Indian Foreign Ministry Responds To U.S. Tariff Threats Over Russian Oil Purchase: 'It Is Revealing That The Very Nations Criticizing India Are Themselves Indulging In Trade With Russia'
In the statement, India stated that "the very nations criticizing India are themselves indulging in trade with Russia. Unlike our case, such trade is not even a vital national compulsion." It then added: "Europe-Russia trade includes not just energy, but also fertilizers, mining products, chemicals, iron and steel and machinery and transport equipment. Where the United States is concerned, it continues to import from Russia uranium hexafluoride for its nuclear industry, palladium for its EV industry, fertilizers as well as chemicals."
Responding to India's statement, President Donald Trump said he "doesn't know anything" about U.S. imports of fertilizers and chemicals from Russia. During a press conference, Trump was asked: "India says the U.S. buys Russian uranium and fertilizers while criticizing them for buying Russian energy. Your response to that? Trump answered: "I don't know anything about it. We will have to check."[1]
President Donald Trump signed an executive order on August 6 to place an additional 25-percent tariff on India for its purchases of Russian oil, bringing the combined tariffs imposed by the U.S. on India to 50 percent.[2]
Following is the text of the statement by India's Foreign Ministry:[3]
"The Targeting Of India Is Unjustified And Unreasonable"
"India has been targeted by the United States and the European Union for importing oil from Russia after the commencement of the Ukraine conflict. In fact, India began importing from Russia because traditional supplies were diverted to Europe after the outbreak of the conflict. The United States at that time actively encouraged such imports by India for strengthening global energy markets stability.
"2. India's imports are meant to ensure predictable and affordable energy costs to the Indian consumer. They are a necessity compelled by global market situation. However, it is revealing that the very nations criticizing India are themselves indulging in trade with Russia. Unlike our case, such trade is not even a vital national compulsion.
"3. The European Union in 2024 had a bilateral trade of Euro 67.5 billion in goods with Russia. In addition, it had trade in services estimated at Euro 17.2 billion in 2023. This is significantly more than India's total trade with Russia that year or subsequently. European imports of LNG in 2024, in fact, reached a record 16.5mn tonnes, surpassing the last record of 15.21mn tonnes in 2022.
"4. Europe-Russia trade includes not just energy, but also fertilizers, mining products, chemicals, iron and steel and machinery and transport equipment.
"5. Where the United States is concerned, it continues to import from Russia uranium hexafluoride for its nuclear industry, palladium for its EV industry, fertilizers as well as chemicals.
"6. In this background, the targeting of India is unjustified and unreasonable. Like any major economy, India will take all necessary measures to safeguard its national interests and economic security."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Shafaq News
3 hours ago
- Shafaq News
Trump: Zelenskyy meeting not required before Putin talks
Shafaq News – Washington On Thursday, the US President Donald Trump announced that Russian President Vladimir Putin wants to meet with him, affirming Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy is not a prerequisite. During remarks in the Oval Office, Trump told reporters that last month, 14,000 people were killed. Every week, 4,000 to 5,000 people, estimating monthly fatalities at 20,000. Earlier, a senior Kremlin official confirmed that preparations are underway for talks. If held, it would mark the first in-person encounter between a sitting US president and Putin since 2021. Russian President Vladimir Putin held a three-hour session in Moscow with US Special Envoy Steve Witkoff to discuss the Ukraine war and broader US-Russia strategic cooperation. Washington has intensified pressure on Moscow 'to end the war in Ukraine,' setting a ceasefire deadline and preparing additional sanctions targeting Russia and its trading partners. These measures form part of a broader strategy aimed at pushing Moscow toward a negotiated settlement.
Rudaw Net
7 hours ago
- Rudaw Net
US says Syria at a crossroads as ‘terror' sponsor status under review
Also in World US reviewing removal of Syria's 'Sponsor of Terrorism' status US affirms support for SDF-Damascus integration talks Damascus-SDF talks to resume in Paris with Trump administration support: Congressman EU remembers Yazidi 'tragedy,' urges action to support return of displaced A+ A- WASHINGTON DC - The United States on Thursday cautioned that Syria is 'at a crossroads,' reaffirming its intention to give the country 'a chance at greatness,' amid reports that President Donald Trump has ordered a review of Syria's designation as a State Sponsor of Terrorism (SST). Responding to a question from Rudaw about a possible reversal of Syria's SST status, State Department Principal Deputy Spokesperson Tommy Pigott reiterated the positions of President Trump, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, and US Special Envoy to Syria Tom Barrack, saying, 'We want to give Syria a chance for greatness,' especially as it 'is at a critical crossroads here when it comes to the ability to achieve that.' Pigott added that Washington is in dialogue with 'all stakeholders in the region' regarding the matter. Earlier on Thursday, a State Department official confirmed to Rudaw that the SST designation is under review, per President Trump's directive. 'Several steps would need to be taken by both the Department [of State] and the President should the decision be made to remove the SST designation,' the official said, noting that US law outlines strict statutory criteria for doing so. Syria's designation as an SST has been in effect since 1979. The status was initially based on the regime of toppled Syrian dictator Bashar al-Assad's support to groups like the Iran-aligned Lebanese Hezbollah movement, as well as its permissive stance toward other organizations labeled Foreign Terrorist Organizations (FTOs) by the US State Department. The SST designation brings significant sanctions, including bans on defense exports and foreign aid. Lifting it would ease those restrictions. Asked about dialogue between the Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) and Syria's interim government, Pigott referenced the US Special Envoy to Syria's remarks on the matter. Barrack recently welcomed SDF chief Mazloum Abdi's remarks that communication channels with the Syrian government are open daily, expressing approval of "the unity of Syria with one army and one flag" and the centralization of some sovereign institutions in Damascus. Speaking to Saudi's state-owned al-Arabiya channel, Abdi added that the SDF aims to "become part of a new Syrian army" through a political solution that guarantees their constitutional rights. Barrack praised Abdi's leadership, calling it 'pivotal to a stable Syria of one army, one government, one state,' and described the ongoing dialogue as 'constructive.' Pigott's remarks follow comments Tuesday by State Department spokesperson Tammy Bruce, who reaffirmed US support for 'dialogue between the Syrian government and the Syrian Democratic Forces aimed at integrating the SDF into the Syrian military.' 'We also support the SDF's intent to transform the current ceasefire in northeast Syria [Rojava] into a comprehensive and lasting peace,' Bruce said. The SDF, which serves as the de facto military force in Rojava, played a pivotal role in the defeat of the Islamic State (ISIS) in 2019 and continues to hold thousands of ISIS fighters in detention. On March 10, Syria's interim President Sharaa and SDF chief Abdi signed an agreement to integrate all civil and military institutions in Rojava - including the Kurdish-led forces - under the authority of the Syrian state. However, implementation talks remain ongoing, as diverging views on the integration process pose a key challenge. While the SDF seeks to enter the Syrian army as a unified entity, Damascus prefers to incorporate SDF fighters individually into its existing military units. Despite this, Qutaiba Idlbi, director of American affairs at Syria's foreign ministry, confirmed to Rudaw on Wednesday that the two parties are set to meet 'soon' in Paris to finalize the terms of integration.
Memri
10 hours ago
- Memri
Needing Hope In Russia As Military Actions Become The Background Of The Everyday Lives Of Average Russians
The calls between Putin and Trump, once sensational, have become routine, losing the urgency of a news event. The talks between the delegations of Russia and Ukraine in Istanbul, previously expected as a ray of hope, no longer cause trepidation – the half-hour protocols still gape with irreconcilable differences. In the precarious situation, when "a few weeks" or "a few days" remain until the fatal order, any actions capable of turning the tide of the exhausting battle seem illusory. The sword of Damocles of the deadline hangs overhead: Trump or another leader of a world power sets a deadline, and the Russian president must determine the further course. Economists must calculate the monstrous price of new sanctions for the Russian economy. Well, until the beginning of September, a viscous routine has reigned. Military actions, no matter how fierce they become, are now the everyday background of the lives of average Russians. An ominous adaptation to losses – that is what we have by the third year of the war. Mournful numbness has given way to chilling indifference, especially in the "enemy" camp. Elvira Vikhareva "History Teaches Us That Wars, Especially Those Waged For Ideological Purposes, Rarely Bring The Desired Result" What happened increasingly reminds me of a protracted chess game, where the pieces are set up, the opening is played out, and the endgame seems endless. Each move, each castling is just a minor fluctuation against the backdrop of general stagnation. The players, tired of the tension, nevertheless continue the game, obeying the unwritten rules, realizing that it is too late to retreat. In this metaphor, human lives become pawns, economic resources are bargaining chips, and the king is the state itself, striving to maintain its position on the board of history. And while strategic tasks are being solved at the top, apathy is growing among the pawns below. People are getting used to war. Everyone. But sooner or later the moment of truth must come. After all, even the most protracted game comes to an end. The only question is at what cost will victory be achieved and who will emerge from this battle as the real winner. History teaches us that wars, especially those waged for ideological purposes, rarely bring the desired result. Perhaps it is this awareness that forces world leaders to seek compromises, offer negotiating platforms and announce deadlines. But as long as the locomotive moves forward and the "pawns" continue to die on the battlefield, the hope for peace remains only a ghostly dream. Insensitivity and cynicism, the absence of mercy and the slightest interest in the true picture of the world, distorted in the mirrors of Russian media mythology, is one of the most terrible wounds inflicted by a protracted war. There are those who yearn for an ending, but its absence is shattered by the excuse: "We are powerless to change anything, and those at the top know better how it should be. The Vietnam War Had Neither A Clear Beginning Nor A Visible End Propaganda, built over the years on the images of the enemy and the "special path," has become firmly rooted in the public consciousness, creating the illusion of the inevitability of what is happening. Even the economic difficulties caused by sanctions are presented as temporary inconveniences and an inevitable price for "protecting national interests." In this situation, attempts at external influence, be it diplomatic efforts or economic pressure, risk being ineffective. The Russian state, locked in its militaristic narrative, demonstrates surprising resilience to external challenges, sacrificing the well-being of citizens for the sake of maintaining the status quo. Perhaps the key to resolving the conflict lies not in geopolitical calculations and ultimatums, but in deep internal changes, in the ability of Russian society to critically look at what is happening and realize the price that must be paid for the protracted confrontation. It is ironic that it was the long-term nature of the conflict, initially conceived as a "quick victory," that became the main factor determining its further dynamics. Violence as a given, lack of faith in the possibility of change – these are the poisonous fruits that a society that has lived in a state of war for years reaps. What began in February 2022, experts compare with the Korean confrontation half a century ago, and if we measure only time, the Korean one has long since died down. Now it is time to draw parallels with the protracted Great Patriotic War – but its crimson reflections have faded in the haze of historical distances. The Vietnam War, it had neither a clear beginning nor a visible end, smoldering despite the triumphant Paris agreements for Henry Kissinger. But even the active phases of this conflict did not last for a whole decade. Vietnam is a vivid example of the senselessness of fratricidal slaughter: the winners were those who were destined to win. The communization of Vietnam, which took place, however, years later, when the country, having repainted itself in market colors, began to play with all the shades of a multi-vector policy, including a pragmatic look towards yesterday's enemy – the United States, proved that the sacrifices were in vain. But America, in turn, received an anti-war tsunami, a counterculture, and, paradoxically, a professional army. You can throw ashes at Richard Nixon as much as you like, his army reform – a brilliant insight about the need to abandon conscription – is one of the most effective pages in American military history. In Russia, however, they have chosen a path paved with a different, ominous palette: not daring to increase the term of service for new recruits, they have made the war lifelong for those mobilized; they have raised the draft age to 30, bleeding the labor market dry, and now a bill on year-round conscription is on the agenda. Even in Brezhnev's Soviet Union, during the time of fulfilling the "international duty" in the Afghan gorges, they did not allow themselves to do anything like this. The Illusion Of Control Is What Feeds This Protracted Agony The state has reforged Russia in a warlike manner, put it on rusty, creaking rails, breaking the reverse control lever. This maddened locomotive is doomed to rush only forward, to an inevitable catastrophe. Russia has become a classic garrison state and it is difficult to find an analogue in the modern, globalized world. It would be naive to believe that this grotesque, monstrous model will not arise in the realized dystopia. In light of the past days and the attempts of those accompanying them to find the key to resolving the conflict, it would of course be absurd in its own way to see Trump and Erdoğan among the Nobel Peace Prize laureates, a universal recipe for reconciliation has not yet been invented, no matter how much they would like it. One opens the doors of the luxurious palaces of Istanbul for peace talks, the other cynically takes a figurine of "a few weeks before the order" out of his pocket and puts it on the table. Meanwhile, the flywheel of war continues to rotate inexorably, grinding millions of twisted human destinies in its womb with a devilish appetite, because for now the state has an inexhaustible resource in reserve – human fuel. And so, when a chess game enters a stage of merciless time pressure, when the pieces, stained with blood and dirt, move with difficulty along the board pitted with scars, the question arises: Do the players remember what, in fact, it was all started for? Tired faces of politicians flicker on TV screens, empty promises and routine phrases about peace are heard, but on the front lines, in the trenches, blood is still flowing. And this blood is not ink on a map, but a living, hot substance, a symbol of torn lives and unfulfilled hopes. The illusion of control over the situation is what feeds this protracted agony. It seems that it is enough to press the right button, say the cherished words – and everything will change. But the world is more complex than a chessboard. There are no clear rules and unambiguous decisions. And the more effort is spent on maintaining control, the further the point of equilibrium moves. Hope Hope, like a smoldering ember, quietly glimmers in the hearts of those tired of war. It lives in children's drawings, in mothers' prayers, in dreams of a peaceful sky. Hope is fragile, it can easily be blown out by the wind of propaganda and fear. And yet, as long as there is at least one person who believes in the possibility of change, the world still has a chance for salvation. Perhaps it is the understanding of this obvious truth that will prompt opponents on opposite sides to interrupt their calculations and look at each other in the eye. To stop. To see not an enemy, but a person, the same as you, striving for peace. And then, perhaps, a "free field" of hope will appear on the war-weary chessboard. *Elvira Vikhareva is a renowned Russian opposition politician based in Russia. In 2023, she was poisoned with heavy metal salts.
