sector in this Budget, which reprioritises existing research funding towards commercially focused science and innovation. A sizeable portion goes to Invest NZ and a new gene tech regulator. The Government says it backs the sector and is prioritising industry partnerships, private-sector investment, and 'innovation outcomes with measurable economic impact.' While officials insist the move reflects 'fiscal discipline and real-world alignment,' many in the sector say it amounts to a dismantling of the research base. Newsroom political journalist Fox Meyer tells The Detail 'the scale of the cuts is not great for the sector, but it's also more about the lack of investment'. 'It's one thing to have cuts and reprioritisation, but people have been calling for more of just anything for some time now. Now, there is a lot of frustration. 'Science funding has been stagnant or declining for years now, and a decision to reprioritise stuff is not necessarily going to put money in the Government's pocket like they think.' With a focus on the bottom line, is this the Government pulling off a Sir John Key 'show me the money' moment, with a scientific bent? 'That actually goes both ways,' says Meyer. 'Scientists are looking at the Government saying, 'Show me the money if you want me to produce more money', and the Government is looking back at the scientists and saying, 'Well, you show me the money, what are you bringing in, how are you lifting your weight?'. 'That is going to be a hard one to reconcile unless the Government is willing to pony up and make the investment.' He worries the fall-out will include a 'brain drain' with our country's brightest and best scientists and researchers opting to take up positions overseas. 'My connections in the science world – plenty of them – have moved. 'The chief science adviser for the Department of Conservation has moved to Australia … that's an expert in a cutting-edge field that we have lost to a company in Australia. 'And it's not the only example of this sort of thing. We invest so much in training up these scientists, and they are very skilled scientists, and then to not give them what they are asking for and what they need, I feel it falls short of our own investment.' In fairness, it is not all doom and gloom. 'So, the positives, there is a new funding pool for Māori-related science, that's a good thing. There's the sector-wide report that has come out, which has given us a good look at the sector. We know more now, that's a good thing. And the chief science adviser has been appointed, and the panel around him has been appointed, that's a good thing there.' Meyer says the sector is crucial to all parts of New Zealand. 'The science sector is about answering questions. If you have questions, science is a method, and it is used to answer a lot of those questions … the more money that we put into this sector, the more questions we can answer. And the more questions we can answer, the more answers we can sell. 'If the Government is worried about economic growth, and they want to champion this sector, then you've got to put your money where your mouth is. 'I am going to be curious to see how they can steer the ship of science, when maybe what they are most suited for is selling the fruits of science.' Check out how to listen to and follow The Detail here. You can also stay up-to-date by liking us on Facebook or following us on Twitter.
RNZ News
02-06-2025
- RNZ News
PM's new science advisor John Roche
Chief science advisor Dr John Roche Photo: Supplied The Prime Minister's new chief science advisor, John Roche, is getting underway with his new job, a year after the position was vacated by his predecessor Dame Juliet Gerrard. John Roche was previously the Chief Science Advisor at the Ministry of Primary Industries.
