
Kodak Warns It Could Shutter, Cuts Retirement Pension Plans
A company once synonymous with photography is now telling investors that it doesn't have enough cash to pay off its debts, raising concerns about its continued presence.
In a Monday second-quarter earnings report, 133-year-old company Eastman Kodak warned investors that it lacked the financial means to make $500 million in upcoming debt payments. The company does not have any committed financing or available cash on hand to pay off its debts, raising "substantial doubt" about its "ability to continue."
Related: Job Search Pioneers CareerBuilder and Monster File for Bankruptcy Less than a Year After Merger
However, the Rochester, New York-based firm has a plan to raise the cash to meet the payments: ending its retirement pension plan for employees. Kodak is terminating the pension plan altogether, selling assets held by the pension plan, and giving the responsibility to an unnamed insurance company to make future payments instead. Kodak intends to gain between $530 million and $585 million after taxes through these actions, enough to cover its debts.
Kodak's pension plan covers 35,000 participants, including retirees and about 2,000 current Kodak employees, according to The Wall Street Journal. The camera giant currently has about 4,000 total employees, per WSJ. After terminating the pension plan, Kodak is planning to offer a new retirement plan for current employees.
"The termination of our U.S. Kodak Retirement Income Plan and subsequent reversion of excess funds to pay down debt is progressing as planned," Kodak CFO David Bullwinkle said in an earnings press release on Monday.
Bullwinkle further stated that by the end of the week, Kodak will better understand how it can fulfill its plan obligations to participants. The company intends to pay down its debt using the retirement funds by December.
Kodak's latest financial earnings show that for the second quarter ending June 30, Kodak reported that revenue declined by 1% year-over-year to reach $263 million. Net loss for the quarter was $26 million compared to net income of $26 million at the same time last year.
Related: Joann, an 80-Year-Old Crafts and Fabrics Store, Will Soon Close All 800 of Its Locations
Kodak's Executive Chairman and CEO Jim Continenza still painted an optimistic picture in the earnings press release, stating that Kodak "continued to make progress" even faced with "an uncertain business environment." Continenza noted that Kodak is "committed to U.S. manufacturing" and makes everything from inkjet inks to pharmaceutical starting ingredients in the U.S.
"For the balance of the year, we plan to focus on serving our customers, strengthening our balance sheet, and developing growth businesses for our future," Continenza stated in the report.
What Happened to Kodak?
Kodak was founded in 1888, when founder George Eastman introduced the $25 Kodak camera, a portable camera that came preloaded with film. Over the next several decades, the company's influence grew. By the 1950s, Kodak had captured close to 70% of the U.S. film market.
Related: 23andMe, Once Worth $6 Billion, Files for Bankruptcy
Kodak was a camera and film powerhouse until the 1990s, when digital technology gained prominence. Though Kodak was the first to invent the digital camera in the 1970s, the company was slow to adapt to the technology, and by 2006 had lagged behind competitors like Canon, Nikon, and Fujifilm in digital camera sales. In the fourth quarter of 2006, Canon raced ahead of Kodak to become the biggest digital camera provider in the world.
Declining revenue and rising competition caused Kodak to file for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in January 2012, with debt of $6.75 billion. In the bankruptcy process, Kodak raised funds by selling patents worth around $525 million to top companies like Apple.
Today, Kodak manufactures commercial printing products, film for the movie industry, and advanced chemicals, in addition to other products. It also offers its recognizable yellow-and-black film cameras for sale. Kodak stock was down over 30% in the past month.
Join top CEOs, founders and operators at the Level Up conference to unlock strategies for scaling your business, boosting revenue and building sustainable success.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Brand advertising on news sites isn't risky, it's absolutely necessary
People who check the news five or more times a day make up a quarter of the American population. They're information hungry, consume media often and tend to have more money and more education. In a political and economic climate where everything is constantly changing, more and more people are checking news websites on their phones. Any sensible marketer would see a no-brainer opportunity there. Yet many brands are completely withdrawn from digital news. Why? An irrational fear of 'brand safety.' But what are brands really missing out on when they don't advertise on news platforms? For one, they're writing off a high-impact audience that makes up a large cross section of the population. Roughly 80.4 million U.S. adults follow the news very closely. News junkies are more likely to show interest in your brands and buy your products. They hold more favorable views of brands, trusting them more and recommending them to others. The average "purchase intent" among news junkies is 66% −16 percentage points higher than the general population − according to Stagwell's Advertising Impact Study, which tested a mix of 20 ads in various formats from 20 brands and major sectors across tech, travel/hospitality, consumer packaged goods, financial services and automotive. (People with purchase intent are defined in the study as those who said they were likely to make a purchase or use services from the brand within the next six months.) Included in this cross section are the vast majority of the world's leaders: 90% of CEOs and board members are news junkies, too. That's not to mention "exclusive news" junkies − the 37 million people (14% of U.S. adults) who follow the news very closely, but do not engage in sports and entertainment in the same way. Best 2025 Super Bowl commercials: Check out all 57 ranked according to USA TODAY Ad Meter By not advertising in news, brands completely forgo 14% of the adult population. This is a group that shows greater post-ad exposure lift than the average American − that is, bigger gains in brand reputation measurement scores like favorability and trust after viewing an ad. These are individuals who are eager for more information and respond better to ads. Also, the number of exclusive news junkies is growing. Just a year ago, they made up 11% of the population. Now, more than 7 million U.S. adults have converted – a nearly 3 point jump in the number of news junkies. Brands safety concerns are overblown Brands that don't invest in news now are missing out on the opportunity to drive real business results. We know why brands aren't investing in news. It's the overblown 'brand safety' movement that turned genuine concern into brand censorship. It's the organized coalitions colluding to demonetize unfavorable content. The Global Alliance for Responsible Media, a now-disbanded advertising coalition that created subjective guidelines dictating what content was suitable for advertising support, is a prime example. It's the outdated blocklists that prevent ads from being placed in articles with chicken 'breasts' and 'shots' and 'Ariana Grande.' That means if 'breasts' is on a blocklist − a list of keywords brands do not want their ads to appear next to − a harmless, otherwise widely read article about the price of poultry goes unadvertised. Now if it's a beverage company around Super Bowl time, that's a huge, missed opportunity to advertise to all the boneless fried chicken fans. However, evidence is growing that these fears really are overblown. Stagwell's News Advertising Study, conducted among 50,000 Americans, found that there is no difference in key brand reputational metrics between ads next to shootings and war versus ads next to business, sports or entertainment stories. The risk, and there's proven to be virtually none, is trivial compared with the reward. 'Fake news' does exist. But Trump is dangerously wrong about where it comes from. | Opinion The time to advertise in news is now. Nearly 60% of news junkies and exclusive news junkies follow the news more closely than they did a year ago. Roughly half of news junkies consume more political, economic and international news today. News junkies have never been a more attractive audience for marketers. Advertising linked to news drives results for businesses Incorporating news into advertising strategies already drives results. Stagwell has seen 2024 campaigns deliver three times the average return on ad spending (ROAS) since beginning news-focused testing in the second half of 2023. News delivers three times higher ROAS than other paid media channels for Stagwell's agency, Assembly. These results mirror what I saw at Microsoft as executive vice president of advertising: News sites were some of the best-performing sites for technology. Opinion alerts: Get columns from your favorite columnists + expert analysis on top issues, delivered straight to your device through the USA TODAY app. Don't have the app? Download it for free from your app store. Refusing to advertise in news over brand safety concerns is like a grocery store that refuses to carry The New York Times or The Wall Street Journal. News is a critical platform for marketers and advertisers. It's a powerful business medium that reaches highly desirable audiences. If you're a chief marketing officer, tell your team you've made the decision to treat news on an equal playing field as sports and entertainment. Run the computer models and try out a minimum media buy. Test and distribute the same ads and see whether they'll work equally well. Your performance metrics will thank you for it. Mark Penn is chairman and CEO of Stagwell Inc. His career spans 40 years in market research, advertising, public relations and politics. A globally recognized strategist, Penn has advised world leaders, including Bill Clinton and Tony Blair, founded companies and written two bestselling books. USA TODAY's parent company, Gannett, is a partner in Stagwell's Future of News initiative. You can read diverse opinions from our USA TODAY columnists and other writers on the Opinion front page, on X, formerly Twitter, @usatodayopinion and in our Opinion newsletter. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Looking to grow business? News sites hold key to marketing | Opinion
Yahoo
2 minutes ago
- Yahoo
US government in talks to acquire stake in Intel
The Trump administration is engaged in discussions with Intel regarding a potential investment in the chipmaker, Bloomberg reported citing sources familiar with the matter. Details regarding the size of the proposed investment remain unspecified. However; such a deal could provide essential support for Intel's ambitious factory hub project in Ohio, which the company had previously aimed to establish as the largest chip manufacturing facility globally, although this initiative has faced numerous delays. These negotiations come on the heels of President Donald Trump's recent call for the removal of Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan, whom he has described as 'highly conflicted' due to concerns over his previous associations with China. The current discussions are said to have originated from a recent meeting between President Trump and Tan. While specifics are still being worked out, one source indicated that the US government would finance the investment. Another source warned that the discussions are still in a preliminary stage and may not result in a formal agreement. In response to the news, Intel's shares rose by as much as 8.9% on 14 August 2025, ultimately closing 7.4% higher at $23.86, giving the company a market capitalisation of approximately $104.4bn, the report added. The stock continued to increase by an additional 4% in after-hours trading. 'Discussion about hypothetical deals should be regarded as speculation unless officially announced by the administration,' Bloomberg quoted White House spokesman Kush Desai as saying. Intel has chosen not to comment on the ongoing discussions. A representative stated that the company is 'deeply committed to supporting President Trump's efforts to strengthen US technology and manufacturing leadership' and expressed a willingness to continue working with the Trump administration on shared goals, while refraining from commenting on speculation. An agreement would provide a financial boost to Intel at a time when the company is implementing cost-cutting measures and workforce reductions. It also suggests that Tan is likely to remain in his role as CEO. This situation represents another instance of the Trump administration's direct involvement in a key industry. Previously, the administration reached an agreement to receive a 15% cut of certain semiconductor sales to China and took a so-called golden share in United States Steel Corp. as part of a deal to facilitate its sale to a Japanese competitor. The discussions regarding Intel also reflect a recent announcement from the Defense Department, which disclosed plans to take a $400m preferred equity stake in US rare-earth producer MP Materials Corp., thereby making the Pentagon the largest shareholder in the company. "US government in talks to acquire stake in Intel" was originally created and published by Verdict, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Wall Street Journal
4 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
China Stock Rally Sends Shanghai Benchmark to Decade High
Chinese shares rallied to multiyear highs on stimulus hopes and easing trade tensions, powering Shanghai's benchmark index to its highest closing level in a decade. The Shanghai Composite Index ended 0.85% higher at 3728.03 on Monday, taking its gain this year to 11%.