7 Differences In Netflix's ‘My Oxford Year' Film Vs. Julia Whelan's Book
School is now in session for My Oxford Year, which arrived August 1 on Netflix.
More from Deadline
Netflix Unveils Premiere Date, First-Look Photos For Romance 'My Oxford Year' Starring Sofia Carson & Corey Mylchreest
All The Songs You'll Hear In Netflix's 'My Oxford Year' Rom Com Book Adaptation
Netflix Rom-Com 'Voicemails For Isabelle' Adds Nick Offerman, Lukas Gage, Harry Shum Jr., Ciara Bravo & More To Cast
The film, based on the book by Julia Whelan, watches Sofia Carson's Anna De La Vega attend Oxford University for a year before she returns to the states to start a job lined up at Goldman Sachs waiting for her. Ambitious Anna strikes up a feud with Jamie Davenport (Corey Mylchreest) who turns out to be one of her professors. The burning hate, which masks other feelings, is mutual until the pair get to know each other, bonding over poetry and nights out on the town.
Several changes — large and small — have been made in the movie adaptation from character names to certain plot points. Astute viewers and readers of the book may have caught these, but those that want to study up can find differences between Whelan's book My Oxford Year versus the Netflix film below.
Anna De La Vega vs. Eleanor Duran
In Whelan's book, the main character, Eleanor Duran, is from Ohio. She also got into Oxford on a Rhodes Scholarship. Carson's character in the film is named Anna De La Vega, and she came to the historic school from New York.
Anna's Post-Grad Job: Goldman Sachs vs. Politics
Another key difference in the female main character from book to film is her job opportunity following her year in England. In the book, Eleanor gets recruited to consult on a political campaign with her background in education policy versus Anna's job lined up at Goldman Sachs after graduating from Oxford. In the book, Eleanor gets the call to advise as she is walking through customs at the London Heathrow airport, and it plays much more of a role in her time at Oxford and her countdown to heading back to the United States.
Anna's Dad Is Alive
A major change for Anna in the film is that her father is alive and well. In Whelan's book, Eleanor's father died when she was young in a freak car accident. The trauma has stuck with Eleanor ever since, making her relationship with her mother tense because Eleanor had to grow up fast, and her mother's anxiety over everything grated on Eleanor. This plot point also significantly factored into the latter half of the story — readers will know, no spoilers — as Eleanor shared her feelings with Jamie, something she doesn't normally do.
Punting With Friends vs. Jamie
Eleanor shares this part of her past with Jamie when they go punting one night in the book. It all comes out over a thermos of hot chocolate Jamie made for their adventure, which reminds Eleanor of her father.
In the movie, Anna goes punting with her friends Charlie (Harry Trevaldwyn), Maggie (Esmé Kingdom) and Tom (Nikhil Parmar), who have just as strong a presence in the film as they do in the show, providing heartfelt moments of laughter and love.
One more spoiler alert! The below two changes spoil the latter half of the story, so last chance to turn back if you haven't seen the film!
Eddie vs. Oliver
Eddie was Jamie's brother in the film, and he died of cancer. Learning about Eddie also clears up the bond that Jamie has with Cecelia Knowles (Poppy Gilbert), who was Eddie's girlfriend.
This reveal plays out largely similarly in the book, with a few different details. In the novel, Jamie's late brother's name is Oliver, and Cecelia was his fiancée, not just his girlfriend.
How Anna Finds Out Jamie Is Lying About His Thesis
About midway through the film, Jamie claims he will be super busy for the next few weeks and not able to see Anna very much, so he suggests she make plans with her friends. He does this under the guise that he has to focus on writing his dissertation, just as he does in the book.
The way Eleanor figures out he is lying about this in the book is when she calls him and asks him for a description of his favorite study spot in the Bodleian Library. She decides to go surprise him, but when she comes upon the study carrell he described to her, he wasn't there.
In the film, the library is still involved in this discovery, but it's the librarian Laura (Nia Anisah) who breaks the news to Anna after Anna mentions to Laura that she must be seeing Jamie a lot while he works in the library. Laura says, no, actually, she hasn't seen him that much.
And what is Jamie covering up? At first, both Eleanor and Anna think it might be that he's cheating or that he just doesn't have the same feelings for her, which she admits to herself, have gone beyond having fun. In reality, Jamie is sick, and he has the same kind of cancer that took his brother.
The Ending
While things start looking grim for Jamie as the story goes on in both book and film after he participated in a trial that was the real reason he couldn't see Anna/Eleanor, the way the book ends versus the movie are slightly different.
In the book, the story leaves off a bit more open-ended, though reasserting through Eleanor's inner monologue that she and Jamie weren't meant to be together. She did break off her plans to return to the states for the political campaign, much to the chagrin of Gavin, her direct connection, but not the political candidate, a woman who was running for office while pregnant.
In the film, Anna seems to take over Jamie's post as poetry professor at Oxford, walking into a new class of first-day students and offering them the same cake he baked for day one of her class with him. This was a different send-off for the character, and viewers also get a montage of Anna seemingly imagining Corey Mylchreest's Jamie with her as they do a grand tour of Europe and hit all the destinations he suggested, when she really went solo.
RELATED:
Best of Deadline
2025 TV Cancellations: Photo Gallery
2025 TV Series Renewals: Photo Gallery
2025-26 Awards Season Calendar: Dates For Emmys, Oscars, Grammys & More
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Materialists director Celine Song reveals big problem with modern dating
The Past Lives director used to be a matchmaker like Dakota Johnson's character in her new film, and she tells Yahoo UK how the experience shaped Materialists. Finding love can be difficult. With online dating taking precedence, there are fewer opportunities to meet people offline, and one might even turn to matchmaking services as depicted in Celine Song's new film Materialists. But modern dating has its own problems, the director tells Yahoo UK, because it is "turning us into commodities". "In 2025, objectification and commodification has gotten worse because it's easier," Song explains. "Now we're so online, our identities are so there, and wealth is really overrepresented online." The Oscar-nominated director explores this and the theme of love in Materialists in a very different way to her critically acclaimed debut, Past Lives. The film stars Dakota Johnson as Lucy, a matchmaker who is forced to question everything she thinks she knows about dating when she meets charming millionaire Harry (Pedro Pascal) and reunites with her old flame John (Chris Evans) on the same night. This might seem a ripe premise for a rom-com, and it was certainly marketed as such, but the film is more introspective in its exploration of the issues of modern dating. It is, Song says, "a rom-com, it's just not escapist." That's because the director once worked as a matchmaker herself and wanted to share a realistic take on dating following her experience. "I worked as a matchmaker in my twenties because I couldn't pay rent, it was my day job because I was a playwright so I thought I would get a day job and that just kind of ended up being the only day job I could get," Song says. "I did it for about six months and, because I learned more about people in those six months than I did in any other part of my life, I left feeling like 'I'm gonna write something about it one day', and here it is." Song is a charming, refreshingly open person, and we bond easily during our short time together after learning we met our respective partners around the same time and avoided online dating completely in the process. We also both find it amusing, and rather ironic, that we're talking about her film's exploration of the merits of love and marriage when I'll be heading straight to a wedding dress fitting straight after our chat. "Me and my husband [screenwriter Justin Kuritzkes] predated Tinder; we were still meeting organically at the time, we knew that online dating existed but it wasn't quite there," Song reflects. "Now, of course, I think the dating market has just fully moved onto our phones." "I worked as a matchmaker when online dating had just started fully happening, like 2016. But I actually think it is a little bit different now because things have only gotten worse," she adds. "I feel like the movie is about objectification and commodification of human beings, right? And we see that in the way that the dating market is. It exists in the job market, it exists online, it's turning every human resource into an algorithm, like you can see the way that AI is, in a way we are turning ourselves into objects and commodities. "The most important line in the film is 'I'm not merchandise.' A piece of merchandise cannot love another piece of merchandise, but a person may have a shot at loving another person. I think there's something about that. "The thing that's really important is that we remember that commodification and objectification of human beings is going to always lead to dehumanisation, which we see in the movie." The filmmaker discovered a lot in her time as a matchmaker, and is frank about the cold and disconnected way people would try to look for love at the time: "I feel like dating is a game we all play in pursuit of love. Something that I learned is the way that we're talking about dating, and the way we talk about what we want in our love, felt like it was contradictory to what love is. "Because I would ask somebody like, 'Well, who are you looking for? What are you looking for?' And then they would say height, weight, income, and age. And then I would just know that none of those things matter." It's this notion that Song tries to bring across in Materialists through the character of Lucy, who spends her days trying to find out who ticks the right boxes for her clients. It's detached because her clients are detached, focused on looks and little else, like Song experienced. However this dehumanisation takes its toll on both Lucy and one of her clients. Focusing on the superficial felt contradictory, Song says: "At the time I was [a matchmaker] I'd just gotten married and I myself was trying to understand love and marriage and relationships. and I remember thinking none of these things —height, weight and all these numbers— seem to mean anything or even be that helpful when it comes to the thing that marriage is, and I think that when it comes to love all the numbers go out the window. "But I felt that contradiction when I was a matchmaker, I think that's what I really wanted to make the movie about. I wanted to talk about the way we talk about dating and then also what love is, which is a great ancient mystery, and total miracle when it happens, right? "The truth is the one thing that should be the non-negotiable for you when you're dating is that the person who is meant to love you loves you, that's the only thing." This is an idea that Song explored so brilliantly in Past Lives, but she while one might assume having your first film land an Oscar nomination would make the follow-up a stressful experience, Song says she didn't feel any different. She was happy returning to similar themes for Materialists despite the pressure, in fact having a successful first movie probably helped. "I think it's really funny cause I feel like the pressure over the first film is so intense because you could also make your first movie and nobody really thinks about it or cares about it," she says. "So I think that the truth is whether it's gonna be my second movie or my fifth movie the pressure is not gonna be any different. It's always gonna be there. "Like with my fifth movie I'll be like 'oh my God, my fifth movie!' But I think what I actually really loved is, having already made a movie, it was easier to ask people to have faith in this movie, getting it made, and it being great. So I think, to me, it was only actually a positive thing that Past Lives went well." Materialists premieres in UK cinemas on Friday, 15 August.


Tom's Guide
14 minutes ago
- Tom's Guide
Pluto TV's free true crime channel may keep you up until 3 a.m. (and it's worth it)
We've all fallen down a true crime rabbit hole at some point. Maybe it started with a podcast, a "Dateline" episode or that one docuseries all your friends were talking about. For me, it started as background noise while I recovered from a broken ankle. What was supposed to be a quick glance while attempting to work turned into a full-blown obsession, and it's all thanks to the Pluto TV's true crime channel. If you haven't heard of it, Pluto TV is one of the best free streaming services out there. It offers live channels and on-demand content across genres, from reality TV to movies, classic sitcoms, and yes, a whole channel dedicated to true crime. Best of all, it's totally free, supported by ads, and you don't even need to create an account to start watching. Just download the app or go to the website, pick a channel, and start streaming. There are dozens to choose from, but here's why I'm locked into the true crime channel. There are over a dozen reasons that I can't stop watching, and they mostly stem from the kinds of content on rotation with this channel. There's a steady rotation of episodes from shows like "Forensic Files," "Cold Case Files," "Dominick Dunne's Power, Privilege, and Justice" and "Unsolved Mysteries." You might start watching one to kill time, but before you know it, you've watched six in a row and have very strong opinions about forensic luminol. It's that always-on format that makes it so easy to leave it running, so that's what I do. There's something deeply nostalgic about binge-watching on Pluto TV. Unlike Netflix or HBO Max, where you select specific titles to watch, it feels more like flipping through cable channels in the early 2000s, when I grew up watching whatever was on TV — which usually included true crime series and documentaries. Whoever programmed this channel knows exactly what kind of viewers they're attracting. These aren't slow-paced crime procedurals. The shows here get straight to the point: There's a dead body. There's a detective. There's a suspect who 'wasn't acting quite right.' And soon enough, there's a lab technician saying something chilling like, "It turned out the fibers matched." And all of those elements add up to a satisfying story that you want to follow, even when it's late at night. Watch on Pluto TV's true crime channel Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips.
Yahoo
43 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Balloon festival hailed as 'one of the best'
This year's Bristol's International Balloon Fiesta - which saw more than 300 balloon flights over the weekend - was "one of the best", its director has said. Thousands of people descended on Ashton Court Estate over the weekend to watch the hot air balloons take off and see the iconic nightglows. Ben Hardy, executive director of the fiesta, said the event was in his "top three" after 15 years in the job. Speaking to Joe Sims on BBC Radio Bristol, Mr Hardy said a tear "rolled down" his cheek during Sunday's mass ascent. More news stories for Bristol Watch the latest Points West Listen to the latest news for Bristol Official turnout figures have not yet been released, but Mr Hardy said he believes attendance was in the hundreds of thousands across the three days. The final mass ascent of the 47th edition of the fiesta saw many colourful balloons soar across the city during a beautiful sunset. "To finish a fiesta weekend with a mass ascent like the one we had straight over the city - I have to say me and a few team members sat in that arena as the last balloon took off, and a little tear did roll down the cheek," Mr Hardy said. The spectacle is a major part of the fiesta weekend, with six planned ascents across the three days showcasing a display of balloons across Bristol's skylines. This year, only four ascents took place as two were called off due to poor weather conditions. They included fan favourites that fly every year and new editions, such as a 143 ft (43.5 metres) dragon called Oggy. Mr Hardy hinted on BBC Radio Bristol that the owners of Oggy the Dragon may return with a scarecrow balloon next year. Work on next year's Balloon Fiesta begins in September, he said. Follow BBC Bristol on Facebook, X and Instagram. Send your story ideas to us on email or via WhatsApp on 0800 313 4630. More on this story Recap: Friday at the Balloon Fiesta - watch the mass ascent and night glow again Balloon festival founder praised as event returns Fiesta gave me ballooning ambition at four Bristol International Balloon Fiesta Bristol International Balloon Fiesta