VW cuts outlook after US tariffs added 1.3 billion euros in costs
The automaker now sees an operating return on sales as low as 4 per cent, from at least 5.5 per cent previously, after the US duties added 1.3 billion euros (S$1.95 billion) in costs during the first half. Volkswagen also cited internal restructuring expenses and greater sales of lower-margin electric vehicles for the forecast change.
'We cannot assume that the tariff situation is only temporary,' chief executive officer Oliver Blume said on Friday (Jul 25) on a call, noting that Trump's current levies would add several billion euros in costs this year. 'We are counting on the European Commission and the US government to reach a balanced outcome on the tariff issue.'
Europe's largest carmaker is under pressure to cut costs and improve its products to deal with crises in three key markets. Trump's levies are eating into sales and earnings for import-dependent Audi and Porsche, while muted demand and high production costs weigh on profits in Europe. Volkswagen also is losing market share in China, where consumers increasingly opt for local brands.
Volkswagen now sees flat revenue for the year, from 5 per cent growth previously, and also reduced its outlook for free cash flow. The lower end of its forecast assumes the 27.5 per cent US tariffs will stick in the second half, while the upper end foresees the levies being reduced to 10 per cent.
'We need a good compromise,' chief financial officer Arno Antlitz said in an interview with Bloomberg Television. 'A solution that fits both the needs of the American administration, but also European automakers.'
BT in your inbox
Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox.
Sign Up
Sign Up
Volkswagen shares declined as much as 3 per cent in Frankfurt. The stock is still up around 6 per cent this year.
The German manufacturer isn't alone in facing challenges: Some of its peers are dealing with tumult in top management, with Stellantis NV having recently named a new chief executive officer and Renault SA seeking a permanent CEO. Volkswagen is counting on partnerships with Rivian Automotive in the US and China's Xpeng to bolster its products, though new models from those efforts won't be available until next year.
The challenges in China, where brands led by BYD are locked in a fierce EV price war, continue to hurt Volkswagen's profits. The operating result from its operations in the biggest car market fell more than a third in the second quarter. Volkswagen expects its joint-venture activities in the country to contribute at best €1 billion this year, down from the 1.7 billion euro proportionate operating result in 2024.
The group's trucking business Traton SE late Thursday cut its outlook due to the trade hurdles as well as weak economic growth in Europe and declining orders in Brazil. The unit's adjusted operating result slumped 29 per cent in the second quarter.
There were some bright spots. The namesake VW brand has seen EV sales rise in Europe in recent months thanks to rebating and buyers increasingly shunning Tesla over Elon Musk's political activities. The company sees strong order intake momentum continuing through the end of the year in Europe after EV deliveries rose 73 per cent there in the second quarter, driven by robust demand for models including the VW ID.5, the Audi Q4 e-tron and the Skoda Enyaq. BLOOMBERG
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
Trump says he is reducing 50-day deadline for Russia on war in Ukraine
Find out what's new on ST website and app. US President Donald Trump said that he will reduce the 50-day deadline he gave Russian President Vladimir Putin over the war in Ukraine. TURNBERRY, Scotland - US President Donald Trump said on July 28 he was reducing the 50-day deadline he gave Russia over its war in Ukraine, underscoring his frustration with Russian President Vladimir Putin for prolonging fighting between the two countries. 'I'm disappointed in President Putin,' Mr Trump said, speaking alongside British Prime Minister Keir Starmer ahead of their meeting in Scotland. 'I'm going to reduce that 50 days that I gave him to a lesser number because I think I already know the answer what's going to happen.' He did not give a new deadline. Mr Trump set the 50-day deadline earlier in July. The US president has repeatedly voiced exasperation with Mr Putin for continuing attacks on Ukraine despite US efforts to end the war. Before returning to the White House in January, Mr Trump, who views himself as a peacemaker, had promised to end the 3½-year-old conflict within 24 hours. Mr Trump has threatened new sanctions on Russia and buyers of its exports unless an agreement is reached by early September. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Asia Thailand, Cambodia agree to 'immediate and unconditional ceasefire' to de-escalate border row Asia Truce between Cambodia and Thailand secured under Asean chair Malaysia, but can it hold? Asia Gunman kills 5 near Bangkok's Chatuchak market before taking own life Singapore Tanjong Katong sinkhole: BCA to conduct independent probe, act against any non-compliance Singapore Foreign workers who rescued woman from sinkhole given tokens of appreciation Business SIA's first-quarter profits fall by 59%; airline group sees volatile times ahead Singapore COE quota up 2.6% to 18,701 for August-October period Singapore Over 6 years' jail for conman who cheated 13 victims of more than $1.2m But the president, who has also expressed annoyance with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, has not always followed up on his tough talk about Mr Putin with action, citing what he deems a good relationship that the two men have had previously. 'We thought we had that settled numerous times, and then President Putin goes out and starts launching rockets into some city like Kyiv and kills a lot of people in a nursing home or whatever,' Mr Trump said. 'And I say that's not the way to do it.' REUTERS
Straits Times
2 hours ago
- Straits Times
EU Commission discusses curbs on Israel research funding amid Gaza pressure
Find out what's new on ST website and app. FILE PHOTO: Palestinians gather at the site of an overnight Israeli air strike on a house, in Khan Younis in the southern Gaza Strip, July 28, 2025. REUTERS/Ramadan Abed/File Photo BRUSSELS - European Commissioners will on Monday discuss a proposal to partially suspend Israel's access to the EU's Horizon research funding program following calls from EU governments to increase pressure on Israel over the humanitarian crisis in Gaza. Multiple EU countries said last week that Israel was not living up to its commitments under an agreement with the European Union on increasing aid supplies to Gaza and asked the Commission to put concrete options on the table. The proposal was mentioned in a published agenda of Monday's meeting of the College of Commissioners, the top decision-making body of the European Union's executive. But the Commission has not explained it in detail. EU and Israeli officials had no immediate comment on the proposal. Israel has been participating in the EU's research programs since 1996, taking part in thousands of joint research projects over the past decades. Earlier this month, EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas said Israel had agreed to expand humanitarian access to Gaza, including increasing the number of aid trucks, crossing points and routes to distribution hubs. But in a tense meeting of European ambassadors in Brussels last week, countries including France, the Netherlands and Spain said not enough was being done, according to diplomats. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Asia Thailand, Cambodia agree to 'immediate and unconditional ceasefire' to de-escalate border row Asia Gunman kills 5 near Bangkok's Chatuchak market before taking own life Singapore Tanjong Katong sinkhole: BCA to conduct independent probe, act against any non-compliance Singapore Foreign workers who rescued woman from sinkhole given tokens of appreciation Singapore COE quota up 2.6% to 18,701 for August-October period Business SIA's first-quarter profits fall by 59%; airline group sees volatile times ahead Singapore Ong Beng Seng set to plead guilty on Aug 4 in case linked to ex-transport minister Iswaran Singapore Jail for former pre-school teacher who tripped toddler repeatedly, causing child to bleed from nose Earlier this month, EU officials presented a list of options that the bloc could pursue to put pressure on Israel but the bloc has so far refrained from pursuing any of them. Israel on Sunday announced a halt in military operations for 10 hours a day in parts of Gaza and new aid corridors, while Jordan and the United Arab Emirates have airdropped supplies into the enclave. But officials and aid groups remain concerned and say much more needs to be done to alleviate the dire humanitarian situation in Gaza. REUTERS
Business Times
2 hours ago
- Business Times
US-China relations: Between confrontation and transaction
THE return of Donald Trump to the White House in January has ushered in a new chapter of Sino-American relations marked by aggressive economic policies, strategic unpredictability and a pattern of escalation followed by tactical negotiations. Six months into his second presidency, Trump's approach to China has proved both more confrontational and more transactional than many observers anticipated. And there are now signs that his administration is starting to reassess its moves. Trump signalled a hard line on China with hawkish Cabinet picks, including Secretary of State Marco Rubio and National Security Advisor Michael Waltz. He also wasted little time in implementing his campaign promises on China trade policy. Within weeks of inauguration, the administration launched what many economists dub the most aggressive trade war in recent history. On Feb 1, Trump signed an executive order imposing an additional 10 per cent tariff on imports from China. Starting in April, Trump imposed a minimum 10 per cent tariff on nearly everything the US imports, although goods from China faced a higher tariff of 34 per cent. The administration's broader China strategy plans to fundamentally restructure economic ties between the two nations. Trump pledged to revoke China's preferential trade status and had threatened at least 60 per cent tariffs on Chinese imports during his campaign, signalling a departure from decades of economic engagement and the start of a process of decoupling. Beyond trade, the Trump administration is also expanding restrictions on Chinese ownership of American assets. The president has said he will pressure Chinese companies to sell holdings that threaten national security interests. This encompasses farm land, natural resources, technology companies and ports. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up These moves represent a broader shift towards viewing the trade relationship through national security lenses, promoted by the China hawks in office. Economic competition is being framed as a matter of strategic rivalry rather than mere trade disputes. Despite the aggressive opening moves, Trump's second term has also demonstrated his willingness to pull back from maximum pressure when it serves his interests. In mid-May, Washington reached an agreement with Beijing to lower tariffs dramatically and open some markets that both sides had closed off as tensions rose. Tariffs on Chinese imports fell to 35 per cent from 145 per cent – a historic level reached in April following retaliatory hikes. That dramatic reduction demonstrated Trump's transactional approach to international relations. The 90-day suspension of the heaviest tariffs has created space for ongoing negotiations, with both sides apparently recognising the economic costs of sustained pressure. US companies have faced particular challenges adapting to the volatile policy environment. The clash has also seen China retaliating through restrictions on critical minerals and magnets needed by US factories. Some sectors have received temporary relief, with the administration exempting certain technology products from the harshest tariffs, but many businesses report difficulties with long-term planning amid policy uncertainty. Trump's confrontational approach extended beyond China to traditional allies, potentially reshaping regional dynamics in Asia. By pressuring Canadian, Mexican and European partners, his administration has created opportunities for China to strengthen relations with countries seeking alternatives to US partnerships. The unpredictability of Trump's approach has forced some regional powers to recalculate their strategic positions, with some hedging their bets between the two superpowers rather than aligning clearly with the US. The rising costs of a growing confrontation with China has led to the reassessment of these policies in Washington. Most intriguingly, the Trump administration reversed its position on technology controls, notably allowing Nvidia to sell lower-level artificial intelligence chips, the H20, to China this month after banning such sales in April. Some suggest that this dramatic about-turn from the administration's initial hardline stance may reflect the eroding power of the China hawks in the administration, including personnel changes. Alex Wong, a known China hawk and former deputy national security advisor, has been reassigned to another role, and the State Department has shuttered the team involved in South China Sea security. These changes appear tied to Trump's broader diplomatic strategy. Some in Washington are speculating that he may be angling for a Chinese trip as he courts a more assertive China. But it is doubtful that the administration is planning to reset the relationship with China through direct engagement rather than continued confrontation. In a way, several patterns have emerged in Sino-American relationships under Trump. The administration appears committed to using economic pressure as its primary tool for reshaping the relationship, but remains willing to negotiate when faced with economic or political costs at home. The relationship is now defined by cycles of escalation followed by tactical compromises, reflecting Trump's preference for dramatic gestures and dealmaking. Still, neither side appears willing to accept a return to the pre-2016 status, suggesting that heightened tensions and economic competition will remain defining features of US-China relations.
